A new breakthrough:ESD using a newly developed grasping type scissor forceps for early gastrointestinal tract neoplasms

Endoscopic submucosal dissection(ESD) has allowed the achievement of histologically curative en bloc resection of gastrointestinal neoplasms regardless of size,permitting the resection of previously non-resectable tumors.The ESD technique for treatment of early gastric cancer has spread rapidly in Japan and a few other Asian countries due to its excellent eradication rate compared to endoscopic mucosal resection.Although numerous electrosurgical knives have been developed for ESD,technical difficulties and high complication rates(bleeding and perforation) have limited their use worldwide.We developed the grasping type scissor forceps(GSF) to resolve such ESD-related problems.Our animal and preliminary clinical studies showed that ESD using GSF is a safe(no intraoperative complication) and technically efficient(curative en bloc resection rate 92%) method for dissection of early gastrointestinal tumors.The use of GSF is a promising option for performing ESD on early stage GI tract tumors both safely and effectively.

Current considerations on intraductal papillary neoplasms of the bile duct and pancreatic duct

Pancreatobiliary intraductal papillary neoplasms(IPNs)represent precursors of pancreatic cancer or bile duct cholangiocarcinoma that can be detected and treated.Despite advances in diagnostic methods,identifying these premalignant lesions is still challenging for treatment providers.Modern imaging,biomarkers and molecular tests for genomic alterations can be used for diagnosis and follow-up.Surgical intervention in combination with new chemotherapeutic agents is considered the optimal treatment for malignant cases.The balance between the risk of malignancy and any risk of resection guides management policy;therefore,treatment should be individualized based on a meticulous preoperative assessment of high-risk stigmata.IPN of the bile duct is more aggressive;thus,early diagnosis and surgery are crucial.The conservative management of low-risk pancreatic branch-duct lesions is safe and effective.

KML001, an arsenic compound, as salvage chemotherapy in refractory biliary tract cancers: A prospective study

Background: Sodium meta-arsenite(NaAsO_2, KML001) is a potential oral anticancer agent acting on telomerase and telomere length. This prospective study evaluated its safety, tolerability, and effectiveness as salvage chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer(BTC) resistant to gemcitabinebased chemotherapy. Methods: Forty-four patients(21 women and 23 men) with advanced BTC and failure history of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy, performance status(PS) 0–2, normal cardiac, hepatic, and renal function were enrolled. Daily dose of KML001(7.5 mg. p.o.) was administered to eligible subjects for 24 weeks divided into six treatment cycles. Response was evaluated bimonthly using CT. Results: After an average of 1.5 months of treatment(range: 0.5–10.0), 3 patients(6.8%) obtained progression-free status, 23 patients(52.3%) had disease progression, and 18 patients(40.9%) dropped out before evaluation. One patient(2.3%) completed six treatment cycles without progression. During the treatment, morphine dosage kept the same or decreased in 20 patients(47.6%). Nine patients(20.5%) experienced grade-3 adverse events(AEs), while no patient experienced grade-4 AEs. The most common AEs were liver enzyme elevation(11/44, 25%) and anemia(10/44, 22.7%). KML001 was discontinued in six patients(13.6%) due to AEs, including liver toxicity( n = 3), QTc prolongation( n = 2), and abdominal pain( n = 1). Conclusions: KML001 did not have enough anticancer effect on patients with advanced BTC resistant to gemcitabine. However, KML001 was safe and well-tolerable in terms of AEs and pain control when used as salvage therapy. Further studies are needed to establish arsenic agents as a reliable treatment option in patients with BTC.

Comparison of 4-Weekly vs 3-Weekly Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Chemotherapy Following Curative Resection for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Surgery for biliary tract cancer, including pancreatoduodenectomy and major hepatectomy, is too aggressive and does not allow postoperative gemcitabine to be administered by the usual dosage protocol. We hypothesized that the feasibility of 3-weekly protocol (days 1 and 8, every 3 weeks) of adjuvant gemcitabine therapy may be superior to the usual 4-weekly protocol (days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks). Method: We compared the outcomes of 6 cycles of the 4-weekly protocol and 9 cycles of the 3-weekly protocol in a prospective randomized setting. The primary endpoint was the completion rate, and the secondary endpoints were the adverse events and the recurrence-free survival rate. Results: Totally, 27 patients were enrolled. The protocol could be completed without any omittances and/or dose modifications in two patients (14%) of the 4-weekly protocol, and three patients (23%) of the 3-weekly protocol (p = 0.8099);grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in almost all the remaining (70%) patients. The relative dose intensity was 72% in the 4-weekly protocol and 78% in the 3-weekly protocol. There was no significant difference in the recurrence-free survival rate. Conclusion: The 3-weekly protocol did not yield superior completion, adverse events or recurrence-free survival rates as compared to the 4-week protocol. Trial Registration: UMIN-CTR, UMIN000001020.

Combining of chemotherapy with targeted therapy for advanced biliary tract cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Targeted therapy(TT)has resulted in controversial efficacy as first-line treatment for biliary tract cancer(BTC).More efficacy comparisons are required to clarify the overall effects of chemotherapy(CT)combined with TT and CT alone on advanced BTC.AIM To conduct a meta-analysis of the available evidence on the efficacy of CT combined with TT for advanced BTC.METHODS The PubMed,EMBASE,ClinicalTrials,Scopus and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for relevant studies published from inception to August 2022.Only randomized clinical trials(RCTs)including comparisons between the combination of gemcitabine-based CT with TT and CT alone as firstline treatment for advanced BTC were eligible(PROSPERO-CRD42022313001).The odds ratios(ORs)for the objective response rate(ORR)and hazard ratios(HRs)for both progression-free survival(PFS)and overall survival(OS)were calculated and analyzed.Subgroup analyses based on different targeted agents,CT regimens and tumor locations were prespecified.RESULTS Nine RCTs with a total of 1361 individuals were included and analyzed.The overall analysis showed a significant improvement in ORR in patients treated with CT+TT compared to those treated with CT alone(OR=1.43,95%CI:1.11-1.86,P=0.007)but no difference in PFS or OS.Similar trends were observed in the subgroup treated with agents targeting epidermal growth factor receptor(OR=1.67,95%CI:1.17-2.37,P=0.004)but not in the subgroups treated with agents targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor or mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor.Notably,patients who received a CT regimen of gemcitabine+oxaliplatin in the CT+TT arm had both a higher ORR(OR=1.75,95%CI:1.20-2.56,P=0.004)and longer PFS(HR=0.83,95%CI:0.70-0.99,P=0.03)than those in the CT-only arm.Moreover,patients with cholangiocarcinoma treated with CT+TT had significantly increased ORR and PFS(ORR,OR=2.06,95%CI:1.27-3.35,PFS,HR=0.79,95%CI:0.66-0.94).CONCLUSION CT+TT is a potential first-line treatment for advanced BTC that leads to improved tumor control and survival outcomes,and highlighting the importance of CT regimens and tumor types in the application of TT.

Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy with or without Targeted Therapy in Biliary Tract Cancer:A Meta-analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials

The systematic treatment based on gemcitabine plus cisplatin is recommended as the current standard chemotherapy for unresectable or metastatic biliary tract cancers.However,the exact benefits from the recognized regime are still dismal.We thus elicit this study in an attempt to analyze whether targeted therapy coupled with various chemotherapy could produce improvement of survival benefits.The clinical trials were searched electronically from databases till July 2016 published in English and Chinese.Nine hundred and sixty-four patients from 7 trials were identified in our analysis.The overall analysis achieved a significantly higher overall response rate（ORR） among the patients treated with targeted drugs plus chemotherapy than chemotherapy alone（OR=1.87;95% CI：1.37–2.57;P=0.000）,but failed in the overall progression-free survival（PFS） [mean difference（MD）=0.63;95% CI：–0.45–1.72;P=0.26] and overall survival（OS）（MD=–0.67;95% CI：–2.54–1.20;P=0.49）.In the sub analysis,better ORR was obtained with the addition of EGFR（OR=1.75;95% CI：1.20–2.56;P=0.004） and VEGFR（OR=2.5;95% CI：1.28–4.87;P=0.007） targeted therapy.Furthermore,the sub analysis of EGFR target showed an significant improvement on PFS（MD=1.36;95% CI：0.29–2.43;P=0.01）.No significant differences were observed in the incidences of neutropenia（OR=1.37;95% CI：0.89–2.12）,thrombocytopenia（OR=1.40;95% CI：0.83–2.39）,anemia（OR=1.21;95% CI：0.62–2.38）,peripheral neuropathy（OR=1.52;95% CI：0.81–2.88）,increased AST/ALT（OR=1.40;95% CI：0.82–2.39） as well as fatigue（OR=1.65;95% CI：0.96–2.84） in either of the treatment groups.In conclusion,better ORR associated with chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy（both targeting EGFR and VEGF） is found in the present meta-analysis without the cost of increased unacceptable toxicities,but regretfully not for the OS.The sub-analysis of targeting EGFR instead of VEGF obtains a superior PFS.Otherwise,there is no statistically significant difference in the overall PFS between the combination regime and chemotherapy alone.Given the paucity of favorable data,we need further studies to characterize optimal targeted agents to confirm the potential value to biliary tract cancer.

Molecular genetics and targeted therapeutics in biliary tractcarcinoma

The primary malignancies of the biliary tract, cholangio-carcinoma and gallbladder cancer, often present at an advanced stage and are marginally sensitive to radiation and chemotherapy. Accumulating evidence indicates that molecularly targeted agents may provide new hope for improving treatment response in biliary tract carcinoma(BTC). In this article, we provide a critical review of the pathogenesis and genetic abnormalities of biliary tract neoplasms, in addition to discussing the current and emerging targeted therapeutics in BTC. Genetic studies of biliary tumors have identified the growth factors and receptors as well as their downstream signaling pathways that control the growth and survival of biliary epithelia. Target-specific monoclonal antibodies and small molecules inhibitors directed against the signaling pathways that drive BTC growth and invasion have been developed. Numerous clinical trials designed to test these agents as either monotherapy or in combination with conventional chemotherapy have been completed or are currently underway. Research focusing on understanding the molecular basis of biliary tumorigenesis will continue to identify for targeted therapy the key mutations that drive growth and invasion of biliary neoplasms. Additional strategies that have emerged for treating this malignant disease include targeting the epigenetic alterations of BTC and immunotherapy. By integrating targeted therapy with molecular profiles of biliary tumor, we hope to provide precision treatment for patients with malignant diseases of the biliary tract.

Multi-institutional retrospective analysis of FOLFIRI in patients with advanced biliary tract cancers

BACKGROUND Gemcitabine plus platinum is the standard of care first-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancers(BTC).There is no established second-line therapy,and retrospective reviews report median progression-free survival(PFS)less than 3 mo on second-line therapy.5-Fluorouracil plus irinotecan(FOLFIRI)is a commonly used regimen in patients with BTC who have progressed on gemcitabine plus platinum,though there is a paucity of data regarding its efficacy in this population.AIM To assess the efficacy of FOLFIRI in patients with biliary tract cancers.METHODS We retrospectively identified patients with advanced BTC who were treated with FOLFIRI at MD Anderson,University of Michigan and Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville.Data were collected on patient demographics,BTC subtype,response per RECIST v1.1,progression and survival.RESULTS Ninety-eight patients were included of which 74(75%)had metastatic and 24(25%)had locally advanced disease at the time of treatment with FOLFIRI.The median age was 60(range,22-86)years.The number of patients with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma,gall bladder cancer and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma were 10,17 and 71,respectively.FOLFIRI was used as 1st,2nd,3rd or 4th–Nth lines in 8,50,36 and 4 patients,respectively.Median duration on FOLFIRI in the entire cohort was 2.2(range,0.5-8.4)mo.The median PFS and overall survival were 2.4(95%confidence interval(CI):1.7-3.1)and 6.6(95%CI:4.7-8.4)mo,respectively.Median PFS for patients treated with FOLFIRI in 1st,2nd,3rd or 4th–Nth lines were 3.1,2.5,2.3 and 1.5 mo,respectively.Eighteen patients received concurrent bevacizumab(n=13)or EGFR-targeted therapy(n=5)with FOLFIRI,with a median PFS of 2.7 mo(95%CI:1.7-5.1).CONCLUSION In this largest multi-institution retrospective review of 98 patients with BTC treated with FOLFIRI,efficacy appears to be modest with outcomes similar to other cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens.

Adjuvant treatment in biliary tract cancer: To treat or not to treat?

Biliary tract cancer is a rare malignant tumor. There is limited knowledge about biology and natural history of this disease and considerable uncertainty remains regarding its optimal diagnostic and therapeutic man- agement. The role of adjuvant therapy is object of debate and controversy. Although resection is identified as the most effective and the only potentially curative treatment, there is no consensus on the impact of ad- juvant chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy on the high incidence of disease recurrence and on survival. This is mainly due to the rarity of this disease and the consequent difficulty in performing randomized trials. The only two prospectively controlled trials concluded that adjuvant chemotherapy did not improve survival. Most of the retrospective trials, which had limited sample size and included heterogeneous patients population and non-standardized therapies, suggested a marginal benefit of chemoradiotherapy in reducing locoregional recurrence and an uncertain impact on survival. Welldesigned multi-institutional randomized trials are necessary to clarify the role of adjuvant therapy. Two ongoing phase Ⅲ trials may provide relevant information.

Biliary tract tumors: past, present and future

Tumors ofthe biliary tract （gallbladder tumors, cholangiocarcinomas and ampullary carcinomas） are low incidence tumors with poor prognosis. The five-year overall survival is 50% for stage I, 30% stage II, 10% stage III and 0% stage IV. Treatment is based on surgery for potentially resectable tumors. Chemotherapy and chemo-radiotherapy is the treatment of choice when surgery is not amenable, however it has not achieved encouraging results. These patients use to have very few symptoms, which is the reason for the delay in diagnosis and the poor prognosis. They frequently develop biliary obstruction： obstructive jaundice, right upper quadrant pain and weight loss. Ampullary carcinomas are frequently related to steatorrhea due to malabsorption. The most effective chemotherapy drugs used in monotherapy are 5FU （response rate 20%） and gemcitabine （response rate of 13%-60%）, so they have been selected for further development in multiple phase II clinical trials to explore their efficacy and safety in combination with other agents. In a phase III clinical trial, combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin has been selected as the schedule of choice. Target therapies are also being developed in this malignancy. The present work reviews the most current knowledge of the pathogenesis, diagnosis and natural history of biliary tract tumors. Further, review of surgery, current adjuvant treatment and therapies for unresectable and advanced disease is provided. The most recent understanding for target therapies and molecular biology is also summarized.

Empirical antibiotic treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam in Patients with microbiologically-documented biliary tract infections

AIM: To report our experience with empiric antimicrobial monotherapy (piperacillin/tazobactam, of which no data are available in such specific circumstances) in microbiologically-documented infections in patients with benign and malignant conditions of the biliary tract.METHODS: Twenty-three patients, 10 with benign and 13 with malignant conditions affecting the biliary tree and microbiologically-documented infections were recruited and the efficacy of empirical antibiotic therapy was assessed.RESULTS: The two groups featured similar demographic and clinical data. Overall, the infective episodes were most due to Gram negative agents, more than 60% of such episodes (mostly in malignant conditions) were preceded by invasive instrumental maneuvers. Empirical antibiotic therapy with a single agent (piperacillin/tazobactam) was effective in more than 80% of cases. No deaths were reported following infections. CONCLUSION: An empiric therapeutic approach with piperacillin/tazobactam is highly effective in biliary tract infections due to benign or malignant conditions.

Metal stent implantation for palliation of malignant biliary obstruction-a report of 57 cases

AIMS To report the first experience in China in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction with expand- able metal stent which allows the insertion of an endo- prosthesis as large as one cm in diameter. METHODS Between April 1994 and May 1996,we implanted expandable metal stents in 57 patients with incurable malignant biliary obstruction,among whom 54 underwent endoscopic procedure and the other 3 re- ceived percutaneous transhepatic placement. RESULTS Insertion of the stent following guidewire positioning was successful in 95% of the patients. Two patients developed cholangitis after stent insertion and were successfully treated with conservative treatment. The jaundice was eliminated completely in 21 cases and markedly decreased in 23 cases within 2 weeks af- ter placement of the stent. Nine patients,however, had late cholangitis due to stent failure after a median interval of 14 days. Twenty-three cases underwent na- sobiliary transient drainage and 3 underwent plastic stent transient drainage prior to metal stent insertion. Transient drainage was believed to have the advan- tages of drainage pre-assessment and infection controlling. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that expandable metal stent is suitable for the irresectable malignant choledochal stenosis. It can eliminate the jaundice and improve the patient's life quality. To get the highest benefit,however,the indication should be strictly selected. And to get long-term patency,the proximal and distal end of the stent proceeding the tumor should be no shorter than 2cm. In the case of hilar cancer, Bismuth classification is greatly helpful for the choice of drainage site.

Interventional radiology in the management of malignant biliary obstruction

Malignant biliary obstruction is commonly due to pancreatic carcinoma,cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic disease which are often inoperable at presentation and carry a poor prognosis.Percutaneous biliary drainage and stenting provides a safe and effective method of palliation in such patients,thereby improving their quality of life.It may also be an adjunct to surgical management by improving hepatic and,indirectly,renal function before resection of the tumor.

Endoscopic stenting for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM: To analyze through meta-analyses the benefits of two types of stents in the inoperable malignant biliary obstruction.METHODS: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials(RCT) was conducted, with the last update on March 2015, using EMBASE, CINAHL(EBSCO), MEDLINE, LILACS/CENTRAL(BVS), SCOPUS, CAPES(Brazil), and gray literature. Information of the selected studies was extracted in sight of six outcomes: primarily regarding dysfunction, complication and reintervention rates; and secondarily costs, survival, and patency time. The data about characteristics of trial participants, inclusion and exclusion criteria and types of stents were also extracted. The bias was mainly assessed through the JADAD scale. This meta-analysis was registered in the PROSPERO database by the number CRD42014015078. The analysis of the absolute risk of the outcomes was performed using the software Rev Man, by computing risk differences(RD) of dichotomous variables and mean differences(MD) of continuous variables. Data on RD and MD for each primary outcome were calculated using the MantelHaenszel test and inconsistency was qualified and reported in χ2 and the Higgins method(I2). Sensitivity analysis was performed when heterogeneity was higher than 50%, a subsequent assay was done and other findings were compiled. Student's t-test was used for the comparison of weighted arithmetic means regarding secondary outcomes.RESULTS: Initial searching identified 3660 studies; 3539 were excluded through title, repetition, and/or abstract, while 121 studies were fully assessed and were excluded mainly because they did not compare self-expanding metal stents(SEMS) and plastic stents(PS), leading to thirteen RCT selected, with 13 articles and 1133 subjects meta-analyzed. The mean age was 69.5 years old, that were affected mostly by bile duct(proximal) and pancreatic tumors(distal). The preferred SEMS diameter used was the 10 mm(30 Fr) and the preferred PS diameter used was 10 Fr. In the metaanalysis, SEMS had lower overall stent dysfunction compared to PS(21.6% vs 46.8%, P < 0.00001) and fewer re-interventions(21.6% vs 56.6%, P < 0.00001), with no difference in complications(13.7% vs 15.9%, P = 0.16). In the secondary analysis, the mean survival rate was higher in the SEMS group(182 d vs 150 d, P < 0.0001), with a higher patency period(250 d vs 124 d, P < 0.0001) and a lower cost per patient(4193.98 vs 4728.65 Euros, P < 0.0985).CONCLUSION: SEMS are associated with lower stent dysfunction, lower re-intervention rates, better survival, and higher patency time. Complications and costs showed no difference.

Managing malignant biliary obstruction in pancreas cancer: Choosing the appropriate strategy

Most patients with pancreatic cancer develop malignant biliary obstruction.Treatment of obstruction is generally indicated to relieve symptoms and improve morbidity and mortality.First-line therapy consists of endoscopic biliary stent placement.Recent data comparing plastic stents to self-expanding metallic stents(SEMS)has shown improved patency with SEMS.The decision of whether to treat obstruction and the means for doing so depends on the clinical scenario.For patients with resectable disease,preoperative biliary decompression is only indicated when surgery will be delayed or complications of jaundice exist.For patients with locally advanced disease,self-expanding metal stents are superior to plastic stents for long-term patency.For patients with advanced disease,the choice of metallic or plastic stent depends on life expectancy.When endoscopic stent placement fails,percutaneous or surgical treatments are appropriate.Endoscopic therapy or surgical approach can be used to treat concomitant duodenal and biliary obstruction.

Endoscopic management of occluded metal biliary stents:Metal versus 10F plastic stents

AIM:To compare the efficacy of self-expandable metal stents(SEMSs) with 10F plastic stents(PSs) in the endoscopic management of occluded SEMSs.METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 56 patients who underwent SEMS insertion for palliation of unresectable malignant biliary obstruction between 2000 and 2007 and subsequent endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage(ERBD) with SEMS or PS for initial SEMS occlusion between 2000 and 2008.RESULTS:Subsequent ERBD with SEMS was performed in 29 patients and with PS in 27.The median time to stent occlusion after subsequent ERBD was 186 d in the SEMS group and 101 d in the PS group(P= 0.118).Overall median stent patency was 79 d for the SEMS group and 66 d for the PS group(P = 0.379).The mean number of additional biliary drainage procedures after subsequent ERBD in patients that died(n = 50) during the study period was 2.54 ± 4.12 for the SEMS group and 1.85 ± 1.95 for the PS group(P = 0.457).The mean total cost of additional biliary drainage procedures after the occlusion of subsequent SEMS or PS was $410.04 ± 692.60 for the SEMS group and $630.16 ± 671.63 for the PS group(P = 0.260).Tumor ingrowth as the cause of initial SEMS occlusion was the only factor associated with a shorter time to subsequent stent occlusion(101 d for patients with tumor ingrowth vs 268 d for patients without tumor ingrowth,P = 0.008).CONCLUSION:Subsequent ERBD with PSs offered similar patency and number of additional biliary drainage procedures compared to SEMSs in the management of occluded SEMS.

Emerging molecular targets and therapy for cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma(CCA) is a rare cancer arising from the biliary tree with a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. Recent large scale molecular characterisation studies have identified recurrent genetic alterations in CCA which may be amenable to therapeutic targeting. In this review we explore the genomic landscape of CCA and examine results from trials of molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapy in this disease. Challenges in CCA diagnosis, treatment and trial design are discussed and we reflect on future directions which may lead to improved outcomes for CCA patients.

Associations between serum uric acid and hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer:A cohort study

BACKGROUND Uric acid is the end product of purine metabolism.Previous studies have found that serum uric acid(SUA)levels are associated with the total cancer risk.However,due to the dual effect of uric acid on cancer,the relationship between the SUA levels and most specific-site cancer remains unclear.AIM To investigate the associations between the SUA levels and incidence of hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer.METHODS In this prospective cohort study,444462 participants free of cancer from the UK Biobank were included.The SUA levels were measured at baseline,and the incidence of hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer was determined by contacting the cancer registry.The hazard ratios(HRs)and 95%confidence intervals(CIs)between the SUA levels and hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer were investigated using multiple adjusted Cox regression models adjusted for potential confounders.RESULTS In total,920 participants developed liver,gallbladder,biliary tract or pancreatic cancer during a median of 6.6 yrs of follow-up.We found that the HR of pancreatic cancer in the highest SUA group was 1.77(95%CI:1.29-2.42)compared with that in the lowest group.After stratifying by gender,we further found that SUA was associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer only among the females(highest quartile vs lowest quartile HR 2.04,95%CI:1.35-3.08).Among the males,the SUA levels were positively associated with the gallbladder cancer risk(highest quartile vs lowest quartile HR 3.09,95%CI:1.28-7.46),but a U-shaped association with the liver cancer risk was observed(P-nonlinear=0.03).CONCLUSION SUA is likely to have gender-specific effects on hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer.High SUA levels are a risk factor for pancreatic cancer in females and gallbladder cancer in males.A U-shaped association with the liver cancer risk was identified.

Photodynamic therapy for middle-advanced stage upper gastrointestinal carcinomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM To determine the therapeutic effect of photodynamic therapy(PDT) for middle-advanced stage upper gastrointestinal carcinomas. METHODS We searched PubM ed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wanfang Database from inception to April 2018 for randomized controlled studies. These studies compared PDT with other palliative therapies(radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or Nd:YAG laser) and compared PDT, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy alone with PDT combined with chemotherapy/radiotherapy. In our meta-analysis, both fixed and random effects models were used to estimate the risk ratio(RR) for dichotomous outcomes(the response rate and one-year survival rate).RESULTS Ten random controlled clinical studies with 953 patients were included in the analysis. The effective rate for PDT was better than that of radiotherapy or Nd:YAG laser for the treatment of middle-advanced upper gastrointestinal carcinomas [RR = 1.36; 95% confidence interval(CI): 1.13-1.65; P = 0.001]. In addition, PDT combined with chemotherapy had significantly better efficacy and a higher one-year survival rate than PDT or chemotherapy alone(significant remission rate, RR = 1.62; 95%CI: 1.34-1.97; P < 0.00001; one-year survival rate, RR = 1.81; 95%CI: 1.13-2.89; P = 0.01).CONCLUSION PDT is a useful method for the treatment of middleadvanced stage upper gastrointestinal carcinomas. PDT combined with chemotherapy or radiotherapy can enhance its efficacy and prolong survival time.

Disease control with sunitinib in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma resistant to gemcitabine-oxaliplatin chemotherapy

Advanced cholangiocarcinoma is associated with poor prognostic survival and has limited therapeutic options available at present. The importance of angiogenesis and expression of pro-angiogenic factors in intrahepatic forms of cholangiocarcinoma suggest that therapies targeting angiogenesis might be useful for the treatment of this disease. Here we report three cases of patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma progressive after standard chemotherapy and treated with sunitinib 50 mg/d in 6-wk cycles of 4 wk on treatment followed by 2 wk off treatment(Schedule 4/2). In all three patients, sunitinib treatment was associated with a sustained disease control superior to 4 mo, patients achieving either a partial response or stable disease. A reduction in tumor size and density was observed in all cases, suggesting tumor necrosis as a result of sunitinib treatment in these patients. In addition, sunitinib was generally well tolerated and the occurrence of side effects was managed with standard medical interventions, as required. Our results suggest that sunitinib therapy maybe associated with favorable outcomes and tolerability in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Those observations contributed to launch a prospective phase Ⅱ multicenter trial investigating sunitinib in advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(SUN-CK study; NCT01718327).