AIM: To clarify the usefulness of a new method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy by using a fast-absorbable suture material irradiated polyglactin 910, and a temporary stent tube for a narrow pancreatic duct wit...AIM: To clarify the usefulness of a new method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy by using a fast-absorbable suture material irradiated polyglactin 910, and a temporary stent tube for a narrow pancreatic duct with a soft pancreatic texture.METHODS: Among 63 consecutive patients with soft pancreas undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2003 to 2006, 35 patients were treated with a new reconstructive method. Briefly, after the pancreatic transaction, a stent tube was inserted into the lumen of the pancreatic duct and ligated with it by a fast-absorbable suture. Another tip of the stent tube was introduced into the intestinal lumen at the jejunal limb, where a purse-string suture was made by another fast-absorbable suture to roughly fix the tube. The pancreaticojejunostomy was completed by ligating two fast-absorbable sutures to approximate the ductal end and the jejunal mucosa, and by adding a rough anastomosis between the pancreatic parenchyma and the seromuscular layer of the jejunum. The initial surgical results with this method were retrospectively compared with those of the 28 patients treated with conventional duct-to-mucosa anastomosis.RESULTS: The incidences of postoperative morbidity including pancreatic fistula were comparable between the two groups (new; 3%-17% vs conventional; 7%-14% according to the definitions). There was no mortality and re-admission. Late complications were also rarely seen.CONCLUSION: A pancreaticojejunostomy using an irradiated polyglactin 910 suture material and a temporary stent is easy to perform and is feasible even in cases with a narrow pancreatic duct and a normal soft pancreas.展开更多
目的比较腹腔镜下T管缝合时预置缝线法与传统缝合方法的效果差异。方法回顾性分析2020年6月至2023年9月间空军特色医学中心行腹腔镜T管缝合的患者的临床资料,对照组采用传统的T管缝合方法,研究组采用预置缝线的T管缝合方法:间断缝合,进...目的比较腹腔镜下T管缝合时预置缝线法与传统缝合方法的效果差异。方法回顾性分析2020年6月至2023年9月间空军特色医学中心行腹腔镜T管缝合的患者的临床资料,对照组采用传统的T管缝合方法,研究组采用预置缝线的T管缝合方法:间断缝合,进针和出针时前一针的缝线不打紧,每组24例。比较两组患者T管缝合时间和注水试验阳性率。结果研究组术中T管缝合时间少于对照组[(12.61±0.88)min vs(17.62±0.58)min,t=-23.34,P<0.001],注水试验阳性率低于对照组[0 vs 25%(6/24),P=0.029],差异均有统计学意义。结论应用预置缝线的间断缝合法可提高腹腔镜下T管缝合速度,使缝合更确切,较传统方法有明显优势。展开更多
文摘AIM: To clarify the usefulness of a new method for performing a pancreaticojejunostomy by using a fast-absorbable suture material irradiated polyglactin 910, and a temporary stent tube for a narrow pancreatic duct with a soft pancreatic texture.METHODS: Among 63 consecutive patients with soft pancreas undergoing a pancreaticoduodenectomy from 2003 to 2006, 35 patients were treated with a new reconstructive method. Briefly, after the pancreatic transaction, a stent tube was inserted into the lumen of the pancreatic duct and ligated with it by a fast-absorbable suture. Another tip of the stent tube was introduced into the intestinal lumen at the jejunal limb, where a purse-string suture was made by another fast-absorbable suture to roughly fix the tube. The pancreaticojejunostomy was completed by ligating two fast-absorbable sutures to approximate the ductal end and the jejunal mucosa, and by adding a rough anastomosis between the pancreatic parenchyma and the seromuscular layer of the jejunum. The initial surgical results with this method were retrospectively compared with those of the 28 patients treated with conventional duct-to-mucosa anastomosis.RESULTS: The incidences of postoperative morbidity including pancreatic fistula were comparable between the two groups (new; 3%-17% vs conventional; 7%-14% according to the definitions). There was no mortality and re-admission. Late complications were also rarely seen.CONCLUSION: A pancreaticojejunostomy using an irradiated polyglactin 910 suture material and a temporary stent is easy to perform and is feasible even in cases with a narrow pancreatic duct and a normal soft pancreas.
文摘目的比较腹腔镜下T管缝合时预置缝线法与传统缝合方法的效果差异。方法回顾性分析2020年6月至2023年9月间空军特色医学中心行腹腔镜T管缝合的患者的临床资料,对照组采用传统的T管缝合方法,研究组采用预置缝线的T管缝合方法:间断缝合,进针和出针时前一针的缝线不打紧,每组24例。比较两组患者T管缝合时间和注水试验阳性率。结果研究组术中T管缝合时间少于对照组[(12.61±0.88)min vs(17.62±0.58)min,t=-23.34,P<0.001],注水试验阳性率低于对照组[0 vs 25%(6/24),P=0.029],差异均有统计学意义。结论应用预置缝线的间断缝合法可提高腹腔镜下T管缝合速度,使缝合更确切,较传统方法有明显优势。
