目的探究关节镜下Bankart修复联合Remplissage术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的疗效。方法回顾性分析郑州市第七人民医院2015年3月至2018年3月收治的31例肩关节前脱位患者资料,其中男24例,女7例;年龄19~44岁,平均(26.9±6.3)岁;左肩11例...目的探究关节镜下Bankart修复联合Remplissage术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的疗效。方法回顾性分析郑州市第七人民医院2015年3月至2018年3月收治的31例肩关节前脱位患者资料,其中男24例,女7例;年龄19~44岁,平均(26.9±6.3)岁;左肩11例,右肩20例;运动伤23例,交通事故伤6例,其他伤2例;脱位次数3~8次,平均(5.1±1.6)次;末次脱位至手术时间2~13 d,平均(4.3±2.7)d。美国加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(University of California at Los Angeles,UCLA)肩关节评分为(18.0±2.7)分,美国肩肘外科协会评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons evaluation form,ASES)为(64.8±4.1)分。前屈上举角度为(168.8±4.7)°,外展外旋角度为(80.3±5.3)°。所有患者均通过肩关节CT三维重建确诊为复发性肩关节前脱位,并接受关节镜下Remplissage术联合Bankart修复术。随访评估患者再脱位发生率、UCLA评分和ASES评分改善情况以及肩关节功能恢复水平。结果31例均获随访,随访时间14~27个月,平均(17.1±4.1)个月。随访期间再脱位2例,其中半脱位1例,完全脱位1例。术后UCLA评分为(30.1±2.1)分,ASES评分为(87.1±4.0)分,与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。术后前屈上举角度为(170.0±4.9)°,外展外旋角度为(77.0±4.4)°,与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论关节镜下Bankart修复联合Remplissage术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位,不影响肩关节外旋功能,有助于患者重返体育运动。盂肱关节骨缺损程度的准确评估不仅对术式的选择至关重要,而且还可降低复发率。展开更多
BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function...BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function and reducing pain.Recent advancements include new suture anchor technologies,such as the Sironix suture anchor known for its biomechanical strength and promising outcomes.However,there are limited real-world data on its effectiveness and safety,particularly in the Indian population.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Sironix suture anchors in rotator cuff and Bankart repair surgeries.METHODS Sixty participants underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022,and demographic data and postoperative outcomes were collected through retrospective reviews and telephonic interviews.Validated scales,including the PENN Shoulder Score(PSS),Disabilities of the Arm,Shoulder,and Hand(DASH)score,and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation(SANE),were utilized for assessment.RESULTS Treatment with Sironix suture anchor devices,including Ceptre Knotted UHMWPE Suture Titanium Anchor,Spyke Knotted UHMWPE Suture Peek Anchor,Stativ Knotted UHMWPE Suture Anchor,and Viplok Knotless Peek Screw Anchor with Titanium Tip,revealed no repair failures.Participants demonstrated high satisfaction and functional improvement,as evidenced by the mean Quick DASH score(32.01)and PSS(71.65)and the satisfactory SANE scores for both injured joints(74.33)and non-injured(83.67)shoulder joints.CONCLUSION The study yielded favorable outcomes for rotator cuff tear repair and Bankart repair.No repair failures were observed,supporting the safety and efficacy of these devices in shoulder injury management.展开更多
BACKGROUND With stiff competition from alternative albeit more expensive counterparts,it has become important to establish the applicability of metallic anchors for shoulder instability in the modern era.This can be a...BACKGROUND With stiff competition from alternative albeit more expensive counterparts,it has become important to establish the applicability of metallic anchors for shoulder instability in the modern era.This can be accomplished,in part,by analysing long-term outcomes.AIM To analyse minimum 10-year outcomes from 30 patients following arthroscopic anterior stabilisation using metallic anchors.METHODS Prospectively collected data from arthroscopic Bankart repairs performed using metal anchors during 2007P-2010 were retrospectively analysed in this singlesurgeon study.Comprehensive data collection included historical and clinical findings,dislocation details,operative specifics,and follow-up radiological and clinical findings including shoulder scores.The primary outcomes were patientreported scores(Constant,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons[ASES],and Rowe scores)and pain and instability on a visual analogue scale(VAS).RESULTS A 3% recurrence rate of dislocation was noted at the final follow-up.Total constant scores at 10 years postoperatively measured between 76 and 100(mean 89)were significantly better than preoperative scores(mean 62.7).Congruous improvements were also noted in the Rowe and ASES scores and VAS at the 10-year review.CONCLUSION Reliable long-term outcomes with metallic anchors in surgery for shoulder instability can be expected.Our results provide additional evidence of their continued,cost-effective presence in the modern scenario.展开更多
目的：探讨肩关节镜下应用带线锚钉技术同期修复骨性Bankart损伤合并肩袖损伤的手术策略和术后疗效。方法：2008年6月至2015年1月共收治18例同时合并骨性Bankant损伤和肩袖损伤的患者,其中女性8例,男性10例,患者平均年龄57.9岁（40~72...目的：探讨肩关节镜下应用带线锚钉技术同期修复骨性Bankart损伤合并肩袖损伤的手术策略和术后疗效。方法：2008年6月至2015年1月共收治18例同时合并骨性Bankant损伤和肩袖损伤的患者,其中女性8例,男性10例,患者平均年龄57.9岁（40~72岁）。患者均有外伤性肩关节前脱位病史,11例急诊复位后因再脱位就医,7例因存在持续肩关节疼痛就医。18例患者均通过MRI结合X线和三维CT确诊同时存在全层肩袖损伤和骨性Bankart损伤。所有患者均于关节镜下一期修复两种损伤,手术中采用带线锚钉先固定骨性Bankart损伤,再用单排锚钉修复撕裂肩袖。结果：18例患者平均随访时间22.5个月（12~38个月）。术后3月、6月随访肩关节前屈上举和体侧外旋活动度较健侧比较差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。术后1年两侧活动度差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。末次随访时,患侧vs健侧ASES肩关节评分为91.6±6.7分vs 93.6±4.8分,Constant-Murley评分为89.9±6.8分vs 92.0±7.9分,Rowe评分为89.3±7.1 vs 91.1±6.7,两侧比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。末次随访外展肌力双侧无显著性差异,VAS疼痛评分较术前显著改善（1.4±1.1 vs 6.2±1.9）。随访过程中1例患者曾出现半脱位,3例出现术后僵硬,经肌力和功能训练后改善,无感染、再脱位等并发症。结论：肩关节脱位同时存在骨性Bankart损伤和肩袖撕裂时,全关节镜下修复骨性Bankart损伤后再修复肩袖损伤,治疗全面,疗效肯定。展开更多
目的:探索肩关节镜下锚钉植入固定治疗肩关节bankart损伤的疗效。方法:采用肩关节镜下锚钉植入治疗复发性肩关节前脱位伴bankart损伤16例,术前均行肩关节X线和MRI检查,按视触动量的顺序检查肩关节,并与健侧对比并评分,确诊后在关节镜下...目的:探索肩关节镜下锚钉植入固定治疗肩关节bankart损伤的疗效。方法:采用肩关节镜下锚钉植入治疗复发性肩关节前脱位伴bankart损伤16例,术前均行肩关节X线和MRI检查,按视触动量的顺序检查肩关节,并与健侧对比并评分,确诊后在关节镜下行相应部位的锚钉固定,术后按肩关节康复指导进行肩关节功能锻炼。手术前后肩关节的评分均参照美国加州洛杉矶大学(University of California at Los Angeles,UCLA)功能评分标准和视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)。结果:全部病例术后随访7～68(中位数25)个月,术后肩关节稳定性良好,未出现肩关节再发脱位,UCLA术前评分20～22(20.8±0.8)分,终末随访29～35(32.9±1.5)分,其中优6例,良10例,术前及随访终末VAS评分分别为2～4(3.3±0.8)和0～1(0.6±0.5)。结论:关节镜下锚钉植入固定治疗肩关节bankart损伤具有损伤小,术后恢复快,疗效确切等优点。展开更多
文摘目的探究关节镜下Bankart修复联合Remplissage术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的疗效。方法回顾性分析郑州市第七人民医院2015年3月至2018年3月收治的31例肩关节前脱位患者资料,其中男24例,女7例;年龄19~44岁,平均(26.9±6.3)岁;左肩11例,右肩20例;运动伤23例,交通事故伤6例,其他伤2例;脱位次数3~8次,平均(5.1±1.6)次;末次脱位至手术时间2~13 d,平均(4.3±2.7)d。美国加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(University of California at Los Angeles,UCLA)肩关节评分为(18.0±2.7)分,美国肩肘外科协会评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons evaluation form,ASES)为(64.8±4.1)分。前屈上举角度为(168.8±4.7)°,外展外旋角度为(80.3±5.3)°。所有患者均通过肩关节CT三维重建确诊为复发性肩关节前脱位,并接受关节镜下Remplissage术联合Bankart修复术。随访评估患者再脱位发生率、UCLA评分和ASES评分改善情况以及肩关节功能恢复水平。结果31例均获随访,随访时间14~27个月,平均(17.1±4.1)个月。随访期间再脱位2例,其中半脱位1例,完全脱位1例。术后UCLA评分为(30.1±2.1)分,ASES评分为(87.1±4.0)分,与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。术后前屈上举角度为(170.0±4.9)°,外展外旋角度为(77.0±4.4)°,与术前比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论关节镜下Bankart修复联合Remplissage术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位,不影响肩关节外旋功能,有助于患者重返体育运动。盂肱关节骨缺损程度的准确评估不仅对术式的选择至关重要,而且还可降低复发率。
文摘BACKGROUND Rotator cuff tears and Bankart lesions significantly affect shoulder function and quality of life.Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and Bankart repair has become the standard treatment for restoring function and reducing pain.Recent advancements include new suture anchor technologies,such as the Sironix suture anchor known for its biomechanical strength and promising outcomes.However,there are limited real-world data on its effectiveness and safety,particularly in the Indian population.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Sironix suture anchors in rotator cuff and Bankart repair surgeries.METHODS Sixty participants underwent surgery between January 2021 and December 2022,and demographic data and postoperative outcomes were collected through retrospective reviews and telephonic interviews.Validated scales,including the PENN Shoulder Score(PSS),Disabilities of the Arm,Shoulder,and Hand(DASH)score,and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation(SANE),were utilized for assessment.RESULTS Treatment with Sironix suture anchor devices,including Ceptre Knotted UHMWPE Suture Titanium Anchor,Spyke Knotted UHMWPE Suture Peek Anchor,Stativ Knotted UHMWPE Suture Anchor,and Viplok Knotless Peek Screw Anchor with Titanium Tip,revealed no repair failures.Participants demonstrated high satisfaction and functional improvement,as evidenced by the mean Quick DASH score(32.01)and PSS(71.65)and the satisfactory SANE scores for both injured joints(74.33)and non-injured(83.67)shoulder joints.CONCLUSION The study yielded favorable outcomes for rotator cuff tear repair and Bankart repair.No repair failures were observed,supporting the safety and efficacy of these devices in shoulder injury management.
文摘BACKGROUND With stiff competition from alternative albeit more expensive counterparts,it has become important to establish the applicability of metallic anchors for shoulder instability in the modern era.This can be accomplished,in part,by analysing long-term outcomes.AIM To analyse minimum 10-year outcomes from 30 patients following arthroscopic anterior stabilisation using metallic anchors.METHODS Prospectively collected data from arthroscopic Bankart repairs performed using metal anchors during 2007P-2010 were retrospectively analysed in this singlesurgeon study.Comprehensive data collection included historical and clinical findings,dislocation details,operative specifics,and follow-up radiological and clinical findings including shoulder scores.The primary outcomes were patientreported scores(Constant,American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons[ASES],and Rowe scores)and pain and instability on a visual analogue scale(VAS).RESULTS A 3% recurrence rate of dislocation was noted at the final follow-up.Total constant scores at 10 years postoperatively measured between 76 and 100(mean 89)were significantly better than preoperative scores(mean 62.7).Congruous improvements were also noted in the Rowe and ASES scores and VAS at the 10-year review.CONCLUSION Reliable long-term outcomes with metallic anchors in surgery for shoulder instability can be expected.Our results provide additional evidence of their continued,cost-effective presence in the modern scenario.
文摘目的：探讨肩关节镜下应用带线锚钉技术同期修复骨性Bankart损伤合并肩袖损伤的手术策略和术后疗效。方法：2008年6月至2015年1月共收治18例同时合并骨性Bankant损伤和肩袖损伤的患者,其中女性8例,男性10例,患者平均年龄57.9岁（40~72岁）。患者均有外伤性肩关节前脱位病史,11例急诊复位后因再脱位就医,7例因存在持续肩关节疼痛就医。18例患者均通过MRI结合X线和三维CT确诊同时存在全层肩袖损伤和骨性Bankart损伤。所有患者均于关节镜下一期修复两种损伤,手术中采用带线锚钉先固定骨性Bankart损伤,再用单排锚钉修复撕裂肩袖。结果：18例患者平均随访时间22.5个月（12~38个月）。术后3月、6月随访肩关节前屈上举和体侧外旋活动度较健侧比较差异具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。术后1年两侧活动度差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。末次随访时,患侧vs健侧ASES肩关节评分为91.6±6.7分vs 93.6±4.8分,Constant-Murley评分为89.9±6.8分vs 92.0±7.9分,Rowe评分为89.3±7.1 vs 91.1±6.7,两侧比较差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。末次随访外展肌力双侧无显著性差异,VAS疼痛评分较术前显著改善（1.4±1.1 vs 6.2±1.9）。随访过程中1例患者曾出现半脱位,3例出现术后僵硬,经肌力和功能训练后改善,无感染、再脱位等并发症。结论：肩关节脱位同时存在骨性Bankart损伤和肩袖撕裂时,全关节镜下修复骨性Bankart损伤后再修复肩袖损伤,治疗全面,疗效肯定。
文摘目的:探索肩关节镜下锚钉植入固定治疗肩关节bankart损伤的疗效。方法:采用肩关节镜下锚钉植入治疗复发性肩关节前脱位伴bankart损伤16例,术前均行肩关节X线和MRI检查,按视触动量的顺序检查肩关节,并与健侧对比并评分,确诊后在关节镜下行相应部位的锚钉固定,术后按肩关节康复指导进行肩关节功能锻炼。手术前后肩关节的评分均参照美国加州洛杉矶大学(University of California at Los Angeles,UCLA)功能评分标准和视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)。结果:全部病例术后随访7～68(中位数25)个月,术后肩关节稳定性良好,未出现肩关节再发脱位,UCLA术前评分20～22(20.8±0.8)分,终末随访29～35(32.9±1.5)分,其中优6例,良10例,术前及随访终末VAS评分分别为2～4(3.3±0.8)和0～1(0.6±0.5)。结论:关节镜下锚钉植入固定治疗肩关节bankart损伤具有损伤小,术后恢复快,疗效确切等优点。
