Objectives:Chronic rhinosinusitis is one of the common diseases that cause morbidity and affects a person's quality of life.We tried to provide a more appropriate and effective approach to selecting patients for e...Objectives:Chronic rhinosinusitis is one of the common diseases that cause morbidity and affects a person's quality of life.We tried to provide a more appropriate and effective approach to selecting patients for endoscopic sinus surgery.Methods:The study population is chronic rhinosinusitis children referred to the ear,nose,and throat clinic of two general hospitals in Tehran,Iran,who have previously undergone sufficient drug treatment and have not recovered.The Lund–Mackay score is calculated by examining the computed tomography(CT)scan.The Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22(SNOT-22)questionnaire was provided to the patients before the operation,after the operation,and 3 and 6 months later in the clinic.Results:Before the operation,the most SNOT-22 score people were in the range of 40–59 points.The SNOT-22 score before the operation is significantly different from 3 and 6 months after the operation.The highest frequency of Lund–Mackay CT(LMCT)scan score was in the range of 18–23 points.The LMCT scan score did not show any significant relationship with the SNOT-22 score before surgery,3 months,and 6 months after surgery.Sensitivity to aspirin had a significant relationship with SNOT-22 scores and the history of asthma and nasal polyps had a significant relationship with the preoperative LMCT scan score.Conclusions:The LMCT scan scoring system cannot be a good measure of chronic rhinosinusitis severity or the prognosis of patients after surgery.The SNOT-22 questionnaire can be used as a predictive tool to help the doctor and the patient in deciding to operate and the possibility of obtaining a relative recovery.展开更多
Purpose:Despite advances in modern medicine,traumatic brain injuries(TBIs)are still a major medical problem.Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis.This study aims to compare the p...Purpose:Despite advances in modern medicine,traumatic brain injuries(TBIs)are still a major medical problem.Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis.This study aims to compare the predictive value of Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores in predicting the 6-month outcomes in blunt TBI patients.Methods:This cohort study was conducted on blunt TBI patients of 15 years or older.All of them were admitted to the surgical emergency department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan,Iran from 2020 to 2021 and had abnormal trauma-related findings on brain CT images.The patients’demographic data such as age,gender,history of comorbid conditions,mechanism of trauma,Glasgow coma scale,CT images,length of hospital stay,and surgical procedures were recorded.The Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores were simultaneously determined according to the existing guidelines.The included patients'6-month outcome was determined using the Glasgow outcome scale extended.M Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16.0.Sensitivity,specificity,negative/positive predictive value and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test.The Kappa agreement coefficient and Kuder Richardson-20 were used to compare the scoring systems.Results:Altogether 171 TBI patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria,with the mean age of(44.9±20.2)years.Most patients were male(80.7%),had traffic related injuries(83.1%)and mild TBIs(64.3%).Patients with lower Glasgow coma scale had higher Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores and lower Glasgow outcome scale extended scores.Among all the scoring systems,the Helsinki and Stockholm scores showed the highest agreement in predicting patients’outcomes(kappa=0.657,p<0.001).The Rotterdam scoring system had the highest sensitivity(90.1%)in predicting death of TBI patients,whereas the Helsinki scoring system had the highest sensitivity(89.8%)in predicting the 6-month outcome in TBI patients.Conclusion:The Rotterdam scoring system was superior in predicting death in TBI patients,whereas the Helsinki scoring system was more sensitive in predicting the 6-month outcome.展开更多
文摘Objectives:Chronic rhinosinusitis is one of the common diseases that cause morbidity and affects a person's quality of life.We tried to provide a more appropriate and effective approach to selecting patients for endoscopic sinus surgery.Methods:The study population is chronic rhinosinusitis children referred to the ear,nose,and throat clinic of two general hospitals in Tehran,Iran,who have previously undergone sufficient drug treatment and have not recovered.The Lund–Mackay score is calculated by examining the computed tomography(CT)scan.The Sino-nasal Outcome Test-22(SNOT-22)questionnaire was provided to the patients before the operation,after the operation,and 3 and 6 months later in the clinic.Results:Before the operation,the most SNOT-22 score people were in the range of 40–59 points.The SNOT-22 score before the operation is significantly different from 3 and 6 months after the operation.The highest frequency of Lund–Mackay CT(LMCT)scan score was in the range of 18–23 points.The LMCT scan score did not show any significant relationship with the SNOT-22 score before surgery,3 months,and 6 months after surgery.Sensitivity to aspirin had a significant relationship with SNOT-22 scores and the history of asthma and nasal polyps had a significant relationship with the preoperative LMCT scan score.Conclusions:The LMCT scan scoring system cannot be a good measure of chronic rhinosinusitis severity or the prognosis of patients after surgery.The SNOT-22 questionnaire can be used as a predictive tool to help the doctor and the patient in deciding to operate and the possibility of obtaining a relative recovery.
基金This study was supported by deputy of research,Kashan University of Medical Sciences(Grant no:99116).
文摘Purpose:Despite advances in modern medicine,traumatic brain injuries(TBIs)are still a major medical problem.Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis.This study aims to compare the predictive value of Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores in predicting the 6-month outcomes in blunt TBI patients.Methods:This cohort study was conducted on blunt TBI patients of 15 years or older.All of them were admitted to the surgical emergency department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan,Iran from 2020 to 2021 and had abnormal trauma-related findings on brain CT images.The patients’demographic data such as age,gender,history of comorbid conditions,mechanism of trauma,Glasgow coma scale,CT images,length of hospital stay,and surgical procedures were recorded.The Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores were simultaneously determined according to the existing guidelines.The included patients'6-month outcome was determined using the Glasgow outcome scale extended.M Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16.0.Sensitivity,specificity,negative/positive predictive value and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test.The Kappa agreement coefficient and Kuder Richardson-20 were used to compare the scoring systems.Results:Altogether 171 TBI patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria,with the mean age of(44.9±20.2)years.Most patients were male(80.7%),had traffic related injuries(83.1%)and mild TBIs(64.3%).Patients with lower Glasgow coma scale had higher Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores and lower Glasgow outcome scale extended scores.Among all the scoring systems,the Helsinki and Stockholm scores showed the highest agreement in predicting patients’outcomes(kappa=0.657,p<0.001).The Rotterdam scoring system had the highest sensitivity(90.1%)in predicting death of TBI patients,whereas the Helsinki scoring system had the highest sensitivity(89.8%)in predicting the 6-month outcome in TBI patients.Conclusion:The Rotterdam scoring system was superior in predicting death in TBI patients,whereas the Helsinki scoring system was more sensitive in predicting the 6-month outcome.
