<strong>Background:</strong><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed worldwide, synchronous bil...<strong>Background:</strong><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed worldwide, synchronous bilateral breast cancer accounts for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">unique</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> entity of the disease, particularly post-operative radiotherapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer (SBBC) is challenging with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">lack</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> of evidence about the best irradiation technique. In this </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">study</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> we tried to explore the optimum radiotherapy technique regarding the dosimetric parameters. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> We recruited 15 SBBC patients in whom </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">post-operative</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> radiotherapy was indicated and we established three plans for each patient using 3DCRT, IMRT </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> VMAT, and then we compared the three plans as regard target volume coverage parameters and organs at risk (OAR) doses. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> We found that PTV coverage parameter was superior with IMRT compared with 3DCRT and VMAT in terms of Dmean (p = 0.001), D95% (p = 0.001), D</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">max</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (p = 0.0001), conformity index (p = 0.0001) and HI (p = 0.0001). Doses to OAR w</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ere</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> not significantly different between the three techniques in </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cardiac</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> dose and LAD maximum dose, but 3DCRT was superior in LAD mean dose (p = 0.03) and lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20) and 10 Gy (V10) (p = 0.0001), but this difference was non-significant between 3DCRT and IMRT (p = 0.4 and 0.06 respectively), while VMAT led to the highest doses to LAD and lung. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">IMRT showed the best target coverage parameters in post-operative radiotherapy for SBBC compared with 3DCRT and VMAT. For OAR doses IMRT showed comparable results with 3DCRT</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">while</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> VMAT delivered </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">a significantly higher dose</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> to OAR.</span></span>展开更多
文摘<strong>Background:</strong><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed worldwide, synchronous bilateral breast cancer accounts for </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">unique</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> entity of the disease, particularly post-operative radiotherapy for Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer (SBBC) is challenging with </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">lack</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> of evidence about the best irradiation technique. In this </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">study</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">,</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> we tried to explore the optimum radiotherapy technique regarding the dosimetric parameters. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Methods:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> We recruited 15 SBBC patients in whom </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">post-operative</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> radiotherapy was indicated and we established three plans for each patient using 3DCRT, IMRT </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">and</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> VMAT, and then we compared the three plans as regard target volume coverage parameters and organs at risk (OAR) doses. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results:</span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> We found that PTV coverage parameter was superior with IMRT compared with 3DCRT and VMAT in terms of Dmean (p = 0.001), D95% (p = 0.001), D</span><sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;">max</span></sub><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (p = 0.0001), conformity index (p = 0.0001) and HI (p = 0.0001). Doses to OAR w</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ere</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> not significantly different between the three techniques in </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">cardiac</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> dose and LAD maximum dose, but 3DCRT was superior in LAD mean dose (p = 0.03) and lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V20) and 10 Gy (V10) (p = 0.0001), but this difference was non-significant between 3DCRT and IMRT (p = 0.4 and 0.06 respectively), while VMAT led to the highest doses to LAD and lung. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">IMRT showed the best target coverage parameters in post-operative radiotherapy for SBBC compared with 3DCRT and VMAT. For OAR doses IMRT showed comparable results with 3DCRT</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">, </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">while</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> VMAT delivered </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">a significantly higher dose</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> to OAR.</span></span>