Anti-androgen therapy is the leading treatment for advanced prostate cancer and is commonly used for neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Bicalutamide is a non-steroidal anti-androgen, used during the initiation of andr...Anti-androgen therapy is the leading treatment for advanced prostate cancer and is commonly used for neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Bicalutamide is a non-steroidal anti-androgen, used during the initiation of androgen deprivation therapy along with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist to reduce the symptoms of tumor-related flares in patients with advanced prostate cancer. As side effects, bicalutamide can cause fatigue, gynecomastia, and decreased libido through competitive androgen receptor blockade. Additionally, although not as common, drug-induced liver injury has also been reported. Herein, we report a case of hepatotoxicity secondary to bicalutamide use. Typically, bicalutamideinduced hepatotoxicity develops after a few days; however, in this case, hepatic injury occurred 5 mo after treatment initiation. Based on this rare case of delayed liver injury, we recommend careful monitoring of liver function throughout bicalutamide treatment for prostate cancer.展开更多
In this retrospective study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and toxicities of maximal androgen blockade (MAB) versus castration alone in Chinese patients with advanced prostate cancer. From 1996 to 2004, 608...In this retrospective study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and toxicities of maximal androgen blockade (MAB) versus castration alone in Chinese patients with advanced prostate cancer. From 1996 to 2004, 608 patients with advanced prostate cancer were included in the study. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups according to different therapeutic regimens. Of the 608 patients, 300 patients were treated with MAB (castration plus nonsteroidal antiandrogens) and the remaining 308 were treated with castration alone. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates of these patients were 73.7% and 56%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, MAB was associated with not only the improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) (increased by 10 months) but also a 20.6% reduction in mortality risk compared with castration alone. In contrast, the efficacy of MAB was not superior to castration alone for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Interestingly, among patients with MAB, those using bicalutamide had a longer PFS than those using flutamide; this was especially so in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Almost all of the toxicities due to the hormone therapy were mild to moderate and manageable. To conclude, in China, hormone therapies, including MAB and castration alone, have been standard treatments for advanced prostate cancer. For patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer, castration alone might be adequately practical and efficient. In patients with metastatic prostate cancer, however, MAB has superior efficacy over castration alone. It is clear that MAB should be considered the first-line standard treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer.展开更多
Clinical trials of weak androgen androstenedione (AD) administered at a high concentration, showed an increase in muscle mass in men like strong androgens testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), but did not sh...Clinical trials of weak androgen androstenedione (AD) administered at a high concentration, showed an increase in muscle mass in men like strong androgens testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), but did not show any inhibitory effect on fat mass unlike strong androgens. This observation prompted us to check the in-vitro effect of AD on adipogenesis using mouse mesenchymal multipotent cells (C3H10T1/2), which can differentiate into both myoblasts and adipocytes. Results indicated that AD inhibited adipogenesis at 10 nM, 100 nM and 1 μM concentrations, but not at 10 μM concentration. AD did not inhibit adipogenesis at 10 μM concentration and also did not inhibitmyogenesis at 10 μM concentration. Addition of bicalutamide, an androgen receptor (AR) antagonist decreased myogenesis and increased adipogenesis, indicating that the effect of AD was mediated through AR. Another weak androgen dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) also showed the same pattern of adipogenesis in 10T1/2 cells. AD also showed a similar pattern of adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cells. Thus, the in-vitro results of AD on adipogenesis correlated with the in-vivo results of AD on fat-mass from clinical trials and suggested a possible difference in biological action between weak androgens (AD, DHEA) and strong androgens (T, DHT) on adipogenesis. Since the biological action of AD was mediated through AR, this physiological difference onadipogenesis could be due to the nature (partial agonist/antagonist) of AD binding to AR.展开更多
The role of adjuvant hormonal therapy and optimized regimens for high-risk localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy remains controversial. Herein, the clinical trial CU 1005 prospectively evaluated two re...The role of adjuvant hormonal therapy and optimized regimens for high-risk localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy remains controversial. Herein, the clinical trial CU 1005 prospectively evaluated two regimens of maximum androgen blockage or bicalutamide 150 mg daily as immediate adjuvant therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer. Overall, 209 consecutive patients were recruited in this study, 107 of whom received 9 months of adjuvant maximum androgen blockage, whereas 102 received 9 months of adjuvant bicalutamide 150 mg. The median postoperative follow-up time was 27.0 months. The primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence. Of the 209 patients, 59 patients developed biochemical recurrence. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to clinical characteristics, including age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, surgical margin status, or pathological stages. The maximum androgen blockage group experienced longer biochemical recurrence-free survival (P = 0.004) compared with the bicalutamide 150 mg group. Side-effects in the two groups were similar and could be moderately tolerated in all patients. In conclusion, immediate, 9-month maximum androgen blockage should be considered as an alternative to bicalutamide 150 mg as adjuvant treatment for high-risk localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.展开更多
基金Supported by Departments of Internal MedicineChungnam National University School of Medicine,Daejeon,South Korea
文摘Anti-androgen therapy is the leading treatment for advanced prostate cancer and is commonly used for neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment. Bicalutamide is a non-steroidal anti-androgen, used during the initiation of androgen deprivation therapy along with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist to reduce the symptoms of tumor-related flares in patients with advanced prostate cancer. As side effects, bicalutamide can cause fatigue, gynecomastia, and decreased libido through competitive androgen receptor blockade. Additionally, although not as common, drug-induced liver injury has also been reported. Herein, we report a case of hepatotoxicity secondary to bicalutamide use. Typically, bicalutamideinduced hepatotoxicity develops after a few days; however, in this case, hepatic injury occurred 5 mo after treatment initiation. Based on this rare case of delayed liver injury, we recommend careful monitoring of liver function throughout bicalutamide treatment for prostate cancer.
基金Acknowledgment We thank Professor Qiao Zhou from the Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Dr Jing Gong from the Laboratory of Pathology, the State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, and many other clinicians from the Department of Urology, West China hospital for their kind assistance. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. NSFC30700977, No. NSFC30800637 and No. NSFC30871383).
文摘In this retrospective study, we evaluated and compared the efficacy and toxicities of maximal androgen blockade (MAB) versus castration alone in Chinese patients with advanced prostate cancer. From 1996 to 2004, 608 patients with advanced prostate cancer were included in the study. Patients were retrospectively divided into two groups according to different therapeutic regimens. Of the 608 patients, 300 patients were treated with MAB (castration plus nonsteroidal antiandrogens) and the remaining 308 were treated with castration alone. The 2- and 5-year overall survival rates of these patients were 73.7% and 56%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that, in patients with metastatic prostate cancer, MAB was associated with not only the improvement of progression-free survival (PFS) (increased by 10 months) but also a 20.6% reduction in mortality risk compared with castration alone. In contrast, the efficacy of MAB was not superior to castration alone for patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Interestingly, among patients with MAB, those using bicalutamide had a longer PFS than those using flutamide; this was especially so in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Almost all of the toxicities due to the hormone therapy were mild to moderate and manageable. To conclude, in China, hormone therapies, including MAB and castration alone, have been standard treatments for advanced prostate cancer. For patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer, castration alone might be adequately practical and efficient. In patients with metastatic prostate cancer, however, MAB has superior efficacy over castration alone. It is clear that MAB should be considered the first-line standard treatment for patients with metastatic prostate cancer.
文摘Clinical trials of weak androgen androstenedione (AD) administered at a high concentration, showed an increase in muscle mass in men like strong androgens testosterone (T) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), but did not show any inhibitory effect on fat mass unlike strong androgens. This observation prompted us to check the in-vitro effect of AD on adipogenesis using mouse mesenchymal multipotent cells (C3H10T1/2), which can differentiate into both myoblasts and adipocytes. Results indicated that AD inhibited adipogenesis at 10 nM, 100 nM and 1 μM concentrations, but not at 10 μM concentration. AD did not inhibit adipogenesis at 10 μM concentration and also did not inhibitmyogenesis at 10 μM concentration. Addition of bicalutamide, an androgen receptor (AR) antagonist decreased myogenesis and increased adipogenesis, indicating that the effect of AD was mediated through AR. Another weak androgen dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) also showed the same pattern of adipogenesis in 10T1/2 cells. AD also showed a similar pattern of adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 preadipocyte cells. Thus, the in-vitro results of AD on adipogenesis correlated with the in-vivo results of AD on fat-mass from clinical trials and suggested a possible difference in biological action between weak androgens (AD, DHEA) and strong androgens (T, DHT) on adipogenesis. Since the biological action of AD was mediated through AR, this physiological difference onadipogenesis could be due to the nature (partial agonist/antagonist) of AD binding to AR.
文摘The role of adjuvant hormonal therapy and optimized regimens for high-risk localized prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy remains controversial. Herein, the clinical trial CU 1005 prospectively evaluated two regimens of maximum androgen blockage or bicalutamide 150 mg daily as immediate adjuvant therapy for high-risk localized prostate cancer. Overall, 209 consecutive patients were recruited in this study, 107 of whom received 9 months of adjuvant maximum androgen blockage, whereas 102 received 9 months of adjuvant bicalutamide 150 mg. The median postoperative follow-up time was 27.0 months. The primary endpoint was biochemical recurrence. Of the 209 patients, 59 patients developed biochemical recurrence. There was no difference between the two groups with respect to clinical characteristics, including age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, Gleason score, surgical margin status, or pathological stages. The maximum androgen blockage group experienced longer biochemical recurrence-free survival (P = 0.004) compared with the bicalutamide 150 mg group. Side-effects in the two groups were similar and could be moderately tolerated in all patients. In conclusion, immediate, 9-month maximum androgen blockage should be considered as an alternative to bicalutamide 150 mg as adjuvant treatment for high-risk localized prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy.