BACKGROUND Adrenal myelolipoma is a rare,benign,non-functioning mass that occurs in the adrenal gland.It is composed of an admixture of hematopoietic elements and mature adipose tissue,similar to bone marrow.Even at l...BACKGROUND Adrenal myelolipoma is a rare,benign,non-functioning mass that occurs in the adrenal gland.It is composed of an admixture of hematopoietic elements and mature adipose tissue,similar to bone marrow.Even at large sizes,adrenal myelolipomas are usually asymptomatic and often incidentally found by ultrasonography or computed tomography(CT)scan.This paper describes an unusual case of adrenal myelolipoma presenting as flank pain.CASE SUMMARY A 50-year-old male with severe right flank pain underwent a CT scan revealing a huge mass extending into the suprarenal space.The mass showed a fat component with retroperitoneal hemorrhage.The tumor was treated laparoscopically,and pathologic examination revealed features of myelolipoma originating from the adrenal gland.CONCLUSION Adrenal myelolipomas are generally asymptomatic and can be treated conservatively.However,rupture and hemorrhage of the tumor can cause symptoms requiring surgical removal.展开更多
AIM: To report the clinical impact of adrenal endoscop-ic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the evaluation of patients with adrenal gland enlargement or mass.METHODS: In a retrospective single-center...AIM: To report the clinical impact of adrenal endoscop-ic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the evaluation of patients with adrenal gland enlargement or mass.METHODS: In a retrospective single-center case-series, patients undergoing EUS-FNA of either adrenal gland from 1997-2011 in our tertiary care center were included. Medical records were reviewed and results of EUS, cytology, adrenal size change on follow-up imag-ing ≥ 6 mo after EUS and any repeat EUS or surgery were abstracted. A lesion was considered benign if: (1) EUS-FNA cytology was benign and the lesion remained 〈 1 cm from its original size on follow-up computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging or repeat EUS ≥ 6 mo after EUS-FNA; or (2) subsequent adrenalectomy and surgical pathology was benign. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients had left (n = 90) and/or right (n = 5) adrenal EUS-FNA without adverse events. EUS indications included: cancer staging or suspected recurrence (n = 31), pancreatic (n = 20), medi-astinal (n = 10), adrenal (n = 7), lung (n = 7) mass or other indication (n = 19). Diagnoses after adrenal EUS-FNA included metastatic lung (n = 10), esophageal (n= 5), colon (n = 2), or other cancer (n = 8); benign primary adrenal mass or benign tissue (n = 60); or was non-diagnostic (n = 9). Available follow-up confrmed a benign lesion in 5/9 non-diagnostic aspirates and 32/60 benign aspirates. Four of the 60 benign aspirates were later confrmed as malignant by repeat biopsy, follow-up CT, or adrenalectomy. Adrenal EUS-FNA diagnosed metastatic cancer in 24, and ruled out metastasis in 10 patients. For the diagnosis of malignancy, EUS-FNA of either adrenal had sensitivity, specifcity, positive predic-tive value and negative predictive value of 86%, 97%, 96% and 89%, respectively.CONCLUSION: Adrenal gland EUS-FNA is safe, mini-mally invasive and a sensitive technique with signifcant impact in the management of adrenal gland mass or enlargement.展开更多
BACKGROUND Retroperitoneal bronchogenic cyst(RBC)is an extremely rare developmental abnormality.Most are benign tumors but malignant transformation is possible.Because of their anatomical position,RBCs are easily misd...BACKGROUND Retroperitoneal bronchogenic cyst(RBC)is an extremely rare developmental abnormality.Most are benign tumors but malignant transformation is possible.Because of their anatomical position,RBCs are easily misdiagnosed as adrenal or pancreatic solid tumors on radiological evaluation.Here,we report a case of RBC,review the literature,and summarize some important features.CASE SUMMARY A 49-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a retroperitoneal tumor during a physical examination.Enhanced computed tomography and laboratory evaluations,including routine blood examination,blood biochemistry,24-h urine 17 ketones,17 hydroxyls,adrenocortical hormone,serum potassium concentration,serum amylase,lipase,and epithelial tumor markers,revealed a moderate density,54 mm×40 mm mass with a clear boundary near the left adrenal gland.The were no abnormalities in the blood and urine values.Because the patient had a history of hypertension and the location of the mass was adjacent to the adrenal gland,it was initially diagnosed as a left adrenal tumor and was resected by retroperitoneal laparoscopy.However,the pathological examination after surgery confirmed it to be a bronchogenic cyst.CONCLUSION Retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery can be prioritized for symptomatic RBC patients.Conservative treatment is feasible for selected patients.展开更多
基金Supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF)Grant Funded by the Korean Government(Ministry of Science and ICT),No.2019R1G1A1100422.
文摘BACKGROUND Adrenal myelolipoma is a rare,benign,non-functioning mass that occurs in the adrenal gland.It is composed of an admixture of hematopoietic elements and mature adipose tissue,similar to bone marrow.Even at large sizes,adrenal myelolipomas are usually asymptomatic and often incidentally found by ultrasonography or computed tomography(CT)scan.This paper describes an unusual case of adrenal myelolipoma presenting as flank pain.CASE SUMMARY A 50-year-old male with severe right flank pain underwent a CT scan revealing a huge mass extending into the suprarenal space.The mass showed a fat component with retroperitoneal hemorrhage.The tumor was treated laparoscopically,and pathologic examination revealed features of myelolipoma originating from the adrenal gland.CONCLUSION Adrenal myelolipomas are generally asymptomatic and can be treated conservatively.However,rupture and hemorrhage of the tumor can cause symptoms requiring surgical removal.
文摘AIM: To report the clinical impact of adrenal endoscop-ic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in the evaluation of patients with adrenal gland enlargement or mass.METHODS: In a retrospective single-center case-series, patients undergoing EUS-FNA of either adrenal gland from 1997-2011 in our tertiary care center were included. Medical records were reviewed and results of EUS, cytology, adrenal size change on follow-up imag-ing ≥ 6 mo after EUS and any repeat EUS or surgery were abstracted. A lesion was considered benign if: (1) EUS-FNA cytology was benign and the lesion remained 〈 1 cm from its original size on follow-up computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging or repeat EUS ≥ 6 mo after EUS-FNA; or (2) subsequent adrenalectomy and surgical pathology was benign. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients had left (n = 90) and/or right (n = 5) adrenal EUS-FNA without adverse events. EUS indications included: cancer staging or suspected recurrence (n = 31), pancreatic (n = 20), medi-astinal (n = 10), adrenal (n = 7), lung (n = 7) mass or other indication (n = 19). Diagnoses after adrenal EUS-FNA included metastatic lung (n = 10), esophageal (n= 5), colon (n = 2), or other cancer (n = 8); benign primary adrenal mass or benign tissue (n = 60); or was non-diagnostic (n = 9). Available follow-up confrmed a benign lesion in 5/9 non-diagnostic aspirates and 32/60 benign aspirates. Four of the 60 benign aspirates were later confrmed as malignant by repeat biopsy, follow-up CT, or adrenalectomy. Adrenal EUS-FNA diagnosed metastatic cancer in 24, and ruled out metastasis in 10 patients. For the diagnosis of malignancy, EUS-FNA of either adrenal had sensitivity, specifcity, positive predic-tive value and negative predictive value of 86%, 97%, 96% and 89%, respectively.CONCLUSION: Adrenal gland EUS-FNA is safe, mini-mally invasive and a sensitive technique with signifcant impact in the management of adrenal gland mass or enlargement.
文摘BACKGROUND Retroperitoneal bronchogenic cyst(RBC)is an extremely rare developmental abnormality.Most are benign tumors but malignant transformation is possible.Because of their anatomical position,RBCs are easily misdiagnosed as adrenal or pancreatic solid tumors on radiological evaluation.Here,we report a case of RBC,review the literature,and summarize some important features.CASE SUMMARY A 49-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a retroperitoneal tumor during a physical examination.Enhanced computed tomography and laboratory evaluations,including routine blood examination,blood biochemistry,24-h urine 17 ketones,17 hydroxyls,adrenocortical hormone,serum potassium concentration,serum amylase,lipase,and epithelial tumor markers,revealed a moderate density,54 mm×40 mm mass with a clear boundary near the left adrenal gland.The were no abnormalities in the blood and urine values.Because the patient had a history of hypertension and the location of the mass was adjacent to the adrenal gland,it was initially diagnosed as a left adrenal tumor and was resected by retroperitoneal laparoscopy.However,the pathological examination after surgery confirmed it to be a bronchogenic cyst.CONCLUSION Retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery can be prioritized for symptomatic RBC patients.Conservative treatment is feasible for selected patients.