Even though Samuel Beckett's works,Waiting for Godot,reflects the idea of absurdism that mainly describes the desolation and the spirit crisis of modern west after two world wars,he doesn't deprive us of all t...Even though Samuel Beckett's works,Waiting for Godot,reflects the idea of absurdism that mainly describes the desolation and the spirit crisis of modern west after two world wars,he doesn't deprive us of all the hopes.In this article we are going to interpret roughly where the hope is embedded in four aspects.展开更多
This paper depicts nothingness expressed in Happy Days in terms of stage design, properties and characters' actions as well as the conversations in it.
Samuel Beckett is a master of the Theatre of Absurd.His plays,such as Waiting for Godot(1954)and Endgame(1958),project the irrationalism,helplessness,and absurdity of life in dramatic forms that reject realistic setti...Samuel Beckett is a master of the Theatre of Absurd.His plays,such as Waiting for Godot(1954)and Endgame(1958),project the irrationalism,helplessness,and absurdity of life in dramatic forms that reject realistic settings,logical reasoning,or a co-herently evolving plot.This thesis intends to interpret Endgame from the perspective of its themes and to help readers gain a betterunderstanding of the major issues confronted by a modern man in life.展开更多
Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Marlowe’s The Tragedy of Dr.Faustus are important dramatic works of the English Renaissance.Despite the distance between their periods of creation,Shakespeare and Marlowe share the same bac...Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Marlowe’s The Tragedy of Dr.Faustus are important dramatic works of the English Renaissance.Despite the distance between their periods of creation,Shakespeare and Marlowe share the same background of social life,and in the same ideological and cultural context,the two playwrights coincidentally deal with the theme of“nothingness”in their respective works.The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast Macbeth and The Tragedy of Dr.Faustus,and to compare the similarities and differences in characterization and narrative techniques between the two works in exploring the theme of“nothingness”.展开更多
In the interpretation of Mark Twain’s Is He Living or Is He Dead,the author points out that in the cage of human predic-ament the choice for being or nothingness lies in the fundamental precondition of ensuring subje...In the interpretation of Mark Twain’s Is He Living or Is He Dead,the author points out that in the cage of human predic-ament the choice for being or nothingness lies in the fundamental precondition of ensuring subjectivity first and foremost,with equal emphasis on the organic whole of the signifier and the signified in what he or she is doing,so as to realize the subject’s true value of life.展开更多
The origin of the universe?The origin of free will?The origin of space?Or simply the appearance of something out of nothing,with no causal before,likes a probability that transforms into an unpredictable particle actu...The origin of the universe?The origin of free will?The origin of space?Or simply the appearance of something out of nothing,with no causal before,likes a probability that transforms into an unpredictable particle actuality in quantum physics.In short,does better explanation for such questions await us?Or are we hamstrung by our tendency for“cause-and-effect”explanations or“something vs.nothing”ways of forcing the options?This essay explores the notion of beginnings-that is,the possibility of something from nothing.It begins by clarifying how the meaning of such terms is being intended,for example the question of whether the moon if no one sees it qualifies as a nothing,the question of an uncaused something or an effect minus an antecedent of any kind.In short,what does a something-from-nothing entail?And what is a something in the first place,as Heidegger asks in his essay,“What Is a Thing?”Having sketched out notions of“something”and“nothing”,the discussion proceeds to the central question,namely the possibility of a something from nothing.What is something?What is nothing?It may be that we need new categories of understanding for a better answer.This essay suggests such a quest.展开更多
文摘Even though Samuel Beckett's works,Waiting for Godot,reflects the idea of absurdism that mainly describes the desolation and the spirit crisis of modern west after two world wars,he doesn't deprive us of all the hopes.In this article we are going to interpret roughly where the hope is embedded in four aspects.
文摘This paper depicts nothingness expressed in Happy Days in terms of stage design, properties and characters' actions as well as the conversations in it.
文摘Samuel Beckett is a master of the Theatre of Absurd.His plays,such as Waiting for Godot(1954)and Endgame(1958),project the irrationalism,helplessness,and absurdity of life in dramatic forms that reject realistic settings,logical reasoning,or a co-herently evolving plot.This thesis intends to interpret Endgame from the perspective of its themes and to help readers gain a betterunderstanding of the major issues confronted by a modern man in life.
文摘Shakespeare’s Macbeth and Marlowe’s The Tragedy of Dr.Faustus are important dramatic works of the English Renaissance.Despite the distance between their periods of creation,Shakespeare and Marlowe share the same background of social life,and in the same ideological and cultural context,the two playwrights coincidentally deal with the theme of“nothingness”in their respective works.The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast Macbeth and The Tragedy of Dr.Faustus,and to compare the similarities and differences in characterization and narrative techniques between the two works in exploring the theme of“nothingness”.
文摘In the interpretation of Mark Twain’s Is He Living or Is He Dead,the author points out that in the cage of human predic-ament the choice for being or nothingness lies in the fundamental precondition of ensuring subjectivity first and foremost,with equal emphasis on the organic whole of the signifier and the signified in what he or she is doing,so as to realize the subject’s true value of life.
文摘The origin of the universe?The origin of free will?The origin of space?Or simply the appearance of something out of nothing,with no causal before,likes a probability that transforms into an unpredictable particle actuality in quantum physics.In short,does better explanation for such questions await us?Or are we hamstrung by our tendency for“cause-and-effect”explanations or“something vs.nothing”ways of forcing the options?This essay explores the notion of beginnings-that is,the possibility of something from nothing.It begins by clarifying how the meaning of such terms is being intended,for example the question of whether the moon if no one sees it qualifies as a nothing,the question of an uncaused something or an effect minus an antecedent of any kind.In short,what does a something-from-nothing entail?And what is a something in the first place,as Heidegger asks in his essay,“What Is a Thing?”Having sketched out notions of“something”and“nothing”,the discussion proceeds to the central question,namely the possibility of a something from nothing.What is something?What is nothing?It may be that we need new categories of understanding for a better answer.This essay suggests such a quest.
