Based on analyses on existing indicators for evaluating journals in the humanities and social sciences and our experience in constructing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index(CSSCI), we proposed a comprehensive s...Based on analyses on existing indicators for evaluating journals in the humanities and social sciences and our experience in constructing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index(CSSCI), we proposed a comprehensive system for evaluating Chinese academic journals in the humanities and social sciences. This system constitutes 8 primary indicators and 17 sub-indicators for multidisciplinary journals and 19 sub-indicators for discipline-specific journals. Each indicator or sub-indicator is assigned a suitable weight according to its importance in terms of measuring a journal's academic quality and/or impact.展开更多
论文数量、来源期刊、国际合作、国际基金资助、论文被引情况是判定"985"高校在"十一五"期间在Web of Science中所发论文影响力的重要指标。对这5项指标的统计分析发现,虽然目前我国高校的人文社会科学研究在国际...论文数量、来源期刊、国际合作、国际基金资助、论文被引情况是判定"985"高校在"十一五"期间在Web of Science中所发论文影响力的重要指标。对这5项指标的统计分析发现,虽然目前我国高校的人文社会科学研究在国际学术界占有了一席之地,但其国际学术影响力尚需要努力提高,具体可以从培养科研工作者树立国际化的学术理念、搭建国际学术交流平台、实施期刊"走出去"战略三方面着手。展开更多
A 10-year-old unified editing standard was recently abolished in the field of humanities and social science journals. This is because the standard failed in showing equal respect to disciplinary differences, in keep...A 10-year-old unified editing standard was recently abolished in the field of humanities and social science journals. This is because the standard failed in showing equal respect to disciplinary differences, in keeping with Chinese culturaltraditions, and in gaining acceptance among journal editors. As such, amendment efforts to the National Standard should be undertaken patiently and in a practical manner to achieve agreement within this publishing field.展开更多
文摘Based on analyses on existing indicators for evaluating journals in the humanities and social sciences and our experience in constructing the Chinese Social Science Citation Index(CSSCI), we proposed a comprehensive system for evaluating Chinese academic journals in the humanities and social sciences. This system constitutes 8 primary indicators and 17 sub-indicators for multidisciplinary journals and 19 sub-indicators for discipline-specific journals. Each indicator or sub-indicator is assigned a suitable weight according to its importance in terms of measuring a journal's academic quality and/or impact.
文摘论文数量、来源期刊、国际合作、国际基金资助、论文被引情况是判定"985"高校在"十一五"期间在Web of Science中所发论文影响力的重要指标。对这5项指标的统计分析发现,虽然目前我国高校的人文社会科学研究在国际学术界占有了一席之地,但其国际学术影响力尚需要努力提高,具体可以从培养科研工作者树立国际化的学术理念、搭建国际学术交流平台、实施期刊"走出去"战略三方面着手。
文摘A 10-year-old unified editing standard was recently abolished in the field of humanities and social science journals. This is because the standard failed in showing equal respect to disciplinary differences, in keeping with Chinese culturaltraditions, and in gaining acceptance among journal editors. As such, amendment efforts to the National Standard should be undertaken patiently and in a practical manner to achieve agreement within this publishing field.