Optimizing prediction models for pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy:Current status and future perspectives

Postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF)is a frequent complication after pancre-atectomy,leading to increased morbidity and mortality.Optimizing prediction models for POPF has emerged as a critical focus in surgical research.Although over sixty models following pancreaticoduodenectomy,predominantly reliant on a variety of clinical,surgical,and radiological parameters,have been documented,their predictive accuracy remains suboptimal in external validation and across diverse populations.As models after distal pancreatectomy continue to be pro-gressively reported,their external validation is eagerly anticipated.Conversely,POPF prediction after central pancreatectomy is in its nascent stage,warranting urgent need for further development and validation.The potential of machine learning and big data analytics offers promising prospects for enhancing the accuracy of prediction models by incorporating an extensive array of variables and optimizing algorithm performance.Moreover,there is potential for the development of personalized prediction models based on patient-or pancreas-specific factors and postoperative serum or drain fluid biomarkers to improve accuracy in identifying individuals at risk of POPF.In the future,prospective multicenter studies and the integration of novel imaging technologies,such as artificial intelligence-based radiomics,may further refine predictive models.Addressing these issues is anticipated to revolutionize risk stratification,clinical decision-making,and postoperative management in patients undergoing pancre-atectomy.

Identifying the risk factors for pancreatic fistula after laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy(LPD)is a surgical procedure for treating pancreatic cancer;however,the risk of complications remains high owing to the wide range of organs involved during the surgery and the difficulty of anastomosis.Pancreatic fistula(PF)is a major complication that not only increases the risk of postoperative infection and abdominal hemorrhage but may also cause multi-organ failure,which is a serious threat to the patient’s life.This study hypothesized the risk factors for PF after LPD.AIM To identify the risk factors for PF after laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 201 patients admitted to the Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center between August 2022 and August 2023 who underwent LPD for pancreatic cancer.On the basis of the PF’s incidence(grades B and C),patients were categorized into the PF(n=15)and non-PF groups(n=186).Differences in general data,preoperative laboratory indicators,and surgery-related factors between the two groups were compared and analyzed using multifactorial logistic regression and receiver-operating characteristic(ROC)curve analyses.RESULTS The proportions of males,combined hypertension,soft pancreatic texture,and pancreatic duct diameter≤3 mm;surgery time;body mass index(BMI);and amylase(Am)level in the drainage fluid on the first postoperative day(Am>1069 U/L)were greater in the PF group than in the non-PF group(P<0.05),whereas the preoperative monocyte count in the PF group was lower than that in the non-PF group(all P<0.05).The logistic regression analysis revealed that BMI>24.91 kg/m²[odds ratio(OR)=13.978,95%confidence interval(CI):1.886-103.581],hypertension(OR=8.484,95%CI:1.22-58.994),soft pancreatic texture(OR=42.015,95%CI:5.698-309.782),and operation time>414 min(OR=15.41,95%CI:1.63-145.674)were risk factors for the development of PF after LPD for pancreatic cancer(all P<0.05).The areas under the ROC curve for BMI,hypertension,soft pancreatic texture,and time prediction of PF surgery were 0.655,0.661,0.873,and 0.758,respectively.CONCLUSION BMI(>24.91 kg/m²),hypertension,soft pancreatic texture,and operation time(>414 min)are considered to be the risk factors for postoperative PF.

Pancreatic fistula after pancreatectomy:Evolving definitions,preventive strategies and modern management

Pancreatic resection is the treatment of choice for pancreatic malignancy and certain benign pancreatic disorders. However, pancreatic resection is technically a demanding procedure and whereas mortality after a pancreaticoduodenectomy is currently < 3%-5% in experienced high-volume centers, post-operative morbidity is considerable, about 30%-50%. At present, the single most significant cause of morbidity and mortality after pancreatectomy is the development of pancreatic leakage and fistula (PF). The occurrence of a PF increases the length of hospital stay and the cost of treatment, requires additional investigations and procedures, and can result in life-threatening complications. There is no universally accepted definition of PF that would allow standardized reporting and proper comparison of outcomes between different centers. However, early recognition of a PF and prompt institution of appropriate treatment is critical to the prevention of potentially devastating consequences. The present article, reviews the evolution of post resection pancreatic fistula as a concept, and discusses evolving definitions, the current preventive strategies and the management of this problem.

Analysis of risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM: To explore the morbidity and risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Risk factors affecting pancreatic fistulas after pancreaticoduodenectomy

AIM: To analyze the risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 172 consecutive patients who had undergone pancreatico-duodenectomy at Inha University Hospital between April 1996 and March 2006. We analyzed the pancreatic fistula rate according to the clinical characteristics, the pathologic and laboratory findings, and the anastomotic methods.RESULTS: The incidence of developing pancreatic fistulas in patients older than 60 years of age was 21.7% (25/115), while the incidence was 8.8% (5/57) for younger patients; the difference was significant (P = 0.03). Patients with a dilated pancreatic duct had a lower rate of post-operative pancreatic fistulas than patients with a non-dilated duct (P = 0.001). Other factors, including clinical features, anastomotic methods, and pathologic diagnosis, did not show any statistical difference. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that pancreatic fistulas are related to age and a dilated pancreatic duct. The surgeon must take these risk factors into consideration when performing a pancre-aticoduodenectomy.

Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy:A comparison between the two pancreaticojejunostomy methods for approximating the pancreatic parenchyma to the jejunal seromuscular layer:Interrupted vs continuous stitches

AIM： The purpose of this study is to find a better operative technique by comparing interrupted stitches with continuous stitches for the outer layer of the pancreaticojejunostomy, i.e. the stitches between the stump parenchyma of the pancreas and the jejunal seromuscular layer, and other risk factors for the incidence of pancreatic leakage.METHODS： During the period January 1997 to October 2004, 133 patients have undergone the end-to-side and duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy with interrupted suture for outer layer of the pancreaticojejunostomy and 170 patients with a continuous suture at our institution by one surgeon.RESULTS： There were no significant differences between the two groups in the diagnosis, texture of the pancreas, use of octreotide and pathologic stage. Pancreatic fistula occurred in 14 patients （11%） among the interrupted suture cases and in 10 （6%） among the continuous suture cases （P = 0.102）. Major pancreatic leakage developed in three interrupted suture patients （2%） and zero continuous suture patients （P = 0.026）. In multivariate analysis, soft pancreatic consistency （odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval 2.3-13.1） and common bile duct cancer （odds ratio, 3.7; 95%CI 1.6-8.5） were＇predictive of pancreatic leakage.CONCLUSION： Pancreatic texture and pathology are the most important factors in determining the fate of pancreaticojejunal anastomosis and our continuous suture method was performed with significantly decreased occurrence of major pancreatic fistula. In conclusion, the continuous suture method is more feasible and safer in performing duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy.

Risk factors associated with pancreatic fistula after distal pancreatectomy, which technique of pancreatic stump closure is more beneficial?

AIM: To identify risk factors related to pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP) and to determine the effectiveness of using a stapled and a sutured closed of pancreatic stump. METHODS: Sixty-four patients underwent DP during a 10-year period. Information regarding diagnosis, operative details, and perioperative morbidity or mortality was collected. Eight risk factors were examined. RESULTS: Indications for DP included primary pancreatic disease (n = 38, 59%) and non-pancreatic malignancy (n = 26, 41%). Postoperative mortality and morbidity rates were 1.5% and 37% respectively; one patient died due to sepsis and two patients required a reoperation due to postoperative bleeding. Pancreatic fistula was developed in 14 patients (22%); 4 of fistulas were classified as Grade A, 9 as Grade B and only 1 as Grade C. Incidence of pancreatic fistula rate was significantly associated with four risk factors: pathology, use of prophylactic octreotide therapy, concomitant splenectomy, and texture of pancreatic parenchyma. The role that technique (either stapler or suture) of pancreatic stump closure plays in the development of pancreatic leak remains unclear. CONCLUSION: The pancreatic fistula rate after DP is 22%. This is reduced for patients with non-pancreatic malignancy, fibrotic pancreatic tissue, postoperative prophylactic octreotide therapy and concomitant splenectomy.

Risk factors and managements of hemorrhage associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND: Post-pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic fistula associated hemorrhage (PPFH) is one of the leading lethal complications. Our study was to analyze the risk factors and managements of hemorrhage associated with pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy, and to evaluate treatment options. METHOD: We analyzed 445 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy or pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy and evaluated the relevance between clinical data and PPFH. RESULTS: The incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) was 27.42% (122/445), and the incidence of PPFH was 4.49% (20/445). Among the 20 patients with PPFH, 7 died and 13 were cured. Interventional angiographic therapy was performed for 10 patients and 5 were successfully treated. Relaparotomy was performed for 5 patients and 2 were successfully cured. Univariate logistic regression analysis indicated that several risk factors were related to PPFH: the nature of tumor (carcinoid/low-grade or high-grade malignancy), preoperative day 1. serum prealbumin, preoperative day 1 total bilirubin (TBIL), operative time, blood loss in the operation, operative method (vascular resection and revascularization), postoperative day 3 TBIL, biliary fistula, and the grade of POPF. The multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the nature of tumor and the grade of POPF were independently risk factors of PPFH. Receiver operating characteristic curve indicated that preoperative day 1 serum prealbumin level <173 mg/L and postoperative day 3 TBIL level.1.68.tmol/L were the risk factors of PPFH. CONCLUSIONS; The risk of PPFH was found to be increased with high potential malignancy and high grade of POPE Angiography-embolization is one of the major and effective therapies for PPFH. Extraluminal-intraluminal PPFH is more serious and needs more aggressive treatments.

Risk prediction platform for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy using artificial intelligence

BACKGROUND Despite advancements in operative technique and improvements in postoperative managements,postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF)is a life-threatening complication following pancreatoduodenectomy(PD).There are some reports to predict POPF preoperatively or intraoperatively,but the accuracy of those is questionable.Artificial intelligence(AI)technology is being actively used in the medical field,but few studies have reported applying it to outcomes after PD.AIM To develop a risk prediction platform for POPF using an AI model.METHODS Medical records were reviewed from 1769 patients at Samsung Medical Center who underwent PD from 2007 to 2016.A total of 38 variables were inserted into AI-driven algorithms.The algorithms tested to make the risk prediction platform were random forest(RF)and a neural network(NN)with or without recursive feature elimination(RFE).The median imputation method was used for missing values.The area under the curve(AUC)was calculated to examine the discriminative power of algorithm for POPF prediction.RESULTS The number of POPFs was 221(12.5%)according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula definition 2016.After median imputation,AUCs using 38 variables were 0.68±0.02 with RF and 0.71±0.02 with NN.The maximal AUC using NN with RFE was 0.74.Sixteen risk factors for POPF were identified by AI algorithm:Pancreatic duct diameter,body mass index,preoperative serum albumin,lipase level,amount of intraoperative fluid infusion,age,platelet count,extrapancreatic location of tumor,combined venous resection,co-existing pancreatitis,neoadjuvant radiotherapy,American Society of Anesthesiologists’score,sex,soft texture of the pancreas,underlying heart disease,and preoperative endoscopic biliary decompression.We developed a web-based POPF prediction platform,and this application is freely available at http://popfrisk.smchbp.org.CONCLUSION This study is the first to predict POPF with multiple risk factors using AI.This platform is reliable(AUC 0.74),so it could be used to select patients who need especially intense therapy and to preoperatively establish an effective treatment strategy.

Impaired immune reaction and increased lactate and C-reactive protein for early prediction of severe morbidity and pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy

Background: Prediction of complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) remains of interest. Blood parameters and biomarkers during rst and second postoperative days (POD1, POD2) may be early indi- cators of complications. Methods: This case-control study included 50 patients. Baseline, POD1 and POD2 values of leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, hemoglobin, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin and arterial lactate were compared between individuals presenting Clavien ≥ III morbidity, pancreatic stula (PF) or clinically relevant PF (CRPF) and those without these morbidities. Common variables reaching signi cance were further analyzed in order to calculate a predictive score. Results: Severe morbidity, PF and CRPF rates were 28.0%, 26.0% and 14.0%, respectively. Patients with severe morbidity had lower leukocytes on POD2 (P=0.04). Patients with PF presented higher CRP on POD2 (P=0.001), higher lactate on POD1 (P=0.007) and POD2 (P=0.008), and lower lymphocytes on POD1 (P=0.007) and POD2 (P=0.008). Patients with CRPF had lower leukocytes and neutrophils on POD1 (P =0.048, P =0.038), lower lymphocytes on POD1 (P =0.001) and POD2 (P =0.003), and higher CRP on POD2 (P =0.001). Baseline parameters and procalcitonin obtained no statistical associations. Score was de ned according to lymphocytes on POD1 < 650/μL and CRP on POD2 ≥ 250 mg/L allocating patients in 3 risk categories. PF and CRPF rates were statistically higher as risk category increased (P<0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curves and Hosmer Lemeshow tests showed a good accuracy. Conclusions: Impaired immunological reaction during early postoperative period (lower leukocytes and, particularly, lymphocytes) in response to surgical aggression would favor complications after PD. Likewise, acidosis (higher arterial lactate) could behave as risk factor of PF. An elevated CRP on POD2 is also an early biomarker of PF. Our novel score based on postoperative lymphocyte count and CRP seems reliable for early prediction of PF.

Drain amylase value as an early predictor of pancreatic fistula after cephalic duodenopancreatectomy

AIM: To determine predictors of clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas (CRPF) by measuring drain fluid amylase (DFA) in the early postoperative period.

Drainage fluid and serum amylase levels accurately predict development of postoperative pancreatic fistula

AIM To investigate potential biomarkers for predicting postoperative pancreatic fistula( POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD).METHODS We prospectively recruited 83 patients to this study. All patients underwent PD(Child's procedure) at the Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery at the First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University between June 2011 and April 2015. Data pertaining to demographic variables, clinical characteristics, texture of pancreas, surgical approach, histopathological results, white blood cell count, amylase and choline levels in the serum, pancreatic/gastric drainage fluid, and choline and amylase levels in abdominal drainage fluid were included in the analysis. Potential correlations between these parameters and postoperative complications such as, POPF, acute pancreatitis, hemorrhage, delayed gastric emptying, and biliary fistula, were assessed. RESULTS Twenty-eight out of the 83(33.7%) patients developed POPF. The severity of POPF was classified as Grade A in 8(28%) patients, grade B in 16(58%), and grade C in4(14%), according to the pancreatic fistula criteria. On univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, higher amylase level in the abdominal drainage fluid on postoperative day(POD)1 and higher serum amylase levels on POD4 showed a significant correlation with POPF(P < 0.05). On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, amylase cut-off level of 2365.5 U/L in the abdominal drainage fluid was associated with a 78.6% sensitivity and 80% specificity [area under the curve(AUC): 0.844; P = 0.009]. A cut-off serum amylase level of 44.2 U/L was associated with a 78.6% sensitivity and 70.9% specificity(AUC: 0.784; P = 0.05).CONCLUSION Amylase level in the abdominal drainage fluid on POD1 and serum amylase level on POD4 represent novel biomarkers associated with POPF development.

Endoscopic naso-pancreatic drainage for the treatment of pancreatic fistula occurring after LDLT

Pancreatic fistula is a quite rare complication in patients who undergo living donor liver transplantation(LDLT).However,in the cases that show pancreatic fistula,the limited volume of the graft and the resultant inadequate liver function may complicate the management of the fistula.As a result,the pancreatic fistula may result in the death of the patient.We present 2 cases in whichendoscopic treatment was effective against pancreatic fistulas that developed after LDLT.In case 1,a 61-yearold woman underwent LDLT for primary biliary cirrhosis.Because of a portal venous thrombus caused by a splenorenal shunt,the patient underwent portal vein reconstruction,and a splenorenal shunt was ligated on postoperative day(POD)7.The main pancreatic duct was injured during the manipulation to achieve hemostasis,thereby necessitating open drainage.However,discharge of pancreatic fluid continued even after POD 300.Endoscopic naso-pancreatic drainage(ENPD)was performed,and this procedure resulted in a remarkable decrease in drain output.The refractory pancreatic fistula healed on day 40 after ENPD.In case 2,a 58-year-old man underwent LDLT for cirrhosis caused by the hepatitis C virus.When the portal vein was exposed during thrombectomy,the pancreatic head was injured,which led to the formation of a pancreatic fistula.Conservative therapy was ineffective;therefore,ENPD was performed.The pancreatic fistula healed on day 38 after ENPD.The findings in these 2 cases show that endoscopic drainage of the main pancreatic duct is a less invasive and effective treatment for pancreatic fistulas that develop after LDLT.

Clinical and economic consequences of pancreatic fistula after elective pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND:Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the main cause of morbidity after pancreatic resection.This study aimed to quantify the clinical and economic consequences of pancreatic fistula in a medium-volume pancreatic surgery center.METHODS:Hospital records from patients who had undergone elective pancreatic resection in our department were identified.Pancreatic fistula was defined according to the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula(ISGPF).The consequences of pancreatic fistula were determined by treatment cost,hospital stay,and out-patient follow-up until the pancreatic fistula was completely healed.All costs of the treatment are calculated in Euros.The cost increase index was calculated for pancreatic fistula of grades A,B,and C as multiples of the total cost for the no fistula group.RESULTS:In 54 months,102 patients underwent elective pancreatic resections.Forty patients(39.2%) developed pancreatic fistula,and 54 patients(52.9%) had one or more complications.The median length of hospital stay for the no fistula,grades A,B,and C fistula groups was 12.5,14,20,and 59 days,respectively.The hospital stay of patients with fistula of grades B and C was significantly longer than that of patients with no fistula(P【0.001).The median total cost of the treatment was 4952,4679,8239,and 30 820 Euros in the no fistula,grades A,B,and C fistula groups,respectively.CONCLUSIONS:The grading recommended by the ISGPF is useful for comparing the clinical severity of fistula and for analyzing the clinical and economic consequences of pancreatic fistula.Pancreatic fistula prolongs the hospital stay and increases the cost of treatment in proportion to the severity of the fistula.

Risk Factors and Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy:Single-center Experience

Pancreatic fistula(PF)remains the most frequent complication after pan­creaticoduodenectomy(PD).This study was undertaken to explore the risk factors of postoperative PF following PD and discuss the management of PF in our center.A single-center respective study,involving 241 patients who underwent PD between September 2015 and June 2018,was conducted.Differences in the demographic data,preoperative,intraoperative and postoperative variables between the group with PF[International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery(ISGPS)grade B/C]and the group without PF(no PF and ISGPS grade BL)were evaluated.The diagnosis and grading of PF were in strict accordance with ISGPS.Risk factors were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.The results showed that postoperative PF occurred in 50(20.7%)of the patients;25(10.4%)patients had a PF type BL,46(19.1%)patients developed a PF type B and 4(1.6%)had a PF type C.Univariate analysis showed that fasting blood glucose(P=0.02),pancreatic texture(P<0.001)and pancreatic duct diameter(P=0.01)were correlated with PF.Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified one independent risk factor for postoperative PF:soft pancreatic texture(OR=3.251,P=0.002).Among the cases,there were three postoperative deaths,giving a 60-day hospital mortality rate of 1.2%(3/241),and the mortality related to PF was 4.0%(2/50).One of the patients died from multiple organ failure caused by postoperative abdominal hemorrhage.In conclusion,soft pancreatic texture is an independent risk factor for PF.Surgeons should be well aware of this risk factor when performing a PD.

Risk factors for pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective study in a Thai tertiary center

AIM To analyze the risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula following pancreaticoduodenectomy in a Thai tertiary care center.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 179 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy at our hospital from January 2001 to December 2016. Pancreatic fistula were classified into three categories according to a definition made by an International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The risk factors for pancreatic fistula were analyzed by univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis.RESULTS Pancreatic fistula were detected in 88/179 patients(49%) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. Fifty-eight pancreatic fistula(65.9%) were grade A, 22 cases(25.0%) were grade B and eight cases(9.1%) were grade C. Clinically relevant pancreatic fistula were detected in 30/179 patients(16.7%). The 30-d mortality rate was 1.67%(3/179 patients). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that soft pancreatic texture(odds ratio = 3.598, 95%CI: 1.77-7.32) was the most significant risk factor for pancreatic fistula. A preoperative serum bilirubin level of > 3 mg/d L was the most significant risk factor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula according to univariate and multivariate analysis.CONCLUSION Soft pancreatic tissue is the most significant risk factor for postoperative pancreatic fistula. A high preoperative serum bilirubin level(> 3 mg/d L) is the most significant risk factor for clinically relevant pancreatic fistula.

Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients with insulinomas:analysis of 292 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic fistula (PF) remains the most challenging complication in pancreatic surgery, yet few published studies have focused on the risk factors for postoperative PF in patients undergoing surgery for insulinomas. METHODS: From January 1990 to February 2010, a total of 292 patients with insulinomas underwent surgery at Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Demographic data, intraoperative procedures, and postoperative data were collected. Particular attention was paid to variables associated with PF as defined by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify possible risk factors for PP. RESULTS: PF was found in 132 (45.2%) patients, of whom 90 were classified into ISGPF grade A, 33 grade B, and 9 grade C. Multivariate analysis showed that male patients (OR=2.56; P=0.007) and operative time > 180 minutes (OR=3.756; P < 0.0001) were independent risk factors for clinical PF. Pancreatic resection with stapler was a protective factor for both total PF (OR=0.022; P=0.010) and clinical PF (OR=0.097; P=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Male gender and operative time > 180 minutes were independent risk factors for clinical PF, while pancreatic resection with a stapler was a protective factor. Whether body mass index (BMI) and other variables during operation are risk factors of PF needs further study. (Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2012;11:102-106)

Delayed internal pancreatic fistula with pancreatic pleural effusion postsplenectomy

The occurrence of pancreatic pleural effusion,secondary to an internal pancreatic fistula,is a rare clinical syndrome and diagnosis is often missed.The key to the diagnosis is a dramatically elevated pleural fluid amylase.This pancreatic pleural effusion is also called a pancreatic pleural fistula.It is characterized by profuse pleural fluid and has a tendency to recur.Here we report a case of delayed internal pancreatic fistula with pancreatic pleural effusion emerging after splenectomy.From the treatment of this case,we conclude that the symptoms and signs of a subphrenic effusion are often obscure;abdominal computed tomography may be required to look for occult,intra-abdominal infection;and active conservative treatment should be carried out in the early period of this complication to reduce the need for endoscopy or surgery.

Pancreatic fistula after central pancreatectomy: case series and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is one of the most common complications after pancreatectomy. This study aimed to assess the occurrence and severity of pancreatic fistula after central pancreatectomy.METHODS: The medical records of 13 patients who had undergone central pancreatectomy were retrospectively studied together with a literature review of studies including at least five cases of central pancreatectomy. Pancreatic fistula was defined and graded according to the recommendations of the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF).RESULTS: No death was observed in the 13 patients. Pancreatic fistula developed in 7 patients and was successfully treated nonoperatively. None of these patients required re-operation. A total of 40 studies involving 867 patients who underwent central pancreatectomy were reviewed. The overall pancreatic fistula rate of the patients was 33.4% (0-100%). Of 279 patients, 250(89.6%) had grade A or B fistulae of ISGPF and were treated nonoperatively, and the remaining 29 (10.4%) had grade C fistulae of ISGPF. In 194 patients, 15 (7.7%) were re-operated upon. Only one patient with grade C fistula of ISGPF died from multiple organ failure after re-operation.CONCLUSION: Despite the relatively high occurrence, most pancreatic fistulae after central pancreatectomy are recognized a grade A or B fistula of ISGPF, which can be treated conservatively or by mini-invasive approaches.

Total closure of pancreatic section for end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy decreases incidence of pancreatic fistula in pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND： Postoperative pancreatic fistula （POPF） is a serious complication and results in prolonged hospitalization and high mortality. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of total closure of pancreatic section for end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy （PD）. METHODS： This was a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the outcomes of PD between patients who un- derwent total closure of pancreatic section for end-to-side pancreaticojejunostomy （Group A） vs those who underwent conventional pancreaticojejunostomy （Group B）. The primary endpoint was the incidence of pancreatic fistula. Secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality rates. RESULTS： One hundred twenty-three patients were included in this study. The POPF rate was significantly lower in Group A than that in Group B （4.8% vs 16.7%, P〈0.05）. About 38.3% patients in Group B developed one or more complications; this rate was 14.3% in Group A （P〈0.01）. The wound/abdomi- nal infection rate was also much higher in Group B than that in Group A （20.0% vs 6.3%, P〈0.05）. Furthermore, the average hospital stays of the two groups were 18 days in Group A, and 24 days in Group B, respectively （P〈0.001）. However, there was no difference in the probability of mortality, biliary leakage,delayed gastric emptying, and pulmonary infection between the two groups. CONCLUSION： Total closure of pancreatic section for end-to- side pancreaticojejunostomy is a safe and effective method for pancreaticojejunostomy in PD.