Bone graft substitutes are widely used in the field of orthopedics and are extensively used to promote vertebral fusion. Fusion is the most common technique in spine surgery and is used to treat morbidities and reliev...Bone graft substitutes are widely used in the field of orthopedics and are extensively used to promote vertebral fusion. Fusion is the most common technique in spine surgery and is used to treat morbidities and relieve discomfort. Allograft and autograft bone substitutes are currently the most commonly used bone grafts to promote fusion. These approaches pose limitations and present complications to the patient. Numerous alternative bone graft substitutes are on the market or have been developed and proposed for application. These options have attempted to promote spine fusion by enhancing osteogenic properties. In this review, we reviewed biology of spine fusion and the current advances in biomedical materials and biological strategies for application in surgical spine fusion. Our findings illustrate that, while many bone graft substitutes perform well as bone graft extenders, only osteoinductive proteins(recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins-2 and osteogenic protein-1) provide evidence for use as both bone enhancers and bone substitutes for specific types of spinal fusion. Tissue engineered hydrogels, synthetic polymer composites and viral based gene therapy also holds the potential to be used for spine fusion in future, though warrants further investigation to be used in clinical practice.展开更多
Introduction: In this paper we investigate the possible connection between socioeconomic status as demarcated by employment and in-surance status and consumption of healthcare resources in spine surgery patients. Meth...Introduction: In this paper we investigate the possible connection between socioeconomic status as demarcated by employment and in-surance status and consumption of healthcare resources in spine surgery patients. Methods: The clinical records of 1599 spine surgery pa-tients counted from 2008-2009 were reviewed. The largest groups of patients belonged to MS-DRG 460 (N = 585) and to MS-DRG 473 (N = 700). These two MS-DRG patient groups were used as the study cohort representing patients who, by definition, did not have serious comor-bidities or complications. Results: Unemployed non-cervical patients tended to stay on average 1.8 days longer in hospital and had on average $5800 higher hospital charges. No major differ-ences were noted in length of stay and hospital cost between government and private insurance patients. However, self-pay non-cervical fusion patients had notable increases in length of stay and hospital cost, especially in the >39 and <60 age group with the difference in length of stay amounting to 5 days and in hospital charges to $10,000. Univariate analysis with DRG (460 or 473) as a covariate showed significant impact from employment status on length of stay (F = 4.259, P = 0.014) and less significant impact from payor category on hospital charges (F = 2.229, P = 0.064) in the economically-productive 40 -59 age group. Conclusions: In general, no increase in hospital resource consumption was noted except among self-pay patients, the same group seemingly least able to afford expensive healthcare.展开更多
Due to matching biomechanical properties and significant biological activity,Mg-based implants present great potential in orthopedic applications.In recent years,the biocompatibility and therapeutic effect of magnesiu...Due to matching biomechanical properties and significant biological activity,Mg-based implants present great potential in orthopedic applications.In recent years,the biocompatibility and therapeutic effect of magnesiumbased implants have been widely investigated in trauma repair.In contrast,the R&D work of Mg-based implants in spinal fusion is still limited.This review firstly introduced the general background for Mg-based implants.Secondly,the mechanical properties and degradation behaviors of Mg and its traditional and novel alloys were reviewed.Then,different surface modification techniques of Mg-based implants were described.Thirdly,this review comprehensively summarized the biological pathways of Mg degradation to promote bone formation in neuro-musculoskeletal circuit,angiogenesis with H-type vessel formation,osteogenesis with osteoblasts activation and chondrocyte ossification as an integrated system.Fourthly,this review followed the translation process of Mg-based implants via updating the preclinical studies in fracture fixation,sports trauma repair and reconstruction,and bone distraction for large bone defect.Furthermore,the pilot clinical studies were involved to demonstrate the reliable clinical safety and satisfactory bioactive effects of Mg-based implants in bone formation.Finally,this review introduced the background of spine fusion surgeryand the challenges of biological matching cage development.At last,this review prospected the translation potential of a hybrid Mg-PEEK spine fusion cage design.展开更多
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis （AIS） is one of the most prevalent diseases among teenagers, with an incidence rate of 1-3% worldwide, and at least 0.02% of patients require surgical treatment. The ＂gold standard＂...Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis （AIS） is one of the most prevalent diseases among teenagers, with an incidence rate of 1-3% worldwide, and at least 0.02% of patients require surgical treatment. The ＂gold standard＂ procedure is instrumentation and fusion of 10 or more vertebrae with forceful correction of the deformity.Although autogenous bone grafts are the ＂gold standard＂ for spine fusion, significant progress has been made in discovering bone graft alternatives, including freeze-dried allograft, demineralized bone matrix （DBM）, triosite ceramics, and bone marrow aspirate （BMA）, which have been used as substitutes for iliac crest in AIS surgery.展开更多
Introduction: Lumbar fusion as low back pain treatment continues to be a challenge because of the multiple techniques and materials available, most popular techniques include Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TL...Introduction: Lumbar fusion as low back pain treatment continues to be a challenge because of the multiple techniques and materials available, most popular techniques include Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Successful lumbar fusion is associated with better clinical outcomes, and it is enhanced and targeted through the use of bone graft materials as an osteogenic cell binding peptide P-15, bound to an anorganic bone mineral (ABM). This peptide improves bone formation when used in fixation devices in a targeted and limited way to the implant surface by activating osteoblast precursor cells;by the osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive stimuli. The main objective of this study is to standardize the lumbar fusion process in the 3 techniques and achieve a more efficient and predictable lumbar fusion, evaluating results with radiological and clinical scales. Material and Methods: Patients underwent lumbar fusion with the use of P-15 Osteogenic Cell Binding Peptide, bound to an anorganic bone mineral (P-15/ABM) bone graft (5 cc) in three different techniques (TLIF, LLIF, ALIF), achieving a total of 100 lumbar levels. Radiological outcomes included fusion rates per Hounsfield Units at computed tomography (CT) scan and Lenke scale. Clinical outcomes were evaluated via the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form Performance (SPF-36) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS and VASs) for pain and satisfaction. Results: 67 patients completed the 12 months follow-up, showing no differences in fusion rates between techniques. (Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units) CTHU reaches more than 200 UH at 3 months follow-up and continues fusion process till 12-month follow-up. Clinical scales showed no disability at ODI, improvement at VAS and VASs scales, absence of health restrictions at SPF-36 score since 6 months follow up. Conclusion: Bone graft volume of 5 cc is adequate for achieving successful lumbar fusion, regardless of the surgical technique employed.展开更多
Bone morphogenetic proteins are osteoinductive factors which have gained popularity in orthopaedicsurgery and especially in spine surgery. The use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 has been officially ...Bone morphogenetic proteins are osteoinductive factors which have gained popularity in orthopaedicsurgery and especially in spine surgery. The use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 has been officially approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration only for single level anterior lumbar interbody fusion, nevertheless it is widely used by many surgeons with off-label indications. Despite advantages in bone formation, its use still remains a controversial issue and several complications have been described by authors who oppose their wide use.展开更多
Not restoring the adequate lumbar lordosis during lumbar fusion surgery may result in mechanical low back pain, sagittal unbalance and adjacent segment degeneration. The objective of this work is to describe the curre...Not restoring the adequate lumbar lordosis during lumbar fusion surgery may result in mechanical low back pain, sagittal unbalance and adjacent segment degeneration. The objective of this work is to describe the current strategies and concepts for restoration of adequate lordosis during fusion surgery. Theoretical lordosis can be evaluated from the measurement of the pelvic incidence and from the analysis of spatial organization of the lumbar spine with 2/3 of the lordosis given by the L4-S1 segment and 85% by the L3-S1 segment. Technical aspects involve patient positioningon the operating table, release maneuvers, type of instrumentation used(rod, screw-rod connection, interbody cages), surgical sequence and the overall surgical strategy. Spinal osteotomies may be required in case of fixed kyphotic spine. AP combined surgery is particularly efficient in restoring lordosis at L5-S1 level and should be recommended. Finally, not one but several strategies may be used to achieve the need for restoration of adequate lordosis during fusion surgery.展开更多
The interpretation of spinal images fixed with metallic hardware forms an increasing bulk of daily practice in a busy imaging department. Radiologists are required to be familiar with the instrumentation and operative...The interpretation of spinal images fixed with metallic hardware forms an increasing bulk of daily practice in a busy imaging department. Radiologists are required to be familiar with the instrumentation and operative options used in spinal fixation and fusion procedures, especially in his or her institute. This is critical in evaluating the position of implants and potential complications associated with the operative approaches and spinal fixation devices used. Thus, the radiologist can play an important role in patient care and outcome. This review outlines the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used imaging methods and reports on the best yield for each modality and how to overcome the problematic issues associated with the presence of metallic hardware during imaging. Baseline radiographs are essential as they are the baseline point for evaluation of future studies should patients develop symptoms suggesting possible complications. They may justify further imaging workup with computed tomography, magnetic resonance and/or nuclear medicine studies as the evaluation of a patient with a spinal implant involves a multi-modality approach. This review describes imaging features of potential complications associated with spinal fusion surgery as well as the instrumentation used. This basic knowledge aims to help radiologists approach everyday practice in clinical imaging.展开更多
Back pain is a common chronic disorder that represents a large burden for the health care system. There is a broad spectrum of available treatment options for patients suffering from chronic lower back pain in the set...Back pain is a common chronic disorder that represents a large burden for the health care system. There is a broad spectrum of available treatment options for patients suffering from chronic lower back pain in the setting of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, including both conservative and operative approaches. Lumbar arthrodesis techniques can be divided into subcategories based on the part of the vertebral column that is addressed(anterior vs posterior). Furthermore, one has to differentiate between approaches aiming at a solid fusion in contrast to motion-sparing techniques with the proposed advantage of a reduced risk of developing adjacent disc disease. However, the field of application and long-term outcomes of these novel motion-preserving surgical techniques, including facet arthroplasty, nucleus replacement, and lumbar disc arthroplasty, need to be more precisely evaluated in long-term prospective studies. Innovative surgical treatment strategies involving minimally invasive techniques, such as lateral lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, as well as percutaneous implantation of transpedicular or trans-facet screws, have been established with the reported advantages of reduced tissue invasiveness, decreased collateral damage, reduced blood loss, and decreased risk of infection. The aim of this study was to review well-established procedures for lumbar spinal fusion with the main focus on current concepts on spinal arthrodesis and motion-sparing techniques in degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.展开更多
Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine is a common and increasingly prevalent condition that is often implicated as the primary reason for chronic low back pain and the leading cause of disability in the western wor...Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine is a common and increasingly prevalent condition that is often implicated as the primary reason for chronic low back pain and the leading cause of disability in the western world. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative disease has historically been approached by way of open surgical procedures aimed at decompressing and/or stabilizing the lumbar spine. Advances in technology andsurgical instrumentation have led to minimally invasive surgical techniques being developed and increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Compared to the traditional open spine surgery, minimally invasive techniques require smaller incisions and decrease approach-related morbidity by avoiding muscle crush injury by self-retaining retractors, preventing the disruption of tendon attachment sites of important muscles at the spinous processes, using known anatomic neurovascular and muscle planes, and minimizing collateral soft-tissue injury by limiting the width of the surgical corridor. The theoretical benefits of minimally invasive surgery over traditional open surgery include reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain and narcotics use, shorter hospital length of stay, faster recover and quicker return to work and normal activity. This paper describes the different minimally invasive techniques that are currently available for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.展开更多
Introduction: Surgical interventions for degenerative spondylolisthesis are varied with comparable claims of success. Fusion based technique is one of the most commonly used surgical interventions in treating this con...Introduction: Surgical interventions for degenerative spondylolisthesis are varied with comparable claims of success. Fusion based technique is one of the most commonly used surgical interventions in treating this condition. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of the Lumbar Interbody Fusion techniques (specifically Posterolateral Interbody approach—PLIF) versus Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion (PLF). The clinical outcomes investigated were: back pain, leg pain, function, Oswestery Disability Index (ODI), Disability Rating Index (DRI), fusion and revision rates if reported. Methods: Combinations of keywords and MeSH terms, where appropriate, were used to search for studies in Medline via Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google scholar. The initial search was conducted on 10 August 2016 and updated on 13 June 2017. Eligibility criteria for the studies to be selected for this meta-analysis were: Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs), cohort and consecutive cases studies that compared at PLIF versus PLF surgical interventions at the lumbar region. Heterogeneity indicators and Forest plot were computed using RevMan 5. Results: Out of the initial hits of 3021, 5 articles were selected as relevant and assessed for risk of bias and then data was extracted and tabulated. These 5 studies reported data from (900 patients’ records, follow up ranges from 6 months to 5 years) undergone one of 2 interventions (PLIF or PLF). The overall effect for ODI and leg pain showed no advantage of any intervention over the other while there was a greater odd ratio of fusion if the operation applied PLIF techniques (Overall Z = 2.86, p = 0.004). Conclusions: There is a need for more high quality clinical trials to compare these two interventions. However, available data indicate that there are comparable results in the main clinical outcomes between PLIF and PLF. PLIF has superior fusion rate which does not seem to affect post-operative pain ratings.展开更多
Surgical treatment for cervical kyphotic deformity is still controversial. Circumferential approach has been well described in the literature but long terms outcomes are not well reported. Important to decide the corr...Surgical treatment for cervical kyphotic deformity is still controversial. Circumferential approach has been well described in the literature but long terms outcomes are not well reported. Important to decide the correct treatment option is the preoperative radiological exams to value the type of deformity(flexible or fixed). We report the case of a 67-year-old woman affected by a severe cervical kyphotic deformity who underwent combined anterior/posterior surgical approach, getting a good reduction of the deformity and an optimal stability in a long term follow up.展开更多
Objective: To quantify the strength of the grafts from different body sites and determine the optimalselection of corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody fusion. Methods: Complete sets of paired freshfroze...Objective: To quantify the strength of the grafts from different body sites and determine the optimalselection of corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody fusion. Methods: Complete sets of paired freshfrozen femurs, humeri, tibias and iliac crests were obtained from 6 individual donors. One centimeter thick slicesstarting from the proximal and distal bone ends were cut from the non--diaphysial portions of the long bones usinga razor saw with a customized miter box. 2. 5 cm× 3. 0 cm × 1. 0 cm unicortical bone blocks were shaped similarlyfor clinical use as a lumbar interbody graft. Multiple 1 cm thick grafts with 1. 5 cm depth were obtained from theiliac crests, to simulate a cervical interbody graft. The left and right sides of each pair were randomized intoperpendicular and parallel cut groups in the long bones or tricortical and bicortical preparations of the iliac graft.The samples were tested on an MTS by applying a compressive load to failure. Results: The failure loads of distaltibia and femoral head grafts were significantly higher than distal femur, proximal tibia and burneral head grafts(PR0. 05). The strength of the grafts prepared by parallel cutting decreased significantly as compared with theperpendicular cutting (P <0. 05). No significant changes were seen in femoral and burneral head grafts for the 2sectioning orientations. The grafts closer to the anterior superior iliac spine had significant higher failure loads andfailure strengths than those closer to the posterior superior iliac spine. After trimming off the lateral cortex, themean strength of the bicortical grafts decreased significantly as compared with the tricortical grafts (P <0. 05).Conclusion: The grafts from femoral head and distal tibia by perpendicular cutting have higher failure load than theload bearing in lumbar spine. The grafts cut close to the anterior superior iliac spine are recommended for cervicalinterbody fusion.展开更多
A 55-year-old female was diagnosed with L5-S1 degenerative disc disease(DDD). Initial scores by the visual analogue scale(VAS) were 5(back) and 9(leg) and the Oswestry disability index(ODI) was 32. Arthroplasty was pe...A 55-year-old female was diagnosed with L5-S1 degenerative disc disease(DDD). Initial scores by the visual analogue scale(VAS) were 5(back) and 9(leg) and the Oswestry disability index(ODI) was 32. Arthroplasty was performed. Clinical and radiographic monitoring took place thereafter at one month, three months, six months and annually. At one month, VAS scores were 2(back) and 3(leg), ODI was 12 and ROM was 2.1° by radiographs. At two years, VAS scores were 1(back) and 2(leg), ODI was 6 and ROM was approaching 0. Five years after surgery, the entire operated segment(L5-S1) was solidly fused. A malpositioned disc implant may impair normal spinal movement, culminating in heterotopic ossification or complete fusion of the operated segment.展开更多
Purpose: Implant subsidence is a possible complication of spinal interbody fusion. We aim to evaluate porous titanium cages subsidence, fusion and functional outcomes in patients subjected to oblique lumbar interbody ...Purpose: Implant subsidence is a possible complication of spinal interbody fusion. We aim to evaluate porous titanium cages subsidence, fusion and functional outcomes in patients subjected to oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with these novel devices. Methods: Our institutional review board approved a single-center experience which included 60 patients who underwent OLIF from June 2018 to June 2020 utilizing the porous titanium implants. Data was collected in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained. Imaging studies including radiographs 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and computed tomography (CT) scan at 6 months obtained during routine postoperative follow-up visits, were studied for signs of implant subsidence, fusion and clinical parameters to determine the effectiveness of surgery such as Oswestry disability index (ODI). Results: Radiographic subsidence occurred in 1 out of 89 porous titanium interbody cages (1.1%). No subsidence was observed in the posterior screws and rods fixation group (N = 57). However, one case of subsidence occurred in the lateral plate fixation group (N = 3). The subsidence occurred in an osteoporotic elderly patient operated for adjacent segment disease, and she was later revised with posterior instrumentation using cemented screws and rods. She had an uneventful recovery. Fusion rates were evaluated under CT scan at 6 months with a rate of 88%. In terms of clinical outcomes, ODI decreased significantly from 20.3 preop to 10.7 postop with a P-value Conclusions: In our study, the subsidence rate was lower than previously reported in the literature. Also, we had good fusion rates at 6 months likely due to the porous titanium cages use. We had no subsidence in the posterior instrumented group and one case in the lateral fixation group with improved clinical outcomes.展开更多
文摘Bone graft substitutes are widely used in the field of orthopedics and are extensively used to promote vertebral fusion. Fusion is the most common technique in spine surgery and is used to treat morbidities and relieve discomfort. Allograft and autograft bone substitutes are currently the most commonly used bone grafts to promote fusion. These approaches pose limitations and present complications to the patient. Numerous alternative bone graft substitutes are on the market or have been developed and proposed for application. These options have attempted to promote spine fusion by enhancing osteogenic properties. In this review, we reviewed biology of spine fusion and the current advances in biomedical materials and biological strategies for application in surgical spine fusion. Our findings illustrate that, while many bone graft substitutes perform well as bone graft extenders, only osteoinductive proteins(recombinant bone morphogenetic proteins-2 and osteogenic protein-1) provide evidence for use as both bone enhancers and bone substitutes for specific types of spinal fusion. Tissue engineered hydrogels, synthetic polymer composites and viral based gene therapy also holds the potential to be used for spine fusion in future, though warrants further investigation to be used in clinical practice.
文摘Introduction: In this paper we investigate the possible connection between socioeconomic status as demarcated by employment and in-surance status and consumption of healthcare resources in spine surgery patients. Methods: The clinical records of 1599 spine surgery pa-tients counted from 2008-2009 were reviewed. The largest groups of patients belonged to MS-DRG 460 (N = 585) and to MS-DRG 473 (N = 700). These two MS-DRG patient groups were used as the study cohort representing patients who, by definition, did not have serious comor-bidities or complications. Results: Unemployed non-cervical patients tended to stay on average 1.8 days longer in hospital and had on average $5800 higher hospital charges. No major differ-ences were noted in length of stay and hospital cost between government and private insurance patients. However, self-pay non-cervical fusion patients had notable increases in length of stay and hospital cost, especially in the >39 and <60 age group with the difference in length of stay amounting to 5 days and in hospital charges to $10,000. Univariate analysis with DRG (460 or 473) as a covariate showed significant impact from employment status on length of stay (F = 4.259, P = 0.014) and less significant impact from payor category on hospital charges (F = 2.229, P = 0.064) in the economically-productive 40 -59 age group. Conclusions: In general, no increase in hospital resource consumption was noted except among self-pay patients, the same group seemingly least able to afford expensive healthcare.
基金supported by Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project(Z201100005520073)Key Clinical projects of Peking University Third hospital(BYSY2022064)+1 种基金China Postdoctoral Science Foundation(M2023740146)National Natural Science Foundation of China(82302731).
文摘Due to matching biomechanical properties and significant biological activity,Mg-based implants present great potential in orthopedic applications.In recent years,the biocompatibility and therapeutic effect of magnesiumbased implants have been widely investigated in trauma repair.In contrast,the R&D work of Mg-based implants in spinal fusion is still limited.This review firstly introduced the general background for Mg-based implants.Secondly,the mechanical properties and degradation behaviors of Mg and its traditional and novel alloys were reviewed.Then,different surface modification techniques of Mg-based implants were described.Thirdly,this review comprehensively summarized the biological pathways of Mg degradation to promote bone formation in neuro-musculoskeletal circuit,angiogenesis with H-type vessel formation,osteogenesis with osteoblasts activation and chondrocyte ossification as an integrated system.Fourthly,this review followed the translation process of Mg-based implants via updating the preclinical studies in fracture fixation,sports trauma repair and reconstruction,and bone distraction for large bone defect.Furthermore,the pilot clinical studies were involved to demonstrate the reliable clinical safety and satisfactory bioactive effects of Mg-based implants in bone formation.Finally,this review introduced the background of spine fusion surgeryand the challenges of biological matching cage development.At last,this review prospected the translation potential of a hybrid Mg-PEEK spine fusion cage design.
基金grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China，Shanghai Natural Science Foundation，Youth Project of Shanghai Municipal Health and Family Planning Commission
文摘Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis （AIS） is one of the most prevalent diseases among teenagers, with an incidence rate of 1-3% worldwide, and at least 0.02% of patients require surgical treatment. The ＂gold standard＂ procedure is instrumentation and fusion of 10 or more vertebrae with forceful correction of the deformity.Although autogenous bone grafts are the ＂gold standard＂ for spine fusion, significant progress has been made in discovering bone graft alternatives, including freeze-dried allograft, demineralized bone matrix （DBM）, triosite ceramics, and bone marrow aspirate （BMA）, which have been used as substitutes for iliac crest in AIS surgery.
文摘Introduction: Lumbar fusion as low back pain treatment continues to be a challenge because of the multiple techniques and materials available, most popular techniques include Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF). Successful lumbar fusion is associated with better clinical outcomes, and it is enhanced and targeted through the use of bone graft materials as an osteogenic cell binding peptide P-15, bound to an anorganic bone mineral (ABM). This peptide improves bone formation when used in fixation devices in a targeted and limited way to the implant surface by activating osteoblast precursor cells;by the osteogenic, osteoinductive and osteoconductive stimuli. The main objective of this study is to standardize the lumbar fusion process in the 3 techniques and achieve a more efficient and predictable lumbar fusion, evaluating results with radiological and clinical scales. Material and Methods: Patients underwent lumbar fusion with the use of P-15 Osteogenic Cell Binding Peptide, bound to an anorganic bone mineral (P-15/ABM) bone graft (5 cc) in three different techniques (TLIF, LLIF, ALIF), achieving a total of 100 lumbar levels. Radiological outcomes included fusion rates per Hounsfield Units at computed tomography (CT) scan and Lenke scale. Clinical outcomes were evaluated via the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form Performance (SPF-36) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS and VASs) for pain and satisfaction. Results: 67 patients completed the 12 months follow-up, showing no differences in fusion rates between techniques. (Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units) CTHU reaches more than 200 UH at 3 months follow-up and continues fusion process till 12-month follow-up. Clinical scales showed no disability at ODI, improvement at VAS and VASs scales, absence of health restrictions at SPF-36 score since 6 months follow up. Conclusion: Bone graft volume of 5 cc is adequate for achieving successful lumbar fusion, regardless of the surgical technique employed.
文摘Bone morphogenetic proteins are osteoinductive factors which have gained popularity in orthopaedicsurgery and especially in spine surgery. The use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 has been officially approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration only for single level anterior lumbar interbody fusion, nevertheless it is widely used by many surgeons with off-label indications. Despite advantages in bone formation, its use still remains a controversial issue and several complications have been described by authors who oppose their wide use.
文摘Not restoring the adequate lumbar lordosis during lumbar fusion surgery may result in mechanical low back pain, sagittal unbalance and adjacent segment degeneration. The objective of this work is to describe the current strategies and concepts for restoration of adequate lordosis during fusion surgery. Theoretical lordosis can be evaluated from the measurement of the pelvic incidence and from the analysis of spatial organization of the lumbar spine with 2/3 of the lordosis given by the L4-S1 segment and 85% by the L3-S1 segment. Technical aspects involve patient positioningon the operating table, release maneuvers, type of instrumentation used(rod, screw-rod connection, interbody cages), surgical sequence and the overall surgical strategy. Spinal osteotomies may be required in case of fixed kyphotic spine. AP combined surgery is particularly efficient in restoring lordosis at L5-S1 level and should be recommended. Finally, not one but several strategies may be used to achieve the need for restoration of adequate lordosis during fusion surgery.
文摘The interpretation of spinal images fixed with metallic hardware forms an increasing bulk of daily practice in a busy imaging department. Radiologists are required to be familiar with the instrumentation and operative options used in spinal fixation and fusion procedures, especially in his or her institute. This is critical in evaluating the position of implants and potential complications associated with the operative approaches and spinal fixation devices used. Thus, the radiologist can play an important role in patient care and outcome. This review outlines the advantages and disadvantages of commonly used imaging methods and reports on the best yield for each modality and how to overcome the problematic issues associated with the presence of metallic hardware during imaging. Baseline radiographs are essential as they are the baseline point for evaluation of future studies should patients develop symptoms suggesting possible complications. They may justify further imaging workup with computed tomography, magnetic resonance and/or nuclear medicine studies as the evaluation of a patient with a spinal implant involves a multi-modality approach. This review describes imaging features of potential complications associated with spinal fusion surgery as well as the instrumentation used. This basic knowledge aims to help radiologists approach everyday practice in clinical imaging.
文摘Back pain is a common chronic disorder that represents a large burden for the health care system. There is a broad spectrum of available treatment options for patients suffering from chronic lower back pain in the setting of degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine, including both conservative and operative approaches. Lumbar arthrodesis techniques can be divided into subcategories based on the part of the vertebral column that is addressed(anterior vs posterior). Furthermore, one has to differentiate between approaches aiming at a solid fusion in contrast to motion-sparing techniques with the proposed advantage of a reduced risk of developing adjacent disc disease. However, the field of application and long-term outcomes of these novel motion-preserving surgical techniques, including facet arthroplasty, nucleus replacement, and lumbar disc arthroplasty, need to be more precisely evaluated in long-term prospective studies. Innovative surgical treatment strategies involving minimally invasive techniques, such as lateral lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion, as well as percutaneous implantation of transpedicular or trans-facet screws, have been established with the reported advantages of reduced tissue invasiveness, decreased collateral damage, reduced blood loss, and decreased risk of infection. The aim of this study was to review well-established procedures for lumbar spinal fusion with the main focus on current concepts on spinal arthrodesis and motion-sparing techniques in degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.
文摘Degenerative disease of the lumbar spine is a common and increasingly prevalent condition that is often implicated as the primary reason for chronic low back pain and the leading cause of disability in the western world. Surgical management of lumbar degenerative disease has historically been approached by way of open surgical procedures aimed at decompressing and/or stabilizing the lumbar spine. Advances in technology andsurgical instrumentation have led to minimally invasive surgical techniques being developed and increasingly used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. Compared to the traditional open spine surgery, minimally invasive techniques require smaller incisions and decrease approach-related morbidity by avoiding muscle crush injury by self-retaining retractors, preventing the disruption of tendon attachment sites of important muscles at the spinous processes, using known anatomic neurovascular and muscle planes, and minimizing collateral soft-tissue injury by limiting the width of the surgical corridor. The theoretical benefits of minimally invasive surgery over traditional open surgery include reduced blood loss, decreased postoperative pain and narcotics use, shorter hospital length of stay, faster recover and quicker return to work and normal activity. This paper describes the different minimally invasive techniques that are currently available for the treatment of degenerative disease of the lumbar spine.
文摘Introduction: Surgical interventions for degenerative spondylolisthesis are varied with comparable claims of success. Fusion based technique is one of the most commonly used surgical interventions in treating this condition. The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of the Lumbar Interbody Fusion techniques (specifically Posterolateral Interbody approach—PLIF) versus Posterolateral Instrumented Fusion (PLF). The clinical outcomes investigated were: back pain, leg pain, function, Oswestery Disability Index (ODI), Disability Rating Index (DRI), fusion and revision rates if reported. Methods: Combinations of keywords and MeSH terms, where appropriate, were used to search for studies in Medline via Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Google scholar. The initial search was conducted on 10 August 2016 and updated on 13 June 2017. Eligibility criteria for the studies to be selected for this meta-analysis were: Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs), cohort and consecutive cases studies that compared at PLIF versus PLF surgical interventions at the lumbar region. Heterogeneity indicators and Forest plot were computed using RevMan 5. Results: Out of the initial hits of 3021, 5 articles were selected as relevant and assessed for risk of bias and then data was extracted and tabulated. These 5 studies reported data from (900 patients’ records, follow up ranges from 6 months to 5 years) undergone one of 2 interventions (PLIF or PLF). The overall effect for ODI and leg pain showed no advantage of any intervention over the other while there was a greater odd ratio of fusion if the operation applied PLIF techniques (Overall Z = 2.86, p = 0.004). Conclusions: There is a need for more high quality clinical trials to compare these two interventions. However, available data indicate that there are comparable results in the main clinical outcomes between PLIF and PLF. PLIF has superior fusion rate which does not seem to affect post-operative pain ratings.
文摘Surgical treatment for cervical kyphotic deformity is still controversial. Circumferential approach has been well described in the literature but long terms outcomes are not well reported. Important to decide the correct treatment option is the preoperative radiological exams to value the type of deformity(flexible or fixed). We report the case of a 67-year-old woman affected by a severe cervical kyphotic deformity who underwent combined anterior/posterior surgical approach, getting a good reduction of the deformity and an optimal stability in a long term follow up.
文摘Objective: To quantify the strength of the grafts from different body sites and determine the optimalselection of corticocancellous allografts for anterior interbody fusion. Methods: Complete sets of paired freshfrozen femurs, humeri, tibias and iliac crests were obtained from 6 individual donors. One centimeter thick slicesstarting from the proximal and distal bone ends were cut from the non--diaphysial portions of the long bones usinga razor saw with a customized miter box. 2. 5 cm× 3. 0 cm × 1. 0 cm unicortical bone blocks were shaped similarlyfor clinical use as a lumbar interbody graft. Multiple 1 cm thick grafts with 1. 5 cm depth were obtained from theiliac crests, to simulate a cervical interbody graft. The left and right sides of each pair were randomized intoperpendicular and parallel cut groups in the long bones or tricortical and bicortical preparations of the iliac graft.The samples were tested on an MTS by applying a compressive load to failure. Results: The failure loads of distaltibia and femoral head grafts were significantly higher than distal femur, proximal tibia and burneral head grafts(PR0. 05). The strength of the grafts prepared by parallel cutting decreased significantly as compared with theperpendicular cutting (P <0. 05). No significant changes were seen in femoral and burneral head grafts for the 2sectioning orientations. The grafts closer to the anterior superior iliac spine had significant higher failure loads andfailure strengths than those closer to the posterior superior iliac spine. After trimming off the lateral cortex, themean strength of the bicortical grafts decreased significantly as compared with the tricortical grafts (P <0. 05).Conclusion: The grafts from femoral head and distal tibia by perpendicular cutting have higher failure load than theload bearing in lumbar spine. The grafts cut close to the anterior superior iliac spine are recommended for cervicalinterbody fusion.
基金Supported by A grant from the Wooridul Spine Hospital
文摘A 55-year-old female was diagnosed with L5-S1 degenerative disc disease(DDD). Initial scores by the visual analogue scale(VAS) were 5(back) and 9(leg) and the Oswestry disability index(ODI) was 32. Arthroplasty was performed. Clinical and radiographic monitoring took place thereafter at one month, three months, six months and annually. At one month, VAS scores were 2(back) and 3(leg), ODI was 12 and ROM was 2.1° by radiographs. At two years, VAS scores were 1(back) and 2(leg), ODI was 6 and ROM was approaching 0. Five years after surgery, the entire operated segment(L5-S1) was solidly fused. A malpositioned disc implant may impair normal spinal movement, culminating in heterotopic ossification or complete fusion of the operated segment.
文摘Purpose: Implant subsidence is a possible complication of spinal interbody fusion. We aim to evaluate porous titanium cages subsidence, fusion and functional outcomes in patients subjected to oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) with these novel devices. Methods: Our institutional review board approved a single-center experience which included 60 patients who underwent OLIF from June 2018 to June 2020 utilizing the porous titanium implants. Data was collected in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and written informed consent was obtained. Imaging studies including radiographs 1, 3, 6 and 12 months and computed tomography (CT) scan at 6 months obtained during routine postoperative follow-up visits, were studied for signs of implant subsidence, fusion and clinical parameters to determine the effectiveness of surgery such as Oswestry disability index (ODI). Results: Radiographic subsidence occurred in 1 out of 89 porous titanium interbody cages (1.1%). No subsidence was observed in the posterior screws and rods fixation group (N = 57). However, one case of subsidence occurred in the lateral plate fixation group (N = 3). The subsidence occurred in an osteoporotic elderly patient operated for adjacent segment disease, and she was later revised with posterior instrumentation using cemented screws and rods. She had an uneventful recovery. Fusion rates were evaluated under CT scan at 6 months with a rate of 88%. In terms of clinical outcomes, ODI decreased significantly from 20.3 preop to 10.7 postop with a P-value Conclusions: In our study, the subsidence rate was lower than previously reported in the literature. Also, we had good fusion rates at 6 months likely due to the porous titanium cages use. We had no subsidence in the posterior instrumented group and one case in the lateral fixation group with improved clinical outcomes.
