1 INTRODUCTIONIn recent years,colloidal dispersion gel(CDG)have been attracting more and more in thefield of enhanced oil recovery on account of the cost-effectiveness and high efficiency ofblocking formation.Compared...1 INTRODUCTIONIn recent years,colloidal dispersion gel(CDG)have been attracting more and more in thefield of enhanced oil recovery on account of the cost-effectiveness and high efficiency ofblocking formation.Compared with bulk gel(BG),CDG exhibits lower polymer concentra-tion,undefined shape and selective blocking formation characteristics.The characteris-tics of CDG and BG are related to structure.In the bulk gel a continuous network of polymermolecules is formed predominant through intermolecular cross-linkages.The展开更多
Daqing Oilfield has carried out the production of polymer flooding was promoted since in 1996. Presently, polymer flooding is very successful in several production plants of Daqing Oilfield, and getting into industria...Daqing Oilfield has carried out the production of polymer flooding was promoted since in 1996. Presently, polymer flooding is very successful in several production plants of Daqing Oilfield, and getting into industrialization production. It has played a very important role in maintaining the oilfield stable production of over 50 million tons of oil. But the high permeability variation is serious, resulting in polymer production in some production wells recylingly and production concentration increasing slowly, which adversely affects polymer flooding efficiency. Chlloid dispersion gels (CDG) is a unique in - depth permeability modification process. It can reduce in - depth reservoir permeability variation by moving into highly permeable, water saturated zones and providing high resistance to subsequent water injection in those zones, so that oil can be produced from tighter rock. So CDG can enlarge volumetric sweep, and improve oil recovery efficiency. We had a CDG pilot programme in Daqing Oil Field in 1999, now this pilot has been entering into effective period with produing more oil and less water.展开更多
This paper examines literature that claims,suggests,or implies that floods with"colloidal dispersion gels"(CDGs)are superior to polymer floods for oil recovery.The motivation for this report is simple.If CDG...This paper examines literature that claims,suggests,or implies that floods with"colloidal dispersion gels"(CDGs)are superior to polymer floods for oil recovery.The motivation for this report is simple.If CDGs can propagate deep into the porous rock of a reservoir,and at the same time,provide resistance factors or residual resistance factors that are greater than those for the same polymer formulation without the crosslinker,then CDGs should be used in place of polymer solutions for most/all polymer,surfactant,and ASP floods.In contrast,if the claims are not valid,(1)money spent on crosslinker in the CDG formulations was wasted,(2)the mobility reduction/mobility control for CDG field projects was under-designed,and(3)reservoir performance could have been damaged by excessive loss of polymer,face-plugging by gels,and/or excessive fracture extension.From this review,the clear answer is that there is no credible evidence that colloidal dispersion gels can propagate deep into the porous rock of a reservoir,and at the same time,provide resistance factors or residual resistance factors that are greater than those for the same polymer formulation without the crosslinker.CDGs have been sold using a number of misleading and invalid arguments.Very commonly,Hall plots are claimed to demonstrate that CDGs provide higher resistance factors and/or residual resistance factors than normal polymer solutions.However,because Hall plots only monitor injection pressures at the wellbore,they reflect the composite of face plugging/formation damage,in-situ mobility changes,and fracture extension.Hall plots cannot distinguish between these effects-so they cannot quantify in situ resistance factors or residual resistance factors.Laboratory studiesdwhere CDG gelants were forced through short cores during 2-3 h-have incorrectly been cited as proof that CDGs will propagate deep(hundreds of feet)into the porous rock of a reservoir over the course of months.In contrast,most legitimate laboratory studies reveal that the gelation time for CDGs is a day or less and that CDGs will not propagate through porous rock after gelation.A few cases were noted where highly depleted Al and/or HPAM fluids passed through cores after one week of aging.Details about these particular formulations/experiments were sparse and questions remain about their reproducibility.No credible evidence indicates that the CDG can propagate deep into a reservoir(over the course of weeks or months)and still provide a greater effect than that from the polymer alone.With one exception,aluminum from the CDG was never reported to be produced in a field application.In the exception,Chang reported producing 1-20%of the injected aluminum concentration.The available evidence suggests that some free(unreacted)HPAM and aluminum that was associated with the original CDG can propagate through porous media.However,there is no evidence that this HPAM or aluminum provides mobility reduction greater than that for the polymer formulation without crosslinker.展开更多
The suggestion that the colloidal-dispersion-gel (CDG) process is superior to normal polymer flooding is misleading and generally incorrect. Colloidal dispersion gels, in their present state of technological developme...The suggestion that the colloidal-dispersion-gel (CDG) process is superior to normal polymer flooding is misleading and generally incorrect. Colloidal dispersion gels, in their present state of technological development, should not be advocated as an improvement to, or substitute for, polymer flooding. Gels made from aluminum-citrate crosslinked polyacrylamides can act as conventional gels and provide effective conformance improvement in treating some types of excess water production problems if sound scientific and engineering principles are respected.展开更多
文摘1 INTRODUCTIONIn recent years,colloidal dispersion gel(CDG)have been attracting more and more in thefield of enhanced oil recovery on account of the cost-effectiveness and high efficiency ofblocking formation.Compared with bulk gel(BG),CDG exhibits lower polymer concentra-tion,undefined shape and selective blocking formation characteristics.The characteris-tics of CDG and BG are related to structure.In the bulk gel a continuous network of polymermolecules is formed predominant through intermolecular cross-linkages.The
文摘Daqing Oilfield has carried out the production of polymer flooding was promoted since in 1996. Presently, polymer flooding is very successful in several production plants of Daqing Oilfield, and getting into industrialization production. It has played a very important role in maintaining the oilfield stable production of over 50 million tons of oil. But the high permeability variation is serious, resulting in polymer production in some production wells recylingly and production concentration increasing slowly, which adversely affects polymer flooding efficiency. Chlloid dispersion gels (CDG) is a unique in - depth permeability modification process. It can reduce in - depth reservoir permeability variation by moving into highly permeable, water saturated zones and providing high resistance to subsequent water injection in those zones, so that oil can be produced from tighter rock. So CDG can enlarge volumetric sweep, and improve oil recovery efficiency. We had a CDG pilot programme in Daqing Oil Field in 1999, now this pilot has been entering into effective period with produing more oil and less water.
文摘This paper examines literature that claims,suggests,or implies that floods with"colloidal dispersion gels"(CDGs)are superior to polymer floods for oil recovery.The motivation for this report is simple.If CDGs can propagate deep into the porous rock of a reservoir,and at the same time,provide resistance factors or residual resistance factors that are greater than those for the same polymer formulation without the crosslinker,then CDGs should be used in place of polymer solutions for most/all polymer,surfactant,and ASP floods.In contrast,if the claims are not valid,(1)money spent on crosslinker in the CDG formulations was wasted,(2)the mobility reduction/mobility control for CDG field projects was under-designed,and(3)reservoir performance could have been damaged by excessive loss of polymer,face-plugging by gels,and/or excessive fracture extension.From this review,the clear answer is that there is no credible evidence that colloidal dispersion gels can propagate deep into the porous rock of a reservoir,and at the same time,provide resistance factors or residual resistance factors that are greater than those for the same polymer formulation without the crosslinker.CDGs have been sold using a number of misleading and invalid arguments.Very commonly,Hall plots are claimed to demonstrate that CDGs provide higher resistance factors and/or residual resistance factors than normal polymer solutions.However,because Hall plots only monitor injection pressures at the wellbore,they reflect the composite of face plugging/formation damage,in-situ mobility changes,and fracture extension.Hall plots cannot distinguish between these effects-so they cannot quantify in situ resistance factors or residual resistance factors.Laboratory studiesdwhere CDG gelants were forced through short cores during 2-3 h-have incorrectly been cited as proof that CDGs will propagate deep(hundreds of feet)into the porous rock of a reservoir over the course of months.In contrast,most legitimate laboratory studies reveal that the gelation time for CDGs is a day or less and that CDGs will not propagate through porous rock after gelation.A few cases were noted where highly depleted Al and/or HPAM fluids passed through cores after one week of aging.Details about these particular formulations/experiments were sparse and questions remain about their reproducibility.No credible evidence indicates that the CDG can propagate deep into a reservoir(over the course of weeks or months)and still provide a greater effect than that from the polymer alone.With one exception,aluminum from the CDG was never reported to be produced in a field application.In the exception,Chang reported producing 1-20%of the injected aluminum concentration.The available evidence suggests that some free(unreacted)HPAM and aluminum that was associated with the original CDG can propagate through porous media.However,there is no evidence that this HPAM or aluminum provides mobility reduction greater than that for the polymer formulation without crosslinker.
文摘The suggestion that the colloidal-dispersion-gel (CDG) process is superior to normal polymer flooding is misleading and generally incorrect. Colloidal dispersion gels, in their present state of technological development, should not be advocated as an improvement to, or substitute for, polymer flooding. Gels made from aluminum-citrate crosslinked polyacrylamides can act as conventional gels and provide effective conformance improvement in treating some types of excess water production problems if sound scientific and engineering principles are respected.
