Pricking-cupping therapy is a Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)nursing technology that can adjust the viscera of the human body,make the meridians smooth,and Yin and Yang balanced mainly by means of relieving heat and...Pricking-cupping therapy is a Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)nursing technology that can adjust the viscera of the human body,make the meridians smooth,and Yin and Yang balanced mainly by means of relieving heat and detoxification,harmonizing Qi and blood,promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis,dredging meridians and activating collaterals,reducing swelling and pain,purging heat and calming shock,clearing heat,and opening orifices.Pricking-cupping therapy has a long history and wide application.After thousands of years of development,it has made great progress.They are widely used to treat lumbar disc herniation,herpes zoster,acute arthritis,migraine,and other diseases in China.Through the clinical practice and theoretical exploration of physicians of past dynasties,the therapeutic mechanism and application scope of pricking-cupping therapy have been greatly enriched.Modern TCM practitioners have conducted in-depth researches on the operation norms of the therapy on the basis of the ancients,hoping to grasp the essence of the disease more accurately and make the rational use of the operation technology of the therapy.展开更多
Background- To compare two types of therapy for primary breast carcinoma, breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM), in a matched cohort study. Methods: A series of 1,746 patients with...Background- To compare two types of therapy for primary breast carcinoma, breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM), in a matched cohort study. Methods: A series of 1,746 patients with primary breast cancer treated with BCT or MRM in a single Chinese institute between January 2000 and February 2009 were analyzed retrospectively to compare their outcomes with respect to the incidence of local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis, and survival. The patients were matched with regard to age at diagnosis, spreading to axillary lymph nodes, hormone receptor status, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and maximal tumor diameter. The match ratio was 1:1, and each arm included 873 patients. Results: The median follow-up period was 71 months. The 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) rates differed significantly between two groups. The 6-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were 98.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.973-0.989] in the BCT group and 98.7% (95% CI: 0.980-0.994) in the MRM group (P=0.182), respectively. DFS rates in BCT and MRM groups were 91.3% (95% CI: 0.894-0.932) and 86.3% (95% CI: 0.840-0.886) (P〈0.001), respectively, whereas the DDFS rates in BCT and MRM groups were 93.6% (95% CI: 0.922-0.950) and 87.7% (95% CI: 0.854-0.900) (P〈0.001), respectively. Conclusions: BCT in eligible patients is as effective as MRM with respect to local tumor control, DFS and DDFS, and may result in a better outcome than MRM in Chinese primary breast cancer patients.展开更多
OBJECT:Progression of infiltrative low-grade gliomas(LGGs)has been reported previously.The limitations ofsuch studies include diverse histological grading systems,intervening therapy,and the lack of histological confi...OBJECT:Progression of infiltrative low-grade gliomas(LGGs)has been reported previously.The limitations ofsuch studies include diverse histological grading systems,intervening therapy,and the lack of histological confir-mation of malignant tumor progression.The aim of this study was to determine tumor progression in adult patientswith an initial diagnosis of infiltrative LGG who subsequently underwent a repeated operation,but no other inter-vening therapy.The authors examined factors that may be associated with tumor progression.展开更多
Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of endovenous laser therapy and conventional thera- py on the varicose of great saphenous vein.Methods:Thirty-two patients received endovenous laser thera- py and 32 patients we...Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of endovenous laser therapy and conventional thera- py on the varicose of great saphenous vein.Methods:Thirty-two patients received endovenous laser thera- py and 32 patients were operated by conventional therapy(high ligation and stripping).The observation results of great saphenous vein(GSV)were recorded by clinical evaluation and duplex ultrasound examina- tion.And the operating time,intraoperative blood loss,time to become moveable,duration of hospitaliza- tion and degree of feeling pain were compared between the two groups.Results:Compared with conven- tional therapy,laser therapy had good curative effect with less complications and no scars and no pains. There were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.01).Conclusion:Laser therapy for varicose of great saphenous vein is better than the conventional therapy.It deserves to be widely used in clinical treatment.展开更多
We investigated the factors predicting radiation-induced organizing pneumonia (RIOP) relapse after tangential breast irradiation. The participants included 23 patients diagnosed with RIOP at the St. Marianna Universit...We investigated the factors predicting radiation-induced organizing pneumonia (RIOP) relapse after tangential breast irradiation. The participants included 23 patients diagnosed with RIOP at the St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital between January 2008 and March 2015. Relapse was defined as the appearance of new lesions on diagnostic images during follow-up or after commencing treatment. The relapse-free survival rate and the following 9 parameters were compared between patients with and without RIOP relapse: 1) age (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);2) white blood cell count (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);3) C-reactive protein (CRP) level at the time of RIOP diagnosis (less than normal, more than normal/ less than borderline, and more than borderline);4) boost irradiation (yes vs. no);5) maximum lung depth on linacgraphy (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);6) hormone therapy (yes vs. no);7) chemotherapy (yes vs. no);8) RIOP ratio in the whole lung (less than vs. equal to or more than the median) at the time of RIOP diagnosis;and 9) use of corticosteroids (yes vs. no). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for statistical analysis, with relapse as the cutoff. The follow-up period spanned the date of RIOP onset to May 30, 2015. The level of significance for 2-sided tests was p < 0.05. Relapse was evident in 14 patients (60.8%). The relapse-free survival rate was significantly greater in the normal CRP group (less than 0.30 mg/dl) than in the abnormal CRP group (more than 0.36 mg/dl) (p = 0.044) and in the normal/borderline CRP group (less than 0.36 mg/dl) than in the high CRP group (more than 0.70 mg/dl) (p < 0.01). The CRP level at RIOP onset may be a useful predictor of relapse after breast-conserving therapy.We investigated the factors predicting radiation-induced organizing pneumonia (RIOP) relapse after tangential breast irradiation. The participants included 23 patients diagnosed with RIOP at the St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital between January 2008 and March 2015. Relapse was defined as the appearance of new lesions on diagnostic images during follow-up or after commencing treatment. The relapse-free survival rate and the following 9 parameters were compared between patients with and without RIOP relapse: 1) age (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);2) white blood cell count (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);3) C-reactive protein (CRP) level at the time of RIOP diagnosis (less than normal, more than normal/ less than borderline, and more than borderline);4) boost irradiation (yes vs. no);5) maximum lung depth on linacgraphy (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);6) hormone therapy (yes vs. no);7) chemotherapy (yes vs. no);8) RIOP ratio in the whole lung (less than vs. equal to or more than the median) at the time of RIOP diagnosis;and 9) use of corticosteroids (yes vs. no). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for statistical analysis, with relapse as the cutoff. The follow-up period spanned the date of RIOP onset to May 30, 2015. The level of significance for 2-sided tests was p < 0.05. Relapse was evident in 14 patients (60.8%). The relapse-free survival rate was significantly greater in the normal CRP group (less than 0.30 mg/dl) than in the abnormal CRP group (more than 0.36 mg/dl) (p = 0.044) and in the normal/borderline CRP group (less than 0.36 mg/dl) than in the high CRP group (more than 0.70 mg/dl) (p < 0.01). The CRP level at RIOP onset may be a useful predictor of relapse after breast-conserving therapy.展开更多
<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)</span><span style="font-fami...<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">continues to be a major problem in societies, causing job loss and lowering quality of life. There are two types of treatment methods, physical therapy and surgery. If patients with LSS avoid treatment, they are likely to experience neurological deterioration in later years.</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Objective: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The study aimed to evaluate the effect of physical therapy applied after decompression surgery or the effect of only applied physical therapy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Materials and Methods: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The results of the physical therapy follow-up of patients who had surgery and did not have surgery due to lumbar spinal stenosis between July 2014 and December 2019 were compared with each other. All patients received physical therapy</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">for 6 months. Included were 42 patients </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">who </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">underwent decompression surgery due to LSS</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">;</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 56 patients were not operated. Clinical outcomes were measured using the</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nottingham Health Profile-Pain</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(NHP-Pain) scale at the</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">initial, first, third and sixth</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">months. The results were compared statistically. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The age of the operated patients was 54.69 ± 8.42 (39</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">71), while the non-operated patients were 59.16 ± 14.04 (34</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">83). There was no significant difference in the statistical comparison (p = 0.053). While the body mass index</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(BMI)</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">of the operated patients was 29.43 ± 4.99 (21</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">40), the BMI of the non-operated patients was 28.84 ± 4.62 (22</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">42). There was no significant difference in the statistical comparison (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.552).</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The scores of a 6-month physical therapy follow-up of patients were evaluated according to the NHP-pain scale. The values of patients </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">who </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">underwent surgery, initial</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1st month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.001), 1st month</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3rd month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.028), 3rd month</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">6th month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.389) follow-up of the intervals were compared statistically.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The values of non-operated patients, initial</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1st month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.008), 1st month</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-3rd month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.013), 3rd month</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">6th month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.025) were compared</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">statistically. Patients with and without surgery had significantly different initial pain scores (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">< 0.001). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The NHP-Pain scores of the patients undergoing physical therapy with the operation were shown to provide more significant improvement than the group receiving only the physical therapy. Patients with LSS should be treated with an operation to obtain the maximum benefit of physical therapy.展开更多
Regenerative medicine has brought about refreshing new thinking about age old problems. However, some problems remain mostly untouched and are not being addressed. A point in question is the track of scar tissue left ...Regenerative medicine has brought about refreshing new thinking about age old problems. However, some problems remain mostly untouched and are not being addressed. A point in question is the track of scar tissue left behind post-operatively, which reveals the surgeon’s line of invasive incision. This confers on the patient an adverse psychological reminder and burden for the rest of his/her life. Most patients cannot afford corrective plastic surgery to ameliorate this skin defect. This paper seeks to ask whether biomedical scientists could play a role in arriving at a more pleasing cosmetic result, using a simple cell culture procedure of isolating un-manipulated autologous primary epidermal and dermal cells from a small skin tissue segment in close proximity to the surgeon’s incision line.展开更多
文摘Pricking-cupping therapy is a Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM)nursing technology that can adjust the viscera of the human body,make the meridians smooth,and Yin and Yang balanced mainly by means of relieving heat and detoxification,harmonizing Qi and blood,promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis,dredging meridians and activating collaterals,reducing swelling and pain,purging heat and calming shock,clearing heat,and opening orifices.Pricking-cupping therapy has a long history and wide application.After thousands of years of development,it has made great progress.They are widely used to treat lumbar disc herniation,herpes zoster,acute arthritis,migraine,and other diseases in China.Through the clinical practice and theoretical exploration of physicians of past dynasties,the therapeutic mechanism and application scope of pricking-cupping therapy have been greatly enriched.Modern TCM practitioners have conducted in-depth researches on the operation norms of the therapy on the basis of the ancients,hoping to grasp the essence of the disease more accurately and make the rational use of the operation technology of the therapy.
文摘Background- To compare two types of therapy for primary breast carcinoma, breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and modified radical mastectomy (MRM), in a matched cohort study. Methods: A series of 1,746 patients with primary breast cancer treated with BCT or MRM in a single Chinese institute between January 2000 and February 2009 were analyzed retrospectively to compare their outcomes with respect to the incidence of local recurrence (LR), distant metastasis, and survival. The patients were matched with regard to age at diagnosis, spreading to axillary lymph nodes, hormone receptor status, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and maximal tumor diameter. The match ratio was 1:1, and each arm included 873 patients. Results: The median follow-up period was 71 months. The 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) and 6-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) rates differed significantly between two groups. The 6-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were 98.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.973-0.989] in the BCT group and 98.7% (95% CI: 0.980-0.994) in the MRM group (P=0.182), respectively. DFS rates in BCT and MRM groups were 91.3% (95% CI: 0.894-0.932) and 86.3% (95% CI: 0.840-0.886) (P〈0.001), respectively, whereas the DDFS rates in BCT and MRM groups were 93.6% (95% CI: 0.922-0.950) and 87.7% (95% CI: 0.854-0.900) (P〈0.001), respectively. Conclusions: BCT in eligible patients is as effective as MRM with respect to local tumor control, DFS and DDFS, and may result in a better outcome than MRM in Chinese primary breast cancer patients.
文摘OBJECT:Progression of infiltrative low-grade gliomas(LGGs)has been reported previously.The limitations ofsuch studies include diverse histological grading systems,intervening therapy,and the lack of histological confir-mation of malignant tumor progression.The aim of this study was to determine tumor progression in adult patientswith an initial diagnosis of infiltrative LGG who subsequently underwent a repeated operation,but no other inter-vening therapy.The authors examined factors that may be associated with tumor progression.
文摘Objective:To evaluate the effectiveness of endovenous laser therapy and conventional thera- py on the varicose of great saphenous vein.Methods:Thirty-two patients received endovenous laser thera- py and 32 patients were operated by conventional therapy(high ligation and stripping).The observation results of great saphenous vein(GSV)were recorded by clinical evaluation and duplex ultrasound examina- tion.And the operating time,intraoperative blood loss,time to become moveable,duration of hospitaliza- tion and degree of feeling pain were compared between the two groups.Results:Compared with conven- tional therapy,laser therapy had good curative effect with less complications and no scars and no pains. There were significant differences between the two groups(P<0.01).Conclusion:Laser therapy for varicose of great saphenous vein is better than the conventional therapy.It deserves to be widely used in clinical treatment.
文摘We investigated the factors predicting radiation-induced organizing pneumonia (RIOP) relapse after tangential breast irradiation. The participants included 23 patients diagnosed with RIOP at the St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital between January 2008 and March 2015. Relapse was defined as the appearance of new lesions on diagnostic images during follow-up or after commencing treatment. The relapse-free survival rate and the following 9 parameters were compared between patients with and without RIOP relapse: 1) age (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);2) white blood cell count (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);3) C-reactive protein (CRP) level at the time of RIOP diagnosis (less than normal, more than normal/ less than borderline, and more than borderline);4) boost irradiation (yes vs. no);5) maximum lung depth on linacgraphy (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);6) hormone therapy (yes vs. no);7) chemotherapy (yes vs. no);8) RIOP ratio in the whole lung (less than vs. equal to or more than the median) at the time of RIOP diagnosis;and 9) use of corticosteroids (yes vs. no). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for statistical analysis, with relapse as the cutoff. The follow-up period spanned the date of RIOP onset to May 30, 2015. The level of significance for 2-sided tests was p < 0.05. Relapse was evident in 14 patients (60.8%). The relapse-free survival rate was significantly greater in the normal CRP group (less than 0.30 mg/dl) than in the abnormal CRP group (more than 0.36 mg/dl) (p = 0.044) and in the normal/borderline CRP group (less than 0.36 mg/dl) than in the high CRP group (more than 0.70 mg/dl) (p < 0.01). The CRP level at RIOP onset may be a useful predictor of relapse after breast-conserving therapy.We investigated the factors predicting radiation-induced organizing pneumonia (RIOP) relapse after tangential breast irradiation. The participants included 23 patients diagnosed with RIOP at the St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital between January 2008 and March 2015. Relapse was defined as the appearance of new lesions on diagnostic images during follow-up or after commencing treatment. The relapse-free survival rate and the following 9 parameters were compared between patients with and without RIOP relapse: 1) age (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);2) white blood cell count (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);3) C-reactive protein (CRP) level at the time of RIOP diagnosis (less than normal, more than normal/ less than borderline, and more than borderline);4) boost irradiation (yes vs. no);5) maximum lung depth on linacgraphy (less than vs. equal to or more than the median);6) hormone therapy (yes vs. no);7) chemotherapy (yes vs. no);8) RIOP ratio in the whole lung (less than vs. equal to or more than the median) at the time of RIOP diagnosis;and 9) use of corticosteroids (yes vs. no). The Kaplan-Meier method was used for statistical analysis, with relapse as the cutoff. The follow-up period spanned the date of RIOP onset to May 30, 2015. The level of significance for 2-sided tests was p < 0.05. Relapse was evident in 14 patients (60.8%). The relapse-free survival rate was significantly greater in the normal CRP group (less than 0.30 mg/dl) than in the abnormal CRP group (more than 0.36 mg/dl) (p = 0.044) and in the normal/borderline CRP group (less than 0.36 mg/dl) than in the high CRP group (more than 0.70 mg/dl) (p < 0.01). The CRP level at RIOP onset may be a useful predictor of relapse after breast-conserving therapy.
文摘<b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Background: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS)</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">continues to be a major problem in societies, causing job loss and lowering quality of life. There are two types of treatment methods, physical therapy and surgery. If patients with LSS avoid treatment, they are likely to experience neurological deterioration in later years.</span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Objective: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The study aimed to evaluate the effect of physical therapy applied after decompression surgery or the effect of only applied physical therapy in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Materials and Methods: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The results of the physical therapy follow-up of patients who had surgery and did not have surgery due to lumbar spinal stenosis between July 2014 and December 2019 were compared with each other. All patients received physical therapy</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">for 6 months. Included were 42 patients </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">who </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">underwent decompression surgery due to LSS</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">;</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> 56 patients were not operated. Clinical outcomes were measured using the</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Nottingham Health Profile-Pain</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(NHP-Pain) scale at the</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">initial, first, third and sixth</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">months. The results were compared statistically. </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Results: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The age of the operated patients was 54.69 ± 8.42 (39</span></span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">71), while the non-operated patients were 59.16 ± 14.04 (34</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">83). There was no significant difference in the statistical comparison (p = 0.053). While the body mass index</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">(BMI)</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">of the operated patients was 29.43 ± 4.99 (21</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">40), the BMI of the non-operated patients was 28.84 ± 4.62 (22</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">42). There was no significant difference in the statistical comparison (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.552).</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The scores of a 6-month physical therapy follow-up of patients were evaluated according to the NHP-pain scale. The values of patients </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">who </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">underwent surgery, initial</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1st month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"><</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.001), 1st month</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">3rd month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.028), 3rd month</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">6th month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.389) follow-up of the intervals were compared statistically.</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The values of non-operated patients, initial</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">1st month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">=</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">0.008), 1st month</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-3rd month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.013), 3rd month</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">-</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">6th month (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">= 0.025) were compared</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">statistically. Patients with and without surgery had significantly different initial pain scores (p</span><span style="font-family:""> </span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">< 0.001). </span><b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Conclusions: </span></b><span style="font-family:Verdana;">The NHP-Pain scores of the patients undergoing physical therapy with the operation were shown to provide more significant improvement than the group receiving only the physical therapy. Patients with LSS should be treated with an operation to obtain the maximum benefit of physical therapy.
文摘Regenerative medicine has brought about refreshing new thinking about age old problems. However, some problems remain mostly untouched and are not being addressed. A point in question is the track of scar tissue left behind post-operatively, which reveals the surgeon’s line of invasive incision. This confers on the patient an adverse psychological reminder and burden for the rest of his/her life. Most patients cannot afford corrective plastic surgery to ameliorate this skin defect. This paper seeks to ask whether biomedical scientists could play a role in arriving at a more pleasing cosmetic result, using a simple cell culture procedure of isolating un-manipulated autologous primary epidermal and dermal cells from a small skin tissue segment in close proximity to the surgeon’s incision line.