Ohjective To review the clinical features and laboratory investigations of ciguatera patients in Hong Kong between 2004 and 2007 in order to show the timely sampling of implicated fish from ciguatera victims and appli...Ohjective To review the clinical features and laboratory investigations of ciguatera patients in Hong Kong between 2004 and 2007 in order to show the timely sampling of implicated fish from ciguatera victims and application of validated mouse bioassay for confirming suspected clinical cases of ciguatera. Methods Diagnosis of the ciguatera victims was based on history of coral fish consumption and clinical presentations stated in official guidelines for clinical diagnosis of ciguatera fish poisoning in Hong Kong. Food remnants of coral fish samples were collected swiftly from ciguatera victims between 2004 and 2007 for ciguatoxins (CTXs) analysis. Results Major clinical symptoms in ciguatera patients included gastrointestinal and neurological effects including limb numbness and diarrhoea, which developed at 0.5 to 15 hours after consumption of fish. In most cases, neurological symptoms were more common than gastrointestinal symptoms. A broad range of attack rate (10%-100%) was observed in each ciguatera outbreak. Validated mouse bioassay on ether extracts of the food remnant samples confirmed that all were CTXs-positive (〈0.5 - 4.3 MU/20 mg ether extract) and directly linked to the corresponding ciguatera cases. Conclusion Consistency between clinical and laboratory analysis for ciguatera poisoning illustrates the application of laboratory mouse bioassay in a timely fashion for confirming ciguatera poisoning cases and implementing effective public health measures. With further improvement in laboratory techniques, features of ciguatera fish poisoning cases can be better defined, Further studies are needed to determine the risk of each class of CTXs (Pacific-, Indian- and Caribbean-CTXs) in Hong Kong.展开更多
Reliability of the commercially available Cigua-Check? test kits to identify ciguateric fish was evaluated by assessing the uniformity of conclusions by multiple readers examining identical sticks. One hundred and eig...Reliability of the commercially available Cigua-Check? test kits to identify ciguateric fish was evaluated by assessing the uniformity of conclusions by multiple readers examining identical sticks. One hundred and eighty-eight samples of two types of reef fish were tested for ciguatera using Cigua-Check? test strips. Paired subsamples of all specimens were also analyzed via the more rigorous N2a neuroblastoma mouse bioassay that is specific for aberration of Na+-channel activity that is presumptive for ciguatera fish poisoning. In a double blind trial, four individuals visually examined identical Cigua-Check? strips to conclude whether the samples were positive or negative for ciguatera. Of the 121 samples that were shown to be positively ciguatoxic via bioassay, the four strip readers were in agreement in concluding positive ciguateric status in 9.9% of the samples;these four readers concluded these positive samples were negative for ciguatera in 26.2% of these bioassay-positive samples. Of the 67 samples that were shown in N2a bioassay to be negatively ciguatoxic, the four readers were in agreement in concluding a negative ciguateric status in 26.9% of the samples;these four strip readers concluded these same samples were positive for ciguatera in 14.9% of these negative samples. The low levels of uniform conclusions among readers examining identical test strips, and the low frequency of agreement with the correct ciguateric status as shown by separate N2a neuroblastoma analyses indicate severe short-comings in the reliability of these test kits to accurately reflect the ciguateric status of samples. The level of uncertainty associated with Cigua-Check? test kits indicate a continuing need for improvement of a simple, rapid, and reliable means to identify ciguateric fish.展开更多
Food poisoning or gastroenteritis is a common diagnosis for individuals who have nausea, vomiting and diarrhea after ingestion of fish. When also manifesting neurological symptoms, these are blamed on puffer fish pois...Food poisoning or gastroenteritis is a common diagnosis for individuals who have nausea, vomiting and diarrhea after ingestion of fish. When also manifesting neurological symptoms, these are blamed on puffer fish poisoning, but ciguatera fish poisoning (CFP) can also manifest only with gastroenteritis, without neurological complications and remain undiagnosed. We report patients who fulfilled criteria of CFP suffering from severe GI disturbances, neurological manifestations, compromised cardiovascular status and autonomic dysfunction. All recovered within 1 - 3 days with supportive treatment. There were two small outbreaks: one in Bangkok in 2007 (2 patients) and another (2009) in Phuket (4 patients). All patients consumed the same unidentified fish portion and had severe GI symptoms. One had acute ventilatory failure requiring intubation whereas the remaining had neurological disturbances consisting of paresthesia, severe vertigo and ataxia. Absence of reflex tachycardia was noted in all patients who had severe volume depletion and shock. The most severe patient could be extubated within 24 hours and was discharged in 48 hours. All of the remaining recovered completely within 48 hours. Severe abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting and autonomic dysfunction in the form of bradycardia in the presence of hypotension were seen. Dramatic recovery within 48 hours occurred in all cases. None of the fish considered to have been responsible was available for testing. Physicians should be aware of CFP intoxication in the differential diagnosis of gastroenteritis-like syndromes after eating seafood.展开更多
This letter is in regards to the paper, “Quantitative evaluation of commercially available test kit for ciguatera in fish” [1]. We were compelled to respond because the entire premise of this paper is flawed, thus i...This letter is in regards to the paper, “Quantitative evaluation of commercially available test kit for ciguatera in fish” [1]. We were compelled to respond because the entire premise of this paper is flawed, thus invalidating its stated conclusions. The data presented in the paper is derived from the opinions of four independent readers who evaluated identical Cigua-Check? test sticks to screen fish samples for ciguatoxin (CTX), the results of which were then compared with corresponding samples tested in a non-specific bioassay with questionable statistics (see Table 1 [1]). In addition to several factual errors presented in the paper, we have identified several issues with this study, such as insufficient detail and questionable data analyses, that make its interpretations unreliable.展开更多
文摘Ohjective To review the clinical features and laboratory investigations of ciguatera patients in Hong Kong between 2004 and 2007 in order to show the timely sampling of implicated fish from ciguatera victims and application of validated mouse bioassay for confirming suspected clinical cases of ciguatera. Methods Diagnosis of the ciguatera victims was based on history of coral fish consumption and clinical presentations stated in official guidelines for clinical diagnosis of ciguatera fish poisoning in Hong Kong. Food remnants of coral fish samples were collected swiftly from ciguatera victims between 2004 and 2007 for ciguatoxins (CTXs) analysis. Results Major clinical symptoms in ciguatera patients included gastrointestinal and neurological effects including limb numbness and diarrhoea, which developed at 0.5 to 15 hours after consumption of fish. In most cases, neurological symptoms were more common than gastrointestinal symptoms. A broad range of attack rate (10%-100%) was observed in each ciguatera outbreak. Validated mouse bioassay on ether extracts of the food remnant samples confirmed that all were CTXs-positive (〈0.5 - 4.3 MU/20 mg ether extract) and directly linked to the corresponding ciguatera cases. Conclusion Consistency between clinical and laboratory analysis for ciguatera poisoning illustrates the application of laboratory mouse bioassay in a timely fashion for confirming ciguatera poisoning cases and implementing effective public health measures. With further improvement in laboratory techniques, features of ciguatera fish poisoning cases can be better defined, Further studies are needed to determine the risk of each class of CTXs (Pacific-, Indian- and Caribbean-CTXs) in Hong Kong.
文摘Reliability of the commercially available Cigua-Check? test kits to identify ciguateric fish was evaluated by assessing the uniformity of conclusions by multiple readers examining identical sticks. One hundred and eighty-eight samples of two types of reef fish were tested for ciguatera using Cigua-Check? test strips. Paired subsamples of all specimens were also analyzed via the more rigorous N2a neuroblastoma mouse bioassay that is specific for aberration of Na+-channel activity that is presumptive for ciguatera fish poisoning. In a double blind trial, four individuals visually examined identical Cigua-Check? strips to conclude whether the samples were positive or negative for ciguatera. Of the 121 samples that were shown to be positively ciguatoxic via bioassay, the four strip readers were in agreement in concluding positive ciguateric status in 9.9% of the samples;these four readers concluded these positive samples were negative for ciguatera in 26.2% of these bioassay-positive samples. Of the 67 samples that were shown in N2a bioassay to be negatively ciguatoxic, the four readers were in agreement in concluding a negative ciguateric status in 26.9% of the samples;these four strip readers concluded these same samples were positive for ciguatera in 14.9% of these negative samples. The low levels of uniform conclusions among readers examining identical test strips, and the low frequency of agreement with the correct ciguateric status as shown by separate N2a neuroblastoma analyses indicate severe short-comings in the reliability of these test kits to accurately reflect the ciguateric status of samples. The level of uncertainty associated with Cigua-Check? test kits indicate a continuing need for improvement of a simple, rapid, and reliable means to identify ciguateric fish.
文摘Food poisoning or gastroenteritis is a common diagnosis for individuals who have nausea, vomiting and diarrhea after ingestion of fish. When also manifesting neurological symptoms, these are blamed on puffer fish poisoning, but ciguatera fish poisoning (CFP) can also manifest only with gastroenteritis, without neurological complications and remain undiagnosed. We report patients who fulfilled criteria of CFP suffering from severe GI disturbances, neurological manifestations, compromised cardiovascular status and autonomic dysfunction. All recovered within 1 - 3 days with supportive treatment. There were two small outbreaks: one in Bangkok in 2007 (2 patients) and another (2009) in Phuket (4 patients). All patients consumed the same unidentified fish portion and had severe GI symptoms. One had acute ventilatory failure requiring intubation whereas the remaining had neurological disturbances consisting of paresthesia, severe vertigo and ataxia. Absence of reflex tachycardia was noted in all patients who had severe volume depletion and shock. The most severe patient could be extubated within 24 hours and was discharged in 48 hours. All of the remaining recovered completely within 48 hours. Severe abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting and autonomic dysfunction in the form of bradycardia in the presence of hypotension were seen. Dramatic recovery within 48 hours occurred in all cases. None of the fish considered to have been responsible was available for testing. Physicians should be aware of CFP intoxication in the differential diagnosis of gastroenteritis-like syndromes after eating seafood.
文摘This letter is in regards to the paper, “Quantitative evaluation of commercially available test kit for ciguatera in fish” [1]. We were compelled to respond because the entire premise of this paper is flawed, thus invalidating its stated conclusions. The data presented in the paper is derived from the opinions of four independent readers who evaluated identical Cigua-Check? test sticks to screen fish samples for ciguatoxin (CTX), the results of which were then compared with corresponding samples tested in a non-specific bioassay with questionable statistics (see Table 1 [1]). In addition to several factual errors presented in the paper, we have identified several issues with this study, such as insufficient detail and questionable data analyses, that make its interpretations unreliable.
基金科技部973项目2013CB956503号+7 种基金海洋公益性项目201005006-01号国家自然科学基金项目41106090号中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金21612401号U.S.Centers for Disease Control and PreventionU01 EH000421号