Value of CA19-9, CA125 and CEA combined magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer

Objective:To study the value of CA19-9, CA125 and CEA combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, and to provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment.Methods:A total of 110 cases of pancreatic cancer admitted to our hospital from November 2015 to November 2017 were selected as the observation group, and another 80 normal pancreas organizers who participated in the physical examination in the same period were selected as the control group. The change of magnetic resonance scanning parameters and serum CA19-9, CA125 and CEA detection were compared between the two groups of subjects at the same time, contrast scan and serum magnetic resonance detection of CA19-9, CA125 and CEA positive rate, and to evaluate the four alone and in combination with the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value.Results:The T1WI of the observation group was low or slightly low signal, T2WI was slightly high signal, and the tumor of fat suppression sequence was low signal, which was in line with the typical characteristics of pancreatic cancer. The serum levels of CA19-9, CA125 and CEA in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. Compared with the two groups, the positive rates of MRI and serum CA19-9, CA125 and CEA in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. The sensitivity and accuracy of MRI scan combined with three serological markers were higher than those of single detection. The specificity was between four.Conclusion: CA19-9, CA125 and CEA combined magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have good sensitivity and accuracy in diagnosis of pancreatic cancer, but their specificity is common, which should be used for reference.

New Progress of CA125 Surveillance in Diagnosis and Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

The fatality rate of ovarian cancer (OC) is the highest, and the 5-year survival rate is only 50.8%. For more than 40 years, CA125 has been the most concerned and widely used biomarker of OC in clinical practice. In recent years, many researchers have proposed a reliable strategy of multiple markers combined with CA125 to screen OC to make up for the lack of accuracy of CA125, redefine the biochemical recurrence threshold of CA125, and use mathematical model scores to provide help for the feasibility of treatment and survival prognosis. To fully understand the role of CA125 in OC screening, initial treatment, and recurrence prediction, and summarize the limitations of CA125, this review has summarized the new progress of CA125 in the diagnosis and treatment of OC in recent years which can also provide a reference for clinicians.

血清CYFRA21-1、CA125联合HPV DNA检测在宫颈癌早期筛查中的价值及病理特征研究

目的分析血清细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、糖类抗原125(CA125)联合HPV DNA检测在宫颈癌早期筛查中的价值及病理特征。方法选取2019年8月至2023年6月沧州市中心医院收治的宫颈癌患者152例为观察组,另选取同期在本院行体检且各项正常女性80名为对照组;对比两组血清CYFRA21-1、CA125水平以及HPV DNA检测结果;对比观察组不同手术病理结果及血清CYFRA21-1、CA125表达水平以及HPV DNA检测结果;以病理学检查为金标准,分析血清CYFRA21-1、CA125水平以及HPV DNA检测单独以及联合诊断宫颈癌的一致性;绘制ROC曲线,分析血清CYFRA21-1、CA125联合HPV DNA单独检测及联合检测宫颈癌的效能。结果152例患者中,鳞状细胞癌104例,腺癌患者48例;其中轻度不典型增生66例、中度不典型增生57例、重度不典型增生29例。观察组血清CYFRA21-1、CA125水平以及HPV DNA阳性率均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);血清CYFRA21-1、CA125水平:鳞状细胞癌<腺癌,轻度不典型增生<中度不典型增生<重度不典型增生,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组不同分期、不同肿瘤增生类型的HPV DNA阳性率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);血清CYFRA21-1、CA125水平、HPV DNA检测单独以及联合诊断宫颈癌与病理学检查结果的一致性Kappa值分别为0.677、0.731、0.756、0.902;CA125+CYFRA21-1+HPV DNA联合检测的AUC为0.894,高于CA125、CYFRA21-1、HPV DNA单独检测(P>0.05)。结论血清CYFRA21-1、CA125联合HPV DNA检测的诊断效能高于单一检测,提示三指标联合检测可显著提高宫颈癌早期筛查的诊断价值,可为制定临床治疗方案提供参考资料。

乳腺X线征象、ADC值联合血清CA125、CEA水平预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结病理状态的价值

目的:探讨联合应用乳腺X线征象、磁共振表观扩散系数(ADC)值与血清CA125、CEA水平预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗后转移性腋窝淋巴结病理状态的价值。方法:前瞻性纳入2020年1月-2022年12月在我院接受全程新辅助化疗及腋窝淋巴结清扫术的152例女性乳腺癌患者作为研究对象,根据腋窝淋巴结清扫术后病理结果将所有患者分为腋窝病理完全缓解(PCR)组(55例)和非PCR组(97例)。于新辅助化疗前一周内,对所有患者进行乳腺X线和磁共振扩散加权成像检查及血清CA125、CEA水平检测。结果:乳腺癌新辅助化疗后腋窝PCR与非PCR患者的Ki-67表达状态差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。新辅助化疗后腋窝非PCR患者治疗前乳腺X线征象中血管增多、增粗及边缘毛刺的发生比例显著高于PCR患者(P<0.05)。新辅助化疗后腋窝非PCR患者的治疗前ADC值显著低于PCR患者(t=4.372,P<0.001),而血清CA125、CEA水平显著高于PCR患者(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析结果显示,Ki-67高表达(X1)、血管增多、增粗(X2)、较高的ADC值(X4)、血清CA125水平(X5)是乳腺癌新辅助化疗后腋窝非PCR的独立危险因素(P<0.05),构建Logistic回归模型为Logit(P)=-3.206+0.792X1+0.953X2+1.199X4+0.845X5。ROC曲线分析结果显示,Logistic回归模型预测新辅助化疗后转移性腋窝淋巴结病理状态的曲线下面积为0.856(95%CI:0.794~0.917),敏感度和特异度分别为73.2%和85.5%。结论:乳腺X线特征、ADC值、血清CA125水平及Ki67表达状态与伴有转移性腋窝淋巴结的乳腺癌患者新辅助化疗后腋窝淋巴结病理状态有关,联合以上特征具有一定预测价值。

超声弹性成像联合癌胚抗原CEA、CA153和CA125对乳腺癌患者的早期诊断价值

目的探讨超声弹性成像与肿瘤标志物CEA、CA153和CA125对乳腺癌的早期诊断价值,为临床诊治提供指导。方法将秦皇岛市第一医院收治早期乳腺癌患者归为A组,良性病变患者为B组,正常体检者为C组,均为48例女性。均行弹性超声诊断并采用CLIA法测定血清CEA、CA153、CA125水平,评估超声及血清检测的联合诊断价值。结果A组弹性评分与血清检测水平和阳性率均高于另外两组(P均<0.05),另外两组之间无统计学意义;联合检测敏感性、特异性、诊断符合率均高于其余单项检测结果(P均<0.05)。结论超声弹性成像、CA153、CA125和CEA联合检测有助于鉴别诊断良恶性病变,提高早期检出率,能够指导治疗方案和监测病情,值得临床推广。

血清CA125、CA724、CEA水平与胃癌临床病理特征的关系研究

目的探讨血清糖类抗原(CA)125、CA724、癌胚抗原(CEA)水平与胃癌(GC)患者临床病理特征的关系。方法选取80例GC患者作为观察组,另选取同期80例胃部良性病变患者作为对照组。检测并比较两组患者血清CA125、CA724、CEA水平及其阳性检出率,并分析GC患者血清CA125、CA724、CEA水平与其临床病理特征的关系。结果观察组CA125、CA724、CEA水平及其阳性检出率均明显高于对照组(P<0.05);且TNM分期为Ⅲ~Ⅳ期、分化程度低、浸润深度在黏膜下层以及有淋巴结转移的GC患者血清CA125、CA724、CEA水平均明显增高,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论CA125、CA724、CEA在GC中呈高表达状态,且与TNM分期、分化程度、浸润深度和淋巴结转移关系密切,可为GC患者病情发展的进一步评估提供有力的参考,也可作为GC预后的评估指标。

超声O-RADS分类联合血清指标CA125及HE4诊断附件肿物良恶性的研究

目的:探讨卵巢-附件影像报告和数据系统(O-RADS)分类联合血清糖类抗原125(CA125)和人附睾分泌蛋白4(HE4)在附件肿物良恶性诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性分析2022年7月至2023年8月在安徽省立医院诊断并经病理证实的114例附件肿物患者,所有患者术前均行常规超声检查及血清CA125和HE4检测,以病理结果为“金标准”,将其分为良性组(87例)和恶性组(27例)。比较两组超声O-RADS分级及血清指标,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析各项检测指标鉴别附件肿物良恶性的诊断效能。结果:良性组87例患者中超声O-RADS分类1类2例,2类22例,3类34例,4类29例,5类0例。恶性组27例患者中超声O-RADS分类1类0例,2类0例,3类2例,4类13例,5类12例。恶性组患者血清CA125中位数21.5(13.2,78.3)U/ml、HE4中位数49.0(31.3,70.5)pmol/L,其水平均高于良性组,差异有统计学意义(Z=-2.121、-2.021,P<0.05)。所有患者超声O-RADS分级、血清CA125、HE4以及联合诊断的准确率分别为71%、66%、78%和88%。经受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析,超声O-RADS分级、血清CA125、HE4以及联合诊断附件肿物良恶性的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.870、0.556、0.594和0.898(95%CI:0.825~0.970)。结论:与单一的指标相比,O-RADS分类联合血清学指标CA125、HE4在附件肿物良恶性的诊断中有更高的应用价值,可提高诊断准确率。

血清HE4、CA125、TK1水平在卵巢癌患者中的相关性分析

目的探讨人附睾蛋白4(HE4)、糖类抗原125(CA125)和胸苷激酶1(TK1)联合检测在卵巢癌患者中的相关性。方法选择2022年1月—2023年11月本院收治的通过影像及病理活检被明确诊断为卵巢癌的53例患者(卵巢癌组)和良性肿瘤的29例患者(良性对照组)作为研究对象;另选同期健康管理中心接受体检的100名健康妇女作为健康对照组。采用化学发光法检测血清中HE4、CA125和免疫印迹法检测TK1水平,分别比较三组及卵巢癌不同分期血清HE4、CA125、TK1的水平以及ROC曲线对血清HE4、CA125、TK1及联合检测对卵巢癌诊断效能的价值分析。结果卵巢癌患者血清中HE4、CA125、TK1水平均明显高于良性对照组和健康对照组(P<0.05);卵巢癌组中Ⅲ~Ⅳ期患者血清中HE4、CA125、TK1水平均明显高于Ⅰ~Ⅱ期患者(P<0.05),TK1水平在卵巢癌分组中差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);经ROC曲线分析发现,血清中HE4、CA125、TK1联合检测对卵巢癌诊断效能优于三项单独检测。结论卵巢癌患者血清中HE4、CA125、TK1的水平异常表达,且HE4、CA125、TK1三者联合检测的诊断价值效能明显优于单独检测,有助于提高临床对卵巢癌早期筛查的准确率以及协助卵巢癌患者预后的评估,以期提高患者的生存率。

血清CEA、CA125、CA199、CA724在胃癌与结肠癌中诊断效果的对比研究

目的对比分析血清CEA、CA125、CA 19-9、CA 72-4在胃癌与结肠癌中的诊断价值。方法纳入50例胃癌患者为胃癌组、50例结肠癌患者为结肠癌组,另选择50例体检健康者为对照组,检测三组的血清CEA、CA125、CA19-9、CA72-4水平,对胃癌组与结肠癌组CEA、CA125、CA 19-9、CA 72-4阳性率进行比较,绘制各标志物及联合指标的ROC曲线并计算曲线下面积。结果胃癌组、结肠癌组血清CEA、CA125、CA19-9、CA72-4水平均显著高于对照组(P<0.05);结肠癌组肿瘤标志物的阳性率普遍高于胃癌组,其中仅CEA在二者之间具有统计学差异(P<0.05);胃癌组与结肠癌组中均为CEA的AUC最大,且联合检测诊断能力均优于各单一检测(P<0.05)。结论联合检测可提升对胃癌和结肠癌的诊断价值。

AFP、CEA、CA724、CA125联合胃蛋白酶原检测对早期胃癌的诊断价值

探究针对早期胃癌疾病进行诊断时采用甲胎蛋白(AFP)、癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原724(CA724)、糖类抗原125(CA125)、胃蛋白酶原I(PGI)和胃蛋白酶原II(PGII)联合检测的价值。方法 选取时间为2021年12月-2023年12月本院医治的80例早期胃癌患者,将其设为观察组,选取同时间段在本院医治的80例胃良性病变患者,即为对照1组。再截取同时间段内80例健康体检者,即为对照2组。各组患者均对其检测上述指标,分析指标水平。再应用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线,分析指标的诊断效能。结果 三组比较AFP、PGII两项指标水平,三组之间无明显差异(P>0.05)。与对照各组对比分析得出,观察组CEA、CA125两项指标水平比较高,其余CA724、PGI、PGR(PGI/PGII比值)指标水平比较低,差异明显(P<0.05)。探究ROC曲线分析得出,联合检测的曲线下面积(AUC)值0.768(95%CI:0.713~0.891)最高,灵敏度数值为71.88%,、特异度数值为91.62%,、准确度数值为74.25%。结论 联合检测AFP、CEA、CA724、CA125、PGI、PGII,可以作为临床辅助诊断早期胃癌的参考指标,有着较高诊断价值,具有推广意义。

CA125、CYFRA21-1、AFR水平与晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗预后的关系

目的 探讨糖链抗原125(CA125)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)、白蛋白与纤维蛋白原比值(AFR)水平与晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗预后的关系。方法 选取2019年6月至2023年6月濉溪县医院肿瘤内科收治的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者102例为实验组,另选取同期本院肺部良性病变者67例为对照组,比较两组CA125、CYFRA21-1、AFR水平,实验组经化疗随访3个月后根据实体瘤疗效标准将其分为缓解组66例和未缓解组36例,比较两组患者病理特征及CA125、CYFRA21-1、AFR水平,并采用多因素Logistics回归和ROC曲线分析CA125、CYFRA21-1、AFR与晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗预后的关系及预测价值。结果 实验组AFR水平显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=10.365,P<0.05),CA125、CYFRA21-1高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=20.063,23.479,P<0.05);缓解组肿瘤最大径、TNM分期、组织学分级、淋巴结转移患者所占比例高于缓解组,差异均有统计学意义(χ^(2)=4.0196,8.302,7.312,4.408,P<0.05),CA125、CYFRA21-1均高于为缓解组,差异均有统计学意义(t=7.022,6.016,P<0.05),AFR水平低于未缓解组,差异有统计学意义(t=5.347,P<0.05);肿瘤最大径、组织学分级、TNM分期及CA125、CYFRA21-1、AFR均是影响晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗预后的危险因素(P<0.05);CA125、CYFRA21-1、AFR三者联合预测预后价值相较于单独检测价值更高(AUC=0.985,P<0.05)。结论 CA125、CYFRA21-1及AFR均是影响晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗预后的危险因素,与晚期非小细胞肺癌化疗预后密切相关,三者联合预测具有较好的预测效能。

Effects of CMNa combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin on elevated CA125 levels in post-operation advanced ovarian cancer patients

Objective： To investigate the effects of CMNa combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin on elevated CA125 levels in post-operation advanced ovarian cancer patients. Methods： The effects of CMNa combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin on elevated CA125 levels in 25 post-operation advanced ovarian cancer patients were retrospectively analyzed and com- pared with those in 20 control cases. Results： After 1 cycle of chemotherapy, CA125 levels had decreasing trend compared with control, but had no statistical significance. While after two cycles of chemotherapy, CA125 levels decreased more rapidly compared with those in control. Side effects in two groups were alike. Conclusion： CMNa combined with paclitaxel and car- boplaline has a stronger effect on the decrease of elevated CA125 levels than paclitaxel and carboplatin have in the treatment of post-operation advanced ovarian cancer, which indicates that CMNa has chemo-sensitizing effects on chemotherapy of paclitaxel and carboplatin.

Are Acute Phase Reactants and CA125 Useful for Pregnancy Prediction in Frozen Embryo Transfer?

Objective: This study assessed blood C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, procalcitonin, and CA125 levels and determined whether they have an effect on pregnancy. Material & Methods: Between Feb. and Sep. 2018, 50 consecutive women who had their first frozen embryo transfer at a tertiary referral IVF center in Turkey were included in the study. Serum samples were collected on the second day of the cycle and on the transfer day. The women were divided into two groups based on the results of pregnancy outcome: pregnant (group 1) and non-pregnant (group 2). Blood CRP, fibrinogen, procalcitonin, and CA125 levels were compared between the groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups according to CA125, CRP, fibrinogen, and procalcitonin levels at the beginning of the cycle and on the transfer day. In comparison with levels at the beginning of the cycle and on the transfer day, fibrinogen and CRP were significantly higher on the transfer day than at the beginning of the cycle. Procalcitonin was significantly higher on the transfer day than at the beginning of the cycle in group 1. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the transfer day and the beginning of the cycle in group 2. Conclusions: However, the fibrinogen, CRP and procalcitonin levels were significantly higher on the transfer day than at the beginning of the cycle. The results indicated that acute phase reactants or CA125 should not be used to determine the time of embryo transfer or predict pregnancy.

Clinical significance of serum tumor markers CA153, CA125, CA72-4 and FIB, IL-6 levels detection in ovarian cancer

Objective: To investigate the clinical significance of serum tumor markers CA153, CA125, CA72-4 and FIB, IL-6 levels in the detection of ovarian cancer. Methods: A total of 40 patients with ovarian carcinoma treated in our hospital from September 2015 to June 2017 were selected as the ovarian cancer group;40 patients with benign ovarian tumors in the same period were selected as the benign ovarian tumor group;40 healthy subjects were selected as the control group. The levels of tumor markers CA153, CA125, CA72-4 and FIB, IL-6 were compared between the three groups. Results: The CA153, CA125, CA72-4 and FIB, IL-6 levels of the ovarian cancer group were significantly higher than those in benign ovarian tumor group and the control group;these levels in the benign ovarian tumor group was not significantly different from those in the control group. With the increase of clinical phase, the levels of CA153, CA125 and CA72-4 in patients with ovarian cancer were gradually increased, and the levels in phase Ⅲ and Ⅳ were significantly higher than those in phase Ⅱ and in phase I;and the CA125 in phase Ⅱ was significantly higher than that in phase Ⅰ. The levels of FIB and IL-6 in phase Ⅱ and in phase Ⅲ, Ⅳ were significantly higher than those in phase I;the IL-6 level in phase Ⅲ, Ⅳ was significantly higher than that in phase Ⅱ. Conclusion: Serum tumor markers CA153, CA125, CA72-4 and FIB, IL-6 levels for ovarian cancer detection can be helpful for clinical diagnosis and worthy of promotion.

肿瘤标志物CA125,CA199,HE4及血HCG在卵巢恶性肿瘤中的表达与临床进展研究

卵巢恶性肿瘤是威胁女性身心健康的常见多发病,在妇科肿瘤中死亡率最高,故探究卵巢恶性肿瘤诊断或判断预后的生物标志物或血清学标志物,成为临床工作的一项重要研究领域。已有较多有关研究及文献报道,讨论血清肿瘤标志物CA125,CA199,HE4在卵巢恶性肿瘤中的表达与研究进展。近年,血HCG对于卵巢恶性肿瘤的影响也受到了关注。实验发现,血HCG,血HCG的产物可作为诊断卵巢恶性肿瘤的依据。另有实验证明,血HCG可刺激离体的卵巢恶性肿瘤细胞生长。或者,血HCG与卵巢恶性肿瘤上的HCG受体结合,直接或间接调控其生长。

Value and significance of tumor markers as CEA,CA125,SCC-Ag,CA199 and CYFRA21-1 in the diagnosis of cervical cancer

Objective: To investigate the value and significance of serum CEA, CA125, SCC-Ag, CA199 and CYFRA21-1 in the diagnosis of cervical cancer by comparing the detection of five serum markers. Methods: A total of 108 cases were divided into three groups, including 60 cervical cancerpatients and 20 cervical intraepithelial neoplasiain patients treated in our hospital from September 2015 to September 2016 and 28 healthy women. Radioimmunoassay was used to detect and compare the serum levels of CA125, CA199, CYFRA21-1 and ELISA method was used to detect and compare the serum levels of SCC-Ag, CEA. Results: (1) There was no statistically significant difference in the serum CEA, CA125, SCC-Ag, CA199, CYFRA21-1 levels between CIN group and control group. The serums CEA, CA125, SCC-Ag, CA199, CYFRA21-1 levels of cervical cancer patients were significantly higher than the other two groups. The differences were statistically significant. (2)There were statistically significant differences in the serum CEA, CA125, SCC-Ag, CA199, CYFRA21-1 levels between different cervical pathological type groups.The serum CA125, CA199, CEA levels of cervical glandular cancer patients were significantly higher than the other two groups. The differences were statistically significant. The serum SCC-Ag, CYFRA21-1 levels of cervical squamous cancer patients were significantly higher than the other two groups. The differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: The serums CEA, CA125, SCC-Ag, CA199, CYFRA21-1 levels of cervical cancer patients were significantly higher than cervical intraepithelial neoplasiain patients and healthy women. The serum CA125, CA199, CEA levels of cervical glandular cancer patients were significantly higher and the serum SCC-Ag, CYFRA21-1 levels of cervical squamous cancer patients were significantly higher. The five tumor markers can be used in diagnosis of cervical cancer and they are also worthy in distinguishing cervical pathological types.

血清HE4、ROMA值联合CA724检测在CA125阴性卵巢癌中的诊断价值

目的 分析血清人附睾蛋白4(HE4)、卵巢恶性肿瘤风险预测模型(ROMA)值联合糖类抗原CA724(CA724)检测在糖类抗原125(CA125)阴性卵巢癌中的诊断价值。方法 选取2022年1月至2022年6月于临沂市肿瘤医院就诊的卵巢癌患者共159例为研究对象,所有患者均经血清CA125检测;依据检测阴、阳性标准:CA125>35 U/mL为阳性,CA125≤35 U/mL为阴性,分为CA125阴性卵巢癌组84例和CA125阳性卵巢癌组75例。对比两组血清CA724、HE4水平和ROMA指数;分析血清CA724、HE4水平和ROMA指数单独及联合检测CA125阴性卵巢癌的诊断效能;对比CA125阴性卵巢癌组不同分期血清CA724、HE4水平和ROMA指数;分析血清CA724、HE4水平和ROMA指数三者之间的相关性。结果CA125阳性组患者血清CA724、HE4水平和ROMA指数均比CA125阴性组低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);CA724、HE4、ROMA指数联合诊断CA125阴性卵巢癌患者灵敏度、特异度、准确度分别为92.73%、89.66%、91.67%,均高于三者单独检测(P<0.05);CA125阴性卵巢癌组Ⅲ~Ⅳ期患者血清CA724、HE4水平和ROMA指数均显著高于Ⅰ~Ⅱ期患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);Pearson相关性分析所示,血清CA724和HE4水平呈正相关(r=0.932,P<0.001);血清CA724和ROMA指数呈正相关(r=0.749,P<0.001);血清HE4和ROMA指数呈正相关(r=0.814,P<0.001)。结论 血清HE4、CA724、ROMA值可成为诊断CA125阴性卵巢癌患者的辅助检查,三指标可进一步判断卵巢癌分期,为患者诊断与治疗提供有效参考价值。

血清TSGF、 CYFRA21-1、CA125变化与非小细胞肺癌患者的关系分析

目的:探讨非小细胞肺癌(NSCC)患者血清TSGF、 CYFRA21-1、CA125变化及与化疗效果、预后的关系。方法:选取2019年4月—2020年4月就诊于本院的NSCC患者100例为研究对象,记为NC组,另选取20例健康体检者,记为CO组,检测血清TSGF、CYFRA21-1、CA125水平,分析其与化疗效果、预后的关系。结果:与CO组相比,NC组血清中TSGF、CYFRA21-1、CA125水平明显升高(P<0.05);与CR患者相比,PR、SD、PD患者血清TSGF、CYFRA21-1、CA125显著升高(P<0.05),且SD比PR升高明显(P<0.05),PD比SD升高明显(P<0.05);Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,TSGF阴性的3年生存率为80.19%,TSGF阳性的3年生存率为52.38%,CYFRA21-1阴性的3年生存率为83.85%,CYFRA21-1阳性的3年生存率为54.52%,CA125阴性的3年生存率为81.03%,CA125阳性的3年生存率为48.38%;血清TSGF检测的AUC为0.736,血清CYFRA21-1检测的AUC为0.721,血清CA125检测的AUC为0.722,三者联合的AUC为0.896。结论:血清TSGF、 CYFRA21-1、CA125水平在NSCC患者中水平显著升高,且其与化疗效果、预后具有明显相关关系,可用于预测和评估化疗效果及患者预后。

射血分数降低型心力衰竭中医证型与BNP、CA125表达水平及心功能的相关性分析

目的探讨射血分数降低型心力衰竭(heart failure with reduced ejection fraction,HFrEF)中医证型与脑钠肽(brain natriuretic peptide,BNP)、血清糖类抗原125(CA125)及心功能的相关性。方法对纳入的HFrEF患者进行中医辨证分型,记录各证型患者的心功能分级、左心超声心功能指标、BNP及CA125表达水平,并进行统计分析。结果HFrEF患者不同中医证型之间BNP及CA125差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);不同心功能等级之间BNP差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);BNP、CA125与HFrEF中医证型呈正相关。结论HFrEF患者的中医证型主要分布在阳虚水泛证,BNP及CA125值基本随中医证型气阴两虚证、气虚血瘀证、痰饮阻肺证、阳虚水泛证、心阳虚脱证顺序递增,对于辅助HFrEF的辨证分型有一定参考价值。

Serum CA125, CA199, CEA, CA724, and AFP for diagnosis and prognosis prediction in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

Objective:Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma(ICC)is a malignancy that involves difficulties in early diagnosis and has extremely poor prognosis.This study aimed to evaluate serum carbohydrate antigen 125(CA125),serum carbohydrate antigen 199(CA199),carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA),carbohydrate antigen 724(CA724)and alpha-fetoprotein(AFP)as biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of ICC patients.