TRIANGLE operation,combined with adequate adjuvant chemotherapy,can improve the prognosis of pancreatic head cancer:A retrospective study

BACKGROUND The TRIANGLE operation involves the removal of all tissues within the triangle bounded by the portal vein-superior mesenteric vein,celiac axis-common hepatic artery,and superior mesenteric artery to improve patient prognosis.Although previously promising in patients with locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma(PDAC),data are limited regarding the long-term oncological outcomes of the TRIANGLE operation among resectable PDAC patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy(PD).AIM To evaluate the safety of the TRIANGLE operation during PD and the prognosis in patients with resectable PDAC.METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent PD for pancreatic head cancer between January 2017 and April 2023,with or without the TRIANGLE operation.Patients were divided into the PD_(TRIANGLE)and PD_(non-TRIANGLE)groups.Surgical and survival outcomes were compared between the two groups.Adequate adjuvant chemotherapy was defined as adjuvant chemotherapy≥6 months.RESULTS The PD_(TRIANGLE)and PD_(non-TRIANGLE) groups included 52 and 55 patients,respectively.There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics or perioperative indexes between the two groups.Furthermore,the recurrence rate was lower in the PD_(TRIANGLE) group than in the PD_(non-TRIANGLE) group(48.1%vs 81.8%,P<0.001),and the local recurrence rate of PDAC decreased from 37.8%to 16.0%.Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that PD_(TRIANGLE)(HR=0.424;95%CI:0.256-0.702;P=0.001),adequate adjuvant chemotherapy≥6 months(HR=0.370;95%CI:0.222-0.618;P<0.001)and margin status(HR=2.255;95%CI:1.252-4.064;P=0.007)were found to be independent factors for the recurrence rate.CONCLUSION The TRIANGLE operation is safe for PDAC patients undergoing PD.Moreover,it reduces the local recurrence rate of PDAC and may improve survival in patients who receive adequate adjuvant chemotherapy.

Optimal extent of lymphadenectomy improves prognosis and guides adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: A propensity scorematched analysis

BACKGROUND The optimal extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC)patients remained debatable.AIM To explore the ideal number of cleared lymph nodes in ESCC patients undergoing upfront surgery.METHODS In this retrospective,propensity score-matched study,we included 1042 ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy from November 2008 and October 2019.Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy were excluded.We collected pa-tients’clinicopathological features and information regarding lymph nodes,in-cluding the total number of resected lymph nodes(NRLN),and pathologically diagnosed positive lymph nodes(RPLN).SPSS and R software were used for statistical analysis.RESULTS Among the included 1042 patients,two cohorts:≤21(n=664)and>21 NRLN(n=378)were identified.The final prognostic model included four variables:T stage,N,venous thrombus,and the number of removed lymph nodes.Among them,NRLN>21 was determined as an independent prognosticator after surgery for esophageal cancer(hazards regression=0.66,95%confidence interval:0.50-0.87,P=0.004).A nomogram was created based on the regression coefficients of the variables in the final model.In the training cohort,the predictive model dis-played an uncorrected five-year overall survival C-index of 0.659,with a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.654.In the subgroup analysis,adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in the subgroup with NRLN>21 and RPLN≤0.16 and NRLN≤21 and RPLN>0.16.CONCLUSION NRLN>21 was an independent prognostic factor after ESCC surgery.The combination of NRLN and RPLN may provide a reference for adjuvant chemotherapy use in potential beneficiaries.

Predictors of disease recurrence after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIb-IIIa squamous cell lung cancer:A retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND Lung cancer(LC)is a global medical,social and economic problem and is one of the most common cancers and the leading cause of mortality from malignant neoplasms.LC is characterized by an aggressive course,and in the presence of disease recurrence risk factors,patients,even at an early stage,may be indicated for adjuvant therapy to improve survival.However,combined treatment does not always guarantee a favorable prognosis.In this regard,establishing predictors of LC recurrence is highly important both for determining the optimal treatment plan for the patients and for evaluating its effectiveness.AIM To establish predictors of disease recurrence after radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage IIb-IIIa lung squamous cell carcinoma(LSCC).METHODS A retrospective case-control cohort study included 69 patients with LSCC who underwent radical surgery at the Orenburg Regional Clinical Oncology Center from 2009 to 2018.Postoperatively,all patients received adjuvant chemotherapy.Histological samples of the resected lung were stained with Mayer's hematoxylin and eosin and examined under a light microscope.Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictors associated with the risk of disease recurrence.Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed to discriminate between patients with a high risk of disease recurrence and those with a low risk of disease recurrence.Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves between patient subgroups.Differences were considered to be significant at P<0.05.RESULTS The following predictors of a high risk of disease recurrence in patients with stage IIb-IIa LSCC were established:a low degree of tumor differentiation[odds ratio(OR)=7.94,95%CI=1.08-135.81,P=0.049];metastases in regional lymph nodes(OR=5.67,95%CI=1.09-36.54,P=0.048);the presence of loose,fine-fiber connective tissue in the tumor stroma(OR=21.70,95%CI=4.27-110.38,P=0.0002);and fragmentation of the tumor solid component(OR=2.53,95%CI=1.01-12.23,P=0.049).The area under the curve of the predictive model was 0.846(95%CI=0.73-0.96,P<0.0001).The sensitivity,accuracy and specificity of the method were 91.8%,86.9%and 75.0%,respectively.In the group of patients with a low risk of LSCC recurrence,the 1-,2-and 5-year disease-free survival(DFS)rates were 84.2%,84.2%and 75.8%,respectively,while in the group with a high risk of LSCC recurrence the DFS rates were 71.7%,40.1%and 8.2%,respectively(P<0.00001).Accordingly,in the first group of patients,the 1-,2-and 5-year overall survival(OS)rates were 94.7%,82.5%and 82.5%,respectively,while in the second group of patients,the OS rates were 89.8%,80.1%and 10.3%,respectively(P<0.00001).CONCLUSION The developed method allows us to identify a group of patients at high risk of disease recurrence and to adjust to ongoing treatment.

Clinical,pathological,and adjuvant chemotherapy use differences among microsatellite unstable and microsatellite stable colon cancers

Background:Colon cancers are categorized into mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite unstable(MSI-H)and mismatch repair proficient/microsatellite stable(MSS)cancers.This study aims to compare the disease char-acteristics and trends in the utilization of cancer therapies across different age groups and stages in these two groups.Methods:MSI-H and MSS colon adenocarcinomas from 2010 to 2016 were identified using the National Can-cer Database.We compared patient and disease characteristics between the two groups and evaluated the use of adjuvant chemotherapy across age groups and cancer stages.Within MSI-H and MSS groups,we conducted a land-mark analysis after propensity score matching for adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy to determine its effect on survival.Results:Of the 542,368 patients that met inclusion criteria,120,751(22%)had mismatch repair results avail-able-out of these 96,928(80%)had MSS colon cancers while 23,823(19.7%)had MSI-H cancers.MSI-H disease had a bimodal age distribution(<40 years=22%;≥75 years=26%)and was frequent among females(22%)and non-Hispanic Whites(20%).Among those<65 years,15%of low-risk stage 2 MSI-H patients and 40%of high-risk stage 2 MSI-H patients received adjuvant chemotherapy.More than two-thirds of stage 3 patients<65 years received adjuvant chemotherapy in both groups.After conducting propensity-score matching for age,gender,and co-morbidities,we found that adjuvant chemotherapy use had a trend towards lower overall survival(OS)in low-risk stage 2 MSI-H(HR=1.8[95%CI,0.8-4.02])and high-risk stage 2 MSI-H(HR=1.42[95%CI,0.96-2.12])groups.Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS in stage 3 colon cancer patients irrespective of microsatellite status or risk category of disease.Conclusions:MSI-H colon cancer had bimodal age distribution.Among stage 2 MSI-H patients<65 years,a notable proportion received adjuvant chemotherapy.Among MSI-H stage 2 patients,adjuvant chemotherapy use was associated with lower survival while it significantly improved survival for stage 3 patients,irrespective of MSI status.

Is there an optimal time to initiate adjuvant chemotherapy to predict benefit of survival in non-small cell lung cancer?

Objective: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after curative resection is known to improve the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, few studies have reported the correlation between the time to initiation of AC (TTAC) and survival in NSCLC patients. Methods: The clinical data of 925 NSCLC patients who received curative resection and post-operative AC at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences between 2003 and 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. TTAC was measured from the date of surgery to the initiation of AC. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined as the duration from surgery to the time of tumor recurrence or last follow-up evaluation. The optimal cut-off value of TTAC was determined by maximally selected log-rank statistics. The DFS curve was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify risk factors independently associated with DFS. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for survival analysis using the match data. Results: The optimal discriminating cut-off value of TTAC was set at d 35 after curative resection based on which the patients were assigned into two groups: group A (<= 35 d) and group B (> 35 d). There was no significant difference in the DFS between the two groups (P=0.246), indicating that the TTAC is not an independent prognostic factor for DFS. A further comparison continued to show no significant difference in the DFS among 258 PSM pairs (P=0.283). Conclusions: There was no significant correlation between the TTAC and DFS in NSCLC patients. Studies with larger samples are needed to further verify this conclusion.

Oxaliplatin plus S-1 or capecitabine as neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer with D2lymphadenectomy: 5-year follow-up results of a phase II-III randomized trial

Objective： To compare the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy （NACT） with adjuvant chemotherapy （ACT） using oxaliplatin plus S-1 （sex） or capecitabine （CapeOX） on gastric cancer patients with D2 lymphadenectomy. Methods： This was a two-by-two factorial randomized phase Ⅱ-Ⅲ trial, and registered on ISRCTN registry （No. ISRCTN12206108）. Locally advanced gastric cancer patients were randomized to neoadjuvant sex, neoadjuvant CapeOX, adjuvant sex, or adjuvant CapeOX arms. Primary analysis was performed on an intention- to-treat （ITT） basis using overall survival （OS） as primary endpoint. Results： This trial started in September 2011 and closed in December 2012 with 100 patients enrolled. Treatment completion rate was 56%, 52%, 38% and 30% in the four arms, respectively. NACT group had fewer dropouts due to unacceptable toxicity （P=0.042）. Surgical complication rate did not differ by the four groups （P=0.986）. No survival signifcant difference was found comparing NACT with ACT （P=0.664; 5-year-OS： 70% vs. 74% respectively）, nor between the sex and CapeOX groups （P=0.252; 5-year-OS： 78% vs. 66% respectively）. Subgroup analysis showed sex significantly improved survival in patents with diffuse type （P=0.048）. Conclusions： No significant survival difference was found between NACT and ACT. sex and CapeOX had good safety and efficacy as neoadjuvant regimens. Diffuse type patients may survive longer due to sex.

Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant chemotherapy benefits overall survival of locally advanced gastric cancer

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has drawn more attention to the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in the current multidisciplinary treatment model. EORTC trial 40954 has recently reported that NAC plus surgery without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy could not benefit the locally AGC patients in their overall survival. We performed a meta-analysis of 10 studies including 1518 gastric cancer patients. Stratified subgroups were NAC plus surgery and NAC plus both surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), while control was surgery alone. The results showed that NAC plus surgery did not benefit the patients with locally AGC in their overall survival [odds ratio (OR) = 1.20, 95% CI 0.80-1.80, P = 0.37] and the number needed to treat (NNT) was 74. However, the NAC plus both surgery and AC had a slight overall survival benefit (OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.03-1.71, P = 0.03) and NNT was 14, which is superior to the NAC plus surgery. Therefore, we recommend that combined NAC and AC should be used to improve the overall survival of the locally AGC patients.

Dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin vs.epirubicin and cyclophosphamide with paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk triple-negative breast cancer

Objective:The objective of this open-label,randomized study was to compare dose-dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin(PCdd)with dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel(ECdd-P)as an adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer(TNBC).Methods:We included Chinese patients with high recurrence risk TNBC who underwent primary breast cancer surgery.They were randomly assigned to receive PCdd[paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 on d 1 and carboplatin,the area under the curve,(AUC)=3 on d 2]or ECdd-P(epirubicin 80 mg/m2 divided in 2 d and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on d 1 for 4 cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on d 1 for 4 cycles)every 2 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor(G-CSF)support.The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival(DFS);the secondary endpoints were overall survival(OS)and safety.Results:The intent-to-treat population included 143 patients(70 in the PCdd arm and 73 in the ECdd-P arm).Compared with the ECdd-P arm,the PCdd arm had significantly higher 3-year DFS[93.9%vs.79.1%;hazard ratio(HR)=0.310;95%confidence interval(95%CI),0.137-0.704;log-rank,P=0.005]and OS(98.5%vs.92.9%;HR=0.142;95%CI,0.060-0.825;log-rank,P=0.028).Worse neutropenia(grade 3/4)was found in the ECdd-P than the PCdd arm(47.9%V5.21.4%,P=0.001).Conclusions:PCdd was superior to ECdd-P as an adjuvant chemotherapy for early TNBC with respect to improving the 3-year DFS and OS.PCdd also yielded lower hematological toxicity.Thus,PCdd might be a preferred regimen for early TNBC patients with a high recurrence risk.

Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Patients Benefit from Extremely Early Initiation of Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Study

Background: For Stage II/III rectal cancer patients, curative resection is the primary treatment, prescribing of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) is regarded as a standard therapy. The interval between surgery and the initiation of PAC is usually within 8 weeks. However, the optimal cut-off is still controversial. This study aimed to explore the impact of extremely early initiation of PAC for II/III rectal cancer. Methods: Patients with Stage II/III rectal cancer treated from January 2013 to December 2015 were retrospectively collected at the Department of Tongji Hospital. According to the starting point of PAC, patients were categorized into two groups: extremely early group (The interval of PAC ≤ 2 weeks) and normal group (The interval of PAC within 3 - 5 weeks). For the sake of evaluating the effectiveness of different intervals, Overall Survival rate (OS), Progress-Free Survival rate (PFS) and Recurrence or Metastasis Rate (RMR) were analyzed, as well as the Quality of Life Score. To estimate the safety of the extremely early PAC, we evaluated the first post chemotherapy adverse reactions and defecation ability, and analyzed the variance laboratory indexes around the first postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: A total of 267 patients were included in this study. Compared to normal group (192 cases), extremely early group (75 cases) of patients attained a better tendency of OS and PFS, although there were no significant statistical differences (OS: P = 0.0930;PFS: P = 0.1058). However, the RMR was significant lower (P = 0.0452) and the Quality of Life Score was significantly higher (P = 0.0090) in extremely early group. Multivariate analysis also showed that extremely early group had better defecation ability (P = 0.0149) and less side reactions of post chemotherapy, such as vomiting (P , got a higher level of inflammatory cells (P Conclusion: For Stage II/III rectal cancer patients, extremely early to start PAC not only might be effectively prolonging the survival, but indeed decrease the tumor-related recurrence risk, increase the quality of life and decrease chemotherapy-associated adverse reactions. Meanwhile, appropriately controlling of inflammatory cells and protecting the liver function should be of concern to ensure the safety of early initial stage.

Clinical Observation of Concurrent Radio-Chemotherapy Combined with Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Treating Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE To investigate the efficacy and side effects of concurrent radiochemotherapy using the TP regimen （paclitaxel and cisplatin） combined with adjuvant treatment in treating patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma （NPC）. METHODS A total of 82 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of locoregionally advanced stage-III and IVa NPC were randomly divided into 2 groups： the treatment group （TG） with concurrent radiochemotherapy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy （n = 44） and the control group （CG） with simple radiotherapy （RT） （n = 38）. A total dose of 68 - 74 Gy of conformal radiation （X-ray, 4 MV or 8 MV） was given to patients in both groups. In the TG, a regimen of paxlitaxel and cisplatin was given via intravenous infusion in the 1st and 6th week concurrently with RT. After a 2-week intermission following RT, these patients received 2 cycles of the same chemotherapeutic regimen triweekly. RESULTS The effective rates of the treatment were, respectively, 71.1% and 76.3% in the CG, and 88.6% and 95.5% in the TG, at the end of treatment and 3 months thereafter. The differences in the therapeutic efficacy between the 2 groups were statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 81.1% and 73%, and 95.2% and 90.5%, respectively in the CG and the TG, and the differences between the 2 groups were statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. The grade I-II reactions in the gastrointestinal tract, skin and oral mucosa were higher in patients receiving concurrent radiochemotherapy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy than in patients receiving simple radiotherapy （P 〈 0.05）. The differences in the occurrence of grade III-IV side effects including gastrointestinal, dermal and oral mucosal discomfort, other side effects, and late radioactive damage between the 2 groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION Concurrent radiochemotherapy combined with adjuvant chemotherapy in treating patients with locoregionally advanced NPC can further improve short-term therapeutic effects and the overall survival. However, there is an increased trend in toxicity secondary to treatment.

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for patients with microinvasive breast cancer after surgery？

Objective: Survival and treatment of patients with microinvasive breast cancer(MIBC) remain controversial. In this paper, we evaluated whether adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for patients with MIBC to identify risk factors influencing its prognosis and decide the indication for adjuvant chemotherapy.Methods: In this retrospective study, 108 patients with MIBC were recruited according to seventh edition of the staging manual of the American Joint Committee on Cancer(AJCC). The subjects were divided into chemotherapy and non-chemotherapy groups.We compared the 5-year disease-free survival(DFS) and overall survival(OS) rates between groups. Furthermore, we analyzed the factors related to prognosis for patients with MIBC using univariate and multivariate analyses. We also evaluated the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the prognostic factors by subgroup analysis after median follow-up time of 33 months(13-104months).Results: The 5-year DFS and OS rates for the chemotherapy group were 93.7% and 97.5%, whereas those for the nonchemotherapy group were 89.7% and 100%. Results indicate that 5-year DFS was superior, but OS was inferior, in the former group compared with the latter group. However, no statistical significance was observed in the 5-year DFS(P=0.223) or OS(P=0.530) rate of the two groups. Most relevant poor-prognostic factors were Ki-67 overexpression and negative hormonal receptors. Cumulative survival was 98.2% vs. 86.5% between low Ki-67(≤20%) and high Ki-67(>20%). The hazard ratio of patients with high Ki-67 was 16.585 [95% confidence interval(CI), 1.969-139.724; P=0.010]. Meanwhile, ER(-)/PR(-) patients with MIBC had cumulative survival of 79.3% compared with 97.5% for ER(+) or PR(+) patients with MIBC. The hazard ratio for ER(-)/PR(-) patients with MIBC was 19.149(95% CI, 3.702-99.057; P<0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that chemotherapy could improve the outcomes of ER(-)/PR(-) patients(P=0.014), but not those who overexpress Ki-67(P=0.105).Conclusions: Patients with MIBC who overexpress Ki-67 and with negative hormonal receptors have relatively substantial risk of relapse within the first five years after surgery. However, adjuvant chemotherapy can only improve the outcomes of ER(-)/PR(-)patients, but not those who overexpress Ki-67. Further studies with prolonged follow-up of large cohorts are recommended to assess the prognostic significance and treatment of this lesion.

Effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapyon the prognosis of patients with ypT0-3N0 rectalcancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on theprognosis of patients with ypT0-3N0 rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Methods The study participants were 110 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Thirty-fourpatients did not receive postoperative AC treatment, and the other 76 patients received postoperative ACtreatment. The differences in the 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) between thetwo groups were compared.Results Age was an important determinant of the patients’ decision to undergo postoperative treatment.Patients who did not receive AC treatment were significantly older than those who received AC treatment(P < 0.05). The tumor location (distance above anal margin) in the AC group was significantly larger thanthat in the non-AC group (P < 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the 5-year DFS andOS between the two groups. Postoperative AC did not significantly improve the prognosis of patients withrectal cancer. Age, tumor differentiation, and the number of resected lymph nodes were independent factorsaffecting the OS of patients (P < 0.05). Older patients, patients with lower degree of tumor differentiation,and patients with <12 resected lymph nodes showed worse prognosis (P < 0.05).Conclusion Patients with rectal cancer whose ypT0-3N0 stage is reduced after neoadjuvantchemoradiotherapy, especially those without adverse prognostic factors, do not need AC after surgery.

The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma remains unclear due to the lack of randomized control studies. This study aimed to investigate the possible benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable cholangiocarcinoma. Data sources: Relevant research articles published before 1 st March 2018 in Pub Med, Embase and the Cochrane library databases were retrieved. Published data were extracted and analyzed by RevMan 5.3, and the results were presented as hazard ratios(HRs) [95% confidence intervals(CI)] and forest plots. Results: One prospective and eighteen retrospective studies were included, with a total number of 11,458 patients, 4696 of whom received postoperative chemotherapy. There was a significant improvement of the overall survival(OS) for patients who underwent operation + adjuvant chemotherapy compared to those who underwent operation alone(HR = 0.61; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses show that the postoperative chemotherapy group compared with operation alone group are indicated as follows: hilar cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.60; P < 0.001), intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.60; P < 0.001), R1 resection group(HR = 0.71; P = 0.04), LN-positive diagnosis group(HR = 0.58; P < 0.001), gemcitabine-based chemotherapy group(HR = 0.42; P < 0.001), distal cholangiocarcinoma group(HR = 0.48; P = 0.17), R0 resection group(HR = 0.69; P = 0.43), and 5-flurouracil-based chemotherapy group(HR = 0.90; P = 0.66), respectively. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy can improve the OS in intrahepatic and hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients. However, distal cholangiocarcinoma patients gain no benefit from postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective randomized trials are warranted in order to define the standard chemotherapy regimen.

Current status of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer

Although radical gastrectomy is a standard treatment for advanced gastric cancer,recurrence remains high.After several large-scale controlled studies have shown the beneficial effects of adjuvant chemotherapy,that treatment emerged as a standard option for advanced gastric cancer after gastrectomy.However,various guidelines from different countries have suggested different adjuvant chemotherapies.Understanding the differences between guidelines is very important for investigating further therapeutic strategies.Fortunately,because there are many ongoing studies about new regimens for adjuvant treatment,it is expected that patients with gastric cancer after surgery will have better outcome.

High-risk endometrial cancer may be benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy plus chemotherapy

Objective： To present patterns of practice and outcomes in the adjuvant treatment of intermediate- and high-risk endometrial cancer. Methods： Retrospective data on 224 women with intermediate-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer from 1999 to 2006 were reviewed. All patients underwent surgical staging. Patterns of adjuvant treatment, consisting of pelvic radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy plus chemotherapy, were assessed. The 3- and 5-year disease-specific survival （DSS） rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results： The difference in 5-year DSS rate was statistically significant between adjuvant group and non-adjuvant group （80.65% vs. 63.80%, P=0.040）. In 110 high-risk patients who underwent adjuvant treatment, both 5-year DSS rate and recurrent rate were significantly different in combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy group compared with radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy alone groups （DSS rate, P=0.049; recurrent rate, P=0.047）. In 83 intermediate-risk women who underwent adjuvant treatment, there was no significant difference in 5-year DSS rate and recurrence rate among the combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone and chemotherapy alone groups （DSS rate, P=0.776; recurrent rate, P=0.937）.

Implications of clinical research on adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: Where to go next?

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy(ACT)confers superior gastric cancer(GC)survival in the Eastern cohort.However,is the current standard of ACT already excessive,or is it still necessary to increase its intensity for specific subgroups?Tailored ACT strategies for GC depend on gradual exploration by clinical trials in selected patients.Thus,understanding the implications of previous and current research can help us respond wisely and design effective,rational trials,save medical resources and make better decisions in clinical practice.After reviewing and analyzing studies on ACT for GC patients undergoing curative resection,we found that research strategies for conducting"addition""ACT for specific stages of the disease have achieved great progress in making ACT more tailored and personalized in consideration of pathology stages.Furthermore,trials indicate that"addition"ACT strategies for GC patient subgroups based on histological characteristics might be helpful to move toward a more specific tailored and personalized management approach.Designing ACT research focused on different node statuses should also be conducted according to the biological specificity of lymph node(LN)metastasis.Therefore,future trials designed to determine tailored treatment based on histological and biological characteristics for specific subgroups are urgently needed and conducted as the theme of the 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology(ASCO):Caring for Every Patient,Learning from Every Patient.

The efficacy of fluoropyrimidine.based adjuvant chemotherapy on biliary tract cancer after R0 resection

Background: The optimal treatment strategy for biliary tract cancer(BTC) after curative?intent resection remains con?troversial. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine?based adjuvant chemotherapy for BTC patients undergoing microscopically margin?negative(R0) resection.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of BTC patients who underwent curative?intent R0 resection. Patients were eligible if they received either fluoropyrimidine?based adjuvant chemotherapy or observation after R0 resection.Results: A total of 153 patients were included. In the entire patient cohort, no significant differences were observed in 5?year overall survival(OS) rates(48.4% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.439) or 3?year recurrence?free survival(RFS) rates(49.1% vs. 39.5%, P = 0.299) between patients who received fluoropyrimidine?based adjuvant chemotherapy or observation. However, for patients with stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ BTC, chemotherapy significantly improved 5?year OS rate(52.4% vs. 35.6%, P = 0.002) and 3?year RFS rate(55.5% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.021) compared with observation.Conclusion: Fluoropyrimidine?based adjuvant chemotherapy may prolong the survival of patients with stages Ⅱ and Ⅲ BTC after R0 resection.

Treatment patterns for adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer in China：A pooled retrospective analysis of four observational studies

Objective：Adjuvant docetaxel-based chemotherapy is frequently used for operable early breast cancer（EBC）.This study investigated patterns of use of docetaxel（T）in real-life clinical practice in China.Methods：This was a retrospective pooled analysis of the Asia-Pacific Breast Initiatives（APBI）Ⅰ（2006–2008）and Ⅱ（2009–2011）registries,and two Chinese observational studies;BC STATE（2011–2014）and BC Local Registry（2007–2010）.Female Chinese adults（≥18 years）with operable breast cancer treated with docetaxel-based adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the analysis.Patients with metastatic disease were excluded.The primary endpoint was assessment of treatment patterns and patient profiles.A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with choice of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen.Results：Data from 3,020 patients were included.The most frequently used adjuvant regimen was docetaxel/anthracycline combination[n=1,421（47.1%）;of whom 52.0%received T/epirubicin（E）/cyclophosphamide（C）],followed by docetaxel/other[n=705（23.3%）;of whom 72.8%received TC],docetaxel/anthracycline sequential[n=447（14.8%）;of whom 40.9%and 39.6%received 5-Fu/EC-T and EC-T,respectively],and＂other＂[n=447（14.8%）;of whom 91.5%received T].A significant association was found between adjuvant therapy with docetaxel/anthracycline combination and patient weight,menopausal status and estrogen receptor status.Conclusions：Real-world data revealed that docetaxel/anthracycline combination is the most commonly used category of docetaxel-based adjuvant therapy for patients with operable breast cancer in China;of which TEC is the most frequently used regimen.

Impact of duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in radically resected patients with T4bN1-3M0/TxN3bM0 gastric cancer

AIM To provide evidence regarding the postoperative treatment of patients with T4 b N1-3 M0/Tx N3 b M0 gastric cancer, for which guidelines have not been established. METHODS Patients who had undergone curative resection between 1996 and 2014 with a pathological stage of T4 b N1-3 M0/Tx N3 b M0 for gastric cancer were retrospectively analyzed; staging was based on the 7 th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. The clinicopathological characteristics, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy, and patterns of recurrence were studied. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors were conducted. The chemotherapeutic agents mainly included fluorouropyrimidine, platinum and taxanes, used as monotherapy, doublet, or triplet regimens. Patterns of first recurrence were categorized as locoregional recurrence, peritoneal dissemination, or distant metastasis.RESULTS The 5-year overall survival(OS) of the whole group(n = 176) was 16.8%, and the median OS was 25.7 mo(95%CI: 20.9-30.5). Lymphovascular invasion and a node positive rate(NPR) ≥ 0.8 were associated with a poor prognosis(P = 0.01 and P = 0.048, respectively). One hundred forty-seven(83.5%) of the 176 patients eventually experienced recurrence; the most common pattern of the first recurrence was distant metastasis. The prognosis was best for patients with locoregional recurrence and worst for those with peritoneal dissemination. Twelve(6.8%) of the 176 patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, while 164(93.2%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. Combined chemotherapy, including doublet and triplet regimens, was associated with a better prognosis than monotherapy, with no significant difference in 5-year OS(17.5% vs 0%, P = 0.613). The triplet regimen showed no significant survival benefit compared with the doublet regimen for 5-year OS(18.5% vs 17.4%, P = 0.661). Thirty-nine(22.1%) patients received adjuvant chemotherapy for longer than six months; the median OS in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy for longer than six months was 40.2 mo(95%CI: 30.6-48.2), significantly longer than the 21.6 mo(95%CI: 19.1-24.0) in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy for less than six months(P = 0.001).CONCLUSION Patients with T4 b N1-3 M0/Tx N3 b M0 gastric cancer showed a poor prognosis and a high risk of distant metastasis. Adjuvant chemotherapy for longer than six months improved outcomes for them.

Feasibility Study for Biweekly Administration of Cisplatin plus Vinorelbine as Adjuvant-Chemotherapy for Completely Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients in a Japanese Population

Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of biweekly administration of cisplatin and vinorelbine as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: This was a single-arm, single-institutional study. Patients with completely resected NSCLC (p-Stage IB-IIIA) with no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy were eligible. Simon’s optimal two-stage design was applied. Both cisplatin (50 mg/m2) and vinorelbine (25 mg/m2) were given on days 1 and 15, every 28 days. The primary endpoint of this study was the feasibility of this combination in the four cycles of treatment. Results: Twenty patients (19 lobectomies and 1 pneumonectomy) were enrolled in this study. 10 (50%) of patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia, and 3 (15%) had grade 3/4 anemia. Severe non-hematologic toxicities were uncommon in this series. No treatment-related death was encountered. 18 (90%) patients completed the planned 4 cycles of chemotherapy. The median intensity was 24.3 (range 18.1 to 25) mg/m2/week with an average of 23.6 (21 - 25) mg/m2/week cisplatin and 12.5 (range 10 to 12.5) mg/m2/week with an average of 12.3 (10 - 12.5) mg/m2/week vinorelbine. The median relative dose intensity of cisplatin was 97.5% (range 72.5% to 100%) with an average of 94.6% (72.5% - 100%) and that of vinorelbine was 100% (range 80% to 100%) with an average of 97.8% (80% - 100%). Conclusion: This regimen is feasible in the treatment of patients with completely resected NSCLC. A phase III trial is warranted to assess the efficacy of this regimen at promoting survival and preventing recurrence.