本文观察了孕37~42周单胎头位的孕妇164例临床检查可疑有脐带异常者进行联合监测,监测指标:1.临床检查;2.B 超检查;3.胎心监护,有异常者。产时详细记载脐带与新生儿的关系,证实急性胎儿窘迫的原因,将以上检查结果与产前联合监测核实,...本文观察了孕37~42周单胎头位的孕妇164例临床检查可疑有脐带异常者进行联合监测,监测指标:1.临床检查;2.B 超检查;3.胎心监护,有异常者。产时详细记载脐带与新生儿的关系,证实急性胎儿窘迫的原因,将以上检查结果与产前联合监测核实,计算出假阳性和假阴性率、阳性和阴性预测率。结果:164例可疑有脐带异常产时已被证实者149例,阳性符合率为90.85%,无围产儿死亡。149例脐带异常中以脐带缠绕为多数,占91.95%,且脐带缠绕周数与其长度呈正相关。单项监护符合率以 B 超较高为75%,临床检查与胎心监护的符合率相近,分别为59.8%、57.9%。若联合监护出现异常项目越多,脐带异常发生率越高,剖宫产的机率也越高,并对联合监护诊断脐带异常的价值及处理进行了讨论。展开更多
The following article has been retracted due to the investigation of complaints received against it. Title: A New Method of Construction of Robust Second Order Rotatable Designs Using Balanced Incomplete Block Designs...The following article has been retracted due to the investigation of complaints received against it. Title: A New Method of Construction of Robust Second Order Rotatable Designs Using Balanced Incomplete Block Designs Authors: Bejjam Re. Victorbabu, Kottapalli Rajyalakshmi. The above paper is a copy of Dr. Rabindra Nath Das’s former article, entitled '“Robust second order rotatable designs (Part I)”. The scientific community takes a very strong view on this matter and we solemnly withdrawn?the paper from the journal OJS. This paper published in OJS Vol.2 No.1, 39-47, 2012, has been retracted.展开更多
文摘本文观察了孕37~42周单胎头位的孕妇164例临床检查可疑有脐带异常者进行联合监测,监测指标:1.临床检查;2.B 超检查;3.胎心监护,有异常者。产时详细记载脐带与新生儿的关系,证实急性胎儿窘迫的原因,将以上检查结果与产前联合监测核实,计算出假阳性和假阴性率、阳性和阴性预测率。结果:164例可疑有脐带异常产时已被证实者149例,阳性符合率为90.85%,无围产儿死亡。149例脐带异常中以脐带缠绕为多数,占91.95%,且脐带缠绕周数与其长度呈正相关。单项监护符合率以 B 超较高为75%,临床检查与胎心监护的符合率相近,分别为59.8%、57.9%。若联合监护出现异常项目越多,脐带异常发生率越高,剖宫产的机率也越高,并对联合监护诊断脐带异常的价值及处理进行了讨论。
文摘The following article has been retracted due to the investigation of complaints received against it. Title: A New Method of Construction of Robust Second Order Rotatable Designs Using Balanced Incomplete Block Designs Authors: Bejjam Re. Victorbabu, Kottapalli Rajyalakshmi. The above paper is a copy of Dr. Rabindra Nath Das’s former article, entitled '“Robust second order rotatable designs (Part I)”. The scientific community takes a very strong view on this matter and we solemnly withdrawn?the paper from the journal OJS. This paper published in OJS Vol.2 No.1, 39-47, 2012, has been retracted.