目的探究全胰切除术(total pancreatectomy,TP)与胰十二指肠切除术(pancreaticoduodenectomy,PD)治疗胰腺癌患者的术后短期并发症与长期预后差异。方法回顾性收集北京协和医院2016年1月至2021年12月行TP(TP组)和2019年1月至2021年12月行...目的探究全胰切除术(total pancreatectomy,TP)与胰十二指肠切除术(pancreaticoduodenectomy,PD)治疗胰腺癌患者的术后短期并发症与长期预后差异。方法回顾性收集北京协和医院2016年1月至2021年12月行TP(TP组)和2019年1月至2021年12月行PD(PD组)的胰腺癌患者临床资料。根据危险因素的不同,将PD组患者分为胰瘘高风险PD组和复发高风险PD组。采用倾向性评分法匹配后,比较TP组与胰瘘高风险PD组、复发高风险PD组术后短期手术疗效指标(术后并发症发生率、30 d死亡率、住院时间等)、长期手术疗效指标(总生存期)及生活质量差异。结果共入选符合纳入与排除标准的TP组患者32例,PD组174例(胰瘘高风险PD组99例,复发高风险PD组15例)。(1)TP组与胰瘘高风险PD组:经倾向性评分匹配后,最终纳入TP组患者29例、胰瘘高风险PD组患者56例。TP组无胰瘘发生,胰瘘高风险PD组胰瘘发生率为19.64%(P=0.027),两组其他术后并发症发生率、Clavien-Dindo分级、住院时间、ICU停留时间、30 d死亡率等短期手术疗效指标均无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。中位随访时间36个月时,两组生命质量核心量表(quality of life questionnaire-core 30,QLQ-C30)评分均无显著差异(P均>0.05)。(2)TP组与复发高风险PD组:由于两组基线资料均无统计学差异(P均>0.05),故TP组32例患者、复发高风险PD组15例患者均纳入分析。TP组无胰瘘发生,复发高风险PD组胰瘘发生率为20.00%(P=0.028),两组其他术后并发症发生率、Clavien-Dindo分级、住院时间、ICU停留时间、30 d死亡率等短期手术疗效指标亦无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。截至末次随访,与复发高风险PD组比较,TP组中位总生存期更长(37.68个月比15.24个月,HR=2.551,95%CI:1.144~5.689,P=0.018);多因素Cox回归分析显示,复发高风险PD、术前合并梗阻性黄疸是胰腺癌患者长期预后不良的独立危险因素。结论对于胰瘘高风险胰腺癌患者,TP可取得与PD相当的短期手术疗效和长期生活质量,且术后无胰瘘负担。对于复发高风险胰腺癌患者,TP可在保证手术安全性的基础上显著延长患者生存期。展开更多
目的探讨颅内压监测对重度颅脑外伤开颅血肿清除术后患者GCS评分、并发症及预后的影响。方法选取重度颅脑外伤患者84例,将以上患者分成常规组和监测组。常规组患者行标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术,监测组患者则在行标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压...目的探讨颅内压监测对重度颅脑外伤开颅血肿清除术后患者GCS评分、并发症及预后的影响。方法选取重度颅脑外伤患者84例,将以上患者分成常规组和监测组。常规组患者行标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术,监测组患者则在行标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术的基础上联合术后颅内压监测。比较2组患者手术前后格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、颅内压变化、术后并发症发生情况以及预后。结果监测组患者术后3、7 d的颅内压下降值显著大于常规组(P<0.05);2组患者术后28 d GCS评分均显著升高,且监测组患者GCS评分升高较常规组更显著(P<0.05);与常规组相比,术后3个月的格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)提示监测组的预后较好(P<0.05);术后6个月,常规组与监测组的电解质紊乱发生率分别为59.5%、33.3%(P<0.05)。结论对重度颅脑外伤患者行标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术联合术后颅内压监测的疗效较好。展开更多
Peritoneal adhesions represent an important clinical challenge in gastrointestinal surgery. Peritoneal adhesions are a consequence of peritoneal irritation by infection or surgical trauma, and may be considered as the...Peritoneal adhesions represent an important clinical challenge in gastrointestinal surgery. Peritoneal adhesions are a consequence of peritoneal irritation by infection or surgical trauma, and may be considered as the pathological part of healing following any peritoneal injury, particularly due to abdominal surgery. The balance between fi brin deposition and degradation is critical in determining normal peritoneal healing or adhesion formation. Postoperative peritoneal adhesions are a major cause of morbidity resulting in multiple complications, many of which may manifest several years after the initial surgical procedure. In addition to acute small bowel obstruction, peritoneal adhesions may cause pelvic or abdominal pain, and infertility. In this paper, the authors reviewed the epidemiology, pathogenesis and various prevention strategies of adhesion formation, using Medline and PubMed search. Several preventive agents against postoperative peri-toneal adhesions have been investigated. Their role aims in activating fi brinolysis, hampering coagulation, diminishing the inflammatory response, inhibiting col-lagen synthesis or creating a barrier between adjacentwound surfaces. Their results are encouraging but most of them are contradictory and achieved mostly in animal model. Until additional fi ndings from future clinical researches, only a meticulous surgery can be recommended to reduce unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates from these untoward effects of surgery. In the current state of knowledge, pre-clinical or clini-cal studies are still necessary to evaluate the effective-ness of the several proposed prevention strategies of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.展开更多
文摘目的探究全胰切除术(total pancreatectomy,TP)与胰十二指肠切除术(pancreaticoduodenectomy,PD)治疗胰腺癌患者的术后短期并发症与长期预后差异。方法回顾性收集北京协和医院2016年1月至2021年12月行TP(TP组)和2019年1月至2021年12月行PD(PD组)的胰腺癌患者临床资料。根据危险因素的不同,将PD组患者分为胰瘘高风险PD组和复发高风险PD组。采用倾向性评分法匹配后,比较TP组与胰瘘高风险PD组、复发高风险PD组术后短期手术疗效指标(术后并发症发生率、30 d死亡率、住院时间等)、长期手术疗效指标(总生存期)及生活质量差异。结果共入选符合纳入与排除标准的TP组患者32例,PD组174例(胰瘘高风险PD组99例,复发高风险PD组15例)。(1)TP组与胰瘘高风险PD组:经倾向性评分匹配后,最终纳入TP组患者29例、胰瘘高风险PD组患者56例。TP组无胰瘘发生,胰瘘高风险PD组胰瘘发生率为19.64%(P=0.027),两组其他术后并发症发生率、Clavien-Dindo分级、住院时间、ICU停留时间、30 d死亡率等短期手术疗效指标均无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。中位随访时间36个月时,两组生命质量核心量表(quality of life questionnaire-core 30,QLQ-C30)评分均无显著差异(P均>0.05)。(2)TP组与复发高风险PD组:由于两组基线资料均无统计学差异(P均>0.05),故TP组32例患者、复发高风险PD组15例患者均纳入分析。TP组无胰瘘发生,复发高风险PD组胰瘘发生率为20.00%(P=0.028),两组其他术后并发症发生率、Clavien-Dindo分级、住院时间、ICU停留时间、30 d死亡率等短期手术疗效指标亦无统计学差异(P均>0.05)。截至末次随访,与复发高风险PD组比较,TP组中位总生存期更长(37.68个月比15.24个月,HR=2.551,95%CI:1.144~5.689,P=0.018);多因素Cox回归分析显示,复发高风险PD、术前合并梗阻性黄疸是胰腺癌患者长期预后不良的独立危险因素。结论对于胰瘘高风险胰腺癌患者,TP可取得与PD相当的短期手术疗效和长期生活质量,且术后无胰瘘负担。对于复发高风险胰腺癌患者,TP可在保证手术安全性的基础上显著延长患者生存期。
文摘目的探讨颅内压监测对重度颅脑外伤开颅血肿清除术后患者GCS评分、并发症及预后的影响。方法选取重度颅脑外伤患者84例,将以上患者分成常规组和监测组。常规组患者行标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术,监测组患者则在行标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术的基础上联合术后颅内压监测。比较2组患者手术前后格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、颅内压变化、术后并发症发生情况以及预后。结果监测组患者术后3、7 d的颅内压下降值显著大于常规组(P<0.05);2组患者术后28 d GCS评分均显著升高,且监测组患者GCS评分升高较常规组更显著(P<0.05);与常规组相比,术后3个月的格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)提示监测组的预后较好(P<0.05);术后6个月,常规组与监测组的电解质紊乱发生率分别为59.5%、33.3%(P<0.05)。结论对重度颅脑外伤患者行标准外伤大骨瓣开颅减压术联合术后颅内压监测的疗效较好。
文摘Peritoneal adhesions represent an important clinical challenge in gastrointestinal surgery. Peritoneal adhesions are a consequence of peritoneal irritation by infection or surgical trauma, and may be considered as the pathological part of healing following any peritoneal injury, particularly due to abdominal surgery. The balance between fi brin deposition and degradation is critical in determining normal peritoneal healing or adhesion formation. Postoperative peritoneal adhesions are a major cause of morbidity resulting in multiple complications, many of which may manifest several years after the initial surgical procedure. In addition to acute small bowel obstruction, peritoneal adhesions may cause pelvic or abdominal pain, and infertility. In this paper, the authors reviewed the epidemiology, pathogenesis and various prevention strategies of adhesion formation, using Medline and PubMed search. Several preventive agents against postoperative peri-toneal adhesions have been investigated. Their role aims in activating fi brinolysis, hampering coagulation, diminishing the inflammatory response, inhibiting col-lagen synthesis or creating a barrier between adjacentwound surfaces. Their results are encouraging but most of them are contradictory and achieved mostly in animal model. Until additional fi ndings from future clinical researches, only a meticulous surgery can be recommended to reduce unnecessary morbidity and mortality rates from these untoward effects of surgery. In the current state of knowledge, pre-clinical or clini-cal studies are still necessary to evaluate the effective-ness of the several proposed prevention strategies of postoperative peritoneal adhesions.
