BACKGROUND Childhood asthma is a common respiratory ailment that significantly affects preschool children.Effective asthma management in this population is particularly challenging due to limited communication skills ...BACKGROUND Childhood asthma is a common respiratory ailment that significantly affects preschool children.Effective asthma management in this population is particularly challenging due to limited communication skills in children and the necessity for consistent involvement of a caregiver.With the rise of digital healthcare and the need for innovative interventions,Internet-based models can potentially offer relatively more efficient and patient-tailored care,especially in children.AIM To explore the impact of an intelligent Internet care model based on the child respiratory and asthma control test(TRACK)on asthma management in preschool children.METHODS The study group comprised preschoolers,aged 5 years or younger,that visited the hospital's pediatric outpatient and emergency departments between January 2021 and January 2022.Total of 200 children were evenly and randomly divided into the observation and control groups.The control group received standard treatment in accordance with the 2016 Guidelines for Pediatric Bronchial Asthma and the Global Initiative on Asthma.In addition to above treatment,the observation group was introduced to an intelligent internet nursing model,emphasizing the TRACK scale.Key measures monitored over a six-month period included the frequency of asthma attack,emergency visits,pulmonary function parameters(FEV1,FEV1/FVC,and PEF),monthly TRACK scores,and the SF-12 quality of life assessment.Post-intervention asthma control rates were assessed at six-month follow-up.RESULTS The observation group had fewer asthma attacks and emergency room visits than the control group(P<0.05).After six months of treatment,the children in both groups had higher FEV1,FEV1/FVC,and PEF(P<0.05).Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups(P<0.05).For six months,children in the observation group had a higher monthly TRACK score than those in the control group(P<0.05).The PCS and MCSSF-12 quality of life scores were relatively higher than those before the nursing period(P<0.05).Furthermore,the groups showed statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The asthma control rate was higher in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION TRACK based Intelligent Internet nursing model may reduce asthma attacks and emergency visits in asthmatic children,improve lung function,quality of life,and the TRACK score and asthma control rate.The effect of nursing was significant,allowing for development of an asthma management model.展开更多
目的:通过研究儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(test for respiratory and asthma control in kids,TRACK)和儿童哮喘控制测试(childhood asthma control test,C-ACT)与全球哮喘防治创议(global initiative for asthma,GINA)标准哮喘控制水平评...目的:通过研究儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(test for respiratory and asthma control in kids,TRACK)和儿童哮喘控制测试(childhood asthma control test,C-ACT)与全球哮喘防治创议(global initiative for asthma,GINA)标准哮喘控制水平评估的一致性、与哮喘儿童肺功能指标的相关性,探讨2种评分方法在儿童哮喘管理中的价值。方法:选择2020年8月至2022年3月重庆市妇幼保健院儿科门诊就诊的哮喘患儿135例为研究对象,用TRACK评分表和C-ACT评分表对相应年龄的患儿及其家长进行问卷调查,分析2种评分方法与GINA标准哮喘控制水平评估分级的一致性、与肺功能指标的相关性,并比较不同评分结果组肺功能指标差异。结果:TRACK评分、C-ACT评分与GINA哮喘控制水平分级一致性检验Kappa值分别为0.517和0.531,均显示一致性一般;TRACK评分与TPF%TE和VPF%VE存在显著的正相关,但TRACK评分、C-ACT评分与FEV1%均没有显著性相关;不同TRACK评分组哮喘患儿的FEV1%差异无统计学意义(F=2.054,P=0.134),但多重比较发现≥80分组与<60分组FEV1%的差异有统计学意义(P=0.048);不同TRACK评分组哮喘患儿的TPTEF/TE(%)(F=3.171,P=0.044)和VPEF/VE(%)(F=3.919,P=0.022)差异有统计学意义,进一步多重比较发现其差异主要来自于≥80分组与60~80分组,其中VPEF/VE(%)(P=0.017)的组间差异较TPTEF/TE(%)(P=0.030)更为明显;比较不同C-ACT评分组哮喘患儿的FEV1%差异无统计学意义(F=1.756,P=0.182)。结论:TRACK评分能更好反映儿童肺功能的差异,可作为5岁以下儿童哮喘管理的一个有效评估工具。展开更多
Setting: Three pediatric pneumatologist offices in Bucaramanga, Colombia. Objective: To establish the concordance between medical criteria and the Childhood-Asthma Control Test (cACT). Design: Study of the assessment ...Setting: Three pediatric pneumatologist offices in Bucaramanga, Colombia. Objective: To establish the concordance between medical criteria and the Childhood-Asthma Control Test (cACT). Design: Study of the assessment of diagnostic technology using transverse sampling. 127 asthma patients aged between 4 and 11 years and their parents filled before clinical evaluation made by a pediatric pneumologist. Patients were classified as controlled or not controlled. Criteria validity was established comparing this classification using Cohen’s kappa and performance indicators according to ROC analysis. Results: 78% of the patients were controlled;patients who are not controlled have a higher score in cACT (mean difference: 3.25 points). Concordance among cACT subscales is acceptable (ρ = 0.554). cACT’s sensitivity was 53.6%, specificity 78.8%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 2.53, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.59. The best cut-off point is 15, with 98% sensitivity, a specificity of 14.3%, LR+ in 1.14, and LR- in 0.14. Conclusions: cACT is a valid tool to determine asthma control in children without replacing medical criteria or other clinical tests. In populations with difficult access to high complexity services, it is useful to decide whether urgent referral to the specialist is necessary.展开更多
哮喘控制测试(Asthma Control Test,ACT)评分作为评估哮喘控制水平调查问卷中的一种,可评估哮喘患者评分时前4周的控制情况,以其简便、快捷、实用等优点受到临床医师及患者的青睐。近年来,随着对ACT评分研究的进一步深入,发现其不仅在...哮喘控制测试(Asthma Control Test,ACT)评分作为评估哮喘控制水平调查问卷中的一种,可评估哮喘患者评分时前4周的控制情况,以其简便、快捷、实用等优点受到临床医师及患者的青睐。近年来,随着对ACT评分研究的进一步深入,发现其不仅在评估哮喘控制水平方面具有重要作用,而且还具有预测哮喘未来风险等功能。本文就ACT评分在哮喘研究中的应用做一综述。展开更多
目的探讨哮喘控制测试(asthma control test,ACT)评分与非过敏性哮喘患者诱导痰液中超敏C反应蛋白(high-sensitivity C-reactive protein,hs-CRP)及气道反应性的相关性。方法选择135例非过敏性哮喘患者(非过敏性哮喘组)及50例同期健康...目的探讨哮喘控制测试(asthma control test,ACT)评分与非过敏性哮喘患者诱导痰液中超敏C反应蛋白(high-sensitivity C-reactive protein,hs-CRP)及气道反应性的相关性。方法选择135例非过敏性哮喘患者(非过敏性哮喘组)及50例同期健康体检者(对照组),检测2组痰液中hs-CRP含量及肺功能情况。再依据入院时ACT评分将非过敏性哮喘患者分为2组,A组58例(ACT评分≥20),B组77例(ACT评分<20),并检测其气道反应性。采用Pearson相关检验分析ACT评分与hs-CRP及气道反应性的相关性。结果非过敏性哮喘患者痰液中hs-CRP含量明显高于对照组,而肺功能各指标FEV1、FEV1%、PEF及PEF%则显著低于对照组(均P<0.01)。非过敏性哮喘B组患者痰液中hs-CRP水平较A组高(P<0.01),而反映气道反应性的FEV1改变量均显著低于A组(P<0.05)。ACT评分与hs-CRP含量呈负相关(r=-0.76,P<0.01),与FEV1增加程度(%)和绝对值增加量(mL)呈正相关(r=0.85,P<0.05;r=0.916,P<0.05)。结论 ACT评分与非过敏性哮喘患者升高的hs-CRP水平及气道反应性密切相关,正确使用该评分有助于简便、快捷地进行病情评估。展开更多
目的:探讨哮喘控制测试(asthma control test,ACT)在支气管哮喘患者管理中的作用。方法:将ACT应用于已在哮喘门诊定期就诊的支气管哮喘患者70例。每月应用1次,观察哮喘患者在药物治疗、应用ACT6个月末时ACT试用率、治疗的依从性、哮喘...目的:探讨哮喘控制测试(asthma control test,ACT)在支气管哮喘患者管理中的作用。方法:将ACT应用于已在哮喘门诊定期就诊的支气管哮喘患者70例。每月应用1次,观察哮喘患者在药物治疗、应用ACT6个月末时ACT试用率、治疗的依从性、哮喘控制情况。在哮喘患者应用ACT前药物治疗时、应用ACT 6个月结束时测定第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1占预计值百分比(FEV1%预计值)和用力肺活量(FVC)、FVC占预计值百分比(FVC%预计值),同时测定ACT评分。结果:每月1次坚持应用ACT66例,使用率97.1%;坚持使用规范的治疗64例,治疗依从性达94.1%;症状完全控制率达47.1%,良好控制率达75.0%。应用ACT前FEV1%预计值为55.13±18.23,ACT评分16.08±3.34。应用ACT 6个月后,FEV1%预计值为76.70±14.60,ACT评分22.44±2.86。治疗前与治疗后差异有统计学意义(t=12.60、18.02,均P<0.01);ACT与FEV1具有良好相关性(r=0.83,P<0.01)。结论:ACT用于支气管哮喘患者的管理能提高患者对治疗的依从性和哮喘控制率,是哮喘管理的一种有效模式。展开更多
目的探讨改良中文版儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids Chinese Version,TRACK-C)在0~3岁哮喘婴幼儿不同患病时期的应用价值。方法选取2017年8月—2023年1月空军军医大学唐都医院小儿哮喘门诊中...目的探讨改良中文版儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids Chinese Version,TRACK-C)在0~3岁哮喘婴幼儿不同患病时期的应用价值。方法选取2017年8月—2023年1月空军军医大学唐都医院小儿哮喘门诊中已建立标准化电子病历的203名0~3岁哮喘患儿作为哮喘组,同期100名健康儿童作为对照组。比较各组的TRACK-C评分、潮气肺功能、呼出气一氧化氮(Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide,FeNO)水平并进行相关性分析。结果哮喘组的FeNO、呼吸频率(Respiratory Rate,RR)和血液IgE水平高于对照组,达峰值时间比(Time to Peak Expirtory Flow/Time of Expiratory,TPTEF/TE)、达峰容积比(Volume to Peak Expiratory Flow/Volume of Expiratory,VPEF/VE)、公斤潮气量(Tidal Volume/kg,VT/KG)、TRACK-C评分水平低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。哮喘组急性期FeNO水平、RR水平高于缓解期,且TPTEF/TE、VPEF/VE、VT/KG、TRACK-C评分水平低于缓解期,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。采用Pearson分析哮喘不同患病时期与各项观察指标的相关性,结果显示哮喘不同患病时期与TPTEF/TE、VPEF/VE、TRACK-C评分呈负相关(r=-0.468、-0.452、-0.289,P均<0.05)。结论TRACK-C评分可充分应用于0~3岁哮喘幼儿的病情评估,与潮气肺功能结合可以更好地对低龄患儿进行哮喘管理。展开更多
目的探讨奥马珠单抗治疗儿童过敏性哮喘的临床疗效。方法选取2021年8月至2022年3月首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院过敏反应科确诊为过敏性哮喘并应用奥马珠单抗治疗的患儿。根据治疗有效性全球评估(global evaluation of treatment effec...目的探讨奥马珠单抗治疗儿童过敏性哮喘的临床疗效。方法选取2021年8月至2022年3月首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院过敏反应科确诊为过敏性哮喘并应用奥马珠单抗治疗的患儿。根据治疗有效性全球评估(global evaluation of treatment effectiveness,GETE)分析患儿治疗16周时的临床疗效,并观察治疗4周和16周时儿童哮喘控制测试(childhood asthma control test/asthma control test,c-ACT/ACT)得分,哮喘和鼻炎视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),哮喘生活质量调查问卷(mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire,mini-AQLQ)得分,每日激素剂量,血清总IgE、肺功能和呼出气一氧化氮(fractional exhaled nitric oxide,FeNO)情况。结果共纳入35例患儿,其中77.1%的患儿在治疗16周时对奥马珠单抗有“极好”或“好”的应答。与治疗前相比,治疗4周和16周时患儿的c-ACT/ACT得分均升高[25.0(20.3,26.8)分,24.5(21.5,27.0)分比23.0(18.0,23.0)分;23.5(21.3,24.8)分,24.5(24.0,25.0)分比22.0(18.0,24.8)分],哮喘VAS[1.0(0.0,2.8)分,1.0(0.0,1.0)分比2.3(0.6,6.3)分]和鼻炎VAS[1.0(0.0,4.8)分,1.4(0.1,3.0)分比4.7(2.1,5.9)分]均下降,哮喘mini-AQLQ评分均升高[98.5(93.0,103.0)分,103.0(98.5,103.8)分比91.0(83.3,96.5)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与治疗前相比,治疗16周时患儿的每日激素剂量下降[100.0(71.0,150.0)μg比160.0(125.0,200.0)μg]、血清总IgE明显升高[1593.0(1131.0,2367.0)kU/L比684.0(331.0,1489.0)kU/L],差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000)。与治疗前相比,治疗16周时患儿肺功能指标无明显改善,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但FeNO显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在过敏性哮喘儿童中应用奥马珠单抗,可以减少患儿临床症状和糖皮质激素的剂量,改善患儿生活质量。展开更多
基金Supported by Science and Technology Research Project of Songjiang District,No.2020SJ340.
文摘BACKGROUND Childhood asthma is a common respiratory ailment that significantly affects preschool children.Effective asthma management in this population is particularly challenging due to limited communication skills in children and the necessity for consistent involvement of a caregiver.With the rise of digital healthcare and the need for innovative interventions,Internet-based models can potentially offer relatively more efficient and patient-tailored care,especially in children.AIM To explore the impact of an intelligent Internet care model based on the child respiratory and asthma control test(TRACK)on asthma management in preschool children.METHODS The study group comprised preschoolers,aged 5 years or younger,that visited the hospital's pediatric outpatient and emergency departments between January 2021 and January 2022.Total of 200 children were evenly and randomly divided into the observation and control groups.The control group received standard treatment in accordance with the 2016 Guidelines for Pediatric Bronchial Asthma and the Global Initiative on Asthma.In addition to above treatment,the observation group was introduced to an intelligent internet nursing model,emphasizing the TRACK scale.Key measures monitored over a six-month period included the frequency of asthma attack,emergency visits,pulmonary function parameters(FEV1,FEV1/FVC,and PEF),monthly TRACK scores,and the SF-12 quality of life assessment.Post-intervention asthma control rates were assessed at six-month follow-up.RESULTS The observation group had fewer asthma attacks and emergency room visits than the control group(P<0.05).After six months of treatment,the children in both groups had higher FEV1,FEV1/FVC,and PEF(P<0.05).Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups(P<0.05).For six months,children in the observation group had a higher monthly TRACK score than those in the control group(P<0.05).The PCS and MCSSF-12 quality of life scores were relatively higher than those before the nursing period(P<0.05).Furthermore,the groups showed statistically significant differences(P<0.05).The asthma control rate was higher in the observation group than in the control group(P<0.05).CONCLUSION TRACK based Intelligent Internet nursing model may reduce asthma attacks and emergency visits in asthmatic children,improve lung function,quality of life,and the TRACK score and asthma control rate.The effect of nursing was significant,allowing for development of an asthma management model.
文摘目的:通过研究儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(test for respiratory and asthma control in kids,TRACK)和儿童哮喘控制测试(childhood asthma control test,C-ACT)与全球哮喘防治创议(global initiative for asthma,GINA)标准哮喘控制水平评估的一致性、与哮喘儿童肺功能指标的相关性,探讨2种评分方法在儿童哮喘管理中的价值。方法:选择2020年8月至2022年3月重庆市妇幼保健院儿科门诊就诊的哮喘患儿135例为研究对象,用TRACK评分表和C-ACT评分表对相应年龄的患儿及其家长进行问卷调查,分析2种评分方法与GINA标准哮喘控制水平评估分级的一致性、与肺功能指标的相关性,并比较不同评分结果组肺功能指标差异。结果:TRACK评分、C-ACT评分与GINA哮喘控制水平分级一致性检验Kappa值分别为0.517和0.531,均显示一致性一般;TRACK评分与TPF%TE和VPF%VE存在显著的正相关,但TRACK评分、C-ACT评分与FEV1%均没有显著性相关;不同TRACK评分组哮喘患儿的FEV1%差异无统计学意义(F=2.054,P=0.134),但多重比较发现≥80分组与<60分组FEV1%的差异有统计学意义(P=0.048);不同TRACK评分组哮喘患儿的TPTEF/TE(%)(F=3.171,P=0.044)和VPEF/VE(%)(F=3.919,P=0.022)差异有统计学意义,进一步多重比较发现其差异主要来自于≥80分组与60~80分组,其中VPEF/VE(%)(P=0.017)的组间差异较TPTEF/TE(%)(P=0.030)更为明显;比较不同C-ACT评分组哮喘患儿的FEV1%差异无统计学意义(F=1.756,P=0.182)。结论:TRACK评分能更好反映儿童肺功能的差异,可作为5岁以下儿童哮喘管理的一个有效评估工具。
文摘Setting: Three pediatric pneumatologist offices in Bucaramanga, Colombia. Objective: To establish the concordance between medical criteria and the Childhood-Asthma Control Test (cACT). Design: Study of the assessment of diagnostic technology using transverse sampling. 127 asthma patients aged between 4 and 11 years and their parents filled before clinical evaluation made by a pediatric pneumologist. Patients were classified as controlled or not controlled. Criteria validity was established comparing this classification using Cohen’s kappa and performance indicators according to ROC analysis. Results: 78% of the patients were controlled;patients who are not controlled have a higher score in cACT (mean difference: 3.25 points). Concordance among cACT subscales is acceptable (ρ = 0.554). cACT’s sensitivity was 53.6%, specificity 78.8%, positive likelihood ratio (LR+) 2.53, and negative likelihood ratio (LR-) 0.59. The best cut-off point is 15, with 98% sensitivity, a specificity of 14.3%, LR+ in 1.14, and LR- in 0.14. Conclusions: cACT is a valid tool to determine asthma control in children without replacing medical criteria or other clinical tests. In populations with difficult access to high complexity services, it is useful to decide whether urgent referral to the specialist is necessary.
文摘哮喘控制测试(Asthma Control Test,ACT)评分作为评估哮喘控制水平调查问卷中的一种,可评估哮喘患者评分时前4周的控制情况,以其简便、快捷、实用等优点受到临床医师及患者的青睐。近年来,随着对ACT评分研究的进一步深入,发现其不仅在评估哮喘控制水平方面具有重要作用,而且还具有预测哮喘未来风险等功能。本文就ACT评分在哮喘研究中的应用做一综述。
文摘[目的]提高哮喘病人失眠的检出率,加强对哮喘病人睡眠质量的关注,提高整体生活质量。[方法]对2018年6月—2019年12月在门诊或住院的206例哮喘病人进行横断面调查。以失眠严重程度指数量表(Insomnia Severity Index,ISI)得分把206例病人分为3组:临床失眠组(ISI≥15分)、亚失眠组(8分≤ISI<15分)、非失眠组(ISI<8分)。收集并分析既往病史、肺功能检测、问卷调查数据临床参数。[结果]206例病人有48例存在失眠状况,占23.3%(ISI≥8分);失眠严重程度与哮喘控制测试(Asthma Control Test,ACT)问卷总分及各因子均相关(除了控制评估项);ACT得分越高哮喘病人失眠越严重;多元回归分析:ACT总分与哮喘病人失眠呈显著相关[OR=1.23,95%CI(1.13,1.34),P<0.001]。ACT得分是哮喘病人失眠严重程度的预测因素(ROC曲线下面积为0.835,P<0.001),最佳截断值为ACT<19.5。在此值下CAT评估失眠的敏感性和特异性分别为76.6%和71.2%。[结论]ACT得分与哮喘病人失眠严重程度密切相关;通过使用ACT量表来评估病人失眠状况,更好管理病人睡眠情况,提高病人整体生活质量。
文摘目的:探讨哮喘控制测试(asthma control test,ACT)在支气管哮喘患者管理中的作用。方法:将ACT应用于已在哮喘门诊定期就诊的支气管哮喘患者70例。每月应用1次,观察哮喘患者在药物治疗、应用ACT6个月末时ACT试用率、治疗的依从性、哮喘控制情况。在哮喘患者应用ACT前药物治疗时、应用ACT 6个月结束时测定第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)、FEV1占预计值百分比(FEV1%预计值)和用力肺活量(FVC)、FVC占预计值百分比(FVC%预计值),同时测定ACT评分。结果:每月1次坚持应用ACT66例,使用率97.1%;坚持使用规范的治疗64例,治疗依从性达94.1%;症状完全控制率达47.1%,良好控制率达75.0%。应用ACT前FEV1%预计值为55.13±18.23,ACT评分16.08±3.34。应用ACT 6个月后,FEV1%预计值为76.70±14.60,ACT评分22.44±2.86。治疗前与治疗后差异有统计学意义(t=12.60、18.02,均P<0.01);ACT与FEV1具有良好相关性(r=0.83,P<0.01)。结论:ACT用于支气管哮喘患者的管理能提高患者对治疗的依从性和哮喘控制率,是哮喘管理的一种有效模式。
文摘目的探讨改良中文版儿童呼吸和哮喘控制测试(Test for Respiratory and Asthma Control in Kids Chinese Version,TRACK-C)在0~3岁哮喘婴幼儿不同患病时期的应用价值。方法选取2017年8月—2023年1月空军军医大学唐都医院小儿哮喘门诊中已建立标准化电子病历的203名0~3岁哮喘患儿作为哮喘组,同期100名健康儿童作为对照组。比较各组的TRACK-C评分、潮气肺功能、呼出气一氧化氮(Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide,FeNO)水平并进行相关性分析。结果哮喘组的FeNO、呼吸频率(Respiratory Rate,RR)和血液IgE水平高于对照组,达峰值时间比(Time to Peak Expirtory Flow/Time of Expiratory,TPTEF/TE)、达峰容积比(Volume to Peak Expiratory Flow/Volume of Expiratory,VPEF/VE)、公斤潮气量(Tidal Volume/kg,VT/KG)、TRACK-C评分水平低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。哮喘组急性期FeNO水平、RR水平高于缓解期,且TPTEF/TE、VPEF/VE、VT/KG、TRACK-C评分水平低于缓解期,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。采用Pearson分析哮喘不同患病时期与各项观察指标的相关性,结果显示哮喘不同患病时期与TPTEF/TE、VPEF/VE、TRACK-C评分呈负相关(r=-0.468、-0.452、-0.289,P均<0.05)。结论TRACK-C评分可充分应用于0~3岁哮喘幼儿的病情评估,与潮气肺功能结合可以更好地对低龄患儿进行哮喘管理。
文摘目的探讨奥马珠单抗治疗儿童过敏性哮喘的临床疗效。方法选取2021年8月至2022年3月首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院过敏反应科确诊为过敏性哮喘并应用奥马珠单抗治疗的患儿。根据治疗有效性全球评估(global evaluation of treatment effectiveness,GETE)分析患儿治疗16周时的临床疗效,并观察治疗4周和16周时儿童哮喘控制测试(childhood asthma control test/asthma control test,c-ACT/ACT)得分,哮喘和鼻炎视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),哮喘生活质量调查问卷(mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire,mini-AQLQ)得分,每日激素剂量,血清总IgE、肺功能和呼出气一氧化氮(fractional exhaled nitric oxide,FeNO)情况。结果共纳入35例患儿,其中77.1%的患儿在治疗16周时对奥马珠单抗有“极好”或“好”的应答。与治疗前相比,治疗4周和16周时患儿的c-ACT/ACT得分均升高[25.0(20.3,26.8)分,24.5(21.5,27.0)分比23.0(18.0,23.0)分;23.5(21.3,24.8)分,24.5(24.0,25.0)分比22.0(18.0,24.8)分],哮喘VAS[1.0(0.0,2.8)分,1.0(0.0,1.0)分比2.3(0.6,6.3)分]和鼻炎VAS[1.0(0.0,4.8)分,1.4(0.1,3.0)分比4.7(2.1,5.9)分]均下降,哮喘mini-AQLQ评分均升高[98.5(93.0,103.0)分,103.0(98.5,103.8)分比91.0(83.3,96.5)分],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与治疗前相比,治疗16周时患儿的每日激素剂量下降[100.0(71.0,150.0)μg比160.0(125.0,200.0)μg]、血清总IgE明显升高[1593.0(1131.0,2367.0)kU/L比684.0(331.0,1489.0)kU/L],差异均有统计学意义(P=0.000)。与治疗前相比,治疗16周时患儿肺功能指标无明显改善,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),但FeNO显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在过敏性哮喘儿童中应用奥马珠单抗,可以减少患儿临床症状和糖皮质激素的剂量,改善患儿生活质量。