Underwater vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection in treatment of colorectal polyps:A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection(UEMR)of colorectal lesions is emerging as an alternative method to conventional endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR);however,it is still controversial whether there is a difference in the effectiveness between UEMR and EMR.AIM To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps.METHODS Clinical studies comparing the effectiveness or safety of UEMR in the treatment of colorectal polyps were searched in medical databases,including Pub Med,Embase,Cochrane Library,CNKI,and Wanfang Data,monographs,theses,and papers presented at conferences.Statistical analyses were performed using Revman 5.3 software.RESULTS Seven non-randomized controlled trials and one randomized controlled trial met the inclusion criteria.In total,1382 patients(1511 polyps)were included in the study,including 722 who received UEMR and 789 who received EMR.In the UEMR and EMR groups,the en bloc resection rates were 85.87%and 73.89%,respectively,with a relative risk(RR)value of 1.14(95%confidence interval[CI]:1.01-1.30;P<0.05).In the sub-group analysis,the en bloc resection rate showed no statistically significant difference between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps less than 20 mm in diameter.However,a statistically significant difference was found between the EMR and UEMR groups for polyps equal to or greater than 20 mm in diameter.The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates at 3-6 mo of the UEMR and EMR groups were 3.26%and 15.17%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.27(95%CI:0.09-0.83;P<0.05).The post-endoscopic resection recurrence rates of UEMR and EMR at 12 mo were 6.25%and 14.40%,respectively,with an RR value of 0.43(95%CI:0.20-0.92;P<0.05).Additionally,the incidence of adverse events was 8.17%and 6.21%,respectively,with an RR value of 1.07(95%CI:0.50-2.30;P>0.05).CONCLUSION UEMR is an effective technique for colorectal polyps and appears to have some advantages over EMR,particularly with regard to some treatment outcomes.

Endoscopic mucosal resection-precutting vs conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for sessile colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm

BACKGROUND The optimal method to remove sessile colorectal lesions sized 10-20 mm remains uncertain.Piecemeal and incomplete resection are major limitations in current practice,such as endoscopic mucosal resection(EMR)and cold or hot snare polypectomy.Recently,EMR with circumferential precutting(EMR-P)has emerged as an effective technique,but the quality of current evidence in comparative studies of conventional EMR(CEMR)and EMR-P is limited.AIM To investigate whether EMR-P is superior to CEMR in removing sessile colorectal polyps.METHODS This multicenter randomized controlled trial involved seven medical institutions in China.Patients with colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm were enrolled and randomly assigned to undergo EMR-P or CEMR.EMR-P was performed following submucosal injection,and a circumferential mucosa incision(precutting)was conducted using a snare tip.Primary outcomes included a comparison of the rates of en bloc and R0 resection,defined as one-piece resection and one-piece resection with histologically assessed clear margins,respectively.RESULTS A total of 110 patients in the EMR-P group and 110 patients in the CEMR group were finally evaluated.In the per-protocol analysis,the proportion of en bloc resections was 94.3%[95%confidence interval(CI):88.2%-97.4%]in the EMR-P group and 86%(95%CI:78.2%-91.3%)in the CEMR group(P=0.041),while subgroup analysis showed that for lesions>15 mm,EMR-P also resulted in a higher en bloc resection rate(92.0%vs 58.8%P=0.029).The proportion of R0 resections was 81.1%(95%CI:72.6%-87.4%)in the EMR-P group and 76.6%(95%CI:68.8%-84.4%)in the CEMR group(P=0.521).The EMR-P group showed a longer median procedure time(6.4 vs 3.0 min;P<0.001).No significant difference was found in the proportion of patients with adverse events(EMR-P:9.1%;CEMR:6.4%;P=0.449).CONCLUSION In this study,EMR-P served as an alternative to CEMR for removing nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 10-20 mm,particularly polyps>15 mm in diameter,with higher R0 and en bloc resection rates and without increasing adverse events.However,EMR-P required a relatively longer procedure time than CEMR.Considering its potential benefits for en bloc and R0 resection,EMR-P may be a promising technique in colorectal polyp resection.

Effect of Femoral Resection on Coronal Overall Alignment after Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background：A good postoperative alignment in total knee arthroplasty （TKA） is the key to achieving satisfactory results.We assessed the effect of femoral and tibial resection on the overall alignment after conventional TKA.Methods：We conducted a retrospective analysis of 212 primary TKAs in 188 patients.Intramedullary （IM）-guided resection was applied on the femoral side while extramedullary （EM）-guided resection was used on the tibial side.Using full-length X-ray,the preoperative femoral valgus angle and lower extremity alignment,as well as 2-week postoperative femoral and tibial prosthetic coronal alignment and overall lower extremity alignment,were measured.Results：Postoperatively,good prosthetic alignment was achieved in 191 cases （90.1%） on the tibial side and in 144 cases （67.9%） on the femoral side （χ^2 =5.441,P =0.02）.Multiple linear regression analysis was used to assess the effect of different alignment sides on the overall alignment in the coronal plane.Data were divided into five subgroups based on the valgus or varus status of the prostheses.The standardized regression coefficients of the femoral and tibial prosthetic alignment on the overall alignment were 0.666 and 0.414,respectively;in varus on both sides were 0.658 and 0.377,respectively;in valgus,0.555 and 0.030;femoral side varus and tibial side valgus,0.702 and 0.211;femoral side valgus and tibial side varus,-0.416 and 0.287.The study showed that the overall low extremity alignment was statistically influenced by the prosthetic alignment,except for the tibial prosthetic alignment when femoral prosthesis was in valgus （P =0.153）.Conclusions：In conventional TKA,tibial side EM-guided resection may offer satisfactory postoperative alignment,and femoral resection relying on IM guide may lead to more undesirable results.Postoperative coronal alignment is mainly affected by the femoral resection.Therefore,femoral side operation should receive adequate attention from the surgeons.

Laparoscopic VS open hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM To perform a meta-analysis on laparoscopic hepatectomy VS conventional liver resection for treating hepatolithiasis.METHODS We conducted a systematic literature search on Pub Med,Embase,Web of Science and Cochrane Library,and undertook a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic hepatectomy V S conventional open liver resection for local hepatolithiasis in the left or right lobe. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes(time,estimated blood loss,blood transfusion rate,postoperative intestinal function recovery time,length of hospital stay,postoperative complication rate,initial residual stone,final residual stone and stone recurrence) were analyzed systematically.RESULTS A comprehensive literature search retrieved 16 publications with a total of 1329 cases. Meta-analysis of these studies showed that the laparoscopic approach for hepatolithiasis was associated with significantly less intraoperative estimated blood loss [weighted mean difference(WMD): 61.56,95% confidence interval(CI): 14.91-108.20,P = 0.01],lower blood transfusion rate [odds ratio(OR): 0.41,95%CI: 0.22-0.79,P = 0.008],shorter intestinal function recovery time(WMD: 0.98,95%CI: 0.47-1.48,P = 0.01),lower total postoperative complication rate(OR: 0.52,95%CI: 0.39-0.70,P < 0.0001) and shorter stay in hospital(WMD: 3.32,95%CI: 2.32-4.32,P < 0.00001). In addition,our results showed no significant differences between the two groups in operative time(WMD: 21.49,95%CI: 0.27-43.24,P = 0.05),residual stones(OR: 0.79,95%CI: 0.50-1.25,P = 0.31) and stone recurrence(OR: 0.34,95%CI: 0.11-1.08,P = 0.07). Furthermore,with subgroups analysis,our results proved that the laparoscopic approach for hepatolithiasis in the left lateral lobe and left side could achieve satisfactory therapeutic effects. CONCLUSION The laparoscopic approach is safe and effective,with less intraoperative estimated blood loss,fewer postoperative complications,reduced length of hospital stay and shorter intestinal function recovery time than with conventional approaches.