Novel mutation in the ligand-binding domain of the androgen receptor gene （1790p） associated with complete androgen insensitivity syndrome

Mutations in the X-linked androgen receptor （AR） gene cause androgen insensitivity syndrome （AIS）, resulting in an impaired embryonic sex differentiation in 46,XY genetic men. Complete androgen insensitivity （CAIS） produces a female external phenotype, whereas cases with partial androgen insensitivity （PALS） have various ambiguities of the genitalia. Mild androgen insensitivity （MAIS） is characterized by undermasculinization and gynecomastia. Here we describe a 2-month-old 46,XY female patient, with all of the characteristics of CAIS. Defects in testosterone （T） and dihydrotestosterone （DHT） synthesis were excluded. Sequencing of the AR gene showed the presence in exon 6 of a T to C transition in the second base of codon 790, nucleotide position 2369, causing a novel missense Leu790Pro mutation in the ligand-binding domain of the AR protein. The identification of a novel AR mutation in a girl with CAIS provides significant information due to the importance of missense mutations in the ligand-binding domain of the AR, which are able to induce functional abnormalities in the androgen binding capability, stabilization of active conformation, or interaction with coactivators.

Detection of androgen receptor (AR) and AR-V7 in small cell prostate carcinoma: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications

Objective:Small cell prostate carcinoma(SCPC)is a rare and highly malignant subtype of prostate cancer.SCPC frequently lacks androgen receptor(AR)and prostate-specific antigen(PSA)expression,and often responds poorly to androgen deprivation therapy(ADT).AR splice variant-7(AR-V7)is a truncated AR protein implicated in resistance to AR-targeting therapies.AR-V7 expression in castration-resistant prostate cancers has been evaluated extensively,and blood-based detection of AR-V7 has been associated with lack of response to abiraterone and enzalutamide.However,whether AR-V7 is expressed in SCPC is not known.Methods:Using validated antibodies,we performed immunohistochemistry(IHC)assay for the full-length AR(AR-FL)and(AR-V7)on post-ADT surgical SCPC specimens.Results:Seventy-five percent(9/12)of the specimens showed positive staining for the AR-FL with various intensities.Thirty-three percent(4/12)of the specimens showed positive staining for AR-V7.Among the specimens with positive AR-V7 staining,two samples displayed very weak staining,one sample showed weak-to-moderate staining,and one sample showed strong staining.All positive specimens displayed a heterogeneous pattern of AR-FL/AR-V7 staining.All specimens positive for AR-V7 were also positive for AR-FL.Conclusion:The study findings support the existence of measurable AR-FL and AR-V7 proteins in SCPC specimens.The results also have implications in detection of AR-V7 in specimens obtained through systemic sampling approaches such as circulating tumor cells.A positive AR-V7 finding by blood-based tests is not impossible in patients with SCPC who often demonstrate low PSA values.

Regulation of androgen receptor variants in prostate cancer

Aberrant activation of androgen receptor(AR)signaling occurs in patients treated with AR-targeted therapies,contributing to the development of castration-resistant prostate cancer(CRPC)and therapeutic resistance.Over the past decade,many AR variants(AR-Vs)have been identified in prostate cancer cell lines and clinical CRPC specimens.These AR-Vs lack the COOH-terminal ligand-binding domain(LBD),and may mediate constitutively active AR signaling acquired following AR-targeting therapies.AR splice variant-7(AR-V7),one of the most well characterized AR-Vs,can be reliably measured in tissue and liquid biopsy specimens,and blood-based detection of AR-V7 is a reliable indicator of poor outcome to relatively novel hormonal therapies(NHT)such as abiraterone and enzalutamide in men with metastatic CRPC(mCRPC).Given the important clinical implication of AR-Vs,this short review will focus on studies addressing how AR-Vs are regulated in prostate cancer.With regard to the molecular origin of AR-Vs,it is established that expression of AR-Vs is highly correlated with androgen deprivation and suppression of AR signaling.Therapeutic targeting of the AR axis may result in active transcription of the AR gene,elevated activities of certain components of the mRNA splicing machinery,as well as AR genomic alterations,all of which may explain the molecular origin of AR-Vs.Although a unified hypothesis is currently lacking,existing data suggest that elevated expression of AR-Vs,which in general occurs quite specifically in a cellular environment where the canonical AR signaling is suppressed,is driven by both genomic and epigenomic features acquired in the development of CRPC.

Identification of neuron selective androgen receptor inhibitors

AIM To identify neuron-selective androgen receptor(AR) signaling inhibitors, which could be useful in the treatment of spinal and bulbar muscular atrophy(SBMA), or Kennedy's disease, a neuromuscular disorder in which deterioration of motor neurons leads to progressive muscle weakness. METHODS Cell lines representing prostate, kidney, neuron, adipose, and muscle tissue were developed that stably expressed the CFP-AR-YFP FRET reporter. We used these cells to screen a library of small molecules for cell typeselective AR inhibitors. Secondary screening in luciferase assays was used to identify the best cell-type specific AR inhibitors. The mechanism of action of a neuronselective AR inhibitor was examined in vitro using luciferase reporter assays, immunofluorescence microscopy, and immunoprecipitations. Rats were treated with the most potent compound and tissue-selective AR inhibition was examined using RT-q PCR of AR-regulated genes and immunohistochemistry.RESULTS We identified the thiazole class of antibiotics as com-pounds able to inhibit AR signaling in a neuronal cell line but not a muscle cell line. One of these antibiotics, thiostrepton is able to inhibit the activity of both wild type and polyglutamine expanded AR in neuronal GT1-7 cells with nanomolar potency. The thiazole antibiotics are known to inhibit FOXM1 activity and accordingly, a novel FOXM1 inhibitor FDI-6 also inhibited AR activity in a neuron-selective fashion. The selective inhibition of AR is likely indirect as the varied structures of these compounds would not suggest that they are competitive antagonists. Indeed, we found that FOXM1 expression correlates with cell-type selectivity, FOXM1 co-localizes with AR in the nucleus, and that sh RNA-mediated knock down of FOXM1 reduces AR activity and thiostrepton sensitivity in a neuronal cell line. Thiostrepton treatment reduces FOXM1 levels and the nuclear localization of beta-catenin, a known co-activator of both FOXM1 and AR, and reduces the association between beta-catenin and AR. Treatment of rats with thiostrepton demonstrated AR signaling inhibition in neurons, but not muscles. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that thiazole antibiotics, or other inhibitors of the AR-FOXM1 axis, can inhibit AR signaling selectively in motor neurons and may be useful in the treatment or prevention of SBMA symptoms.

Phenotypic heterogeneity of mutations in androgen receptor gene

Androgen receptor （AR） gene has been extensively studied in diverse clinical conditions. In addition to the point mutations, trinucleotide repeat （CAG and GGN） length polymorphisms have been an additional subject of interest and controversy among geneticists. The polymorphic variations in triplet repeats have been associated with a number of disorders, but at the same time contradictory findings have also been reported. Further, studies on the same disorder in different populations have generated different results. Therefore, combined analysis or review of the published studies has been of much value to extract information on the significance of variations in the gene in various clinical conditions. AR genetics has been reviewed extensively but until now review articles have focused on individual clinical categories such as androgen insensitivity, male infertility, prostate cancer, and so on. We have made the first effort to review most the aspects of AR genetics. The impact of androgens in various disorders and polymorphic variations in the AR gene is the main focus of this review. Additionally, the correlations observed in various studies have been discussed in the light of in vitro evidences available for the effect of AR gene variations on the action of androgens.

Androgen receptor signaling and mutations in prostate cancer

Normal and neoplastic growth of the prostate gland are dependent on androgen receptor （AR） expression and function. Androgenic activation of the AR, in association with its coregulatory factors, is the classical pathway that leads to transcriptional activity of AR target genes. Alternatively, cytoplasmic signaling crosstalk of AR by growth factors, neurotrophic peptides, cytokines or nonandrogenic hormones may have important roles in prostate carcinogenesis and in metastatic or androgen-independent （AI） progression of the disease. In addition, cross-modulation by various nuclear transcription factors acting through basal transcriptional machinery could positively or negatively affect the AR or AR target genes expression and activity. Androgen ablation leads to an initial favorable response in a significant number of patients; however, almost invariably patients relapse with an aggressive form of the disease known as castration-resistant or hormone-refractory prostate cancer （PCa）. Understanding critical molecular events that lead PCa cells to resist androgen-deprivation therapy is essential in developing successful treatments for hormone-refractory disease. In a significant number of hormone-refractory patients, the AR is overexpressed, mutated or genomically amplified. These genetic alterations maintain an active presence for a highly sensitive AR, which is responsive to androgens, antiandrogens or nonandrogenic hormones and collectively confer a selective growth advantage to PCa cells. This review provides a brief synopsis of the AR structure, AR coregulators, posttranslational modifications of AR, duality of AR function in prostate epithelial and stromal cells, AR-dependent signaling, genetic changes in the form of somatic and germline mutations and their known functional significance in PCa cells and tissues.

nfluence of immune inflammation on androgen receptor expression in benign prostatic hyperplasia tissue

This study was designed to investigate the association between immune inflammation and androgen receptor （AR） expression in benign prostatic hyperplasia （BPH）. We retrospectively analyzed 105 prostatectomy specimens. An immune inflammation score for each specimen was defined by combining three immunohistochemical markers （CD4, CD8 and CD20）. The immunohistochemical markers were CD4 and CD8 for T lymphocytes, CD20 for B lymphocytes and AR antibody for the AR in BPH samples. Rates of CD4, CD8, CD20 and AR expression in BPH were 20 （19.0%）, 21 （20.0%）, 101 （96.2%） and 48 （45.7%）, respectively. Total prostate volume （TPV） was higher in the immune inflammation group than in the non-immune inflammation group （62.7 ml vs. 49.2 ml, t=-2.482, P〈0.05）. Patients in the immune inflammation group had a higher serum prostate-specific antigen （PSA） than those in the non-inflammation group （7.5 ng m1-1 vs. 5.4 ng m1-1, t=-2.771, P〈0.05）. Specifically, the immune inflammation group showed a higher rate of AR expression than the non-inflammation group （56.1% vs. 28.2%, χ2=7.665, P〈0.05）. Our study revealed a strong association between immune inflammation and TPV, serum PSA and AR expression in BPH tissue. Prostate hyperplasia caused by an immune inflammatory process may contribute to BPH progression over time. Therefore, the inflammatory response involved in BPH may be a prime therapeutic target.

Androgen receptor isoforms in human and rat prostate

Aim: To investigate the androgen receptor (AR) isoforms and its variability of expression in human and rat prostatictissues. Methods: Human benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostatic cancer tissues were obtained from pa-tients undergoing prostatectomy, and rat ventral prostate was incised 3 days after castration. Forty-one AR-positive BPHspecimens, 3 prostatic cancer specimens, and 6 rat prostates were used. After processing at 4℃, the tissues were ex-amined by means of high resolution isoelectric focusing (IEF) technique to determine their AR isoforms. Results:From the prostatic specimens, 3 types of AR isoforms were detected with pI values at 6.5, 6.0, and 5.3. In humanBPH tissues, 15/41 (36.6%) specimens showed all the three types of isoforms, while 19/41 (46.3%) showed 2 iso-fora at various combinations and 7/41 (17.1%), 1 isoform. For the 3 prostatic cancer specimens, one showed 3 iso-forms, one, 2 isoforms, and the other failed to show any isoform. All rat prostatic tissues showed 2 isoforms at differ-ent combinations. Binding of ~3H-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) to the isoforms was inhibited by the addition of 100-foldexcess of DHT or testosterone, but not progesterone, oestradiol or diethylstilboestrol. Conclusion: AR isoforms aredifferent in different patients. Although their genesis is not clear, the therapeutic implication of the present observationappears to be interesting, that may help clarifying the individual differences in the response to hormonal therapy.(Asian J Androl 2000 Dec; 2: 307-310)

dentification of testosterone-/androgen receptor-regulated genes in mouse Sertoli cells

Androgen and androgen receptor （AR） play important roles in male spermatogenesis and fertility, yet detailed androgen/AR signals in Sertoli cells remain unclear. To identify AR target genes in Sertoli cells, we analyzed the gene expression profiles of testis between mice lacking AR in Sertoli cells （S-AR-/y） and their littermate wild-type （WT） mice. Digital gene expression analysis identified 2276 genes downregulated and 2865 genes upregulated in the S-AR-/y mice testis compared to WT ones. To further nail down the difference within Sertoli cells, we first constructed Sertoli cell line TM4 with stably transfected AR （named as TM4/AR） and found androgens failed to transactivate AR in Sertoli TM4 and TM4/AR cells. Interestingly, additional transient transfection of AR-cDNA resulted in significant androgen responsiveness with TM4/AR cells showing 10 times more androgen sensitivity than TM4 cells. In the condition where maximal androgen response was demonstrated, we then analyzed gene expression and found the expression levels of 2313 genes were changed more than twofold by transient transfection of AR-cDNA in the presence of testosterone. Among these genes, 603 androgen-/ AR-regulated genes, including 164 upregulated and 439 downregulated, were found in both S-AR-/y mice testis and TM4/AR cells. Using informatics analysis, the gene ontology was applied to analyze these androgen-/AR-regulated genes to predict the potential roles of androgen/AR in the process of spermatogenesis. Together, using gene analysis in both S-AR-/y mice testis and TM4/AR cells may help us to better understand the androeen/AR signals in Sertoli cells and their influences in spermatogenesis.

Chimeric molecules facilitate the degradation of androgen receptors and repress the growth of LNCaP cells

Post-translational degradation of protein plays an important role in cell life. We employed chimeric molecules （dihydrotestosterone-based proteolysis-targeting chimeric molecule [DHT-PROTAC]） to facilitate androgen receptor （AR） degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway （UPP） and to investigate the role of AR in cell proliferation and viability in androgen-sensitive prostate cancer cells. Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry were applied to analyse AR levels in LNCaP cells after DHT-PROTAC treatment. Cell counting and the 3-（4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl）-2,5- diphenyl tetrazolium bromide （MTT） cell viability assay were used to evaluate cell proliferation and viability after AR elimination in both LNCaP and PC-3 cells. AR was tagged for elimination via the UPP by DHT-PROTAC, and this could be blocked by proteasome inhibitors. Degradation of AR depended on DHT-PROTAC concentration, and either DHT or an ALAPYIP-（arg）8 peptide could compete with DHT-PROTAC. Inhibition of cell proliferation and decreased viability were observed in LNCaP cells, but not in PC-3 or 786-0 cells after DHT-PROTAC treatment. These data indicate that AR elimination is facilitated via the UPP by DHT-PROTAC, and that the growth of LNCaP cells is repressed after AR degradation.

The role of the androgen receptor in prostate development and benign prostatic hyperplasia:A review

Benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH)is a benign enlargement of the prostate in which incidence increases linearly with age,beginning at about 50 years old.BPH is a significant source of morbidity in aging men by causing lower urinary tract symptoms and acute urinary retention.Unfortunately,the etiology of BPH incidence and progression is not clear.This review highlights the role of the androgen receptor(AR)in prostate development and the evidence for its involvement in BPH.The AR is essential for normal prostate development,and individuals with defective AR signaling,such as after castration,do not experience prostate enlargement with age.Furthermore,decreasing dihydrotestosterone availability through therapeutic targeting with 5a-reductase inhibitors diminishes AR activity and results in reduced prostate size and symptoms in some BPH patients.While there is some evidence that AR expression is elevated in certain cellular compartments,how exactly AR is involved in BPH progression has yet to be elucidated.It is possible that AR signaling within stromal cells alters intercellular signaling and a“reawakening”of the embryonic mesenchyme,loss of epithelial AR leads to changes in paracrine signaling interactions,and/or chronic inflammation aids in stromal or epithelial proliferation evident in BPH.Unfortunately,a subset of patients fails to respond to current medical approaches,forcing surgical treatment even though age or associated co-morbidities make surgery less attractive.Fundamentally,new therapeutic approaches to treat BPH are not currently forthcoming,so a more complete molecular understanding of BPH etiology is necessary to identify new treatment options.

Localization and potential function of androgen receptor in rat salivary gland

Aim： To investigate the localization and quantity of androgen receptor （AR） in the salivary glands of rats with further analysis on the effect of castration. Methods： Sixty male Wistar rats, aged 30-60 days, were randomly divided into three groups （castrated, sham-operated and normal controls） with 20 rats in each group. The rats in the castrated group were castrated and the submaxillary glands were removed after 1 week. The salivary glands of the rats in the sham-operated and the normal control groups were also removed. Parts of the salivary glands were fixed for immuohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays. Other parts were used for Western blot. Results： AR immunoreactivity in the three groups was localized in the glandular epithelial cells of the serous acinus and the glandular duct of the salivary gland, mainly in the nuclei. AR mRNA hybridization signals in the salivary glands of the castrated group were mainly distributed in the epithelial cells of the convoluted and secretary ducts; AR mRNA in the sham-operated and the normal control groups were found in the epithelial cells of the convoluted, the secretary and the excretory ducts. The quantity of AR in the salivary glands was decreased significantly in the castrated rats compared with the sham-operated and the normal controls. Moreover, epidermal growth factor （EGF） secreted by the salivary glands was also decreased in the castrated rats. Conclusion： Castration appears to affect the production of AR in the salivary gland and the distribution of the AR mRNA and could further affect the function of the salivary gland. The changes of AR and the distribution of AR mRNA may play an important role in the interactions between the testes and the salivary gland. （Asian J Androl 2005 Sep; 7： 295-301）

Androgen receptors are expressed in a variety of human fetal extragenital tissues： an immunohistochemical study

Aim： To investigate the expression of androgen receptors in the extragenital tissues of developing human embryo. Methods： Using immunohistochemistry, we investigated the distribution of androgen receptor （AR） in the extragenital tissues of paraffin-embedded tissue sections of first trimester （8-12 weeks gestation） human embryos. Gender was determined by polymerized chain reaction. Results： There were no differences in the expression and distribution of AR in male and female embryos at any stage of gestation. AR expression was seen in the thymus gland. The bronchial epithelium of the lungs showed intense positive staining with surrounding stroma negative. Furthermore, positive staining for androgen receptor was exhibited in the spinal cord with a few positive cells in the surrounding tissues. Cardiac valves also showed strong positive staining but with faint reactivity of the surrounding cardiac muscle. There was no staining in kidney, adrenal, liver or bowel. Conclusion： This study demonstrates that immunoreactive AR protein is present in a wide variety of human first trimester fetal tissues and shows the potential for androgen affecting tissues, which are mostly not considered to be androgen dependent. Moreover, it implies that androgen might act as atrophic factor and affect the early development of these organs rather than simply sexual differentiation.

The androgen receptor in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Advanced prostate cancer is responsive to hormone therapy that interferes with androgen receptor （AR） signalling. However, the effect is short-lived, as nearly all tumours progress to a hormone-refractory （HR） state, a lethal stage of the disease. Intuitively, the AR should not be involved because hormone therapy that blocks or reduces AR activity is not effective in treating HR tumours. However, there is still a consensus that AR plays an essential role in HR prostate cancer （HRPC） because AR signalling is still functional in HR tumours. AR signalling can be activated in HR tumours through several mechanisms. First, activation of intracellular signal transduction pathways can sensitize the AR to castrate levels of androgens. Also, mutations in the AR can change AR ligand specificity, thereby allowing it to be activated by non-steroids or anti-androgens. Finally, overexpression of the wild-type AR sensitizes itself to low concentrations of androgens. Therefore, drugs targeting AR signalling could still be effective in treating HRPC.

Androgen receptor expression in clinically localized prostate cancer： immunohistochemistry study and literature review

Aim： To evaluate androgen receptor （AR） expression in clinically localized prostate cancer （PCa）. Methods： Specimens were studied from 232 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostatic adenocarcinoma without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy or chemotherapy at our institution between November 2001 and June 2005. Immunohistochemical study was performed using an anti-human AR monoclonal antibody AR441. The mean AR density in the hot spots of different histological areas within the same sections were compared and the correlation of malignant epithelial AR density with clinicopathological parameters such as Gleason score, tumor, nodes and metastases （TNM） stage and pre-treatment prostate-specific antigen （PSA） value was assessed. Results： AR immunoreactivity was almost exclusively nuclear and was observed in tumor cells, non-neoplastic glandular epithelial cells and a proportion of peritumoral and interglandular stromal cells. Mean percentage of AR-positive epithelial cells was significantly higher in cancer tissues than that in normal prostate tissues （mean e SD, 90.0% ± 9.3% vs. 85.3% ±9.7%, P 〈 0.001）. The histological score yielded similar results. The percentage ofAR immunoreactive prostatic cancer nuclei and histological score were not correlated with existing parameters such as Gleason score, tumor, nodes and metastases stage and pre-treatment PSA value in this surgically treated cohort. Conclusion： The results of the present study suggest that there may be limited clinical use for determining AR expression （if evaluated in hot spots） in men with localized PCa.

Role of androgen receptor in prostate cancer

The growth of prostate cancer is sensitive to androgen, and hormonal therapy has been used for treatment of ad-vanced cancer. About 80% of prostate cancers initially respond to hormonal therapy, howerver, more than half of the re-sponders gradually become resistant to this therapy. Changes in tumors from an androgen-responsive to an androgen-unre-sponsive state have been widely discussed. Since androgen action is mediated by androgen receptor (AR), abnormalitiesof AR is believed to play an important role of the loss of androgen responsiveness in prostate cancer. This article focusedon the role of AR in the progression of prostate cancer. (Asian J Androl 1999 Sep; 1: 81-85)

Posttranslational regulation of androgen dependent and independent androgen receptor activities in prostate cancer

Prostate cancer(PCa)is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among men in western countries.Androgen receptor(AR)signaling plays key roles in the development of PCa.Androgen deprivation therapy(ADT)remains the standard therapy for advanced PCa.In addition to its ligand androgen,accumulating evidence indicates that posttranscriptional modification is another important mechanism to regulate AR activities during the progression of PCa,especially in castration resistant prostate cancer(CRPC).To date,a number of posttranscriptional modifications of AR have been identified,including phosphorylation(e.g.by CDK1),acetylation(e.g.by p300 and recognized by BRD4),methylation(e.g.by EZH2),ubiquitination(e.g.by SPOP),and SUMOylation(e.g.by PIAS1).These modifications are essential for the maintenance of protein stability,nuclear localization and transcriptional activity of AR.This review summarizes posttranslational modifications that influence androgen-dependent and-independent activities of AR,PCa progression and therapy resistance.We further emphasize that in addition to androgen,posttranslational modification is another important way to regulate AR activity,suggesting that targeting AR posttranslational modifications,such as proteolysis targeting chimeras(PROTACs)of AR,represents a potential and promising alternate for effective treatment of CRPC.Potential areas to be investigated in the future in the field of AR posttranslational modifications are also discussed.

In vivo modulation of androgen receptor by androgens

Aim: To study the effect of androgen and antiandrogen on the level of androgen receptor (AR) mRNA. Methods: The total RNA was extracted from the prostate and analyzed by slot blot analysis. The blots were hybridized with AR cDNA probe and 1A probe (internal control) and autoradiography was performed. The intensity of signal was measured with a densitometer and the ratio of AR RNA and 1A RNA was calculated. Results: Androgenic deprivation produced by castration decreased the weight of the prostate and increased the levels of AR mRNA. Treatment of the castrated rats with testostrone increased the weight of prostate and decreased the levels of AR mRNA. Treatment of normal rats with flutamide decreased the weight of the gland and increased the levels Of AR mRNA. Conclusion: Androgens produce proliferative effect on the prostate and negatively regulate the AR transcription.

Androgen receptors expressed by prostatic stromal cells obtained from younger versus older males exhibit opposite roles in prostate cancer progression

Aging is a major risk factor for prostate cancer （PCa）, and prostatic stromal cells may also promote PCa progression. Accordingly, stromal cells do not equally promote PCa in older males and younger males. Therefore, it is also possible that the expression of androgen receptors （ARs） by prostatic stromal cells in older versus younger males plays different roles in PCa progression. Using a gene knockdown technique and coculture system, we found that the knockdown of the AR in prostatic stromal cells obtained from younger males could promote the invasiveness and metastasis of cocultured PC3/LNCaP cells in vitro. By contrast, the invasiveness and metastasis of LNCaP cells was inhibited when cocultured with prostatic stromal cells from older males that when AR expression was knocked down. Moreover, after targeting AR expression with small hairpin RNA （shRNA）, matrix metalloproteinase （MMP） expression in stromal cells was observed to increase in the younger group, but decreased or remained unchanged in the older group. One exception, however, was observed with MMP9. In vivo, after knocking down AR expression in prostatic stromal cells, the incidence of metastatic lymph nodes was observed to increase in the younger age group, but decreased in the older age group. Together, these data suggest that the AR in prostatic stromal cells played opposite roles in PCa metastasis for older versus younger males. Therefore, collectively, the function of the AR in prostatic stromal cells appears to change with age, and this may account for the increased incidence of PCa in older males.

Androgen insensitivity syndrome： do trinucleotide repeats in androgen receptor gene have any role？

Aim： To investigate the role of CAG and GGN repeats as genetic background affecting androgen insensitivity syndrome （AIS） phenotype. Methods： We analyzed lengths of androgen receptor （AR）-CAG and GGN repeats in 69 AIS cases, along with 136 unrelated normal male individuals. The lengths of repeats were analyzed using polymerase chain reaction （PCR） amplification followed by allelic genotyping to determine allele length. Results： Our study revealed significantly shorter mean lengths of CAG repeats in patients （mean 18.25 repeats, range 14-26 repeats） in comparison to the controls （mean 22.57 repeats, range 12-39 repeats） （two-tailed P 〈 0.0001）. GGN repeats, however, did not differ significantly between patients （mean 21.48 repeats） and controls （mean 21.21 repeats） （two- tailed P = 0.474）. Among patients＇ groups, the mean number of CAG repeats in partial androgen insensitivity cases （mean 15.83 repeats） was significantly less than in complete androgen insensitivity cases （mean 19.46 repeats） （two- tailed P 〈 0.0001）. Conclusion： The findings suggest that shorter lengths of repeats in the AR gene might act as low penetrance genetic background in varying manifestation of androgen insensitivity.