Fournier’s gangrene after insertion of thermo-expandable prostatic stent for benign prostatic hyperplasia:A case report

BACKGROUND Thermo-expandable urethral stent(Memokath 028)implantation is an alternative treatment for older patients with lower urinary tract symptoms and benign prostatic obstruction.Following prostatic urethral stent implantation,minor complications such as urinary tract infection,irritative symptoms,gross hematuria,and urethral pain have been observed;however,there are no reports of life-threatening events.Herein,we report a critical case of Fournier’s gangrene that occurred 7 years after prostatic stenting.CASE SUMMARY An 81-years-old man with benign prostatic hyperplasia(volume,126 ccs;as measured by transrectal ultrasound)had undergone insertion of a thermoexpandable urethral stent(Memokath 028)as he was unfit for surgery under general anesthesia.However,the patient had undergone a suprapubic cystostomy for recurrent acute urinary retention 4 years after the insertion of prostatic stent(Memokath 028).We had planned to remove the Memokath 028;however,the patient was lost to follow-up.The patient presented to the emergency department 3 years after the suprapubic cystostomy with necrotic changes from the right scrotum to the right inguinal area.In digital rectal examination,tenderness and heat of prostate was identified.Also,the black skin color change with foulsmelling from right scrotum to right inguinal area was identified.In computed tomography finding,subcutaneous emphysema was identified to same area.He was diagnosed with Fournier’s gangrene based on the physical examination and computed tomography findings.In emergency room,Fournier’s gangrene severity index value is seven points.Therefore,he underwent emergent extended surgical debridement and removal of the Memokath 028.Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were administered and additional necrotic tissue debridement was performed.However,the patient died 14 days after surgery due to multiorgan failure.CONCLUSION If Memokath 028 for benign prostatic hyperplasia is not working in older patients,its rapid removal may help prevent severe complications.

The impact of minimally invasive surgeries for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia on male sexual function： a systematic review

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies was conducted to evaluate data for the effects of minimally invasive procedures for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH） on male sexual function. The studies searched were trials that enrolled men with symptomatic BPH who were treated with laser surgeries, transurethral microwave therapy （TUMT）, transurethral needle ablation of the prostate （TUNA）, transurethral ethanol ablation of the prostate （TEAP） and high-intensity frequency ultrasound （HIFU）, in comparison with traditional transurethral resection of the prostate （TURP） or sham operations. A total of 72 studies were identified, of which 33 met the inclusion criteria. Of the 33 studies, 21 were concerned with laser surgeries, six with TUMT, four with TUNA and two with TEAP containing information regarding male sexual function. No study is available regarding the effect of HIFU for BPH on male sexual function. Our analysis shows that minimally invasive surgeries for BPH have comparable effects to those of TURP on male erectile function. Collectively, less than 15.4% or 15.2% of patients will have either decrease or increase, respectively, of erectile function after laser procedures, TUMT and TUNA. As observed with TURP, a high incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction （EjD） is common after treatment of BPH with holmium, potassium-titanyl-phosphate and thulium laser therapies （〉 33.6%）. TUMT, TUNA and neodymium：yttrium aluminum garnet visual laser ablation or interstitial laser coagulation for BPH has less incidence of EjD, but these procedures are considered less effective for BPH treatment when compared with TURP.

Urinary and sexual function changes in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients before and after transurethral columnar balloon dilatation of the prostate

BACKGROUND Transurethral columnar balloon dilatation of the prostate(TUCBDP) is a new surgical treatment, but its efficacy remains controversial because of limited clinical application.AIM To investigate the clinical effect of TUCBDP for benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).METHODS Overall, 140 patients with BPH who underwent surgical treatment were included in the study. A random number table was used to divide the participants into study and control groups(n = 70 per group). The study group underwent TUCBDP. The prostate resection surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, bladder irrigation time, catheter indwelling time, length of hospital stay, International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS), maximum urine flow rate(Qmax), residual urine volume(RUV), changes in the International Erectile Function Score(ⅡEF-5) score, serum prostate-specific antigen(PSA), quality of life(QOL) score, and surgical complications were compared in both groups.RESULTS The operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, bladder flushing time, urinary catheter indwelling time, and length of hospital stay were significantly lower in the study group than in the control group(P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the IPSS, Qmax, and RUV measurements between the study and control groups(P > 0.05). However, at 3 mo post-surgery, the IPSS and RUV measurements were both lower(P < 0.05) and Qmax values were higher(P < 0.05) compared to the pre-surgery results in both groups. The ⅡEF-5 scores before and 3 mo after surgery were not significantly different between the study and control groups(P > 0.05). At 1 mo after surgery, the ⅡEF-5 score was higher in the study group than in the control group(P < 0.05). The serum PSA levels and QOL scores before treatment and at 1 and 3 mo after treatment were not significantly different between the study and control groups(P > 0.05). However, lower serum PSA levels and QOL scores were observed after 1 and 3 mo of treatment compared to pre-treatment levels in the study group(P < 0.05). The surgical complication rate of the study group(4.29%) was lower than that of the control group(12.86%;P < 0.05).CONCLUSION TUCBDP for BPH and transurethral resection of the prostate can achieve better results, but the former method is associated with less surgical trauma.

Predictive Factors for a Successful Day Case Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery: A Review

Introduction: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one among the foremost common diseases affecting the aging man with, almost 80% of the lads greater than 70 affected. BPH is caused by unregulated proliferation within the prostate, which may cause physical obstruction of the prostatic urethra and result in anatomic bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the historical gold standard up till now to which all endoscopic procedures for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are compared with a mean hospital stay of three days. This surgery although efficacious has been related with increased morbidity and increased day case failure rates as compared to newer techniques. These shortcomings have prompted the utilization of newer methods like Transurethral enucleation and resection of the prostate (TUERP), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) and Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP). This review will discuss the enucleation techniques, advantages and therefore the predictive factors for a successful day case prostate surgery. Materials and Methods: During this review, we discuss the newer techniques utilized in day case BPH surgery as well as the predictive factors for a successful BPH surgery, both enucleation, benefits and morcellation are covered also. Results: TUERP, ThuLEP and HoLEP have literature supporting the advantages of these techniques, which demonstrates its ability in day case BPH surgeries in specially selected cases with favorable factors and a 61% overall success rate. Conclusion: TUERP, ThuLEP and HoLEP Have proven to show favorable outcomes in day case BPH surgery with urologist’s experience, prostate size, duration of operation, age, use of anticoagulants, morning theatre list and ASA score being the key factors for a successful day case surgery.

Transurethral prostate surgery in prostate cancer patients: A population-based comparative analysis of complication and mortality rates

Objective:Prostate cancer(PCa)patients might experience lower urinary tract symptoms as those diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Some of them might be treated for their lower urinary tract symptoms instead of PCa.We aimed to test the effect of PCa versus BPH on surgical outcomes after transurethral prostate surgery,namely complication and mortality rates.Methods:Within the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database(2011-2016),we identified patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate,photoselective vaporization,or laser enucleation.Patients were stratified according to postoperative diagnosis(PCa vs.BPH).Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the predictors of perioperative morbidity and mortality.A formal test of interaction between diagnosis and surgical technique used was performed.Results:Overall,34542 patients were included.Of all,2008(5.8%)had a diagnosis of PCa.The multivariable logistic regression model failed to show statistically significant higher rates of postoperative complications in PCa patients(odds ratio:0.9,95%confidence interval:0.7-1.1;p=0.252).Moreover,similar rates of perioperative mortality(p=0.255),major acute cardiovascular events(p=0.581),transfusions(p=0.933),and length of stay of more than or equal to 30 days(p=0.174)were found.Additionally,all tests failed to show an interaction between post-operative diagnosis and surgical technique used.Conclusion:Patients diagnosed with PCa do not experience higher perioperative morbidity or mortality after transurethral prostate surgery when compared to their BPH counterparts.Moreover,the diagnosis seems to not influence surgical technique outcomes.

Evaluation of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Aim： To explore the feasibility and safety of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate （PVP） on high-risk patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH） and to evaluate their clinical and voiding outcome. Methods： A total of 85 high-risk patients with obstructive BPH underwent PVP with an 80 W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser, which was delivered through a side-deflecting fiber with a 23 Fr continuous flow cystoscope. Operative time, blood loss, indwelling catheterzation, international prostate symptom score （IPSS）, quality of life score （QoL）, uroflowmetry, postvoid residual urine volume and short-term complication rates were evaluated for all patients. Results： All patients got through the perioperative period safely. The chief advantages of PVP were： short operative time （25.6 ± 7.6 min）, little bleeding loss （56.8 ± 14.3 mL） and short indwelling catheterization （1.6 ± 0.8 d）. The IPSS and QoL decreased from （29.6 ± 5.4） and （5.4 ± 0.6） to （9.5 ± 2.6） and （1.3 ± 0.6）, respectively. The vast majority of patients were satisfied with voiding outcome. The mean maximal urinary flow rate increased to 17.8 mL/s and postvoid residual urine volume decreased to 55.6 mL. These results are significantly different from preoperative data （P 〈 0.05）. No patient required blood transfusion or fluid absorption. There were few complications and very high patient satisfaction after operation. Conclusion： PVP has a short operative time and high tolerance, and is safe, effective and minimally invasive for high-risk patients, therefore it might be considered as a good alternative treatment for high-risk patients with obstructive urinary symptoms as a result of BPH.

Sonablate-500^(TM) Transrectal High-intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Patients

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound （HIFU） in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）, serial studies were conducted in 150 BPH patients before and 30 min, 1, 2, 6 and 12 month（s） after Sonablate-500TM HIFU treatment. A silicon-coated indwelling 16F latex catheter was placed during the determination of the therapy zone. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were made by using the international prostate symptom score （IPSS）, quality of life （QOL）, uroflowmetric findings and transrectal ultrasound, and incidence of complications. The cystourethrography was done in 23 patients within 1 year postoperatively. The results showed that after HIFU treatment, IPSS and QOL scores were significantly decreased at 1, 2, 6 and 12 month（s） （P〈0.01）. Maximum urine flow rate （6.0 to 17.2 mL/s, P〈0.01）, PVR （75.0 to 30.3, P〈0.01） and prostatic volume （65.0 to 38.1 mL, P〈0.05） were significantly improved 12 months after the operation. Recurrent urinary retention （17=2） and urethrorectal fistula （n=1） occurred at the 15th postoperative day. The duration of the HIFU prostate ablation was 25-90 min. The mean time for an indwelling catheter was 3-19 days. These data demonstrate that treatment of BPH with Sonab- late-500TM HIFU is safe and effective.

A Review of Risk Factors for Predicting Urinary Incontinence after Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is one of the common diseases in middle-aged and elderly men, and its clinical symptoms include storage symptoms, voiding symptoms and post-urination symptoms. Surgery is an important treatment method for benign prostatic hyperplasia. It is suitable for BPH patients with moderate to severe LUTS (Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms) and has significantly affected the quality of life. The surgical methods include transurethral resection of the prostate and transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. While offering a high chance of cure, it also brings some complications, including postoperative urinary incontinence. This article mainly reviews the urinary incontinence after transurethral prostate surgery in recent years and analyzes its risk factors, and summarizes the experience for further prediction and reduction of the incidence of urinary incontinence.

Evaluation of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Aim:To explore the feasibility and safely of greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate(PVP)on high-risk patients presenting with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)and to evalu- ate their clinical and voiding outcome.Methods:A total of 85 high-risk patients with obstructive BPH underwent PVP with an 80W potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser,which was delivered through a side-deflecting fiber with a 23 Fr continuous flow cystoscope.Operative time,blood loss,indwelling catheterzation,international prostate symptom score(IPSS),quality of life score(QoL),uroflowmetry,postvoid residual urine volume and short-term complication rates were evaluated for all patients.Results:All patients got through the perioperative period safely.The chief advantages of PVP were:short operative time(25.6±7.6min),little bleeding loss(56.8±14.3mL)and short indwelling catheterization(1.6±0.8d).The IPSS and QoL decreased from(29.6±5.4)and(5.4±0.6)to(9.5±2.6)and(1.3± 0.6),respectively.The vast majority of patients were satisfied with voiding outcome.The mean maximal urinary flow rate increased to 17.8 roLls and postvoid residual urine volume decreased to 55.6mL.These results are signifi- cantly different from preoperative data(P<0.05).No patient required blood transfusion or fluid absorption.There were few complications and very high patient satisfaction after operation.Conclusion:PVP has a short operative time and high tolerance,and is safe,effective and minimally invasive for high-risk patients,therefore it might be considered as a good alternative treatment for high-risk patients with obstructive urinary symptoms as a result of BPH.

Epidemiological, Clinical and Management of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophia in Urologie Department in N’Djamena, Chad

Aim: To determine the epidemiological, clinical, paraclinical characteristics and assess the result of surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in the urological department. Patients and Method: It is a retrospective descriptive study of 757 patient samples whose BPH diagnosis was pronounced and have benefited of the open surgery in urology department from January 2006 to December 2010. The variables studied were sociodemographical, clinical, paraclinical, therapeutical and the follow up. Those variables were: arterial tension, sonography, consultation reasons and hospitalization, the data provided rectal touch, the comorbidity, the prostatic specific antigen (PSA), other blood tests, urinary tests, medical management surgical treatment, the causes of death and the complications. Results: during the study period, 2406 patients were hospitalized, from them 1472 (61.18%) for low urinary tract diseases where 757 for BPH. The mean age was 64.18 years. The acute urine retention was the main cause of hospitalizations and consultations (51.51%). The rectal touch Helped in diagnosing 96.43% of cases. PSA in 74.10%, the sonography evaluated the volume of the prostate and the complications on the upper urinary tract, kidney dilatation and stones. An urgent evacuation of acute retention of urine in the bladder was done in 74.10%, a medical treatment was done in 33.47%. The open surgery was done in 66.47%. The evolution was good for 703 (92.86%), 54 died (7.14%) and the causes were various (anemia, hyperglycemia, HIV…). Conclusion: The BHP was the first reason of consultation and hospitalization in urology department in N’Djamena. Its diagnosis was done after the analysis of a beam clinical and paraclinical arguments. In the absence of an endoscopic resection column, open surgery was the only surgical treatment.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Enhanced recovery after surgery(ERAS)measures have not been systematically applied in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).This study was performed on patients with BPH who required surgical intervention.From July 2019 to June 2020,the ERAS program was applied to 248 patients,and the conventional program was applied to 238 patients.After 1 year of follow-up,the differences between the ERAS group and the conventional group were evaluated.The ERAS group had a shorter time of urinary catheterization compared with the conventional group(mean±standard deviation[s.d.]:1.0±0.4 days vs 2.7±0.8 days,P<0.01),and the pain(mean±s.d.)was significantly reduced through postoperative hospitalization days(PODs)0-2(POD 0:1.7±0.8 vs 2.4±1.0,P<0.01;POD 1:1.6±0.9 vs 3.5±1.3,P<0.01;POD 2:1.2±0.7 vs 3.0±1.3,P<0.01).No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of postoperative complications,such as postoperative bleeding(P=0.79),urinary retention(P=0.40),fever(P=0.55),and readmission(P=0.71).The hospitalization cost of the ERAS group was similar to that of the conventional group(mean±s.d.:16927.8±5808.1 Chinese Yuan[CNY]vs 17044.1±5830.7 CNY,P=0.85).The International Prostate Symptom Scores(IPSS)and quality of life(QoL)scores in the two groups were also similar when compared at 1 month,3 months,6 months,and 12 months after discharge.The ERAS program we conducted was safe,repeatable,and efficient.In conclusion,patients undergoing the ERAS program experienced less postoperative stress than those undergoing the conventional program.

Modified Madigan Prostatectomy: A Procedure Preserved Prostatic Urethra Intact

A total of 92 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were subjected to modified Madigan prostatectomy (MPC) for a much satisfactory effect in open prostatectomy surgery. Exposing anterior prostatic urethra near the bladder neck and conjunct cystotomy modified the MPC procedure. This modified procedure preserved prostatic urethra intact and could also deal with intracystic lesions at the same time. The intact of prostatic urethra was kept completely or largely in 86 cases. The amount of blood loss during modified procedure was less. The mean operative time was 105 min. Seventy patients had been followed up for 3-24 months. The postoperative average Qmax was 19.2 ml/s. The cystourethrography revealed that the urethra and bladder neck were intact in 10 patients postoperatively. Furthermore, the prostatic urethra was obviously wider after modified MPC. The modified MPC can reduce the occurrence of urethra injury and enlarge the MPC indications. The modified technique is easy to perform with less complications and much satisfactory clinical result.

Beyond prostate, beyond surgery and beyond urology: The “3Bs” of managing non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms

Lower urinary tract symptoms(LUTS),consisting storage,voiding and postmicturition symptoms,is a comprehensive definition involving symptoms that may occur due to several causes.Instead of simply focusing on the enlarged prostate,more attention has to be paid to the entire urinary tract as well as multiple system comorbidities.Therefore,prostate surgery alone does not necessarily provide adequate management and cross-disciplinary collaborations are sometimes required.Based on current literature,this paper proposes the“3Bs”concept for managing non-neurogenic male LUTS,namely,“beyond prostate”,“beyond surgery”and“beyond urology”.The clinical application of the“3Bs”enables urologists to carry out integrated,individualized and precise medical care for each non-neurogenic male LUTS patient.

Combined urethral and suprapubic catheter drainage improves post operative management after open simple prostatectomy without bladder irrigation

AIM To compare outcomes after open simple prostatectomy without bladder irrigation, in subjects drained by combined 2-way urethral catheter and suprapubic catheter(SPC) vs those drained by 2-way urethral catheter only.METHODS A total of 84 participants undergoing Freyer's simple prostatectomy over an 18-mo period were randomized into 2 groups(n=42). Subjects in group 1 were managed with 2-way urethral catheter and in situ 2-way SPC while subjects in group 2 had a 2-way urethral catheter drainage only. In group 1 subjects, the SPC was spigotted and only used for drainage if there was clot retention. The primary outcomes were number of clot retention episodes, and number of clot retention episodes requiring bladder syringe evacuation. Other secondary outcomes evaluated were blood loss, requirement of extra analgesics, duration of surgery, hospital stay and presence or absence of post-op complications. RESULTS The mean age in the groups was 65.7(± 7.6) in group 1 vs 64.8(±6.8) in group 2.The groups were similar with respect to age, prostate specific antigen, prostate volume, blood loss, duration of surgery, blood transfusion and overall complication rate. However statistically significant differences were observed in clot retention episodes between group 1 and 2:0.8(±1.5)vs3.5(±4.4), P<0.000, clot retention episodes requiring evacuation with bladder syringe 0.4(± 0.9) vs 2.6(± 3.8), P = 0.001, requirement of extra analgesics 0.4(±0.5)vs4.0(±1.5), P<0.000 and duration of admission 8.6d(± 1.2) vs 7.3 CONCLUSION Subjects drained with a combination of urethral and SPCs have fewer clot retention episodes and reduced requirement of extra analgesics but slightly longer hospital stay.

Bladder calculi concomitant with benign prostatic enlargement:is prostate surgery mandatory in patients who have never received medical therapy?

The historical dogma that bladder calculi comprise the main indication for prostatic surgery has recently been questioned.In this study,we aimed to predict which patients should undergo simultaneous prostate and bladder calculi surgery or only bladder calculi removal by evaluating preoperative risk factors.One hundred and seventeen men with bladder stones and concomitant benign prostate enlargement(BPE)who had not received medical treatment before were included in the study.In the first step,only the bladder calculi of patients were removed and medical treatment was given for BPE.The patients who benefited from medical treatment during the follow-up were defined as Group 1 and the patients who required prostate surgery for any indication comprised Group 2.Risk factors for prostate surgery requirements were determined by comparing preoperative characteristics between the two groups with a cox regression model.In the follow-up of 117 patients with bladder stones removed and medical treatment initiated,49(41.9%)patients had prostate surgery indications.The indication for 33(67.3%)of 49 patients was medical treatment failure.The presence of intravesical prostatic protrusion(IPP;hazard ratio:2.071,95%confidence interval[Cl]:1.05-4.05,P=0.034),and high postvoiding residual urine volume(hazard ratio:1.013,95%Cl:1.007-1.019,P<0.001)were found to be preoperative risk factors for needing future prostate surgery.In patients who have not received medical treatment for BPE before,bladder calculi developing secondary to BPE do not always constitute an indication for prostate surgery.

普适泰片对良性前列腺增生术后尿动力学的影响

目的探讨普适泰片对良性前列腺增生术后尿动力学的影响。方法选取2022年5月—2023年5月南京医科大学附属苏州医院良性前列腺增生患者80例,随机数字表法分为2组,各40例。观察组采用普适泰片联合手术治疗,对照组单用经尿道纽扣式等离子前列腺剜除术治疗。比较2组的尿动力学参数、生活质量评分、疾病疗效、术后并发症。结果观察组残余尿量较对照组更低,但最大尿流率、膀胱顺应性尿动力学指标较高(P<0.05)。观察组生活质量高于对照组,总有效率(95.00%)高于对照组(70.00%)(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论针对良性前列腺增生患者,通过采用普适泰片联合手术治疗,可改善患者尿动力学参数,提升生活质量,降低术后并发症,提升对良性前列腺增生的治愈率。

经尿道前列腺柱状水囊扩开术与经尿道前列腺电切术治疗良性前列腺增生的疗效对比

目的:对比经尿道前列腺柱状水囊扩开术(TUCBDP)与经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效。方法:2021年7月至2022年11月,218例我院收治的BPH组患者随机分为两组,每组109例,一组采用TURP进行治疗(TURP组),另一组采用TUCBDP进行治疗(TUCBDP组),两组均观察至患者出院,出院后随访1年。比较两组临床疗效、手术情况、术后恢复情况、并发症发生情况、血清疼痛、炎症指标、细胞因子水平、尿流动力学指标、症状改善情况、生活质量。结果:术后1年与TURP组比较,TUCBDP组总有效率更高(P<0.05)。TUCBDP组手术情况、术后恢复情况优于TURP组(P<0.05)。TURP组和TUCBDP组术后1 d血清PGE2、P物质、TNF-α、hs-CRP水平与术前比较,升高,但TUCBDP组较TURP组更低(P<0.05)。TURP组和TUCBDP组术后3个月血清PSA、E2水平与术前比较,降低,TUCBDP组较TURP组更低;血清T水平与术前比较,升高,TUCBDP组较TURP组更高(P<0.05)。术前及术后3个月、1年,TURP组和TUCBDP组PVR及NIH-CPS、IPSS、QOL评分呈降低趋势,TUCBDP组术后3个月较TURP组更低(P<0.05);术前及术后3个月、1年,TURP组和TUCBDP组Qmax、MCC、MUCP呈升高趋势,TUCBDP组术后3个月较TURP组更高(P<0.05)。结论:与TURP相比,TUCBDP改善BPH患者手术情况,促进术后恢复,提高生活质量,降低术后疼痛、机体炎症反应及并发症的发生,调节血清细胞因子水平,改善患者尿流动力学及临床症状,疗效较好,但随着术后时间延长,两种方法对尿流动力学、症状及生活质量的改善效果基本相当。

前列腺剜除电切术后排尿训练中的心理干预策略研究

目的了解在前列腺剜除电切术后排尿训练中介入心理干预的临床疗效。方法本次病例研究相关资料全部来自本院2022年5月至2022年12月期间由我科诊治的良性前列腺增生的患者100例,根据是否给予患者心理干预将这100例患者分为试验组和对照组,对照组予以常规护理+排尿训练,试验组予以心理干预+排尿训练,每组50例。对比两组患者排尿训练依从性、排尿障碍发生率以及生活质量改善情况。结果试验组患者排尿训练依从性高于对照组(P<0.05);生活质量改善情况优于对照组(P<0.05);满意度评价高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在前列腺剜除电切术后患者排尿训练中介入心理干预,可提高患者排尿训练治疗的依从性,提高患者生活质量,进而提高了前列腺剜除电切术后的预后效果,可在临床上推广应用。

良性前列腺增生行经尿道前列腺切除术后尿道狭窄发生状况及外科治疗研究进展

经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)是良性前列腺增生(BPH)的主要治疗方法,尿道狭窄是TURP后再入院的主要原因,无论采用何种术式治疗BPH均不能完全避免尿道狭窄发生,对患者排尿功能和生活质量造成严重影响,因此需合理选择有效的治疗策略以改善患者排尿功能。对于BPH行TURP后尿道狭窄的治疗手段与其他病因所致的尿道狭窄相同,分为开放手术和腔内治疗,不同类型手术的近期、远期效果有明显差异,且适应证人群也有严格限制。文章总结了BPH行TURP后尿道狭窄的发生状况和外科治疗方式,以指导临床医师针对患者的不同情况选择最恰当的手术方案,改善患者预后。

经尿道前列腺电切术与经尿道柱状水囊前列腺扩开术治疗老年良性前列腺增生的比较研究

目的分析老年良性前列腺增生(BPH)治疗中,经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)与经尿道柱状水囊前列腺扩开术(TUCBDP)的疗效差异,旨在为该病症提供更科学的治疗策略。方法回顾性分析2021年2月—2024年2月青岛市胶州中心医院收治的150例老年BPH患者的临床资料,依据手术方式的不同分为TUCBDP组78例和TURP组72例,经倾向性评分匹配以1∶1比例,最终纳入基线均衡的2组,每组67例。分析2组围手术期与并发症情况。于术前及术后90 d,比较2组尿动力学指标[峰值排尿流速(Qmax)、尿后膀胱剩余量(RUV)、膀胱顺应程度(BC)、最大尿道闭合压(Pdet.max)]和疾病转归[采用国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、BPH生活质量量表(BPHQLS)评估]。结果与TURP组相比,TUCBDP组的手术时长、尿管插置期限、膀胱灌洗时长、留院时长更短,手术失血量更少(均P<0.05)。术后90 d,2组Qmax、BC均较同组术前升高,且TUCBDP组Qmax、BC均高于TURP组(P<0.05);2组RUV、Pdet.max均较同组术前降低,与TURP组相比,TUCBDP组RUV、Pdet.max的降幅更大(P<0.05);2组IPSS、BPHQLS评分均低于同组术前,且TUCBDP组上述评分的降幅更大(P<0.05)。TUCBDP组术后并发症发生率明显低于TURP组(P<0.05)。随访期内,2组复发率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论相比TURP术,TUCBDP术治疗的老年BPH患者围手术期指标改善效果更为显著,并且在促进排尿功能恢复、减少前列腺症状、提高生活质量和安全性等方面具有优势,但对远期疗效可能无影响。