目的观察中医经筋手法结合运动疗法对小儿痉挛型脑瘫运动及步行能力的影响。方法选取2021年1月—2022年6月期间湖南省儿童医院收治的127例痉挛型脑瘫患儿为研究对象,以单纯随机抽样法分为对照组63例和观察组64例。对照组给予常规对症治...目的观察中医经筋手法结合运动疗法对小儿痉挛型脑瘫运动及步行能力的影响。方法选取2021年1月—2022年6月期间湖南省儿童医院收治的127例痉挛型脑瘫患儿为研究对象,以单纯随机抽样法分为对照组63例和观察组64例。对照组给予常规对症治疗和运动疗法,观察组在对照组基础上联合中医经筋手法治疗。治疗3个月后,观察比较两组患儿临床疗效,治疗前后改良Ashworth痉挛量表(Modified Ashworth Scale,MAS)评分、精细运动功能评定量表(Peabody developmental motor scale,PDMS-2)评分、粗大运动功能评定量表(Gross Motor Function Measure,GMFM)评分和步行能力。结果治疗后观察组临床总有效率93.75%(60/64)高于对照组80.95%(51/63),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗1、2、3个月后两组患儿MAS评分均较治疗前下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患儿抓握能力、视觉运动能力评分均较治疗前升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患儿抓握能力、视觉运动能力评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后两组患儿GMFM行走和跑跳、站立位、坐位、爬与跪位、卧位与翻身评分均较治疗前升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组站立位、坐位、爬与跪位评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患儿跨步长、1 min步行距离较治疗前增加,步宽、10 m步行时间较治疗前减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组跨步长、1 min步行距离长于对照组,步宽、10 m步行时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论中医经筋手法联合运动疗法治疗痉挛性脑瘫患儿疗效较好,有利于减轻肌张力、缓解肌肉痉挛状态,可提高粗大运动功能,具有较好的应用价值。展开更多
Paraplegic gait orthosis has been shown to help paraplegic patients stand and walk, although this method cannot be individualized for patients with different spinal cord injuries and functional recovery of the lower e...Paraplegic gait orthosis has been shown to help paraplegic patients stand and walk, although this method cannot be individualized for patients with different spinal cord injuries and functional recovery of the lower extremities. There is, however, a great need to develop individualized paraplegic orthosis to improve overall quality of life for paraplegic patients. In the present study, 36 spinal cord（below T4） injury patients were equally and randomly divided into control and observation groups. The control group received systematic rehabilitation training, including maintenance of joint range of motion, residual muscle strength training, standing training, balance training, and functional electrical stimulation. The observation group received an individualized paraplegic locomotion brace and functional training according to the various spinal cord injury levels and muscle strength based on comprehensive systematic rehabilitation training. After 3 months of rehabilitation training, the observation group achieved therapeutic locomotion in 8 cases, family-based locomotion in 7 cases, and community-based locomotion in 3 cases. However, locomotion was not achieved in any of the control group patients. These findings suggest that individualized paraplegic braces significantly improve activity of daily living and locomotion in patients with thoracolumbar spinal cord injury.展开更多
文摘目的观察中医经筋手法结合运动疗法对小儿痉挛型脑瘫运动及步行能力的影响。方法选取2021年1月—2022年6月期间湖南省儿童医院收治的127例痉挛型脑瘫患儿为研究对象,以单纯随机抽样法分为对照组63例和观察组64例。对照组给予常规对症治疗和运动疗法,观察组在对照组基础上联合中医经筋手法治疗。治疗3个月后,观察比较两组患儿临床疗效,治疗前后改良Ashworth痉挛量表(Modified Ashworth Scale,MAS)评分、精细运动功能评定量表(Peabody developmental motor scale,PDMS-2)评分、粗大运动功能评定量表(Gross Motor Function Measure,GMFM)评分和步行能力。结果治疗后观察组临床总有效率93.75%(60/64)高于对照组80.95%(51/63),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗1、2、3个月后两组患儿MAS评分均较治疗前下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患儿抓握能力、视觉运动能力评分均较治疗前升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患儿抓握能力、视觉运动能力评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后两组患儿GMFM行走和跑跳、站立位、坐位、爬与跪位、卧位与翻身评分均较治疗前升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组站立位、坐位、爬与跪位评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后两组患儿跨步长、1 min步行距离较治疗前增加,步宽、10 m步行时间较治疗前减少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且观察组跨步长、1 min步行距离长于对照组,步宽、10 m步行时间短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论中医经筋手法联合运动疗法治疗痉挛性脑瘫患儿疗效较好,有利于减轻肌张力、缓解肌肉痉挛状态,可提高粗大运动功能,具有较好的应用价值。
文摘Paraplegic gait orthosis has been shown to help paraplegic patients stand and walk, although this method cannot be individualized for patients with different spinal cord injuries and functional recovery of the lower extremities. There is, however, a great need to develop individualized paraplegic orthosis to improve overall quality of life for paraplegic patients. In the present study, 36 spinal cord（below T4） injury patients were equally and randomly divided into control and observation groups. The control group received systematic rehabilitation training, including maintenance of joint range of motion, residual muscle strength training, standing training, balance training, and functional electrical stimulation. The observation group received an individualized paraplegic locomotion brace and functional training according to the various spinal cord injury levels and muscle strength based on comprehensive systematic rehabilitation training. After 3 months of rehabilitation training, the observation group achieved therapeutic locomotion in 8 cases, family-based locomotion in 7 cases, and community-based locomotion in 3 cases. However, locomotion was not achieved in any of the control group patients. These findings suggest that individualized paraplegic braces significantly improve activity of daily living and locomotion in patients with thoracolumbar spinal cord injury.
