Background It is now recognized that Cimicifuga foetida extract is effective in alleviating menopausal symptoms. But the durations reported were usually short. This paper compares the clinical effects of different reg...Background It is now recognized that Cimicifuga foetida extract is effective in alleviating menopausal symptoms. But the durations reported were usually short. This paper compares the clinical effects of different regimens of three-month course on climacteric symptoms in Chinese women, so as to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cimicifuga foefida extract. Methods This was a prospective, randomized trial. Ninety-six early menopausal women were recruited and randomly assigned into 3 groups to take different kinds of medicine for 3 months; participants were given Cimicifuga foefida extract daily in group A (n=32), given estradiol valerate and progesterone capsule cycle sequentially in group B (n=32), and given estradiol valerate and medroxyprogesterone acetate cycle sequentially in group C (n=32). The questionnaires of Kupperman menopause index, Menopause-Specific Quality of Life, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were finished before and after the treatment. The status of vaginal bleeding and breast tenderness was recorded every day. Results Eighty-nine participants (89/96, 92.7%) completed the treatment. Kupperman menopause index decreased after taking the medicine for 3 months in each group (with all P〈0.001), but the score after the treatment was higher in group A than in the other 2 groups. Except for the score of sexual domain in group A (P=0.103), the scores of all domains of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life decreased significantly after the treatment in all groups (with all P〈-0.01). Score of anxity decreased significantly in group A (P=0.0l 5) and B (P=0.003). Incidence of breast tenderness was 12.9% (4/31) in groupA, 36.7% (11/30) in group B, and 14.3% (4/28) in group C. Incidence of vaginal bleeding was 6.5% (2/31)in group A, 26.7% (8/30) in group B, and 82.1% (23/28)in group C. Conclusions Cimicifuga foeticla extract is effective and safe in the treatment of menopausal syndrome. It is worth extending its use in the treatment of climacteric complaints, especially among those having contradiction for hormone replacement therapy.展开更多
Background: It is now recognized that Cimicifuga foetida (C. foetida) extract is effective in alleviating menopausal symptoms. But the durations reported were usually short, The aim of this study was to investigate...Background: It is now recognized that Cimicifuga foetida (C. foetida) extract is effective in alleviating menopausal symptoms. But the durations reported were usually short, The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of C. fl)etida extract therapy and different estrogen and progesterone sequential therapies, on the breasts of early postmenopausal women. Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial. Ninety-six early menopausal women were recruited and randomly assigned into three groups treated with different therapies for 2 years. Patients were given C. foetida extract in Group A, estradiol valerate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in Group B, and estradiol valerate and progesterone in Group C. Ultrasonography was used to monitor changes in breast during treatment. Results: In comparing breast glandular section thickness before and after 1 and 2 years of treatment, no significant difference was observed in Group A (11.97 ± 2.84 mm vs. 12.09 ± 2.58 mm and 12.61 ± 3.73 mm, P 〉 0.05); in Group B glandular section thickness had increased significantly (10.98 ± 2.34 mm vs. 11.84± 2.72 mm and 11.90 ± 3.33 mm, P 〈 0.05) after treatment, the same as Group C ( 11.56 ± 3.03 mm vs. 12.5 ± 3.57 mm and 12.22 ± 4.39 mm P 〈 0.05). In comparing breast duct width betbre and after 1 and 2 years of treatment, no significant difference was seen in Group A (1.07 ± 0.19 mm vs. 1.02 ±0.18 mm and 0.98 ± 0.21 mm, P 〉 0.05); in Group B the duct width had a downward trend after treatment (0.99 ± 0.14 mm vs. 0.96 ± 0.22 mm and 0.90 ± 0.18 mm, P 〈 0.05), the same as Group C ( 1.07 ± 0.20 mm vs. 1.02 ± 0.17 mm and 0.91 ± 0.19 mm, P 〈 0.05). The nodules detected before treatment had disappeared after 1 -year of treatment or exhibited no distinct changes in the three groups. However, new breast nodules had appeared after 2 years of treatment: There was one case in Group A, two cases in Group B and four cases in Group C, with breast hyperplasia after the molybdenum target check. Conclusions: In early postmenopausal patients, C. foetida extract therapy and estrogen and progesterone therapy at low doses did not increase the incidence of malignant breast tumors.展开更多
文摘Background It is now recognized that Cimicifuga foetida extract is effective in alleviating menopausal symptoms. But the durations reported were usually short. This paper compares the clinical effects of different regimens of three-month course on climacteric symptoms in Chinese women, so as to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Cimicifuga foefida extract. Methods This was a prospective, randomized trial. Ninety-six early menopausal women were recruited and randomly assigned into 3 groups to take different kinds of medicine for 3 months; participants were given Cimicifuga foefida extract daily in group A (n=32), given estradiol valerate and progesterone capsule cycle sequentially in group B (n=32), and given estradiol valerate and medroxyprogesterone acetate cycle sequentially in group C (n=32). The questionnaires of Kupperman menopause index, Menopause-Specific Quality of Life, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were finished before and after the treatment. The status of vaginal bleeding and breast tenderness was recorded every day. Results Eighty-nine participants (89/96, 92.7%) completed the treatment. Kupperman menopause index decreased after taking the medicine for 3 months in each group (with all P〈0.001), but the score after the treatment was higher in group A than in the other 2 groups. Except for the score of sexual domain in group A (P=0.103), the scores of all domains of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life decreased significantly after the treatment in all groups (with all P〈-0.01). Score of anxity decreased significantly in group A (P=0.0l 5) and B (P=0.003). Incidence of breast tenderness was 12.9% (4/31) in groupA, 36.7% (11/30) in group B, and 14.3% (4/28) in group C. Incidence of vaginal bleeding was 6.5% (2/31)in group A, 26.7% (8/30) in group B, and 82.1% (23/28)in group C. Conclusions Cimicifuga foeticla extract is effective and safe in the treatment of menopausal syndrome. It is worth extending its use in the treatment of climacteric complaints, especially among those having contradiction for hormone replacement therapy.
文摘Background: It is now recognized that Cimicifuga foetida (C. foetida) extract is effective in alleviating menopausal symptoms. But the durations reported were usually short, The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of C. fl)etida extract therapy and different estrogen and progesterone sequential therapies, on the breasts of early postmenopausal women. Methods: This was a prospective randomized trial. Ninety-six early menopausal women were recruited and randomly assigned into three groups treated with different therapies for 2 years. Patients were given C. foetida extract in Group A, estradiol valerate and medroxyprogesterone acetate in Group B, and estradiol valerate and progesterone in Group C. Ultrasonography was used to monitor changes in breast during treatment. Results: In comparing breast glandular section thickness before and after 1 and 2 years of treatment, no significant difference was observed in Group A (11.97 ± 2.84 mm vs. 12.09 ± 2.58 mm and 12.61 ± 3.73 mm, P 〉 0.05); in Group B glandular section thickness had increased significantly (10.98 ± 2.34 mm vs. 11.84± 2.72 mm and 11.90 ± 3.33 mm, P 〈 0.05) after treatment, the same as Group C ( 11.56 ± 3.03 mm vs. 12.5 ± 3.57 mm and 12.22 ± 4.39 mm P 〈 0.05). In comparing breast duct width betbre and after 1 and 2 years of treatment, no significant difference was seen in Group A (1.07 ± 0.19 mm vs. 1.02 ±0.18 mm and 0.98 ± 0.21 mm, P 〉 0.05); in Group B the duct width had a downward trend after treatment (0.99 ± 0.14 mm vs. 0.96 ± 0.22 mm and 0.90 ± 0.18 mm, P 〈 0.05), the same as Group C ( 1.07 ± 0.20 mm vs. 1.02 ± 0.17 mm and 0.91 ± 0.19 mm, P 〈 0.05). The nodules detected before treatment had disappeared after 1 -year of treatment or exhibited no distinct changes in the three groups. However, new breast nodules had appeared after 2 years of treatment: There was one case in Group A, two cases in Group B and four cases in Group C, with breast hyperplasia after the molybdenum target check. Conclusions: In early postmenopausal patients, C. foetida extract therapy and estrogen and progesterone therapy at low doses did not increase the incidence of malignant breast tumors.