Unraveling the efficacy network: A network meta-analysis of adjuvant external beam radiation therapy methods after hepatectomy

BACKGROUND Primary liver cancer is a malignant tumor with a high recurrence rate that significantly affects patient prognosis.Postoperative adjuvant external radiation therapy(RT)has been shown to effectively prevent recurrence after liver cancer resection.However,there are multiple RT techniques available,and the differ-ential effects of these techniques in preventing postoperative liver cancer re-currence require further investigation.AIM To assess the advantages and disadvantages of various adjuvant external RT methods after liver resection based on overall survival(OS)and disease-free survival(DFS)and to determine the optimal strategy.METHODS This study involved network meta-analyses and followed the PRISMA guidelines.The data of qualified studies published before July 10,2023,were collected from PubMed,Embase,the Web of Science,and the Cochrane Library.We included relevant studies on postoperative external beam RT after liver resection that had OS and DFS as the primary endpoints.The magnitudes of the effects were determined using risk ratios with 95%confidential intervals.The results were analyzed using R software and STATA software.RESULTS A total of 12 studies,including 1265 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC)after liver resection,were included in this study.There was no significant heterogeneity in the direct paired comparisons,and there were no significant differences in the inclusion or exclusion criteria,intervention measures,or outcome indicators,meeting the assumptions of heterogeneity and transitivity.OS analysis revealed that patients who underwent stereotactic body radiotherapy(SBRT)after resection had longer OS than those who underwent intensity modulated radiotherapy(IMRT)or 3-dimensional conformal RT(3D-CRT).DFS analysis revealed that patients who underwent 3D-CRT after resection had the longest DFS.Patients who underwent IMRT after resection had longer OS than those who underwent 3D-CRT and longer DFS than those who underwent SBRT.CONCLUSION HCC patients who undergo liver cancer resection must consider distinct advantages and disadvantages when choosing between SBRT and 3D-CRT.IMRT,a RT technique that is associated with longer OS than 3D-CRT and longer DFS than SBRT,may be a preferred option.

Outcomes of External-Beam Radiation Therapy Boost with Conventional Fractionation in Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis about 133 Cases

Introduction: External-beam radiation therapy boost is a treatment option in cervical cancer when brachytherapy is not feasible. Though less effective than brachytherapy, some encouraging results have been reported from some institutions experiences. We conducted this study to assess outcomes of EBRT boost for our patients at National Institute of Oncology in Rabat. Patients and Methods: We collected data from patients treated for cervical cancer between January 2012 and December 2015. Patients, tumor and treatment characteristics were collected. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and prognostic factors influencing DFS were assessed. Results: One hundred and thirty-three patients were enrolled. Median age was 52 years. Patient haemoglobin level ranged from 3.9 to 15.5 g/dl [mean: 11.2 g/dl]. Most tumors were classified stage III/IVA (63.2%) according to the FIGO classification. Regional lymph node metastases (pelvic and or para-aortic) were observed in 45.1%. Median total dose to tumor was 69.6 Gy (ranging from 66 to 70 Gy). Overall treatment time was protracted, with a median of 60 days. Most of patients received concurrent chemotherapy (94.7%) and the number of cycle ranged from 2 to 7 (median = 5). The follow-up median was 31.3 months, ranging from 6.2 to 96.8 months. At the first visit, most patients achieved complete response (80.5%). Five years OS and DFS were 47% and 44% respectively. In univariate and multivariate analysis, regional lymph nodes metastasis (presence or absence) and haemoglobin level (≤11 g/dl and >11 g/dl) were the two significant and independent prognostic factors influencing DFS (HR: 1.86;p = 0.01 for the former) (HR: 0.59;p = 0.03 for the latter). Conclusion: Our study showed that EBRT boost in conventional fractionation was an acceptable treatment option for cervical cancer unamenable to brachytherapy, especially in the two subgroups of patients that are those without pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastasis and those with haemoglobin level above 11 g/dl.

Application of Statistical Process Control for Setting Action Thresholds as Quality Assurance of Dose Verifications in External Beam Radiotherapy

Purpose: To test the concept of Statistical Process Control (SPC) as a Quality Assurance (QA) procedure for dose verifications in external beam radiation therapy in conventional and 3D Conformal Radiotherapy (3D-CRT) treatment of cervical cancer. Materials and Methods: A study of QA verification of target doses of 198 cervical cancer patients undergoing External Beam Radiotherapy (EBRT) treatments at two different cancer treatment centers in Kenya was conducted. The target doses were determined from measured entrance doses by the diode in vivo dosimetry. Process Behavior Charts (PBC) developed by SPC were applied for setting Action Thresholds (AT) on the target doses. The AT set was then proposed as QA limits for acceptance or rejection of verified target doses overtime of the EBRT process. Result and Discussion: Target doses for the 198 patients were calculated and SPC applied to test whether the action limits set by the Process Behavior Charts could be applied as QA for verified doses in EBRT. Results for the two sub-groups of n = 3 and n = 4 that were tested produced action thresholds which are within clinical dose specifications for both conventional AP/PA and 3D-CRT EBRT treatment techniques for cervical cancer. Conclusion: Action thresholds set by SPC were within the clinical dose specification of ±5% uncertainty for both conventional AP/PA and 3D-CRT EBRT treatment techniques for cervical cancer. So the concept of SPC could be applied in setting QA action limits for dose verifications in EBRT.

Accelerated partial breast irradiation:Current evidence and future developments

Whole breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer has become one of the standard treatment modes for breast cancer and yields the same effect as radical surgery.Accelerated partial breast irradiation(APBI)as a substitute for whole breast irradiation for patients with early breast cancer is a hot spot in clinical research.APBI is characterised by simple high-dose local irradiation of the tumour bed in a short time,thus improving convenience for patients and saving costs.The implementation methods of APBI mainly include brachytherapy,external beam radiation therapy,and intraoperative radiotherapy.This review provides an overview of the clinical effects and adverse reactions of the main technologies of APBI and discusses the prospects for the future development of APBI.

Efficacy and safety of intraoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND In recent years,intraoperative radiotherapy(IORT)has been increasingly used for the treatment of rectal cancer.However,the efficacy and safety of IORT for the treatment of rectal cancer are still controversial.AIM To evaluate the value of IORT for patients with rectal cancer.METHODS We searched PubMed,Embase,Cochrane Library,Web of Science databases,and conference abstracts and included randomized controlled trials and observational studies on IORT vs non-IORT for rectal cancer.Dichotomous variables were evaluated by odds ratio(OR)and 95%confidence interval(CI),hazard ratio(HR)and 95%CI was used as a summary statistic of survival outcomes.Statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.15.0 and Review Manager 5.3 software.RESULTS In this study,3 randomized controlled studies and 12 observational studies were included with a total of 1460 patients,who are mainly residents of Europe,the United States,and Asia.Our results did not show significant differences in 5-year overall survival(HR=0.80,95%CI=0.60-1.06;P=0.126);5-year disease-free survival(HR=0.94,95%CI=0.73-1.22;P=0.650);abscess(OR=1.10,95%CI=0.67-1.80;P=0.713),fistulae(OR=0.79,95%CI=0.33-1.89;P=0.600);wound complication(OR=1.21,95%CI=0.62-2.36;P=0.575);anastomotic leakage(OR=1.09,95%CI=0.59-2.02;P=0.775);and neurogenic bladder dysfunction(OR=0.69,95%CI=0.31-1.55;P=0.369).However,the meta-analysis of 5-year local control was significantly different(OR=3.07,95%CI=1.66-5.66;P=0.000).CONCLUSION The advantage of IORT is mainly reflected in 5-year local control,but it is not statistically significant for 5-year overall survival,5-year disease-free survival,and complications.

Salvage treatments for prostate-specific antigen relapse of cT3N0M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma after radical prostatectomy combined with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation

Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficiency of salvage treatments for prostate specific antigen(PSA)relapse of cT3N0M0 prostatic adenocarcinoma(PCa)after radical prostatectomy(RP)combined with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation(ADT).Methods A total of 332 patients with cT3N0M0 PCa were enrolled in the prospective study and received RP and pelvic lymph node dissection with neoadjuvant ADT for 3 months.All patients with PSA relapse were treated with salvage external beam radiation therapy(RT)and ADT for 6 months.Results The 5-year postoperative PSA relapse rate was 40.96%(136/332).The patients have been divided into the PSA relapse and PSA relapse-free groups in order to compare patient characteristics.The ratio of patients with Gleason score≥8 and positive surgical margin in the PSA relapse group were significantly higher than those of in the PSA relapse-free group(P=0.01).The mean duration between the start of operative treatment and PSA relapse was 31 months.Salvage treatment to all 136 PSA relapse patients led to favorable outcomes.PSA relapse was not observed after salvage treatment by the end of follow-up.The 5-year overall survival rates of the PSA relapse and PSA relapse-free groups were 94.9%and 93.9%,respectively.Conclusion In pursuit of curative treatment,our study showed that RP combined with neoadjuvant ADT is an aggressive multimodality strategy associated with lower PSA relapse and better survival outcomes for stage cT3N0M0 PCa patients.Patients with PSA relapse after RP may benefit from early aggressive salvage RT combined with short-term ADT.

Assessing keloid recurrence following surgical excision and radiation

Keloids are a fibroproliferative disorder that can result from a cutaneous injury to the reticular dermis.Recurrence rates as high as 100%have been reported following surgical excision alone.Consequently,a variety of post-surgical techniques have been employed to prevent keloid recurrence,including the use of radiation.Although numerous studies have shown post-excisional X-rays,electron beam,lasers and brachytherapy can reduce the rate of keloid recurrence,numerous inconsistencies,including a wide range of definitions for keloid recurrence,make it difficult to compare study outcomes.The review aims to examine the various means for defining keloid recurrence in clinical trials involving the use of radiation therapy.Searches of the Cochrane Library and PubMed were performed to identify the available information for post-surgical keloid recurrence following radiation therapy.Each identified study was reviewed for patient followup and criteria used to define keloid recurrence.The search results included clinical studies with external beam radiation,brachytherapy and superficial radiation therapy.Many studies did not include a definition of keloid recurrence,or defined recurrence only as the return of scar tissue.Other studies defined keloid recurrence based on patient self-assessment questionnaires,symptoms and scar elevation and changes in Kyoto Scar Scale,Japan Scar Workshop Scale and Vancouver Scar Scale scores.The results of this review indicate keloidectomy followed by radiation therapy provide satisfactory recurrence rates;however,clinical studies evaluating these treatments do not describe treatment outcomes or use different definitions of keloid recurrence.Consequently,recurrence rates vary widely,making comparisons across studies difficult.Keloid recurrence should be clearly defined using both objective and subjective measures.