Objective:To evaluate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy(PGT-A)with comprehensive chromosome screening increases live birth rate(LBR)in normal karyotype couples with recurrent pregnancy loss(RPL).M...Objective:To evaluate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy(PGT-A)with comprehensive chromosome screening increases live birth rate(LBR)in normal karyotype couples with recurrent pregnancy loss(RPL).Methods:A retrospective cohort follow-up study of 506 couples with RPL was conducted between April 2014 and March 2017.Couples were allocated to two groups according to their decision to choose PGT-A or not.The primary outcome was LBR per start/transfer cycle;secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate.Statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age.Results:LBR per start(26.6%vs.15.4%,relative risk[RR]:2.66,95%confidence interval[CI][1.69-4.20],P<0.0001;adjusted RR[aRR]:2.40,95%CI[1.49-3.86],P=0.0004)and per transfer(44.9%vs.25.1%,RR:3.00,95%CI[1.96-4.60],P<0.0001;aRR:2.64,95%CI[1.68-4.14],P<0.0001)was significantly higher in the PGT-A group than in the non-PGT-A group.The miscarriage rate was significantly lower in the PGT-A group compared to the non-PGT-A group(15.7%vs.34.6%,RR:0.27,95%CI[0.13-0.57],P=0.00005;aRR:0.26,95%CI[0.12-0.57],P=0.0007).Conclusions:LBR per start cycle following PGT-A is significantly higher,and risk of miscarriage is significantly lower among infertile couples with RPL,irrespective of maternal age.PGT-A should be recommended to infertile couples with RPL.展开更多
基金This study was supported by Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning Project(No.201640365)Shanghai Shen Kang Hospital Development Center Municipal Hospital New Frontier Technology Joint Project(SHDC12017105).
文摘Objective:To evaluate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy(PGT-A)with comprehensive chromosome screening increases live birth rate(LBR)in normal karyotype couples with recurrent pregnancy loss(RPL).Methods:A retrospective cohort follow-up study of 506 couples with RPL was conducted between April 2014 and March 2017.Couples were allocated to two groups according to their decision to choose PGT-A or not.The primary outcome was LBR per start/transfer cycle;secondary outcomes were ongoing pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate.Statistical analyses were conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age.Results:LBR per start(26.6%vs.15.4%,relative risk[RR]:2.66,95%confidence interval[CI][1.69-4.20],P<0.0001;adjusted RR[aRR]:2.40,95%CI[1.49-3.86],P=0.0004)and per transfer(44.9%vs.25.1%,RR:3.00,95%CI[1.96-4.60],P<0.0001;aRR:2.64,95%CI[1.68-4.14],P<0.0001)was significantly higher in the PGT-A group than in the non-PGT-A group.The miscarriage rate was significantly lower in the PGT-A group compared to the non-PGT-A group(15.7%vs.34.6%,RR:0.27,95%CI[0.13-0.57],P=0.00005;aRR:0.26,95%CI[0.12-0.57],P=0.0007).Conclusions:LBR per start cycle following PGT-A is significantly higher,and risk of miscarriage is significantly lower among infertile couples with RPL,irrespective of maternal age.PGT-A should be recommended to infertile couples with RPL.
