AIM： Acute pancreatitis （AP） is a process with variable involvement of regional tissues or organ systems. Multifactorial scales included the Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE Ⅱ） syst...AIM： Acute pancreatitis （AP） is a process with variable involvement of regional tissues or organ systems. Multifactorial scales included the Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE Ⅱ） systems and Balthazar computed tomography severity index （CTSI）. The purpose of this review study was to assess the accuracy of CTSI, Ranson score, and APACHE II score in course and outcome prediction of AP. METHODS： We reviewed 121 patients who underwent helical CT within 48 h after onset of symptoms of a first episode of AP between 1999 and 2003. Fourteen inappropriate subjects were excluded; we reviewed the 107 contrastenhanced CT images to calculate the CTSI. We also reviewed their Ranson and APACHE Ⅱ score. In addition, complications, duration of hospitalization, mortality rate, and other pathology history also were our comparison parameters. RESULTS： We classified 85 patients （79%） as having mild AP （CTSI 〈5） and 22 patients （21%） as having severe AP （CTSI ≥5）. In mild group, the mean APACHE II score and Ranson score was 8.6±1.9 and 2.4±1.2, and those of severe group was 10.2±2.1 and 3.1±0.8, respectively. The most common complication was pseudocyst and abscess and it presented in 21 （20%） patients and their CTSI was 5.9±1.4. A CTSI ≥5 significantly correlated with death, complication present, and prolonged length of stay. Patients with a CTSI ≥5 were 15 times to die than those CTSI 〈5, and the prolonged length of stay and complications present were 17 times and 8 times than that in CTSI 〈5, respectively. CONCLUSION： CTSI is a useful tool in assessing the severity and outcome of AP and the CTSI ≥5 is an index in our study. Although Ranson score and APACHE II score also are choices to be the predictors for complications, mortality and the length of stay of AP, the sensitivity of them are lower than CTSI.展开更多
目的探究在对重症冠心病患者护理时开展急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluation,APACHElI)的护理联合身心综合护理对患者睡眠质量、生活质量的影响。方法在2022年1月至2023年12月重症冠心病患...目的探究在对重症冠心病患者护理时开展急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluation,APACHElI)的护理联合身心综合护理对患者睡眠质量、生活质量的影响。方法在2022年1月至2023年12月重症冠心病患者中选择76例,按照数字表随机排序1-76号,奇数序列开展常规护理(38例,对照组),偶数序列开展APACHEⅡ的护理联合身心综合护理(38例,观察组)。针对两组睡眠质量、生活质量以及并发症进行统计。结果针对患者睡眠质量评估,观察组护理后睡眠质量高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对比患者生活质量,观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。针对患者并发症统计,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在对重症冠心病患者护理时开展APACHEⅡ的护理联合身心综合护理,可以提升患者睡眠质量以及生活质量,降低并发症发生率,有助于患者恢复。展开更多
文摘AIM： Acute pancreatitis （AP） is a process with variable involvement of regional tissues or organ systems. Multifactorial scales included the Ranson, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation （APACHE Ⅱ） systems and Balthazar computed tomography severity index （CTSI）. The purpose of this review study was to assess the accuracy of CTSI, Ranson score, and APACHE II score in course and outcome prediction of AP. METHODS： We reviewed 121 patients who underwent helical CT within 48 h after onset of symptoms of a first episode of AP between 1999 and 2003. Fourteen inappropriate subjects were excluded; we reviewed the 107 contrastenhanced CT images to calculate the CTSI. We also reviewed their Ranson and APACHE Ⅱ score. In addition, complications, duration of hospitalization, mortality rate, and other pathology history also were our comparison parameters. RESULTS： We classified 85 patients （79%） as having mild AP （CTSI 〈5） and 22 patients （21%） as having severe AP （CTSI ≥5）. In mild group, the mean APACHE II score and Ranson score was 8.6±1.9 and 2.4±1.2, and those of severe group was 10.2±2.1 and 3.1±0.8, respectively. The most common complication was pseudocyst and abscess and it presented in 21 （20%） patients and their CTSI was 5.9±1.4. A CTSI ≥5 significantly correlated with death, complication present, and prolonged length of stay. Patients with a CTSI ≥5 were 15 times to die than those CTSI 〈5, and the prolonged length of stay and complications present were 17 times and 8 times than that in CTSI 〈5, respectively. CONCLUSION： CTSI is a useful tool in assessing the severity and outcome of AP and the CTSI ≥5 is an index in our study. Although Ranson score and APACHE II score also are choices to be the predictors for complications, mortality and the length of stay of AP, the sensitivity of them are lower than CTSI.
文摘目的探究在对重症冠心病患者护理时开展急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ(acute physiology and chronic health evaluation,APACHElI)的护理联合身心综合护理对患者睡眠质量、生活质量的影响。方法在2022年1月至2023年12月重症冠心病患者中选择76例,按照数字表随机排序1-76号,奇数序列开展常规护理(38例,对照组),偶数序列开展APACHEⅡ的护理联合身心综合护理(38例,观察组)。针对两组睡眠质量、生活质量以及并发症进行统计。结果针对患者睡眠质量评估,观察组护理后睡眠质量高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。对比患者生活质量,观察组高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。针对患者并发症统计,观察组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在对重症冠心病患者护理时开展APACHEⅡ的护理联合身心综合护理,可以提升患者睡眠质量以及生活质量,降低并发症发生率,有助于患者恢复。
