Clinical Evaluation after Introduction of Stem Cell Supernatant Biocell Shot 65 by Electroporation

Objectives: The objective of this study is clinical evaluation after introduction of stem cell supernatant Biocell Shot 65 by electroporation. Background: There is a clinical report of psoriasis treatment by umbilical cord blood-derived stem cells, in which there was a beneficial result. These clinical results are the result of cord blood-derived cell growth factors. The umbilical cord blood-derived stem cell culture supernatant contains a high amount of TGF-β, PDGA, etc., and promotes wound healing. In addition, we suppose that the supernatant has the esthetic effect of improving skin condition, thus, we planned to make a clinical evaluation. However, it is difficult to set judgement criteria, and human judgement tends to be subjective. Therefore, in this study, as a new clinical evaluator, we used an AI skin diagnostic device with learning function. Methods: Stem cell culture supernatant Biocell Shot 65 was used as an introduction solution. After it was applied to the full faces of four patients, electroporation with BeBe pinocchio DM-5 SUPER DX Plus promoted infiltration deep in the keratinized layer. The patients were all healthy women in their forties. This procedure was performed every two weeks for three months. Wrinkles, fine lines around eyes, stains, pores, and 4V, which is considered as one diagnostic criteria, were evaluated at baseline and after each procedure with the skin diagnostic device HiMirror-Professional. In this study, macroscopic findings were not examined. Results: In all four patients, 4V did not change remarkably. Patient 1 showed improvement after the procedure in wrinkles, fine lines around eyes, stains, and pores. Patient 2 revealed improvement only in fine lines around eyes, but did not show improvement in other items. Patient 3 improved in wrinkles, stains, and pores only after the second procedure, but did not show improvement in the other procedures. Patient 4 improved in all items except 4V after the fourth procedure. In addition, when the mean values of all the patients were plotted and compared before and after each procedure, there was a trend toward improvements after the fifth procedure. Conclusion: In addition to application of supernatant culture to the skin, introduction of the solution to the skin by electroporation might improve stains, wrinkles, and pores. Our evaluation was performed with a facial diagnostic device three months after the start of the procedure.

Clinical evaluation of timing of endovascular embolization treatment for intracranial aneurysm

Objective To evaluate the effects of endovascular embolization treatment for intracranial aneurysms in different time. Methods The clinical data of 165 cases of ruptured intracranial aneurysm treated by endovascular treatment were analysed retrospectively. The patients were divided into 3 groups accrodding to

Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes of ses Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease After Intracoronary Stenting in Small Vessels

Background:Limited data are available for sirolimus-eluting stent(SES,Cypher)implantation in patients with coronary artery disease in small vessels.The clinical longtermoutcomes of SES in patients with coronary artery disease after intracoronary stenting in small vessels has not been yet evaluated.

Establishment and Clinical Application of Multidisciplinary Collaborative Rapid Rehabilitation Nursing Pathway in Perioperative Period of Brucellosis Spondylitis

Objective: To study the establishment and clinical application of multidisciplinary collaborative rapid rehabilitation nursing model in patients with brucellosis spondylitis during the perioperative period. Method: From January 2009 to January 2013, 39 patients diagnosed with brucellosis spondylitis were treated with focal clearance combined with posterior pedicle internal fixation. Nursing was randomly divided into 2 groups: 19 cases of routine nursing as the control group (group A);20 cases of implementation of the nursing path as the intervention group (group B). In the intervention group, analgesic nursing plan, daily activity ability training path, medication compliance and health education path were used to effectively intervene on the evaluation parameters affecting rapid recovery and clinical efficacy (VAS score, daily activity ability mastery, Oswestry disability index and medication Morisky-Green index). The nursing effect and clinical evaluation of the two groups were compared. Results: As time went by, VAS pain score, mastery of daily activity ability, Oswestry disability index and medication compliance between the two groups at the same time point were significantly different (P Conclusions: The nursing path of brucellosis spondylitis is positively correlated with rapid recovery and clinical efficacy. Compared with routine nursing, it has a significant effect on accelerating postoperative rehabilitation and clinical efficacy.

Evaluation of the Sensitivity and Specificity of the New Clinical Diagnostic and Classification Criteria for Kashin-Beck Disease,an Endemic Osteoarthritis,in China

这研究试图评估敏感和特性新临床诊断并且为用六个临床的标记的 Kashin 山涧疾病(KBD ) 的分类标准：手指的远侧的部分的屈曲，使变形的手指，扩大手指关节，弄短的手指，蹲下来，并且侏儒症。在 Linyou 县的三分之一个张全部的人口被成层的随机的采样取样。调查包括了基线特征并且临床诊断，并且新标准的敏感和特性被评估。我们鉴别 3,459 个 KBD 病人， 69 早有上演 KBD， 1,952 有的舞台我， 1,132 有的阶段 II，和 306 有的阶段 III。分类的屏蔽测试作为舞台扩大了手指关节我 KBD 与 0.978 和 0.045 的敏感和特性，分别地。分别地，弄短的手指作为阶段 II KBD 被分类，与 0.969 和 0.844 的敏感和特性，侏儒症分别地与 0.951 和 0.992 的敏感和特性作为阶段 III KBD 被分类。连续屏蔽测试表明 KBD 的新临床的分类分类阶段与 0.949， 0.945，和 0.925 的敏感和 0.967， 0.970，和 0.993 的特性我， II，和 III KBD 分别地。屏蔽测试表明扩大手指关节，弄短的手指，和侏儒症是为有高敏感和特性的 KBD 的临床的诊断和分类的适当标记。

Prospects for the future of clinical efficacy evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine——Emphasis on original theory and clinical practice

Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)clinical efficacy evaluation runs through the development of TCM and has been progressing so far.With the introduction of evidence-based medicine(EBM)in recent 20 years,TCM clinical efficacy evaluation has developed rapidly,accumulated research and experience,improved the quality and standardization of research,but also gradually found deep-seated deficiencies.In 2019,the China Center for Evidence-based Traditional Chinese Medicine(CCEBTCM)was established,and TCM was included in the 11th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases(ICD-11).In above opportunities for TCM clinical efficacy evaluation,it is necessary to face up to the previous deficiencies,so that the TCM clinical efficacy evaluation can truly reflect the actual clinical practice characteristics,including TCM clinical problems,TCM thinking and TCM diagnosis&treatment mode.Based on the summary and analysis of past research,development concepts are proposed in this article.On the one hand,original concepts of TCM should be confidently paid more attention to the design and implementation of TCM clinical efficacy evaluation to be close to TCM clinical practice.On the other hand,it is necessary to consolidate the foundation of TCM clinical practice before evaluating efficacy.Evaluated object built on TCM ontology knowledge should be demonstrated based on clinical practice,and unknown evaluated object combined with new methods,technologies and concepts should be maturely integrated in clinical practice firstly.

Attitudes of Nursing Faculty Members and Graduates towards the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the attitudes of faculty and graduates of college of nursing towards Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) as a valid and reliable method of clinical competency assessment in nursing ten years after its inception. Core nursing courses are based on instructional teaching methods and “hands-on” approach to impact cognitive, psychomotor skills and clinical judgments. Different clinical competency assessment methods are used globally;however, most of them are subjective. A descriptive survey using 16-item five-point likert scale questionnaire was conducted. The study sample consisted of 140 participants: 20 faculty members, 27 graduates of the Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) Degree and 93 graduates of the Associate Degree of Nursing (ADN) programs with OSCE experience during their training. Data collection was carried out between October and November 2015. Eighty percent of faculty members, 74% of BSN and 62.3% of ADN graduates agreed that OSCE represented an objective evaluation method for psychomotor skills. Majority of the graduates perceived their OSCE experience positively although stressful. However, they have suggested the introduction of trial/mock OSCE prior to each exam to minimize the stress associated with it. In conclusion, there appears to be no single “gold-standard” assessment tool for clinical competency. OSCE assesses student nurses’ psychomotor skills in a non-clinical environment, therefore without risks to real patients. In combination with other assessment methods in the clinical settings, OSCE will provide a more comprehensive student psychomotor skill evaluation. OSCE experiences gave new nursing graduates confidence to work as registered nurses in health care settings.

Status and Development Trend of Evaluation of Post-Marketing Traditional Chinese Medicines in China

Evaluation of traditional Chinese medicines after the market has achieved fruitful results after years of development.The real-world research concept has been first proposed by Chief Researcher Xie Yanming in 2010 and to 2020 with the approval of the National Medical Products Administration to use real-world evidence to support drug development and review in 2020.Real-world data application and transformation continue to cause heated discussions in the industry.Real-world research concepts have been added new motivation into the evaluation of Chinese medicines after they are marketed.The development of the Chinese patent medicine industry is facing unprecedented opportunities and challenges.

A comprehensive review of research progress in Chinese medicines for primary liver cancer treatment

Primary liver cancer seriously threatens human health,affects the quality of life,and has a high mortality rate.Traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)has long been used in the prevention,treatment,and adjuvant treatment of primary liver cancer.Clinical trials were conducted in recent years to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCM.The mechanism of action of TCM in primary liver cancer treatment also received extensive attention.This study summarizes the common monomial Chinese herbal medicines and their components,formulae,and the proprietary Chinese medicines used to treat primary liver cancer.Common medicines include Chansu(Bufonis venenum),Kushen(Sophorae flavescentis radix),Renshen(Ginseng radix et rhizoma),and Jianghuang(Curcumae longae rhizoma).This study also reviewed the literature on liver cancer treatment using TCM.The results confirmed the safety and efficacy of TCM in liver cancer treatment.The possible mechanisms involved are also listed,including influencing the cell cycle,inducing cancer cell apoptosis and autophagy,inhibiting cancer cell angiogenesis and metastasis,regenerating the microenvironment and DNA methylation,and regulating the innate immune response.For primary liver cancer patients who often have a long disease course,Chinese herbal medicine often plays a role in protecting and conditioning the body.Research aimed at finding more traditional Chinese herbal medicines and their mechanisms of action should be promoted.This study aimed to provide a scientific reference for further research and the rational clinical application of TCM for primary liver cancer treatment.

Meta-analyses in the wonderl and of neurology

Meta-analyses are often misused and underused in neurology. This editorial provides some comments on the role of meta-analyses in neurological research.Recently, a huge increase in the number of metaanalyses and systematic reviews has been observed in neurological journals. The major strengths of metaanalyses are the increase of statistical power. However, as for any other investigative tool, meta-analytic research is a research method itself which can produce severe shortcomings. Specifically, the issues of search terms, time periods of published studies, databases used for searching, the definitions of inclusion and exclusion criteria for papers(which greatly affect clinical heterogeneity), publication bias; and the statistical methods used, dramatically influence the results of metaanalyses. The main problem of meta-analyses is that they cannot be expected to overcome the limitations of the studies they include(the so-called "garbage in,garbage out" phenomenon). Furthermore, most systematic reviews in the neurological literature lead to the unsatisfying and clinically frustrating statement "further studies are needed". However it is much more frustrating to see how the gaps in scientific knowledge identified by meta-analyses have not been translated into serious efforts to fill them. Besides their role in evaluating efficacy and tolerability of drugs, meta-analyses may be used to assess diagnostic values of debatable clinical findings, as they represent powerful tools to try to answer questions not posed by individual studies and to settle controversies arising from conflicting claims.

Posturodynamic 6 Test: A New Scoring Method for Effective Communication of Results

Background: Posturodynamic 6 (PDN-6) is a clinical assessment of posture that merges the Clinical Posturodynamic Test and the Pelvic Maintain Test. Current scoring system does not fulfill all our needs and requirements mostly because the same numeric score might reflect 28 different possible combinations of postural dysfunction in terms of anatomic region and laterality. Objective: We propose a new scoring method for the PDN-6 that would not change the clinical methods for the PDN-6 assessment. Specifically, new scoring method would clearly indicate specific patterns of postural dysfunction while still enabling statistical analyses. Methods: We developed a new scoring method for the PDN-6 without changing the instrument’s clinical procedures. We qualitatively assessed the validity of the new scoring system to detail specific patterns of postural dysfunction in terms of anatomic region and laterality. Results: New scoring method successfully deals with limitations of the previous scoring method. The new method enables clinicians to differentiate among 2 or more patients who might have very different patterns of postural dysfunction while still having the same numeric score using the previous scoring. The new scoring method provides quantitative data that are easily translated in terms of anatomic region and laterality for the postural dysfunctions that are present. Patient behavioral improvements are quantified, documented and interpreted with a change in score, and the exact nature of the improvements can be determined in terms of anatomic location and laterality. Rash analyses can also be used for statistical analyses. Conclusion: PDN-6 new scoring method provides quantitative data that provide more specific information about a patient’s postural deficits and any changes in their postural dysfunction over time without changing the clinical assessment methods.