In recent decades, international trade has evolved into a complex system of trade barriers to ensure the protection of domestic industry and its workers interests. However as tariffs have fallen and international trad...In recent decades, international trade has evolved into a complex system of trade barriers to ensure the protection of domestic industry and its workers interests. However as tariffs have fallen and international trade tends to be free trade, countries have found another way of protecting domestic industries from foreign competition—non-tariff protection. Among them anti-dumping is the most controversial subject that is involved in the foreign trade. This theme will analyze the reason and effect of growing use anti-dumping measures by countries in recent decades and try to give some possible solutions.展开更多
Although the benefits of China’s trade expansion have been distributed much more broadly than those of some early industrialized nations,China has become the primary target of anti-dumping activities.Being a new and ...Although the benefits of China’s trade expansion have been distributed much more broadly than those of some early industrialized nations,China has become the primary target of anti-dumping activities.Being a new and relatively efficient new rival in the global market may be an important reason for this.On the other hand,China’s development stage and her trade structure also place her in a disadvantageous position when it comes to anti-dumping activities.展开更多
In the run up to the expiry of quota restrictions that had long regulated much of global trade in textiles and clothing, many a pundit predicted widespread recourse to anti-dumping actions.
The president of the National Council of Textile Organizations(NCTO )has written a letter to the Mexican Economic Secretary Hugo Diaz strongly endorsing his country’s decision to seek a World Trade Organization(WTO)
Under the pressure of the anti- dumping investigations on silk fabrics launched by the Indian government, the China Chamber of Commerce for Import & Export of Textiles (CCCT) announced that it has decided not to h...Under the pressure of the anti- dumping investigations on silk fabrics launched by the Indian government, the China Chamber of Commerce for Import & Export of Textiles (CCCT) announced that it has decided not to hold the Silk Trade Fair (Autumn) this year, in order to avoid the negative effects the case might bring.展开更多
The past years saw an increased cases of anti-dumping on China mostly from the developed countries,some from developing countries.But Pakistan,a friendly neighbor to China,recently adds up to that list of ranks for an...The past years saw an increased cases of anti-dumping on China mostly from the developed countries,some from developing countries.But Pakistan,a friendly neighbor to China,recently adds up to that list of ranks for an anti-dumping investigation on China.It is the national interests that count most,after all. It gives out a signal that anti-dumping would be a frequent tool to defend or to attack. Evidences show China is a target for this trade remedy,but is also targeting others.展开更多
Based on 1995-2008 data, the author researched China and India’s anti-dumping situations, examining the level ofinternational status and countries and industries involved, and analyzed the symmetry between China and ...Based on 1995-2008 data, the author researched China and India’s anti-dumping situations, examining the level ofinternational status and countries and industries involved, and analyzed the symmetry between China and India’sinitiation and the encounter of anti-dumping cases using the index of accusation symmetry (IA) and the index ofsanction symmetry (IS); based on this, the author surveyed India’s successful anti-dumping experiences and analyzedwhy China is frequently accused of anti-dumping, yet loses most anti-dumping petitions initiated against othercountries.The author then put forward policy suggestions regarding how to reduce the intensity of anti-dumpingaccusations filed against China and intensify the strength of its own anti-dumping actions filed against other dumpingnations.展开更多
Anti-dumping policies,as one of the most important nontariff measures to protect a country's economic interests,can have an impact not only on a country's trade and social welfare,but also on capital fows.Anti...Anti-dumping policies,as one of the most important nontariff measures to protect a country's economic interests,can have an impact not only on a country's trade and social welfare,but also on capital fows.Anti-dumping measures can result in increased trade costs and alterations to exchange rate risk.This study investigates the impact of anti-dumping sanctions on the international portfolio allocations of global funds.Anti-dumping policies can decrease the proportion of a fund's investment portfolio allocated to recently-sanctioned countries.Closer trade ties between the sanctioned country and the country where a fund is domiciled exacerbate the divestiture,but stronger foreign direct investment links weaken the negative association.Some country and fund heterogeneities are also discussed.We find that more developed countries are less affected by the impact of anti-dumping measures on equity fund allocations;liberalization of the economy and stable government could also mitigate the negative impact of anti-dumping sanctions.High-risk funds,such as growth funds or funds that invest in leveraged buyouts,showed the greatest response to changes in anti-dumping regulations.展开更多
Using the numbers of anti-dumping cases both in China and around the world, the value of imports and exports from 1995 to 2012, and the anti-dumping index (ADI) proposed by Finger and Murray in 1999, this paper analyz...Using the numbers of anti-dumping cases both in China and around the world, the value of imports and exports from 1995 to 2012, and the anti-dumping index (ADI) proposed by Finger and Murray in 1999, this paper analyzes the characteristics of anti-dumping measures that target China and those imposed by China, and constructs a multiple linear regression model. We try to show the effect of anti-dumping measures in either direction on the total value of China’s trade. This paper finds that both have great impact on export trade value. The intensity of the level of anti-dumping measures to which China is subject is positively correlated with total export value since this intensity, to a certain degree, can promote China’s industrial upgrading and the increase of the export of high value-added products. This paper further analyzes different effects of anti-dumping measures based on the method of technological content classification of Lall (2000). Finally, we put forward policy suggestions on how to enhance China’s export competitiveness by overcoming the effects of antidumping measures to which we are subject and by making proper use of antidumping measures on others.展开更多
This paper investigates the effects of trade barriers on China s participation in the global value chain(GVC)using a thorough decomposition approach for trade volume,total exports,final exports and intermediate export...This paper investigates the effects of trade barriers on China s participation in the global value chain(GVC)using a thorough decomposition approach for trade volume,total exports,final exports and intermediate exports.Our econometric results indicate that anti-dumping(AD)measures initiated by trade partners have restrained the process of China s participation in the GVC.From 2000 to 2014,AD measures reduced the foreign value-added rate of total,final and intermediate exports by 4.5 to 28.7 percent,3.4 to 17 percent and 1.2 to 8.5 percent,respectively.In addition,suffering the effects of AD measures,China s GVC position index declined by 8.2 percent to 28.6 percent during this period.Moreover,AD measures have increased industries'upstream index by 3.2 to 13.7 percent over the same period.These results imply that both the petition and approval of AD cases has had a negative influence on the extent and position of China s GVC participation.展开更多
The present paper explores the opportunities for China's regional trade agreement (RTA) initiatives to mitigate its anti-dumping problems. The paper highlights the severity and discriminatory nature of China's ant...The present paper explores the opportunities for China's regional trade agreement (RTA) initiatives to mitigate its anti-dumping problems. The paper highlights the severity and discriminatory nature of China's anti-dumping problems. The high concentration of the share of anti-dumping actions taken by the top 4 and top 8 anti-dumping initiators is noted. Our finding of a weak effect of existing RTAs on mitigating China 's anti-dumping problems supports the argument that China could become more active in mitigating anti-dumping problems through RTA negotiations. An RTA can include a higher level of openness in exchange for an improvement in regional anti-dumping provisions. Case studies on RTAs involving the EU, the USA and India offer some precedents for offering inducements and modifying regional anti-dumping provisions. The approaches for China may lie in obtaining market economy status from intensive anti-dumping initiators at RTA levels and also altering regional anti-dumping provisions that could be put in place in exchange for some potential concessions.展开更多
After a 15-year accession path, China became a full member of the WTO in December 2001. Since then, China has become one of the most important trade partners of the EU countries. However, the increasingly strengthenin...After a 15-year accession path, China became a full member of the WTO in December 2001. Since then, China has become one of the most important trade partners of the EU countries. However, the increasingly strengthening trade relationship and China's official entrance into the WTO unexpectedly leads to many more trade disputes between China and the EU in the era of globalization and free trade. This paper thus investigates the motive and outcome of the EU government's frequent resort to trade protectionism against products made in China.展开更多
During the early days of Trump’s administration,the Mar-a-lago summit,held between US and Chinese leaders,once injected high-level momentum into bilateral trade talks and laid a solid foundation for the release of th...During the early days of Trump’s administration,the Mar-a-lago summit,held between US and Chinese leaders,once injected high-level momentum into bilateral trade talks and laid a solid foundation for the release of the initial actions of the China-US Economic Cooperation 100-Day Plan.The bilateral trade relations began amicably early in Trump’s presidency.However,the US soon began to play hardball against China,initiating anti-dumping and countervailing investigations and imposing punitive duties on several Chinese imports,and launched the Section 301 investigation on what it alleged was China’s theft of US intellectual property.The US also denied China’s market economy status,promoted reforms that gave a stronger hand to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States(CFIUS),vetoed several mergers and acquisitions cases involving Chinese investment in the US and interfered in the relevant operations of Chinese enterprises.Recently,it has even spearheaded Chinese products and investment in strategic hightech fields.This policy transition not only embodies Trump’s“America First”principle but also shows that non-economic factors have played an increasingly important role in US policy-making.展开更多
In June 2004, the European Union (EU) made a decision on its preliminary assessmentof China’s market economy status (MES). After seriously studying the EU’s preliminary assessment report, the Institute ofEconomicand...In June 2004, the European Union (EU) made a decision on its preliminary assessmentof China’s market economy status (MES). After seriously studying the EU’s preliminary assessment report, the Institute ofEconomicand Resources Managementof Beijing Normal University madea review. We hold that the decision on the assessment fails to be fair and objectiveand isundermined byincorrectunderstanding andlogicalcontradictions.However, the decision hasstillleft someleeway forChina’s improvement and Chinaneedsto speed up in improving its market economy regime.展开更多
文摘In recent decades, international trade has evolved into a complex system of trade barriers to ensure the protection of domestic industry and its workers interests. However as tariffs have fallen and international trade tends to be free trade, countries have found another way of protecting domestic industries from foreign competition—non-tariff protection. Among them anti-dumping is the most controversial subject that is involved in the foreign trade. This theme will analyze the reason and effect of growing use anti-dumping measures by countries in recent decades and try to give some possible solutions.
文摘Although the benefits of China’s trade expansion have been distributed much more broadly than those of some early industrialized nations,China has become the primary target of anti-dumping activities.Being a new and relatively efficient new rival in the global market may be an important reason for this.On the other hand,China’s development stage and her trade structure also place her in a disadvantageous position when it comes to anti-dumping activities.
文摘In the run up to the expiry of quota restrictions that had long regulated much of global trade in textiles and clothing, many a pundit predicted widespread recourse to anti-dumping actions.
文摘The president of the National Council of Textile Organizations(NCTO )has written a letter to the Mexican Economic Secretary Hugo Diaz strongly endorsing his country’s decision to seek a World Trade Organization(WTO)
文摘Under the pressure of the anti- dumping investigations on silk fabrics launched by the Indian government, the China Chamber of Commerce for Import & Export of Textiles (CCCT) announced that it has decided not to hold the Silk Trade Fair (Autumn) this year, in order to avoid the negative effects the case might bring.
文摘The past years saw an increased cases of anti-dumping on China mostly from the developed countries,some from developing countries.But Pakistan,a friendly neighbor to China,recently adds up to that list of ranks for an anti-dumping investigation on China.It is the national interests that count most,after all. It gives out a signal that anti-dumping would be a frequent tool to defend or to attack. Evidences show China is a target for this trade remedy,but is also targeting others.
基金funded by the state social science project of Research on the Relationship Between Chinas Financial Development and Trade Structure Optimization (No. 07CGJ00)
文摘Based on 1995-2008 data, the author researched China and India’s anti-dumping situations, examining the level ofinternational status and countries and industries involved, and analyzed the symmetry between China and India’sinitiation and the encounter of anti-dumping cases using the index of accusation symmetry (IA) and the index ofsanction symmetry (IS); based on this, the author surveyed India’s successful anti-dumping experiences and analyzedwhy China is frequently accused of anti-dumping, yet loses most anti-dumping petitions initiated against othercountries.The author then put forward policy suggestions regarding how to reduce the intensity of anti-dumpingaccusations filed against China and intensify the strength of its own anti-dumping actions filed against other dumpingnations.
基金Haoyuan Ding acknowledges financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.72173082)the Ministry of Education Project of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences at Universities in China(No.22JJD790011)+1 种基金Jiezhou Ying acknowledges financial support from the Zhejiang Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project of China(No.23NDJC023Z)the Shanghai Sailing Program(No.21YF1431900).
文摘Anti-dumping policies,as one of the most important nontariff measures to protect a country's economic interests,can have an impact not only on a country's trade and social welfare,but also on capital fows.Anti-dumping measures can result in increased trade costs and alterations to exchange rate risk.This study investigates the impact of anti-dumping sanctions on the international portfolio allocations of global funds.Anti-dumping policies can decrease the proportion of a fund's investment portfolio allocated to recently-sanctioned countries.Closer trade ties between the sanctioned country and the country where a fund is domiciled exacerbate the divestiture,but stronger foreign direct investment links weaken the negative association.Some country and fund heterogeneities are also discussed.We find that more developed countries are less affected by the impact of anti-dumping measures on equity fund allocations;liberalization of the economy and stable government could also mitigate the negative impact of anti-dumping sanctions.High-risk funds,such as growth funds or funds that invest in leveraged buyouts,showed the greatest response to changes in anti-dumping regulations.
文摘Using the numbers of anti-dumping cases both in China and around the world, the value of imports and exports from 1995 to 2012, and the anti-dumping index (ADI) proposed by Finger and Murray in 1999, this paper analyzes the characteristics of anti-dumping measures that target China and those imposed by China, and constructs a multiple linear regression model. We try to show the effect of anti-dumping measures in either direction on the total value of China’s trade. This paper finds that both have great impact on export trade value. The intensity of the level of anti-dumping measures to which China is subject is positively correlated with total export value since this intensity, to a certain degree, can promote China’s industrial upgrading and the increase of the export of high value-added products. This paper further analyzes different effects of anti-dumping measures based on the method of technological content classification of Lall (2000). Finally, we put forward policy suggestions on how to enhance China’s export competitiveness by overcoming the effects of antidumping measures to which we are subject and by making proper use of antidumping measures on others.
基金the National Social Science Fund of China(No.17ZDA097)the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Nos.71673280 and 71873031).
文摘This paper investigates the effects of trade barriers on China s participation in the global value chain(GVC)using a thorough decomposition approach for trade volume,total exports,final exports and intermediate exports.Our econometric results indicate that anti-dumping(AD)measures initiated by trade partners have restrained the process of China s participation in the GVC.From 2000 to 2014,AD measures reduced the foreign value-added rate of total,final and intermediate exports by 4.5 to 28.7 percent,3.4 to 17 percent and 1.2 to 8.5 percent,respectively.In addition,suffering the effects of AD measures,China s GVC position index declined by 8.2 percent to 28.6 percent during this period.Moreover,AD measures have increased industries'upstream index by 3.2 to 13.7 percent over the same period.These results imply that both the petition and approval of AD cases has had a negative influence on the extent and position of China s GVC participation.
文摘The present paper explores the opportunities for China's regional trade agreement (RTA) initiatives to mitigate its anti-dumping problems. The paper highlights the severity and discriminatory nature of China's anti-dumping problems. The high concentration of the share of anti-dumping actions taken by the top 4 and top 8 anti-dumping initiators is noted. Our finding of a weak effect of existing RTAs on mitigating China 's anti-dumping problems supports the argument that China could become more active in mitigating anti-dumping problems through RTA negotiations. An RTA can include a higher level of openness in exchange for an improvement in regional anti-dumping provisions. Case studies on RTAs involving the EU, the USA and India offer some precedents for offering inducements and modifying regional anti-dumping provisions. The approaches for China may lie in obtaining market economy status from intensive anti-dumping initiators at RTA levels and also altering regional anti-dumping provisions that could be put in place in exchange for some potential concessions.
文摘After a 15-year accession path, China became a full member of the WTO in December 2001. Since then, China has become one of the most important trade partners of the EU countries. However, the increasingly strengthening trade relationship and China's official entrance into the WTO unexpectedly leads to many more trade disputes between China and the EU in the era of globalization and free trade. This paper thus investigates the motive and outcome of the EU government's frequent resort to trade protectionism against products made in China.
文摘During the early days of Trump’s administration,the Mar-a-lago summit,held between US and Chinese leaders,once injected high-level momentum into bilateral trade talks and laid a solid foundation for the release of the initial actions of the China-US Economic Cooperation 100-Day Plan.The bilateral trade relations began amicably early in Trump’s presidency.However,the US soon began to play hardball against China,initiating anti-dumping and countervailing investigations and imposing punitive duties on several Chinese imports,and launched the Section 301 investigation on what it alleged was China’s theft of US intellectual property.The US also denied China’s market economy status,promoted reforms that gave a stronger hand to the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States(CFIUS),vetoed several mergers and acquisitions cases involving Chinese investment in the US and interfered in the relevant operations of Chinese enterprises.Recently,it has even spearheaded Chinese products and investment in strategic hightech fields.This policy transition not only embodies Trump’s“America First”principle but also shows that non-economic factors have played an increasingly important role in US policy-making.
文摘In June 2004, the European Union (EU) made a decision on its preliminary assessmentof China’s market economy status (MES). After seriously studying the EU’s preliminary assessment report, the Institute ofEconomicand Resources Managementof Beijing Normal University madea review. We hold that the decision on the assessment fails to be fair and objectiveand isundermined byincorrectunderstanding andlogicalcontradictions.However, the decision hasstillleft someleeway forChina’s improvement and Chinaneedsto speed up in improving its market economy regime.