Impact of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers on the mortality in sepsis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND The effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors(ACEIs)or angiotensin receptor blockers(ARBs)on the mortality of patients with sepsis is not well characterized.AIM To elucidate the association between prior ACEI or ARB exposure and mortality in sepsis.METHODS The PubMed,EMBASE,Web of Science,and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all studies of premorbid ACEI or ARB use and sepsis mortality until November 302019.Two reviewers independently assessed,selected,and ab-stracted data from studies reporting ACEIs or ARBs,sepsis,and mortality.The primary extracted data consisted of premorbid ACEI or ARB exposure,mortality,and general patient data.Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence.RESULTS A total of six studies comprising 281238 patients with sepsis,including 49799 cases with premorbid ACEI or ARB exposure were eligible for analysis.Pre-morbid ACEIs or ARBs exposure decreased the 30-d mortality in patients with sepsis.Moreover,the use of ACEIs or ARBs was associated with approximately a 6%decreased risk of 30-d mortality.CONCLUSION The results of this systematic review suggest that ACEI or ARB exposure prior to sepsis may be associated with reduced mortality.Further high-quality cohort studies and molecular mechanism experiments are required to confirm our results.

Role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in cryoballoon ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND Cryoballoon ablation(CBA)is recommended for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation(AF)refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs.However,only 80%of patients benefit from initial CBA.There is growing evidence that pretreatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors(ACEIs)and angiotensin receptor blockers(ARBs)decreases the recurrence of AF postablation,particularly in nonparoxysmal AF undergoing radiofrequency ablation.The role of ACEIs and ARBs in patients with paroxysmal AF in CBA remains unknown.We decided to investigate the role of ACEIs and ARBs in preventing the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia(AA)following CBA for paroxysmal AF.AIM To investigate the role of ACEIs and ARBs in preventing recurrence of AA following CBA for paroxysmal AF.METHODS We followed 103 patients(age 60.6±9.1 years,29%women)with paroxysmal AF undergoing CBA 1-year post procedure.Recurrence was assessed by documented AA on electrocardiogram or any form of long-term cardiac rhythm monitoring.A multivariable Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess if ACEI or ARB treatment predicted the risk of AA recurrence.RESULTS After a 1-year follow-up,19(18.4%)participants developed recurrence of AA.Use of ACEI or ARB therapy was noted in the study population.Patients on ACEI/ARB had a greater prevalence of hypertension and coronary artery disease.On a multivariate model adjusted for baseline demographics and risk factors for AF,ACEI or ARB therapy did not prevent recurrence of AA following CBA(P=0.72).Similarly,on Kaplan–Meier analysis pretreatment with ACEI/ARB did not predict the time to first recurrence of AA(P=0.2173).CONCLUSION In our study population,preablation treatment with an ACEI or ARB had no influence on the recurrence of AA following CBA for paroxysmal AF.

Hyperkalemia of Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Hemodialysis: A Meta-analysis

The safety of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) used in hemodialysis (HD) patients was evaluated.Medline,Embase,the Cochrane Library,some databases of clinical trial registries,grey literatures,other reference lists of eligible articles and review articles for the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) on comparison of ACEIs/ARBs or placebo in HD patients were retrieved.RCTs reporting the risk of hyperkalemia by using ACEIs/ARBs in HD patients were selected.Eight articles met the eligibility criteria and were subjected to meta-analysis by using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2 software package.The results showed that there was no significant difference in hyperkalemia in HD patients between ACEIs or ARBs group and control group (ACEIs vs.control:RD=0.03,95% CI=-0.13?0.18,Z=0.34,P=0.73;ARBs vs.control:RD=-0.02,95% CI=-0.07?0.03,Z=0.75,P=0.45).However,there was no significant difference in the serum potassium between ACEIs or ARBs group and control group in HD patients (ACEIs vs.control:WMD=0.10,95% CI=0.06?0.15,Z=4.64,P<0.00001;ARBs vs.control:WMD=-0.24,95% CI=-0.37--0.11,Z=3.58,P=0.0003).The use of ACEIs or ARBs could not cause an increased risk of hyperkalemia in HD patients,however the serum potassium could be increased with use of ACEIs in HD patients.Therefore the serum potassium concentration should still be closely monitored when ACEIs are taken during the maintenance HD.

Angiotensin converting enzymes inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers should be continued in COVID-19 patients with hypertension

BACKGROUND Recent studies have revealed that sustained ingestion of angiotensin converting enzymes inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers(ACEIs/ARBs)had no harmful effects on coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)patients complicated with hypertension.AIM To investigate the impact on COVID-19 patients complicated with hypertension who discontinued using ACEIs/ARBs.METHODS All COVID-19 patients complicated with hypertension admitted to our isolated unit were consecutively recruited in this study.Some patients switched from ACEIs/ARBs to calcium channel blocker(CCBs)after admission,while others continued using non-ACEIs/ARBs.We compared characteristics and clinical outcomes between these two groups of patients.RESULTS A total of 53 patients were enrolled,27 patients switched from ACEIs/ARBs to CCBs while 26 patients continued with non-ACEIs/ARBs.After controlling potential confounding factors using the Cox proportional hazards model,hospital stay was longer in patients who discontinued ACEIs/ARBs,with a hazard ratio of 0.424(95%confidence interval:0.187-0.962;P=0.040),upon discharge than patients using other anti-hypertensive drugs.A sub-group analysis showed that the effect of discontinuing use of ACEIs/ARBs was stronger in moderate cases[hazard ratio=0.224(95%confidence interval:0.005-0.998;P=0.0497)].CONCLUSION Patients in the discontinued ACEIs/ARBs group had longer hospital stays.Our findings suggest that COVID-19 patients complicated with hypertension should continue to use ACEIs/ARBs.

Effects of angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on COVID-19

BACKGROUND The World Health Organization reported that 28637952 people worldwide had been infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2,the causative agent of coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19),by September 13.AIM The aim was to investigate whether long-term use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system(RAAS)inhibitors for the treatment of hypertension aggravates the performance of COVID-19 patients with hypertension.METHODS This was a retrospective analysis of lung computed tomography(CT)data and laboratory values of COVID-19 patients with hypertension who were admitted to Huoshenshan Hospital,Wuhan,Hubei Province,between February 18 and March 31,2020.Patients were divided into two groups.Group A included 19 people who were long-term users of RAAS inhibitors for hypertension;and group B included 28 people who were randomly selected from the database and matched with group A by age,sex,basic diseases,and long-term use of other antihypertensive drugs.All patients underwent a series of CT and laboratory tests.We compared the most severe CT images of the two groups and the laboratory examination results within 2 d of the corresponding CT images.RESULTS The time until the most severe CT images from the onset of COVID-19 was 30.37±14.25 d group A and 26.50±11.97 d in group B.The difference between the two groups was not significant(t=1.01,P=0.32).There were no significant differences in blood laboratory values,C-reactive protein,markers of cardiac injury,liver function,or kidney function between the two groups.There was no significant difference in the appearance of the CT images between the two groups.The semiquantitative scores of each involved lobe were 11.84±5.88 in group A and 10.36±6.04 group B.The difference was not significantly different(t=0.84,P=0.41).CONCLUSION Chest CT is an important imaging tool to monitor the characteristics of COVID-19 and the degree of lung injury.Chronic use of RAAS inhibitors is not related to the severity of COVID-19,and it does not worsen the clinical process.

Evaluation of Anti-inflammatory Effects of Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in an Experimental Model of Acute Inflammation in Rats

There is a renewed interest in ARBs （angiotensin receptor blockers） for their effects on inflammation, as they are commonly used in the elderly suffering from disorders like arthritis, atherosclerosis which may have a potential inflammatory etiology. But there have been conflicting reports on the effect of ARBs on inflammation. The present study was aimed to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effect of ARBs in rat model of acute inflammation. Albino Wistar rats were randomly assigned to seven groups, i.e., Control （1% CMC （carboxy methyl cellulose））, Aspirin, Losartan, Telmisartan, Valsartan, Candesartan and Irbesartan groups. Rats were orally pretreated with drugs for three consecutive days. On the 3rd day, rats were challenged by a subcutaneous injection of 0.05 mL of 1% carrageenan into the plantar side of right hind paw, 30 min after drug administration. Paw edema was measured using a mercury plethysmograph and paw diameter by micrometer screw-gauge at 0, 3, 6 and 24 h after carrageenan challenge. Percentage inhibition of edema was also calculated. All the ARBs showed a significant anti-inflammatory effect at 3, 6 and 24 h as compared to control, although not comparable to that of aspirin. This anti-inflammatory effect, although not comparable to a known anti-inflammatory agent like aspirin, would perhaps prove beneficial in elderly patients routinely treated with these drugs.

Angiotensin receptor blocker drugs and inhibition of adrenal beta-arrestin-1-dependent aldosterone production: Implications for heart failure therapy

Aldosterone mediates many of the physiological and pathophysiological/cardio-toxic effects of angiotensin II(Ang II). Its synthesis and secretion from the zona glomerulosa cells of the adrenal cortex, elevated in chronic heart failure(HF), is induced by Ang II type 1 receptors(AT1Rs). The AT1R is a G protein-coupled receptor, mainly coupling to Gq/11 proteins. However, it can also signal through β-arrestin-1(βarr1) or-2(βarr2), both of which mediate G protein-independent signaling. Over the past decade, a second, Gq/11 proteinindependent but βarr1-dependent signaling pathway emanating from the adrenocortical AT1R and leading to aldosterone production has become appreciated. Thus, it became apparent that AT1R antagonists that block both pathways equally well are warranted for fully effective aldosterone suppression in HF. This spurred the comparison of all of the currently marketed angiotensin receptor blockers(ARBs, AT1R antagonists or sartans) at blocking activation of the two signaling modes(G protein-, and βarr1-dependent) at the Ang IIactivated AT1R and hence, at suppression of aldosterone in vitro and in vivo. Although all agents are very potent inhibitors of G protein activation at the AT1R, candesartan and valsartan were uncovered to be the most potent ARBs at blocking βarr activation by Ang II and at suppressing aldosterone in vitro and in vivo in post-myocardial infarction HF animals. In contrast, irbesartan and losartan are virtually G protein-"biased" blockers at the human AT1R, with very low efficacy for βarr inhibition and aldosterone suppression. Therefore, candesartan and valsartan(and other, structurally similar compounds) may be the most preferred ARB agents for HF pharmacotherapy, as well as for treatment of other conditions characterized by elevated aldosterone.

Effect of angiotensin Ⅱ type 1 receptor blocker and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor on the intraocular growth factors and their receptors in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats

AIM： To investigate the effect of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker （ARB） and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor （ACEI） on intraocular growth factors and their receptors in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. METHODS： Forty Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 4 groups： control, diabetes mellitus （DM）, candesartan- treated DM, and enalapril-treated DM （each group, n---10）. After the induction of DM by streptozotocin, candesartan [ARB, 5 mg/（kg · d）] and enalapril [ACEI, 10 mg/（kg · d）] were administered to rats orally for 4Wko Vascular endothelial growth factor （VEGF） and angiotensin II （Ang II） concentrations in the vitreous were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, and VEGF receptor 2 and angiotensin II type 1 receptor （ATIR） levels were assessed at week 4 by Western blotting. RESULTS： Vitreous Ang II levels were significantly higher in the DM group and candesartan-treated DM group than in the control （P=0.04 and 0.005, respectively）. Vitreous ATIR increased significantly in DM compared to the other three groups （P〈0.007）. Candesartan-treated DM rats showed higher vitreal ATIR concentration than the enalapril-treated DM group and control （P〈0.001 and P=0.005, respectively）. No difference in vitreous Ang II and ATIR concentration was found between the enalapril- treated DM group and control. VEGF and its receptor were below the minimum detection limit in all 4 groups. CONCLUSION： Increased Ang II and ATIR in the hyperglycemic state indicate activated the intraocular renin-angiotensin system, which is inhibited more effectively by systemic ACEI than systemic ARB.

Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin Ⅱ receptor blocker on one-year outcomes of patients with atrial fibrillation: insights from a multicenter registry study in China

Objective To evaluate the effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor(ACEI)/angiotensin Ⅱ receptor blocker(ARB)therapy on the prognosis of patients with atrial fibrillation(AF).Methods A total of 1,991 AF patients from the AF registry were divided into two groups according to whether they were treated with ACEI/ARB at recruitment.Baseline characteristics were carefully collected and analyzed.Logistic regression was utilized to identify the predictors of ACEI/ARB therapy.The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality,while the secondary endpoints included cardiovascular mortality,stroke and major adverse events(MAEs)during the one-year follow-up period.Univariable and multivariable Cox regression were performed to identify the association between ACEI/ARB therapy and the one-year outcomes.Results In total,759 AF patients(38.1%)were treated with ACEI/ARB.Compared with AF patients without ACEI/ARB therapy,patients treated with ACEI/ARB tended to be older and had a higher rate of permanent AF,hypertension,diabetes mellitus,heart failure(HF),left ventricular ejection fraction(LVEF)<40%,coronary artery disease(CAD),prior myocardial infarction(MI),left ventricular hypertrophy,tobacco use and concomitant medications(all P<0.05).Hypertension,HF,LVEF<40%,CAD,prior MI and tobacco use were determined to be predictors of ACEI/ARB treatment.Multivariable analysis showed that ACEI/ARB therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of one-year all-cause mortality[hazard ratio(HR)(95%CI):0.682(0.527-0.882),P=0.003],cardiovascular mortality[HR(95%CI):0.713(0.514-0.988),P=0.042]and MAEs[HR(95%CI):0.698(0.568-0.859),P=0.001].The association between ACEI/ARB therapy and reduced mortality was consistent in the subgroup analysis.Conclusions In patients with AF,ACEI/ARB was related to significantly reduced one-year all-cause mortality,cardiovascular mortality and MAEs despite the high burden of cardiovascular comorbidities.

ACEI和ARB治疗COVID-19合并高血压患者的效果分析

目的血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素Ⅱ受体阻滞剂(ARB)治疗是否有利于合并高血压的新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)患者仍存在争议。该研究旨在探讨ACEI和ARB在COVID-19合并高血压患者中的治疗效果。方法采用回顾性分析方法,选择收治的COVID-19合并高血压患者,根据患者是否使用抗高血压药物ACEI或ARB治疗分为ACEI/ARB组(n=18)和非ACEI/ARB组(n=29),并根据患者的疾病严重程度分为普通型和重型患者,比较分析患者的临床特征、实验室检测结果、影像学数据、临床结局参数等资料。结果所有患者的年龄中位数为65.0岁(57.0~69.0岁),57.4%为男性,76.6%患者有明确的接触史,发病至入院的中位数时间为3.0 d(1.0~7.0 d),比较常见的临床表现为发热(74.5%)、咳嗽(48.9%)、乏力(27.7%)和咳痰(25.5%)。ACEI/ARB组和非ACEI/ARB组的临床分型比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两组患者基线期的临床特征和实验室检查结果的比较均差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。在ACEI/ARB组和非ACEI/ARB组中,重型患者的淋巴细胞计数(LYMPH)相对低于普通型患者,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、降钙素原(PCT)和D-二聚体(D-dimer)都普遍高于普通型患者。在病程第15天,非ACEI/ARB组重型患者的LDH、CRP、IL-6、PCT和D-dimer水平均高于ACEI/ARB组的重型患者,但两组间的比较差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。非ACEI/ARB组有1例死亡患者,其余患者经过治疗均痊愈出院。所有患者中,ACEI/ARB组的发热持续时间、胸部X线计算机断层扫描(CT)改善时间均短于非ACEI/ARB组,住院时间和病毒核酸转阴时间长于非ACEI/ARB组,但比较均差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。普通型患者中,ACEI/ARB组的住院时间、病毒核酸转阴时间和胸部CT改善时间长于非ACEI/ARB组,但仅有病毒核酸转阴时间的比较具差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。相反地,在重症患者中,非ACEI/ARB组的发热持续时间、住院时间、病毒核酸转阴时间和胸部CT改善时间长于ACEI/ARB组,但差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。结论ACEI或ARB治疗可缩短患者发热持续时间,对合并高血压的重症COVID-19患者可能有积极保护作用。

Angiotensin receptor blocker neprilysin inhibitors

Heart failure(HF)is a clinical syndrome that results from a structural or functional cardiac disorder that reduces the ability of the ventricle of the heart to fill with,or eject,blood.It is a multifaceted clinical condition that affects up to 2%of the population in the developed world,and is linked to significant morbidity and mortality;it is therefore considered a major concern for public health.Regarding the mechanism of HF,three neurohumoral factors-the reninangiotensin-aldosterone system,the sympathetic nervous system,and natriuretic peptides—are related to the pathology of chronic HF(CHF),and the targets of treatment.Angiotensin receptor blocker and neprilysin inhibitor(angiotensinreceptor neprilysin inhibitor),namely sacubitril/valsartan(SAC/VAL),has been introduced as a treatment for CHF.SAC/VAL is an efficacious,safe,and costeffective therapy that improves quality of life and longevity in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction(HFrEF),and reduces hospital admissions.An inhospital initiation strategy offers a potential new avenue to improve the clinical uptake of SAC/VAL.In the last five years,SAC/VAL has been established as a cornerstone component of comprehensive disease-modifying medical therapy in the management of chronic HFrEF.On the other hand,further work,with carefully designed and controlled preclinical studies,is necessary for understanding the molecular mechanisms,effects,and confirmation of issues such as long-term safety in both human and animal models.

The Significance of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Use in Sudden Cardiac Death

Objectives: To investigate the relationship between the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) and hyperkalemia in patients diagnosed with sudden cardiac death. Methods: We examined oral ACE inhibitor or ARB use among cardiopulmonary arrest patients brought by ambulance to our emergency room during a 5-year period from January 2012 to December 2016. The cause of death was determined to be sudden cardiac death, despite temporary return of spontaneous circulation after starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Subjects were dichotomized into 2 groups, those taking and those not taking an ACE inhibitor or ARB. Variables determined retrospectively included serum potassium, estimated glomerular filtration rate as an index of kidney function and time from cardiopulmonary arrest to return of spontaneous circulation. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare continuous data, and the chi-square test to compare categorical data between groups. The results are expressed as the median plus range. Statistical significance was assumed at p Results: Thirty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 77.1 years (range, 35 - 93 years), and there were 26 males and 9 females. Eleven subjects were ACE inhibitor or ARB users, and 24 were non-users. The serum potassium level was significantly higher in users than non-users (median, 6.2 mEq/L (range, 4.5 - 10.0) vs. 5.2 mEq/L (range, 3.6 - 8.3);p = 0.001). The estimated glomerular filtration rate was significantly lower in users than non-users (median, 25.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range, 4.6 - 60.3) vs. 46.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 (range, 19.8 - 97.1);p = 0.009). There was no significant difference in time from cardiopulmonary arrest to return of spontaneous circulation between the 2 groups (median, 24 minutes (range, 3 - 111) vs. 29 minutes (range, 10 - 54);p = 0.355). Conclusion: It is possible that hyperkalemia induced by ACE inhibitor or ARB use is a cause of sudden cardiac death, especially in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Long-term clinical outcome between beta-blocker with ACEI or ARB in patients with NSTEMI who underwent PCI with drug-eluting stents

Background Because limited comparative data are available,we decided to compare 2-year major clinical outcomes between beta-blockers (BB) with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and BB with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) therapy in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES).Methods A total 11,288 NSTEMI patients who underwent PCI with DES were enrolled and they were divided into two groups,the BB with ACEI group (n = 7600) and the BB with ARB group (n = 3688).The major clinical endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as all-cause death,recurrent myocardial infarction (re-MI),total revascularization [target lesion revascularization (TLR),target vessel revascularization (TVR),non-TVR] rate during the 2-year follow-up period.Results After propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis,two PSM groups (3317 pairs,n = 6634,C-statistic = 0.695) were generated.Although the cumulative incidences of all-cause death,cardiac death,TLR,and non-TVR were similar between the two groups,MACE (HR = 0.832,95% CI: 0.704?0.982,P = 0.030),total revascularization rate (HR = 0.767,95% CI: 0.598?0.984,P = 0.037),and TVR rate (HR = 0.646,95% CI: 0.470?0.888,P = 0.007) were significantly lower in the BB with ACEI group after PSM.Conclusions In this study,we suggest that the combination of BB with ACEI may be beneficial for reducing the cumulative incidences of MACE,total revascularization rate,and TVR rather than the BB with ARB after PCI with DES in NSTEMI patients.

The role of angiotensinⅡtype 1 receptor pathway in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury:Implications for the neuroprotective effectof ARBs

Cerebral ischemia-reperfusion(I/R)injury is a crucial factor that impacts the prognosis of recanalization therapy for acute ischemic stroke(AIS).It has been found that the brain renin-angiotensin system,especially the angiotensinⅡtype 1 receptor(AT1R)pathway,plays a significant role in cerebral I/R injury.This pathway is involved in processes such as oxidative stress,neuroinflammation,apoptosis,and it affects cerebrovascular autoregulation and the maintenance of blood-brain barrier.AT1R blocker(ARB),widely used as an antihypertensive agent,has demonstrated stroke prevention capabilities in numerous prospective studies,independent of its antihypertensive characteristics.Studies focusing on neurological diseases like Alzheimer's disease,Parkinson's disease,and cognitive impairment have confirmed that ARBs exhibit neuroprotective effects and aid in improving neurological functions.Preclinical studies have shown that ARBs can reduce infarct volume and brain edema,inhibit multiple signaling pathways associated with I/R injury,restore energy levels in damaged brain regions,and rescue the penumbra by promoting neovascularization in cerebral I/R models.These findings suggest that ARBs have potential to become a novel category of neuroprotecting agents for clinical treatment of Als.Therefore,this review primarily provides a theoretical foundation and practical evidence for the future clinical utilization of ARBs as neuroprotective agents following reperfusion therapy for Als.It outlines the role of cerebral I/R injury through the AT1R pathway and highlights the research progressmadeonARBs in I/Rmodels.

厄贝沙坦通过调节NLRP3表达在糖尿病肾病大鼠中的保护作用

目的 观察糖尿病肾病大鼠中NLRP3(NOD-like receptor protein 3)的表达,并在沉默NLRP3和以血管紧张素受体抑制剂(ARB)厄贝沙坦干预后观察NLRP3及炎症和纤维化因子的表达变化,探讨厄贝沙坦对糖尿病肾病大鼠的保护作用。方法 雄性SD大鼠随机分成5组:对照(Control)组、模型(Model)组、空载(Model+Blank)组、NLRP3沉默(Model+NLRP3 Sh)组、ARB(Model+ARB)组,分别在糖尿病肾病模型建立后8周、12周处死大鼠并收集肾脏组织。实时荧光定量PCR检测NLRP3、半胱氨酸天冬氨酸蛋白酶-1(Caspase-1)、核因子κB(NF-κB)P65和波形蛋白(Vimentin)的mRNA表达水平;Western blot检测NLRP3、P65、热休克蛋白47(heat shock protein 47,HSP47)和Vimentin的蛋白表达水平;免疫荧光法观察NLRP3、Caspase-1和Vimentin的表达;PAS、PASM和Masson染色观察肾脏病理改变。结果 与对照组比较,模型组及空载组NLRP3、Caspase-1、P65和Vimentin mRNA的表达升高(均P<0.05),NLRP3、Caspase-1、P65、HSP47和Vimentin的蛋白表达升高(均P<0.05)。与模型组及空载组相比,NLRP3沉默组及ARB组的上述指标表达均下调(均P<0.05),模型组与空载组以上指标之间差异无统计学意义。病理染色结果显示NLRP3沉默和厄贝沙坦干预可减轻糖尿病肾病大鼠肾脏损害,减轻肾小球肥大、肾小球硬化、系膜扩张、间质纤维化。结论 糖尿病肾病大鼠肾脏NLRP3信号通路被激活,且炎性和纤维化因子表达上调。厄贝沙坦可阻断NLRP3信号通路,减轻肾脏损害。天然免疫受体NLRP3可能成为治疗糖尿病肾病的新靶点。

ACEI联合ARB对心力衰竭患者安全性的Meta分析

目的血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂（ACEI）联合血管紧张素受体拮抗剂（ARB）对心力衰竭患者安全性分析。方法计算机检索Embase、PubMed、CoChrane图书馆、维普、中国知网数据库。按照纳入与排除标准选择文献、提取资料和评价纳入研究的方法学质量后，采用Revman5．3软件进行Meta分析。结果对11篇随机对照试验（RCT）的18160例患者进行了Meta分析。对照组为ACEI常规治疗，试验组为ACEI＋ARB联合治疗。接受联合治疗不良反应显著增加，其中低血压风险增加1.1％（WMD=1．91，95％CI：1．37～2．66，P〈0．01，I2=22％），高血钾0．6％（WMD=4．17，95％CI：2．31～7．53，P=0．02，I2=56％）；加重肾功能损害差异无统计学意义（WMD=2．73，95％CI：0．76～9．77，P=0．12，I2=84％），咳嗽无显著性差异（WMD=0．84，95％CI：0．65～1．09，P=0．18，I2=0％）。结论ARB类药物与ACEI类药物联用治疗心力衰竭应注意观察不良反应。

尿毒清联合ARB/ACEI治疗糖尿病肾病大量蛋白尿的疗效观察

目的观察尿毒清颗粒联合血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)或血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(ARB)类药物对糖尿病肾病不同分期的疗效。方法将46例糖尿病肾病患者分为对照组和治疗组,每组各23例。两组患者均常规降糖治疗,对照组给予ACEI或ARB类药物;治疗组在对照组治疗的基础上联用尿毒清颗粒每日4次,每次5g,连续服药4周,观察治疗前后24h尿微量蛋白、24h尿蛋白定量、血肌酐、尿素氮、胱抑素的变化。结果两组治疗后24h尿微量蛋白、24h蛋白定量均较治疗前减少(P<0.01)。对于糖尿病肾病Ⅲ期患者,治疗组和对照组在减少尿蛋白的治疗上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),对于糖尿病肾病Ⅳ期患者,治疗组较对照组尿蛋白明显减少(P<0.05)。结论 ACEI或ARB类药物联合尿毒清颗粒治疗糖尿病肾病大量蛋白尿患者疗效确切。

ARB联用ACEI治疗老年糖尿病肾病的临床效果观察

目的:评价血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂(ARB)和血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)联合用药治疗老年糖尿病的疗效。方法:80例临床确诊的糖尿病肾病(DN)患者按照入院顺序分为3组,ACEI组25例,ARB组25例,联合用药组30例,观察用药前、用药2个月后3组患者空腹血糖、血压、血肌酐、24h尿蛋白定量。结果:3组血压、24h尿蛋白定量均显著降低(P<0.05),联合用药组效果显著优于ACEI和ARB组(P<0.05)。结论:ACEI与ARB联合用药可提高糖尿病患者降压效果,降低蛋白尿。

高血压合并心力衰竭患者应用ACEI和ACEI联合ARB的随机对照研究

目的 探讨高血压合并心力衰竭的患者治疗中联合应用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂（ACEI）和血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拈抗剂（ARB）的安全性和对心功能的影响。方法 自2005年2月-2006年2月扎入选91例高血压合并心力衰竭患者．采用随机对照方法，将入选患者分为ACEI组46例和ACH联合ARB组45例。2组均应用氢氯噻嗪25mg／d，用药前血钾、肝功能、肾功能均正常．ACEI组给予培哚普利。4mg／d；ACEI联合ARB组给予培哚普利。4mg／d，缬沙坦80mg／d，均以血压降至140／90mmHg以下为达标。监测用药1个月前后的血钾、C反心蛋白（CRP）、血肌酐水平及心功能变化。，结果（1）未见血钾及咀肌酐的异常增高。（2）与治疗前比较，2组患者治疗后血浆CRP浓度差异有显著意义（P〈0．05）．2组间比较亦有显著差异（P〈0．05）。（3）2组患者治疗后心脏收缩功能改变差异有显著意义（P〈0．05）．但2组间比较尤显著差异（P〉0．05）。（4）2组治疗前后心室舒张功能改变差异有显著意义（P〈0．05）。2组间比较亦有显著差异（P〈0．05）。结论 在应用排钾利尿剂的基础上，联合应用ACEI和ARB冶疗高血压合并心力衰竭的患者，小但可以增加控制高血压的疗效，而且不会导致血钾、血肌酐水平的异常增高，并且町降低血清CRP浓度。在改善心脏收缩功能的同时，明显改善心脏的舒张功能。

肾上腺糖皮质激素联合ACEI/ARB治疗原发性IgA肾病的疗效观察

目的研究肾上腺糖皮质激素联合血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂或血管紧张素受体拮抗剂(ACEI/ARB)治疗原发性IgA肾病的疗效。方法利用笔者所在科室慢性肾脏病患者随访数据,选取其中经肾活检确诊并长期正规随访的原发性IgA肾病患者,按照其既往治疗方案,排除使用过其他免疫抑制及未使用ACEI/ARB治疗者,分为肾上腺糖皮质激素组(激素组)和对照组。收集并比较两组患者的各项临床指标及实验室结果。结果共入组92例患者,其中女性50例,占54.3%,激素组40例,对照组52例,平均随访时间27.8个月。随访中激素组无患者出现肌酐翻倍,对照组8例出现肌酐翻倍,其中2例进入透析。随访前激素组24h尿蛋白定量、舒张压高于对照组(P均<0.05)。随访末激素组舒张压、平均动脉压、24h尿蛋白定量低于对照组(P均<0.05)。对照组随访末血肌酐较随访前升高(P<0.05),激素组随访末血浆白蛋白较随访前升高(P<0.05)、随访末24h尿蛋白定量较随访前降低(P<0.01)。激素组e GFR(估计肾小球滤过率)随访中上升,对照组则下降,比较两者改变差值差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肾上腺糖皮质激素联合ACEI/ARB治疗能够减少IgA肾病患者尿蛋白,有效改善其预后。