目的探究孕妇孕期血清样本中血清十八碳一不饱和脂肪酸硬脂酰鞘氨醇(serum stearoyl sphingosine,C18∶1-Cer)和1-硬脂酰基-sn-甘油-3-磷酸胆碱(lysophosphatidyl choline,LPC18∶0)水平在预测孕妇患妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes ...目的探究孕妇孕期血清样本中血清十八碳一不饱和脂肪酸硬脂酰鞘氨醇(serum stearoyl sphingosine,C18∶1-Cer)和1-硬脂酰基-sn-甘油-3-磷酸胆碱(lysophosphatidyl choline,LPC18∶0)水平在预测孕妇患妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes mellitus,GDM)方面的价值。方法回顾性分析126例孕妇的临床资料和实验室指标,根据GDM诊断结果,将研究对象分为GDM组(n=66)和对照组(n=60)。采用质谱法检测研究对象孕早期和孕中期血清C18∶1-Cer和LPC18∶0水平,通过Logistic回归分析筛选出GDM的危险因素,采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评估C18∶1-Cer,LPC188∶0和两者联合对GDM的预测价值。结果与对照组相比,GDM组血清C18∶1-Cer和LPC18∶0水平在孕早期(18.92±2.77ng/ml vs 23.47±4.18ng/ml,41.32±17.55ng/ml vs 88.08±16.02ng/ml)和孕中期(23.14±4.10ng/ml vs 18.76±4.05ng/ml,84.60±14.53ng/ml vs 40.50±17.79ng/ml)均显著升高,差异具有统计学意义(t=7.127,15.637;-5.984,2.174,均P<0.05)。C18∶1-Cer与空腹血糖(fasting plasma glucose,FPG)、空腹胰岛素(fasting plasma insulin,FPI)、胰岛素抵抗指数(homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance,HOMA-IR)、糖化血红蛋白(glycated hemoglobin,HbA1c)和三酰甘油(triglyceride,TG)呈正相关(r=0.458,0.209,0.317,0.223,0.219,均P<0.05)。LPC18∶0与FPG,FPI,HOMA-IR,HbA1c,总胆固醇(total cholesterol,TC)和TG呈正相关(r=0.715,0.426,0.580,0.465,0.232,0.372,均P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,C18∶1-Cer[OR(95%CI):1.522(1.136~.039),P<0.05]和LPC18∶0[OR(95%CI):1.198(1.102~1.302),P<0.001]是GDM的独立危险因素。ROC曲线分析结果显示,血清C18∶1-Cer,LPC18∶0和两指标联合的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分别为0.819,0.971和0.986,两者联合检测的预测效能优于单独检测。结论妊娠早期血清中的C18∶1-Cer和LPC18∶0与GDM的发生密切相关,C18∶1-Cer联合LPC18∶0对GDM早期诊断有一定的预测价值。展开更多
以程序性死亡蛋白-1(programmed death protein-1,PD-1)抑制剂为代表的免疫检查点抑制剂在胃癌中显示良好疗效,逐步改变晚期胃癌的治疗格局。对于程序性死亡蛋白配体-1(programmed death-ligand 1,PD-L1)高表达的患者,PD-L1单抗的治疗...以程序性死亡蛋白-1(programmed death protein-1,PD-1)抑制剂为代表的免疫检查点抑制剂在胃癌中显示良好疗效,逐步改变晚期胃癌的治疗格局。对于程序性死亡蛋白配体-1(programmed death-ligand 1,PD-L1)高表达的患者,PD-L1单抗的治疗效果更为优异,且与PD-L1蛋白表达水平呈正相关。而对于PD-L1阴性或低表达这类免疫治疗非优势人群,以PD-1单抗为基础的用药方案疗效有限,尝试双特异性抗体、ADC等不同药物的联合也是一种趋势。为了精准指导临床实践,中国抗癌协会胃癌专业委员会组织国内胃癌领域专家进行多轮讨论,系统汇总国内外最新指南和循证证据,并结合我国临床实际,从病理检测、晚期治疗以及围术期治疗3个方面制订了本专家共识,旨在提高胃癌诊治的科学性和规范性,尤其是指导基层医生对免疫治疗的选择和应用。展开更多
BACKGROUND Regorafenib(R)and fruquintinib(F)are the standard third-line regimens for colorectal cancer(CRC)according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines,but both have limited efficacy.Several phase...BACKGROUND Regorafenib(R)and fruquintinib(F)are the standard third-line regimens for colorectal cancer(CRC)according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines,but both have limited efficacy.Several phase 2 trials have indicated that R or F combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can reverse immunosuppression and achieve promising efficacy for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair(MSS/pMMR)CRC.Due to the lack of studies comparing the efficacy between F,R,F plus programmed death-1(PD-1)inhibitor,and R plus PD-1 inhibitors(RP),it is still unclear whether the combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy.AIM To provide critical evidence for selecting the appropriate drugs for MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC(mCRC)patients in clinical practice.METHODS A total of 2639 CRC patients were enrolled from January 2018 to September 2022 in our hospital,and 313 MSS/pMMR mCRC patients were finally included.RESULTS A total of 313 eligible patients were divided into F(n=70),R(n=67),F plus PD-1 inhibitor(FP)(n=95)and RP(n=81)groups.The key clinical characteristics were well balanced among the groups.The median progression-free survival(PFS)of the F,R,FP,and RP groups was 3.5 months,3.6 months,4.9 months,and 3.0 months,respectively.The median overall survival(OS)was 14.6 months,15.7 months,16.7 months,and 14.1 months.The FP regimen had an improved disease control rate(DCR)(P=0.044)and 6-month PFS(P=0.014)and exhibited a better trend in PFS(P=0.057)compared with F,and it was also significantly better in PFS than RP(P=0.030).RP did not confer a significant survival benefit;instead,the R group had a trend toward greater benefit with OS(P=0.080)compared with RP.No significant differences were observed between the R and F groups in PFS or OS(P>0.05).CONCLUSION FP is superior to F in achieving 6-month PFS and DCR,while RP is not better than R.FP has an improved PFS and 6-month PFS compared with RP,but F and R had similar clinical efficacy.Therefore,FP may be a highly promising strategy in the treatment of MSS/pMMR mCRC.展开更多
Objective:This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)antibody(SCT200)and an anti-programmed cell death 1(PD-1)antibody(SCT-I10A)as third-line or subsequent therapies ...Objective:This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)antibody(SCT200)and an anti-programmed cell death 1(PD-1)antibody(SCT-I10A)as third-line or subsequent therapies in patients with rat sarcoma viral oncogene(RAS)/v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B(BRAF)wild-type(wt)metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC).Methods:We conducted a multicenter,open-label,phase Ib clinical trial.Patients with histologically confirmed RAS/BRAF wt m CRC with more than two lines of treatment were enrolled and treated with SCT-I10A and SCT200.The primary endpoints were the objective response rate(ORR)and safety.The secondary endpoints included disease control rate(DCR),progression-free survival(PFS),and overall survival(OS).Results:Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study through January 28,2023.The ORR was 28.57%and the DCR was 85.71%(18/21).The median PFS and OS were 4.14 and 12.84 months,respectively.The treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs)were tolerable.Moreover,compared with the monotherapy cohort from our previous phase I study evaluating SCT200 for RAS/BRAF wt m CRC in a third-line setting,no significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed in the combination group.Conclusions:SCT200 combined with SCT-I10A demonstrated promising efficacy in previously treated RAS/BRAF wt m CRC patients with an acceptable safety profile.Further head-to-head studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate whether the efficacy and safety of combined anti-EGFR and anti-PD-1 therapy are superior to anti-EGFR monotherapy in the third-line setting.(Registration No.NCT04229537).展开更多
Objective: IMpower210(NCT02813785) explored the efficacy and safety of single-agent atezolizumab vs.docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) in East Asian patients.Methods: Key...Objective: IMpower210(NCT02813785) explored the efficacy and safety of single-agent atezolizumab vs.docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) in East Asian patients.Methods: Key eligibility criteria for this phase Ⅲ, open-label, randomized study included age ≥18 years;histologically documented advanced NSCLC per the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system(7th edition);Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1;and disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezolizumab(1,200 mg) or docetaxel(75 mg/m^(2)). The primary study endpoint was overall survival(OS) in the intention-to-treat(ITT) population with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor expression(ITT EGFR-WT) and in the overall ITT population.Results: Median OS in the ITT EGFR-WT population(n=467) was 12.3 [95% confidence interval(95% CI),10.3-13.8] months in the atezolizumab arm(n=312) and 9.9(95% CI, 7.8-13.9) months in the docetaxel arm[n=155;stratified hazard ratio(HR), 0.82;95% CI, 0.66-1.03]. Median OS in the overall ITT population was 12.5(95% CI, 10.8-13.8) months with atezolizumab treatment and 11.1(95% CI, 8.4-14.2) months(n=377) with docetaxel treatment(n=188;stratified HR, 0.87;95% CI, 0.71-1.08). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs) occurred in 18.4% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 50.0% of patients in the docetaxel arm.Conclusions: IMpower210 did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint of OS in the ITT EGFR-WT or overall ITT populations. Atezolizumab was comparatively more tolerable than docetaxel, with a lower incidence of grade3/4 TRAEs.展开更多
BACKGROUND Anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1)immuno-therapy has demonstrated promising results on gastric cancer(GC).However,PD-L1 can express differently between metastatic sites and primar...BACKGROUND Anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1)immuno-therapy has demonstrated promising results on gastric cancer(GC).However,PD-L1 can express differently between metastatic sites and primary tumors(PT).AIM To compare PD-L1 status in PT and matched lymph node metastases(LNM)of GC patients and to determine the correlation between the PD-L1 status and clinicopathological characteristics.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 284 GC patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy.PD-L1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry(clone SP142)using the com-bined positive score.All PD-L1+PT staged as pN+were also tested for PD-L1 expression in their LNM.PD-L1(-)GC with pN+served as the comparison group.RESULTS Among 284 GC patients included,45 had PD-L1+PT and 24 of them had pN+.For comparison,44 PD-L1(-)cases with pN+were included(sample loss of 4 cases).Of the PD-L1+PT,54.2%(13/24 cases)were also PD-L1+in the LNM.Regarding PD-L1(-)PT,9.1%(4/44)had PD-L1+in the LNM.The agreement between PT and LNM had a kappa value of 0.483.Larger tumor size and moderate/severe peritumoral inflammatory response were associated with PD-L1 positivity in both sites.There was no statistical difference in overall survival for PT and LNM according to the PD-L1 status(P=0.166 and P=0.837,respectively).CONCLUSION Intra-patient heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression was observed between the PT and matched LNM.This disagreement in PD-L1 status may emphasize the importance of considering different tumor sites for analyses to select patients for immunotherapy.展开更多
Despite the continuous developments and advancements in the treatment of gastric cancer(GC),which is one of the most prevalent types of cancer in China,the overall survival is still poor for most patients with advance...Despite the continuous developments and advancements in the treatment of gastric cancer(GC),which is one of the most prevalent types of cancer in China,the overall survival is still poor for most patients with advanced GC.In recent years,with the progress in tumor immunology research,attention has shifted toward immunotherapy as a therapeutic approach for GC.Programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)inhibitors,as novel immunosuppressive medications,have been widely utilized in the treatment of GC.However,many patients are still resistant to PD-1 inhibitors and experience recurrence in the advanced stages of PD-1 immunotherapy.To reduce the occurrence of drug resistance and recurrence in GC patients receiving PD-1 immunotherapy,to maximize the clinical activity of immunosuppressive drugs,and to elicit a lasting immune response,it is essential to research the tumor microenvironment mechanisms leading to PD-1 inhibitor resistance in GC patients.This article reviews the progress in studying the factors influencing the resistance to PD-1 inhibitors in the GC tumor microenvironment,aiming to provide insights and a basis for reducing resistance to PD-1 inhibitors for GC patients in the future.展开更多
文摘目的探究孕妇孕期血清样本中血清十八碳一不饱和脂肪酸硬脂酰鞘氨醇(serum stearoyl sphingosine,C18∶1-Cer)和1-硬脂酰基-sn-甘油-3-磷酸胆碱(lysophosphatidyl choline,LPC18∶0)水平在预测孕妇患妊娠期糖尿病(gestational diabetes mellitus,GDM)方面的价值。方法回顾性分析126例孕妇的临床资料和实验室指标,根据GDM诊断结果,将研究对象分为GDM组(n=66)和对照组(n=60)。采用质谱法检测研究对象孕早期和孕中期血清C18∶1-Cer和LPC18∶0水平,通过Logistic回归分析筛选出GDM的危险因素,采用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线评估C18∶1-Cer,LPC188∶0和两者联合对GDM的预测价值。结果与对照组相比,GDM组血清C18∶1-Cer和LPC18∶0水平在孕早期(18.92±2.77ng/ml vs 23.47±4.18ng/ml,41.32±17.55ng/ml vs 88.08±16.02ng/ml)和孕中期(23.14±4.10ng/ml vs 18.76±4.05ng/ml,84.60±14.53ng/ml vs 40.50±17.79ng/ml)均显著升高,差异具有统计学意义(t=7.127,15.637;-5.984,2.174,均P<0.05)。C18∶1-Cer与空腹血糖(fasting plasma glucose,FPG)、空腹胰岛素(fasting plasma insulin,FPI)、胰岛素抵抗指数(homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance,HOMA-IR)、糖化血红蛋白(glycated hemoglobin,HbA1c)和三酰甘油(triglyceride,TG)呈正相关(r=0.458,0.209,0.317,0.223,0.219,均P<0.05)。LPC18∶0与FPG,FPI,HOMA-IR,HbA1c,总胆固醇(total cholesterol,TC)和TG呈正相关(r=0.715,0.426,0.580,0.465,0.232,0.372,均P<0.05)。Logistic回归分析结果显示,C18∶1-Cer[OR(95%CI):1.522(1.136~.039),P<0.05]和LPC18∶0[OR(95%CI):1.198(1.102~1.302),P<0.001]是GDM的独立危险因素。ROC曲线分析结果显示,血清C18∶1-Cer,LPC18∶0和两指标联合的曲线下面积(area under the curve,AUC)分别为0.819,0.971和0.986,两者联合检测的预测效能优于单独检测。结论妊娠早期血清中的C18∶1-Cer和LPC18∶0与GDM的发生密切相关,C18∶1-Cer联合LPC18∶0对GDM早期诊断有一定的预测价值。
文摘以程序性死亡蛋白-1(programmed death protein-1,PD-1)抑制剂为代表的免疫检查点抑制剂在胃癌中显示良好疗效,逐步改变晚期胃癌的治疗格局。对于程序性死亡蛋白配体-1(programmed death-ligand 1,PD-L1)高表达的患者,PD-L1单抗的治疗效果更为优异,且与PD-L1蛋白表达水平呈正相关。而对于PD-L1阴性或低表达这类免疫治疗非优势人群,以PD-1单抗为基础的用药方案疗效有限,尝试双特异性抗体、ADC等不同药物的联合也是一种趋势。为了精准指导临床实践,中国抗癌协会胃癌专业委员会组织国内胃癌领域专家进行多轮讨论,系统汇总国内外最新指南和循证证据,并结合我国临床实际,从病理检测、晚期治疗以及围术期治疗3个方面制订了本专家共识,旨在提高胃癌诊治的科学性和规范性,尤其是指导基层医生对免疫治疗的选择和应用。
文摘BACKGROUND Regorafenib(R)and fruquintinib(F)are the standard third-line regimens for colorectal cancer(CRC)according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines,but both have limited efficacy.Several phase 2 trials have indicated that R or F combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors can reverse immunosuppression and achieve promising efficacy for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair(MSS/pMMR)CRC.Due to the lack of studies comparing the efficacy between F,R,F plus programmed death-1(PD-1)inhibitor,and R plus PD-1 inhibitors(RP),it is still unclear whether the combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy.AIM To provide critical evidence for selecting the appropriate drugs for MSS/pMMR metastatic CRC(mCRC)patients in clinical practice.METHODS A total of 2639 CRC patients were enrolled from January 2018 to September 2022 in our hospital,and 313 MSS/pMMR mCRC patients were finally included.RESULTS A total of 313 eligible patients were divided into F(n=70),R(n=67),F plus PD-1 inhibitor(FP)(n=95)and RP(n=81)groups.The key clinical characteristics were well balanced among the groups.The median progression-free survival(PFS)of the F,R,FP,and RP groups was 3.5 months,3.6 months,4.9 months,and 3.0 months,respectively.The median overall survival(OS)was 14.6 months,15.7 months,16.7 months,and 14.1 months.The FP regimen had an improved disease control rate(DCR)(P=0.044)and 6-month PFS(P=0.014)and exhibited a better trend in PFS(P=0.057)compared with F,and it was also significantly better in PFS than RP(P=0.030).RP did not confer a significant survival benefit;instead,the R group had a trend toward greater benefit with OS(P=0.080)compared with RP.No significant differences were observed between the R and F groups in PFS or OS(P>0.05).CONCLUSION FP is superior to F in achieving 6-month PFS and DCR,while RP is not better than R.FP has an improved PFS and 6-month PFS compared with RP,but F and R had similar clinical efficacy.Therefore,FP may be a highly promising strategy in the treatment of MSS/pMMR mCRC.
基金funded by Tianjin Key Medical Discipline(Specialty)Construction Project(Grant No.TJYXZDXK-009A)National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant No.82103677)National Science and Technology Major Projects of China(Grant No.2019ZX09732-001)。
文摘Objective:This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR)antibody(SCT200)and an anti-programmed cell death 1(PD-1)antibody(SCT-I10A)as third-line or subsequent therapies in patients with rat sarcoma viral oncogene(RAS)/v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B(BRAF)wild-type(wt)metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC).Methods:We conducted a multicenter,open-label,phase Ib clinical trial.Patients with histologically confirmed RAS/BRAF wt m CRC with more than two lines of treatment were enrolled and treated with SCT-I10A and SCT200.The primary endpoints were the objective response rate(ORR)and safety.The secondary endpoints included disease control rate(DCR),progression-free survival(PFS),and overall survival(OS).Results:Twenty-one patients were enrolled in the study through January 28,2023.The ORR was 28.57%and the DCR was 85.71%(18/21).The median PFS and OS were 4.14 and 12.84 months,respectively.The treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs)were tolerable.Moreover,compared with the monotherapy cohort from our previous phase I study evaluating SCT200 for RAS/BRAF wt m CRC in a third-line setting,no significant improvements in PFS and OS were observed in the combination group.Conclusions:SCT200 combined with SCT-I10A demonstrated promising efficacy in previously treated RAS/BRAF wt m CRC patients with an acceptable safety profile.Further head-to-head studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate whether the efficacy and safety of combined anti-EGFR and anti-PD-1 therapy are superior to anti-EGFR monotherapy in the third-line setting.(Registration No.NCT04229537).
基金funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd sponsored the IMpower210 study。
文摘Objective: IMpower210(NCT02813785) explored the efficacy and safety of single-agent atezolizumab vs.docetaxel as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) in East Asian patients.Methods: Key eligibility criteria for this phase Ⅲ, open-label, randomized study included age ≥18 years;histologically documented advanced NSCLC per the Union for International Cancer Control/American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system(7th edition);Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1;and disease progression following platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive either atezolizumab(1,200 mg) or docetaxel(75 mg/m^(2)). The primary study endpoint was overall survival(OS) in the intention-to-treat(ITT) population with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor expression(ITT EGFR-WT) and in the overall ITT population.Results: Median OS in the ITT EGFR-WT population(n=467) was 12.3 [95% confidence interval(95% CI),10.3-13.8] months in the atezolizumab arm(n=312) and 9.9(95% CI, 7.8-13.9) months in the docetaxel arm[n=155;stratified hazard ratio(HR), 0.82;95% CI, 0.66-1.03]. Median OS in the overall ITT population was 12.5(95% CI, 10.8-13.8) months with atezolizumab treatment and 11.1(95% CI, 8.4-14.2) months(n=377) with docetaxel treatment(n=188;stratified HR, 0.87;95% CI, 0.71-1.08). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events(TRAEs) occurred in 18.4% of patients in the atezolizumab arm and 50.0% of patients in the docetaxel arm.Conclusions: IMpower210 did not meet its primary efficacy endpoint of OS in the ITT EGFR-WT or overall ITT populations. Atezolizumab was comparatively more tolerable than docetaxel, with a lower incidence of grade3/4 TRAEs.
基金The study was approved by the hospital ethics committee and registered online(https://plataformabrasil.saude.gov.br,CAAE:26380019.6.0000.0065).
文摘BACKGROUND Anti-programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1(PD-1/PD-L1)immuno-therapy has demonstrated promising results on gastric cancer(GC).However,PD-L1 can express differently between metastatic sites and primary tumors(PT).AIM To compare PD-L1 status in PT and matched lymph node metastases(LNM)of GC patients and to determine the correlation between the PD-L1 status and clinicopathological characteristics.METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 284 GC patients who underwent D2-gastrectomy.PD-L1 was evaluated by immunohistochemistry(clone SP142)using the com-bined positive score.All PD-L1+PT staged as pN+were also tested for PD-L1 expression in their LNM.PD-L1(-)GC with pN+served as the comparison group.RESULTS Among 284 GC patients included,45 had PD-L1+PT and 24 of them had pN+.For comparison,44 PD-L1(-)cases with pN+were included(sample loss of 4 cases).Of the PD-L1+PT,54.2%(13/24 cases)were also PD-L1+in the LNM.Regarding PD-L1(-)PT,9.1%(4/44)had PD-L1+in the LNM.The agreement between PT and LNM had a kappa value of 0.483.Larger tumor size and moderate/severe peritumoral inflammatory response were associated with PD-L1 positivity in both sites.There was no statistical difference in overall survival for PT and LNM according to the PD-L1 status(P=0.166 and P=0.837,respectively).CONCLUSION Intra-patient heterogeneity in PD-L1 expression was observed between the PT and matched LNM.This disagreement in PD-L1 status may emphasize the importance of considering different tumor sites for analyses to select patients for immunotherapy.
基金Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province,No.21JR1RA186and the Health Industry Research Program of Gansu Province,No.GSWSKY2021-043.
文摘Despite the continuous developments and advancements in the treatment of gastric cancer(GC),which is one of the most prevalent types of cancer in China,the overall survival is still poor for most patients with advanced GC.In recent years,with the progress in tumor immunology research,attention has shifted toward immunotherapy as a therapeutic approach for GC.Programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1)inhibitors,as novel immunosuppressive medications,have been widely utilized in the treatment of GC.However,many patients are still resistant to PD-1 inhibitors and experience recurrence in the advanced stages of PD-1 immunotherapy.To reduce the occurrence of drug resistance and recurrence in GC patients receiving PD-1 immunotherapy,to maximize the clinical activity of immunosuppressive drugs,and to elicit a lasting immune response,it is essential to research the tumor microenvironment mechanisms leading to PD-1 inhibitor resistance in GC patients.This article reviews the progress in studying the factors influencing the resistance to PD-1 inhibitors in the GC tumor microenvironment,aiming to provide insights and a basis for reducing resistance to PD-1 inhibitors for GC patients in the future.
