AIM:To investigate the actual injury situation of seniors in traffic accidents and to evaluate the different injury patterns.METHODS:Injury data,environmental circumstances and crash circumstances of accidents were co...AIM:To investigate the actual injury situation of seniors in traffic accidents and to evaluate the different injury patterns.METHODS:Injury data,environmental circumstances and crash circumstances of accidents were collected shortly after the accident event at the scene.With these data,a technical and medical analysis was performed,including Injury Severity Score,Abbreviated Injury Scale and Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale.The method of data collection is named the German InDepth Accident Study and can be seen as representative.RESULTS:A total of 4430 injured seniors in traffic accidents were evaluated.The incidence of sustaining severe injuries to extremities,head and maxillofacial region was significantly higher in the group of elderly people compared to a younger age(P<0.05).The number of accident-related injuries was higher in the group of seniors compared to other groups.CONCLUSION:Seniors are more likely to be involved in traffic injuries and to sustain serious to severe injuries compared to other groups.展开更多
目的:探讨基于应激系统理论的护理干预在口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年1月-2021年10月在笔者医院口腔科收治的80例口腔颌面部损伤患者作为研究对象,采用1:1简单随机数表法将入组患者分为观察组和对照组,每组4...目的:探讨基于应激系统理论的护理干预在口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年1月-2021年10月在笔者医院口腔科收治的80例口腔颌面部损伤患者作为研究对象,采用1:1简单随机数表法将入组患者分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。两组患者均在急诊科抢救室进行口腔颌面部修复重建,并于修复完成后进急诊观察室观察病情。对照组予以急诊科常规护理,观察组行基于应激系统理论的护理干预,持续护理直至患者病情稳定后离开急诊。护理后比较两组疼痛水平、睡眠、心理状态、术后并发症、满意度评价情况。结果:术后第6 h、术后第3天疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual analog scoring,VAS)先升高后下降,且观察组均低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后第3天,两组患者匹茨堡睡眠质量(Pittsburg sleep quality index,PSQI)评分均明显降低,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05),两组患者心理韧性评分(Chinese version of resilience scale,CD-RISC)均明显升高,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后病房环境、技术操作、术后形态、服务态度满意度问卷评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:基于应激系统理论的护理干预可以降低口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者术后疼痛应激水平,并改善患者睡眠与心理状态。展开更多
Objective： To assess whether these characteristics of less misclassification and greater area under receiver operator characteristic （ROC） curve of the new injury severity score （NISS） are better than the injury ...Objective： To assess whether these characteristics of less misclassification and greater area under receiver operator characteristic （ROC） curve of the new injury severity score （NISS） are better than the injury severity score （ISS） as applying it to our multiple trauma patients registered into the emergency intensive care unit （EICU）. Methods： This was a retrospective review of registry data from 2 286 multiple trauma patients consecutively registered into the EICU from January 1,1997 to December 31, 2006 in the Second Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University in China. Comparisons between ISS and NISS were made using misclassification rates, ROC curve analysis, and the H-L statistics by univariate and multivariate logistic progression model. Results： Among the 2 286 patients, 176 （7.7%） were excluded because of deaths on arrival or patients less than 16 years of age. The study population therefore comprised 2 1 10 patients. Mean EICU length of stay （LOS） was 7.8 days ± 2.4 days. Compared with the blunt injury group, the penetrating injury group had a higher percentage of male, lower mean EICU LOS and age. The most frequently injured body regions were extremities and head/neck, followed by thorax, face and abdomen in the blunt injury group; whereas, thorax and abdomen were more frequently seen in the penetrating injury group. The minimum misclassification rate for NISS was slightly less than ISS in all groups （4.01% versus 4.49%）. However, NISS had more tendency to misclassify in the penetrating injury group. This, we noted, was attributed mainly to a higher false-positive rate （21.04% versus 15.55% for IS S, t=-3.310, P〈0.001）, resulting in an overall misclassification rate of 23.57% for NISS versus 18.79% for ISS （t=3.290, P〈0.001）. In the whole sample, NISS presented equivalent discrimination （area under ROC curve： NISS=0.938 versus ISS=0.943）. The H-L statistics showed poorer calibration （48.64 versus 32.11, t=3.305, P〈0.001） in the penetrating injury group. Conclusions： NISS should not replace ISS because Lhey share similar accuracy and calibration in predicting multiple blunt trauma patients. NISS may be more sensitive but less specific than ISS in predicting mortality in certain penetrating injury patients.展开更多
目的探讨（modified early warning system，MEWS）评分在急诊批量伤员救治中的实践意义。方法将2011年6月-2016年10月新疆军区总医院急诊科救治的459例批量伤员使用MEWS评分与AIS—ISS评分进行一致性分析，并与现存的各评分比较推测近...目的探讨（modified early warning system，MEWS）评分在急诊批量伤员救治中的实践意义。方法将2011年6月-2016年10月新疆军区总医院急诊科救治的459例批量伤员使用MEWS评分与AIS—ISS评分进行一致性分析，并与现存的各评分比较推测近、远期死亡率。结果根据Kappa一致性分析，本研究Kappa值为0．691，P=0．000〈0．005有统计学意义，提示一致性好。通过c—statistics显示推测MEWS远期死亡率为0．945（95％CI 0．879-0．961），短期死亡率为0．962（95％CI 0．901-0．973）。结论在院内急救批量伤员拣伤分类中，MEWS评分与AIS—ISS评分一致性好，MEWS评分推测死亡率与现存的各评分相近或更优，可以应用于急诊科的批量伤员检伤分类。展开更多
AIM: To determine the association of unstable pelvic ring injuries with trauma code status.METHODS: A retrospective review of all pelvic ring injuries at a single academic center from July 2010 to June 2013 was perfor...AIM: To determine the association of unstable pelvic ring injuries with trauma code status.METHODS: A retrospective review of all pelvic ring injuries at a single academic center from July 2010 to June 2013 was performed. The trauma registry was used to identify level 1 and level 2 trauma codes for each injury. The computed tomography scans in all patients were classified as stable or unstable using the Abbreviated Injury Scale. Pelvic injury classifications in level 1 and level 2 groups were compared. Patient disposition at discharge in level 1 and level 2 groups were also compared.RESULTS: There were 108 level 1 and 130 level 2 blunt trauma admissions. In the level 1 group, 67% of pelvic injuries were classified as stable fracture patterns and 33% were classified as unstable. In the level 2 group, 62% of pelvic injuries were classified as stable fracture patterns and 38% were classified as unstable. level 1 trauma code was not associated with odds of having an unstable fracture pattern(OR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.48-1.41, P = 0.485). In the level 1 group with unstable pelvic injuries, 33% were discharged to home, 36% to a rehabilitation facility, and 32% died. In the level 2 group with unstable pelvic injuries, 65% were discharged to home, 31% to a rehabilitation facility, and 4% died. For those with unstable pelvic fractures(n = 85), assignment of a level 2 trauma code was associated with reduced odds of death(OR = 0.07, 95%CI: 0.01-0.35, P = 0.001) as compared to being discharged to home.CONCLUSION: Trauma code level assignment is not correlated with severity of pelvic injury. Because an unstable pelvis can lead to hemodynamic instability, these injuries may be undertriaged.展开更多
基金Supported by Federal Highway Research Institute(BASt)the German Research Association of the Automotive Technology,a department of the VDA(German Association of the Automotive Industry)
文摘AIM:To investigate the actual injury situation of seniors in traffic accidents and to evaluate the different injury patterns.METHODS:Injury data,environmental circumstances and crash circumstances of accidents were collected shortly after the accident event at the scene.With these data,a technical and medical analysis was performed,including Injury Severity Score,Abbreviated Injury Scale and Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale.The method of data collection is named the German InDepth Accident Study and can be seen as representative.RESULTS:A total of 4430 injured seniors in traffic accidents were evaluated.The incidence of sustaining severe injuries to extremities,head and maxillofacial region was significantly higher in the group of elderly people compared to a younger age(P<0.05).The number of accident-related injuries was higher in the group of seniors compared to other groups.CONCLUSION:Seniors are more likely to be involved in traffic injuries and to sustain serious to severe injuries compared to other groups.
文摘目的:探讨基于应激系统理论的护理干预在口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者中的应用效果。方法:选取2019年1月-2021年10月在笔者医院口腔科收治的80例口腔颌面部损伤患者作为研究对象,采用1:1简单随机数表法将入组患者分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。两组患者均在急诊科抢救室进行口腔颌面部修复重建,并于修复完成后进急诊观察室观察病情。对照组予以急诊科常规护理,观察组行基于应激系统理论的护理干预,持续护理直至患者病情稳定后离开急诊。护理后比较两组疼痛水平、睡眠、心理状态、术后并发症、满意度评价情况。结果:术后第6 h、术后第3天疼痛视觉模拟评分(Visual analog scoring,VAS)先升高后下降,且观察组均低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后第3天,两组患者匹茨堡睡眠质量(Pittsburg sleep quality index,PSQI)评分均明显降低,且观察组低于对照组(P<0.05),两组患者心理韧性评分(Chinese version of resilience scale,CD-RISC)均明显升高,且观察组高于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后病房环境、技术操作、术后形态、服务态度满意度问卷评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:基于应激系统理论的护理干预可以降低口腔颌面部大面积损伤患者术后疼痛应激水平,并改善患者睡眠与心理状态。
文摘Objective： To assess whether these characteristics of less misclassification and greater area under receiver operator characteristic （ROC） curve of the new injury severity score （NISS） are better than the injury severity score （ISS） as applying it to our multiple trauma patients registered into the emergency intensive care unit （EICU）. Methods： This was a retrospective review of registry data from 2 286 multiple trauma patients consecutively registered into the EICU from January 1,1997 to December 31, 2006 in the Second Affiliated Hospital, Medical School of Zhejiang University in China. Comparisons between ISS and NISS were made using misclassification rates, ROC curve analysis, and the H-L statistics by univariate and multivariate logistic progression model. Results： Among the 2 286 patients, 176 （7.7%） were excluded because of deaths on arrival or patients less than 16 years of age. The study population therefore comprised 2 1 10 patients. Mean EICU length of stay （LOS） was 7.8 days ± 2.4 days. Compared with the blunt injury group, the penetrating injury group had a higher percentage of male, lower mean EICU LOS and age. The most frequently injured body regions were extremities and head/neck, followed by thorax, face and abdomen in the blunt injury group; whereas, thorax and abdomen were more frequently seen in the penetrating injury group. The minimum misclassification rate for NISS was slightly less than ISS in all groups （4.01% versus 4.49%）. However, NISS had more tendency to misclassify in the penetrating injury group. This, we noted, was attributed mainly to a higher false-positive rate （21.04% versus 15.55% for IS S, t=-3.310, P〈0.001）, resulting in an overall misclassification rate of 23.57% for NISS versus 18.79% for ISS （t=3.290, P〈0.001）. In the whole sample, NISS presented equivalent discrimination （area under ROC curve： NISS=0.938 versus ISS=0.943）. The H-L statistics showed poorer calibration （48.64 versus 32.11, t=3.305, P〈0.001） in the penetrating injury group. Conclusions： NISS should not replace ISS because Lhey share similar accuracy and calibration in predicting multiple blunt trauma patients. NISS may be more sensitive but less specific than ISS in predicting mortality in certain penetrating injury patients.
文摘AIM: To determine the association of unstable pelvic ring injuries with trauma code status.METHODS: A retrospective review of all pelvic ring injuries at a single academic center from July 2010 to June 2013 was performed. The trauma registry was used to identify level 1 and level 2 trauma codes for each injury. The computed tomography scans in all patients were classified as stable or unstable using the Abbreviated Injury Scale. Pelvic injury classifications in level 1 and level 2 groups were compared. Patient disposition at discharge in level 1 and level 2 groups were also compared.RESULTS: There were 108 level 1 and 130 level 2 blunt trauma admissions. In the level 1 group, 67% of pelvic injuries were classified as stable fracture patterns and 33% were classified as unstable. In the level 2 group, 62% of pelvic injuries were classified as stable fracture patterns and 38% were classified as unstable. level 1 trauma code was not associated with odds of having an unstable fracture pattern(OR = 0.83, 95%CI: 0.48-1.41, P = 0.485). In the level 1 group with unstable pelvic injuries, 33% were discharged to home, 36% to a rehabilitation facility, and 32% died. In the level 2 group with unstable pelvic injuries, 65% were discharged to home, 31% to a rehabilitation facility, and 4% died. For those with unstable pelvic fractures(n = 85), assignment of a level 2 trauma code was associated with reduced odds of death(OR = 0.07, 95%CI: 0.01-0.35, P = 0.001) as compared to being discharged to home.CONCLUSION: Trauma code level assignment is not correlated with severity of pelvic injury. Because an unstable pelvis can lead to hemodynamic instability, these injuries may be undertriaged.
