The UV irradiation is used for removing Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria(ARB)and Antibiotic Resistance Genes(ARG)from wastewater treatment.Bacteriophages are viruses that infect within bacteria,are recognized for bacteri...The UV irradiation is used for removing Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria(ARB)and Antibiotic Resistance Genes(ARG)from wastewater treatment.Bacteriophages are viruses that infect within bacteria,are recognized for bacterial control.The influence of some parameters in quantification and performance influencing of pathogen demobilization could be considered in disinfection of wastewater.The comparison of Polyvalent phage(NE1)versus Coliphage(NE4)in suppressing a bacterium Escherichia coli(NDM-1:b-lactam-resistant)with UV irradiation was observed the efficacy in reduction of cells in the disinfection and parameter process.The results with the effect of UV-C irradiation on NDM-1 infected with 1%of NE4 showed a decrease of cells from 8×10^(6)to 2×10^(5)in 60 min with UV-C dose.The NDM1(E.coli)was infected with 1%of NE4(Polyvalent Phage)under magnetic stirring for 1 h,the cells count was 8×10^(6).After 1 h in UV-C e×posure,the cells number reached 3×10^(5).The NDM1 that was e×posed in 1 h of UV-C irradiation and then was infected with 1%of NE4.Cells counting were done 24 h after this procedure.These cells were e×posed in UV-C and showed a reduction in the number of cells from 1×10^(8)to 4×10^(5)after 60 min.The results indicate that bacteriophages can mitigate bacteria species,and combined the conventional water disinfection technologies that can support the microbial safety control strategies.展开更多
目的系统评价ACEI或ARB对射血分数正常性心力衰竭(HFNEF)的治疗是否有益。方法检索2001年11月—2011年11月Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails、MEDLINE、EMBASE和万方数据库中关于ACEI或ARB和安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT),...目的系统评价ACEI或ARB对射血分数正常性心力衰竭(HFNEF)的治疗是否有益。方法检索2001年11月—2011年11月Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails、MEDLINE、EMBASE和万方数据库中关于ACEI或ARB和安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT),计算出优势比(OR)和OR的95%可信区间。对符合质量标准的RCT进行Meta分析。结果共4个RCT符合条件纳入Meta分析。ACEI或ARB组与安慰剂组总病死率的OR值为0.99,95%可信区间为(0.87～1.14),2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ACEI或ARB组与安慰剂组治疗心脏原因死亡的OR值为1.02,95%可信区间为(0.87～1.20),2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ACEI或ARB组与安慰剂组住院率OR值为0.97,95%可信区间为(0.88～1.07),2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ACEI或ARB组与安慰剂组心力衰竭恶化的OR值为1.03,95%可信区间为(0.80～1.32),2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 ACEI或ARB组与对照组间在降低HFNEF的总病死率、心脏原因病死率、住院率和心力衰竭恶化方面没有统计学差异。展开更多
基金Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo(FAPESP)and the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico(CNPq),São Paulo,Brazil for PhD scholarship(Process N°.141086/2015-7)financial support(Process No.870243/1997-7).
文摘The UV irradiation is used for removing Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria(ARB)and Antibiotic Resistance Genes(ARG)from wastewater treatment.Bacteriophages are viruses that infect within bacteria,are recognized for bacterial control.The influence of some parameters in quantification and performance influencing of pathogen demobilization could be considered in disinfection of wastewater.The comparison of Polyvalent phage(NE1)versus Coliphage(NE4)in suppressing a bacterium Escherichia coli(NDM-1:b-lactam-resistant)with UV irradiation was observed the efficacy in reduction of cells in the disinfection and parameter process.The results with the effect of UV-C irradiation on NDM-1 infected with 1%of NE4 showed a decrease of cells from 8×10^(6)to 2×10^(5)in 60 min with UV-C dose.The NDM1(E.coli)was infected with 1%of NE4(Polyvalent Phage)under magnetic stirring for 1 h,the cells count was 8×10^(6).After 1 h in UV-C e×posure,the cells number reached 3×10^(5).The NDM1 that was e×posed in 1 h of UV-C irradiation and then was infected with 1%of NE4.Cells counting were done 24 h after this procedure.These cells were e×posed in UV-C and showed a reduction in the number of cells from 1×10^(8)to 4×10^(5)after 60 min.The results indicate that bacteriophages can mitigate bacteria species,and combined the conventional water disinfection technologies that can support the microbial safety control strategies.
文摘目的系统评价ACEI或ARB对射血分数正常性心力衰竭(HFNEF)的治疗是否有益。方法检索2001年11月—2011年11月Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails、MEDLINE、EMBASE和万方数据库中关于ACEI或ARB和安慰剂的随机对照试验(RCT),计算出优势比(OR)和OR的95%可信区间。对符合质量标准的RCT进行Meta分析。结果共4个RCT符合条件纳入Meta分析。ACEI或ARB组与安慰剂组总病死率的OR值为0.99,95%可信区间为(0.87～1.14),2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ACEI或ARB组与安慰剂组治疗心脏原因死亡的OR值为1.02,95%可信区间为(0.87～1.20),2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ACEI或ARB组与安慰剂组住院率OR值为0.97,95%可信区间为(0.88～1.07),2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);ACEI或ARB组与安慰剂组心力衰竭恶化的OR值为1.03,95%可信区间为(0.80～1.32),2组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 ACEI或ARB组与对照组间在降低HFNEF的总病死率、心脏原因病死率、住院率和心力衰竭恶化方面没有统计学差异。
