目的分析腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后吻合口瘘(Anastomotic Leakage,AL)的危险因素,为临床有效预防腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL提供理论依据,并进一步探索AL对患者预后和生活质量的影响。方法回顾性分析2017年1月—2020年12月皖南医学院第一...目的分析腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后吻合口瘘(Anastomotic Leakage,AL)的危险因素,为临床有效预防腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL提供理论依据,并进一步探索AL对患者预后和生活质量的影响。方法回顾性分析2017年1月—2020年12月皖南医学院第一附属医院胃肠外科收治的394例行腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术患者的临床资料,将其按是否发生术后吻合口瘘分成无吻合口瘘(无AL组,359例)和吻合口瘘组(AL组35例)两组。采用单因素分析和多因素二元Logistic回归分析探寻术后AL独立的危险因素。根据可能会影响患者术后生存的因素,将无AL组和AL组进行1︰1倾向性得分匹配(PSM),再采用Kaplan-Meier法比较匹配组和匹配后AL组患者术后3年的总生存率、局部复发率、远处转移率。对于生存时间满3年的匹配组和匹配后AL组的患者,进行癌症患者生命质量测定量表体系QLICP(Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients)中的大肠癌CR(Colorectal Cancer)量表第二版(简称为QLICP-CR(V2.0))评分,比较两组患者生命质量差异。结果单因素和多因素logistic分析发现患者男性(OR:2.680,95%CI:1.098~6.540),术前接受新辅助治疗(OR:5.109,95%CI:2.347~11.118),术前白蛋白<35 g/L(OR:3.269,95%CI:1.507~7.090),肿瘤距肛缘距离<7 cm(OR:3.330,95%CI:1.448~7.657)是腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL的独立危险因素。Kaplan-Meier法分析显示,AL并不影响患者的3年总生存率(78.8%vs 75.8%,P=0.752)、3年局部复发率(9.1%vs 18.2%,P=0.285)、3年远处转移率(12.1%vs 15.2%,P=0.726)。AL患者在心理功能中的情绪侧面(P=0.029)、大肠特异模块中的大便情况侧面(P=0.039)评分显著降低。结论男性、术前接受新辅助治疗、术前白蛋白<35 g/L、肿瘤距肛缘距离<7 cm是腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL的独立危险因素。AL不影响腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术预后。AL会对患者带来情绪、大便情况上的不良影响。展开更多
Curability and safety are essential for patients with advanced liver malignancy undergoing extended liver resection.If the future liver remnant(FLR)volume is insufficient,portal embolization with or without hepatic ar...Curability and safety are essential for patients with advanced liver malignancy undergoing extended liver resection.If the future liver remnant(FLR)volume is insufficient,portal embolization with or without hepatic arterial or venous embolization or a conventional two-stage hepatectomy(TSH)can be performed(1,2).Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy(ALPPS)was introduced in 2007.展开更多
BACKGROUND Postoperative complications remain a paramount concern for surgeons and healthcare practitioners.AIM To present a comprehensive analysis of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress(E-PASS)s...BACKGROUND Postoperative complications remain a paramount concern for surgeons and healthcare practitioners.AIM To present a comprehensive analysis of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress(E-PASS)scoring system’s efficacy in predicting postoperative complications following abdominal surgery.METHODS A systematic search of published studies was conducted,yielding 17 studies with pertinent data.Parameters such as preoperative risk score(PRS),surgical stress score(SSS),comprehensive risk score(CRS),postoperative complications,post-operative mortality,and other clinical data were collected for meta-analysis.Forest plots were employed for continuous and binary variables,withχ2 tests assessing heterogeneity(P value).RESULTS Patients experiencing complications after abdominal surgery exhibited significantly higher E-PASS scores compared to those without complications[mean difference and 95%confidence interval(CI)of PRS:0.10(0.05-0.15);SSS:0.04(0.001-0.08);CRS:0.19(0.07-0.31)].Following the exclusion of low-quality studies,results remained valid with no discernible heterogeneity.Subgroup analysis indicated that variations in sample size and age may contribute to hetero-geneity in CRS analysis.Binary variable meta-analysis demonstrated a correlation between high CRS and increased postoperative complication rates[odds ratio(OR)(95%CI):3.01(1.83-4.95)],with a significant association observed between high CRS and postoperative mortality[OR(95%CI):15.49(3.75-64.01)].CONCLUSION In summary,postoperative complications in abdominal surgery,as assessed by the E-PASS scoring system,are consistently linked to elevated PRS,SSS,and CRS scores.High CRS scores emerge as risk factors for heightened morbidity and mortality.This study establishes the accuracy of the E-PASS scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in abdominal surgery,underscoring its potential for widespread adoption in effective risk assessment.展开更多
目的:评价日常活动和手术应激评估(Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress,E-PASS)系统用于评估老龄患者消化道手术后并发症和转归的临床价值。方法:回顾性分析2011年7月至2013年7月西京医院消化外科所有65岁以上的患...目的:评价日常活动和手术应激评估(Estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress,E-PASS)系统用于评估老龄患者消化道手术后并发症和转归的临床价值。方法:回顾性分析2011年7月至2013年7月西京医院消化外科所有65岁以上的患者的临床资料,计算其中行消化道手术者的E-PASS评分,并记录这些患者术后并发症的发生情况和患者术后的住院时间。分析E-PASS评分和几项该评分未涉及的因素与老龄患者消化道手术后并发症的发病率、死亡率、住院时间的相关性。结果:研究共纳入1236例老龄行消化道手术的患者,其中521例发生术后并发症(42.15%),8例死亡(0.65%)。患者术前E-PASS评分系统中,三项评分均与术后住院时间相关,术前风险评分(Preoperative risk score,PRS)和综合风险评分(Comprehensive risk score,CRS)与术后并发症的发病率和死亡率显著相关(P均<0.05)。E-PASS评分系统未包含的指标中,麻醉方法与术后并发症发生和住院时间无关,术后入ICU、术中使用血管活性药物和急诊手术与术后发病率、死亡率和住院时间相关(P均<0.05)。结论:E-PASS评分系统可用于预测老龄患者行消化道手术后并发症的发生情况和转归,纳入术后入ICU、术中使用血管活性药物和急诊手术三项指标可能进一步提高E-PASS评分系统的预测准确性。展开更多
文摘目的分析腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后吻合口瘘(Anastomotic Leakage,AL)的危险因素,为临床有效预防腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL提供理论依据,并进一步探索AL对患者预后和生活质量的影响。方法回顾性分析2017年1月—2020年12月皖南医学院第一附属医院胃肠外科收治的394例行腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术患者的临床资料,将其按是否发生术后吻合口瘘分成无吻合口瘘(无AL组,359例)和吻合口瘘组(AL组35例)两组。采用单因素分析和多因素二元Logistic回归分析探寻术后AL独立的危险因素。根据可能会影响患者术后生存的因素,将无AL组和AL组进行1︰1倾向性得分匹配(PSM),再采用Kaplan-Meier法比较匹配组和匹配后AL组患者术后3年的总生存率、局部复发率、远处转移率。对于生存时间满3年的匹配组和匹配后AL组的患者,进行癌症患者生命质量测定量表体系QLICP(Quality of Life Instruments for Cancer Patients)中的大肠癌CR(Colorectal Cancer)量表第二版(简称为QLICP-CR(V2.0))评分,比较两组患者生命质量差异。结果单因素和多因素logistic分析发现患者男性(OR:2.680,95%CI:1.098~6.540),术前接受新辅助治疗(OR:5.109,95%CI:2.347~11.118),术前白蛋白<35 g/L(OR:3.269,95%CI:1.507~7.090),肿瘤距肛缘距离<7 cm(OR:3.330,95%CI:1.448~7.657)是腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL的独立危险因素。Kaplan-Meier法分析显示,AL并不影响患者的3年总生存率(78.8%vs 75.8%,P=0.752)、3年局部复发率(9.1%vs 18.2%,P=0.285)、3年远处转移率(12.1%vs 15.2%,P=0.726)。AL患者在心理功能中的情绪侧面(P=0.029)、大肠特异模块中的大便情况侧面(P=0.039)评分显著降低。结论男性、术前接受新辅助治疗、术前白蛋白<35 g/L、肿瘤距肛缘距离<7 cm是腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术后AL的独立危险因素。AL不影响腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术预后。AL会对患者带来情绪、大便情况上的不良影响。
文摘Curability and safety are essential for patients with advanced liver malignancy undergoing extended liver resection.If the future liver remnant(FLR)volume is insufficient,portal embolization with or without hepatic arterial or venous embolization or a conventional two-stage hepatectomy(TSH)can be performed(1,2).Associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy(ALPPS)was introduced in 2007.
基金Supported by Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province of China,No.2020PY053.
文摘BACKGROUND Postoperative complications remain a paramount concern for surgeons and healthcare practitioners.AIM To present a comprehensive analysis of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress(E-PASS)scoring system’s efficacy in predicting postoperative complications following abdominal surgery.METHODS A systematic search of published studies was conducted,yielding 17 studies with pertinent data.Parameters such as preoperative risk score(PRS),surgical stress score(SSS),comprehensive risk score(CRS),postoperative complications,post-operative mortality,and other clinical data were collected for meta-analysis.Forest plots were employed for continuous and binary variables,withχ2 tests assessing heterogeneity(P value).RESULTS Patients experiencing complications after abdominal surgery exhibited significantly higher E-PASS scores compared to those without complications[mean difference and 95%confidence interval(CI)of PRS:0.10(0.05-0.15);SSS:0.04(0.001-0.08);CRS:0.19(0.07-0.31)].Following the exclusion of low-quality studies,results remained valid with no discernible heterogeneity.Subgroup analysis indicated that variations in sample size and age may contribute to hetero-geneity in CRS analysis.Binary variable meta-analysis demonstrated a correlation between high CRS and increased postoperative complication rates[odds ratio(OR)(95%CI):3.01(1.83-4.95)],with a significant association observed between high CRS and postoperative mortality[OR(95%CI):15.49(3.75-64.01)].CONCLUSION In summary,postoperative complications in abdominal surgery,as assessed by the E-PASS scoring system,are consistently linked to elevated PRS,SSS,and CRS scores.High CRS scores emerge as risk factors for heightened morbidity and mortality.This study establishes the accuracy of the E-PASS scoring system in predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in abdominal surgery,underscoring its potential for widespread adoption in effective risk assessment.
