期刊文献+
共找到1篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
A Study of the Key Concepts "Heng" and "Hengxian' in the Hengxian on Chu Bamboo Slips Housed at the Shanghai Museum
1
作者 DING Sixin 《Frontiers of Philosophy in China》 2016年第2期206-221,共16页
This essay agrees that the two controversial characters on Slip 12 of the Hengxian 亘先 should be transcribed as " ~ and " " and pronounced as "ji" 极. Secondly, with respect to six occurrences of the charact... This essay agrees that the two controversial characters on Slip 12 of the Hengxian 亘先 should be transcribed as " ~ and " " and pronounced as "ji" 极. Secondly, with respect to six occurrences of the character "亘" (heng) on Slips 1-9 which Qiu Xigui 裘锡圭 reads as "极" (ji), this essay holds that in the end it should be read as "恒" (heng), and that the reading provided by Li Ling is acceptable. Therefore, that piece of bamboo slip writing can be named "恒先" (Hengxian). Thirdly, "亘" (heng) and "亘先" (hengxian), or "恒" (heng) and "恒先" (hengxian), are two concepts, the latter of which is based on the former. "亘" (heng) is more fundamental and more important than "亘先" (hengxian). Scholars mostly equate "恒" (heng) with "恒先" (hengxian), and even regard "恒先" as the prior expression of this concept. One can hardly say that this is correct. In the bamboo writing, "恒" (heng) actually refers to "tian dao" 天道(heavenly dao), rather than "dao" in the Laozi. The so-called "恒先" (hengxian) suggests the very commencement of the genesis and evolvement of Heavenly dao, which is somewhat equivalent to "taishi" 太始 (grand commencement) in the Huainanzi 淮南子. Fourthly, in the Hengxian, "恒" (heng) implies objective and natural laws, while "极" (ji) suggests ought-to-be rules. "极" (ji) in the bamboo writing is actually informed by "恒" (heng). 展开更多
关键词 Chu bamboo slips (heng) 恒先 (hengxian) heavenly dao
原文传递
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部