Objective:CDK4/6 inhibitors(CDK4/6is)in combination with endocrine therapy have secured a central role in the treatment of hormone receptor(HR)-positive advanced breast cancer(ABC)and have transformed the therapeutic ...Objective:CDK4/6 inhibitors(CDK4/6is)in combination with endocrine therapy have secured a central role in the treatment of hormone receptor(HR)-positive advanced breast cancer(ABC)and have transformed the therapeutic landscape.Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy in which another CDK4/6i is continued after progression on a prior CDK4/6i may still offer advantageous therapeutic effects.Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is an area of active investigation in the ongoing pursuit to improve outcomes for patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)–ABC.Methods:This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with HR+/HER2–ABC who were treated with cross-line CDK4/6is(abemaciclib,palbociclib,ribociclib,and dalpiciclib)after progression with another CDK4/6i.The primary endpoint was progression-free survival(PFS)according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.Secondary endpoints included toxicity,objective response rate,disease control rate,and overall survival.Adverse events(AEs)were graded according to version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events,as promulgated by the U.S.Department of Health and Human Services.Results:Eighty-two HR+/HER2–ABC patients who received cross-line CDK4/6i therapy from January 2022 to February 2024 were enrolled.The median age of the patients was 60 years.The median PFS of all patients was 7.6 months(95%CI,5.9-9.2).Cox regression analysis identified lung metastasis and a switch to endocrine therapy following prior CDK4/6i therapy as independent predictive factors for PFS.Notably,patients who previously received abemaciclib and switched to palbociclib upon disease progression had a median PFS of 10.7 months.The strategy of transitioning to chemotherapy after progression on a prior CDK4/6i,then to a subsequent CDK4/6i merits further investigation.Hematologic toxicity was the most common grade≥3 AEs.No instances of fatal safety events were observed.Conclusions:Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is associated with significant clinical benefits and manageable safety profiles in patients with HR+/HER2–ABC,which underscores cross-line CDK4/6i therapy potential as an effective treatment strategy.展开更多
This editorial introduces the potential of targeting macrophage function for diabetic cardiomyopathy(DCM)treatment by dipeptidyl peptidase-4(DPP-4)inhibitors.Zhang et al studied teneligliptin,a DPP-4 inhibitor used fo...This editorial introduces the potential of targeting macrophage function for diabetic cardiomyopathy(DCM)treatment by dipeptidyl peptidase-4(DPP-4)inhibitors.Zhang et al studied teneligliptin,a DPP-4 inhibitor used for diabetes management,and its potential cardioprotective effects in a diabetic mouse model.They suggested teneligliptin administration may reverse established markers of DCM,including cardiac hypertrophy and compromised function.It also inhibited the NLRP3 inflammasome and reduced inflammatory cytokine production in diabetic mice.Macrophages play crucial roles in DCM pathogenesis.Chronic hyperglycemia disturbs the balance between pro-inflammatory(M1)and antiinflammatory(M2)macrophages,favoring a pro-inflammatory state contributing to heart damage.Here,we highlight the potential of DPP-4 inhibitors to modulate macrophage function and promote an anti-inflammatory environment.These compounds may achieve this by elevating glucagon-like peptide-1 levels and potentially inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome.Further studies on teneligliptin in combination with other therapies targeting different aspects of DCM could be suggested for developing more effective treatment strategies to improve cardiovascular health in diabetic patients.展开更多
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists(GLP-1RAs)and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are commonly used treatments for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).Both anti-diabetic treatments function by playing ...Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists(GLP-1RAs)and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are commonly used treatments for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).Both anti-diabetic treatments function by playing key modulatory roles in the incretin system.Though these drugs have been deemed effective in treating T2DM,the Food and Drug Administration(FDA)and some members of the scientific community have questioned the safety of these therapeutics relative to important cardiovascular endpoints.As a result,since 2008,the FDA has required all new drugs for glycemic control in T2DM patients to demonstrate cardiovascular safety.The present review article strives to assess the safety and benefits of incretin-based therapy,a new class of antidiabetic drug,on the health of patient cardiovascular systems.In the process,this review will also provide a physiological overview of the incretin system and how key components function in T2DM.展开更多
目的对比胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂分别联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效及对其血清抗氧因子、炎症因子的影响。方法将2020年5月至2022年5月中国中医科学院广安门医院南区收治的120例T2DM患...目的对比胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂分别联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效及对其血清抗氧因子、炎症因子的影响。方法将2020年5月至2022年5月中国中医科学院广安门医院南区收治的120例T2DM患者纳入本次前瞻性研究,采用随机数字表法分成GLP-1联合组(n=40)、DPP-4联合组(n=40)和对照组(n=40)。GLP-1联合组患者治疗方案为二甲双胍治疗+利拉鲁肽,DPP-4联合组患者治疗方案为二甲双胍+沙格列汀,对照组患者仅口服二甲双胍治疗。治疗为期6个月。比较3组患者治疗前后的血糖相关指标[空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)]及胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)、氧化应激指标[超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和6-酮-前列环素F1α(6-Keto-PGF1α)]和炎症因子[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)]表达情况。结果GLP-1联合组治疗后的空腹血糖、2 hPPG、HbA1c和HOMA-IR分别为(5.05±0.69)mmol/L、(7.42±0.98)mmol/L、(6.11±0.70)%和(3.20±0.45),DPP-4联合组分别为(5.58±0.61)mmol/L、(8.09±1.04)mmol/L、(6.65±0.76)%和(3.78±0.50),对照组分别为(6.50±0.75)mmol/L、(10.14±1.22)mmol/L、(7.80±0.81)%和(4.61±0.59),GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的上述血糖相关指标及HOMA-IR均较对照组显著下降,且GLP-1联合组显著低于DPP-4联合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GLP-1联合组治疗后的SOD和6-Keto-PGF1α分别为(95.09±9.97)U/mL、(76.19±6.80)ng/L,DPP-4联合组分别为(85.17±10.18)U/mL、(67.32±6.39)ng/L,对照组分别为(76.89±9.06)U/mL、(60.46±6.02)ng/L,GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的血清SOD、6-Keto-PGF1α均较对照组显著上升,且GLP-1联合组血清SOD、6-Keto-PGF1α均较DPP-4联合组显著上升,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GLP-1联合组TNF-α、IL-6和hs-CRP分别为(7.05±1.16)ng/L、(5.01±1.35)pg/mL、(4.04±0.51)mg/L,DPP-4联合组为(7.93±1.29)ng/L、(5.97±1.40)pg/mL、(4.99±0.59)mg/L,对照组为(10.34±1.58)ng/L、(7.58±1.49)pg/mL、(5.94±0.64)mg/L,GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的上述血清炎症因子均较对照组显著下降,且GLP-1联合组显著低于DPP-4联合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论GLP-1受体激动剂联合二甲双胍治疗T2DM的降糖效果优于DPP-4受体抑制剂联合二甲双胍,在改善胰岛素抵抗和氧化应激,降低炎症反应方面同样优于DPP-4受体抑制剂联合二甲双胍治疗。展开更多
[目的]探讨二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP-4i)对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血清肌酐(Cr)的影响。[方法]系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库,纳入DPP-4i治疗T2DM患者调节Cr的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用固定效应或随机效应...[目的]探讨二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP-4i)对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血清肌酐(Cr)的影响。[方法]系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库,纳入DPP-4i治疗T2DM患者调节Cr的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用固定效应或随机效应模型进行数据拟合,采用I^(2)指数定量评价异质性,使用标准方法进行敏感性分析和发表偏倚检验。[结果]经系统检索数据库,纳入12项RCT,共计2276名受试者。由于潜在异质性的原因,故采用随机效应模型进行数据拟合,DPP-4i治疗可轻度提高T2DM患者的Cr水平(WMD:0.15 mg/L,95%CI:0.03~0.27,I^(2)=18%,P=0.02),结果具有统计学差异。根据敏感性测试,Meta分析其结果较为可靠。同时进行Begg’s与Egger’s检验,未见发表偏倚。[结论]T2DM患者应用DPP-4i进行降糖治疗,可能会出现血Cr水平轻度升高。未来还需开展更大样本量的多中心研究,以进一步探讨DPP-4i治疗引起Cr水平改变的临床意义。展开更多
基金supported by grants from the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences[CIFMS](Grant Nos.2021-I2M-1-014 and 2022-I2M-2-002).
文摘Objective:CDK4/6 inhibitors(CDK4/6is)in combination with endocrine therapy have secured a central role in the treatment of hormone receptor(HR)-positive advanced breast cancer(ABC)and have transformed the therapeutic landscape.Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy in which another CDK4/6i is continued after progression on a prior CDK4/6i may still offer advantageous therapeutic effects.Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is an area of active investigation in the ongoing pursuit to improve outcomes for patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2(HER2)–ABC.Methods:This retrospective study enrolled 82 patients with HR+/HER2–ABC who were treated with cross-line CDK4/6is(abemaciclib,palbociclib,ribociclib,and dalpiciclib)after progression with another CDK4/6i.The primary endpoint was progression-free survival(PFS)according to version 1.1 of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.Secondary endpoints included toxicity,objective response rate,disease control rate,and overall survival.Adverse events(AEs)were graded according to version 5.0 of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events,as promulgated by the U.S.Department of Health and Human Services.Results:Eighty-two HR+/HER2–ABC patients who received cross-line CDK4/6i therapy from January 2022 to February 2024 were enrolled.The median age of the patients was 60 years.The median PFS of all patients was 7.6 months(95%CI,5.9-9.2).Cox regression analysis identified lung metastasis and a switch to endocrine therapy following prior CDK4/6i therapy as independent predictive factors for PFS.Notably,patients who previously received abemaciclib and switched to palbociclib upon disease progression had a median PFS of 10.7 months.The strategy of transitioning to chemotherapy after progression on a prior CDK4/6i,then to a subsequent CDK4/6i merits further investigation.Hematologic toxicity was the most common grade≥3 AEs.No instances of fatal safety events were observed.Conclusions:Cross-line CDK4/6i therapy is associated with significant clinical benefits and manageable safety profiles in patients with HR+/HER2–ABC,which underscores cross-line CDK4/6i therapy potential as an effective treatment strategy.
文摘This editorial introduces the potential of targeting macrophage function for diabetic cardiomyopathy(DCM)treatment by dipeptidyl peptidase-4(DPP-4)inhibitors.Zhang et al studied teneligliptin,a DPP-4 inhibitor used for diabetes management,and its potential cardioprotective effects in a diabetic mouse model.They suggested teneligliptin administration may reverse established markers of DCM,including cardiac hypertrophy and compromised function.It also inhibited the NLRP3 inflammasome and reduced inflammatory cytokine production in diabetic mice.Macrophages play crucial roles in DCM pathogenesis.Chronic hyperglycemia disturbs the balance between pro-inflammatory(M1)and antiinflammatory(M2)macrophages,favoring a pro-inflammatory state contributing to heart damage.Here,we highlight the potential of DPP-4 inhibitors to modulate macrophage function and promote an anti-inflammatory environment.These compounds may achieve this by elevating glucagon-like peptide-1 levels and potentially inhibiting the NLRP3 inflammasome.Further studies on teneligliptin in combination with other therapies targeting different aspects of DCM could be suggested for developing more effective treatment strategies to improve cardiovascular health in diabetic patients.
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(81974254,31870906,and 82170470)。
文摘Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists(GLP-1RAs)and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are commonly used treatments for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM).Both anti-diabetic treatments function by playing key modulatory roles in the incretin system.Though these drugs have been deemed effective in treating T2DM,the Food and Drug Administration(FDA)and some members of the scientific community have questioned the safety of these therapeutics relative to important cardiovascular endpoints.As a result,since 2008,the FDA has required all new drugs for glycemic control in T2DM patients to demonstrate cardiovascular safety.The present review article strives to assess the safety and benefits of incretin-based therapy,a new class of antidiabetic drug,on the health of patient cardiovascular systems.In the process,this review will also provide a physiological overview of the incretin system and how key components function in T2DM.
文摘目的对比胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂和二肽基肽酶-4(DPP-4)抑制剂分别联合二甲双胍治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效及对其血清抗氧因子、炎症因子的影响。方法将2020年5月至2022年5月中国中医科学院广安门医院南区收治的120例T2DM患者纳入本次前瞻性研究,采用随机数字表法分成GLP-1联合组(n=40)、DPP-4联合组(n=40)和对照组(n=40)。GLP-1联合组患者治疗方案为二甲双胍治疗+利拉鲁肽,DPP-4联合组患者治疗方案为二甲双胍+沙格列汀,对照组患者仅口服二甲双胍治疗。治疗为期6个月。比较3组患者治疗前后的血糖相关指标[空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖(2 h PPG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)]及胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)、氧化应激指标[超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和6-酮-前列环素F1α(6-Keto-PGF1α)]和炎症因子[肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)和超敏C反应蛋白(hs-CRP)]表达情况。结果GLP-1联合组治疗后的空腹血糖、2 hPPG、HbA1c和HOMA-IR分别为(5.05±0.69)mmol/L、(7.42±0.98)mmol/L、(6.11±0.70)%和(3.20±0.45),DPP-4联合组分别为(5.58±0.61)mmol/L、(8.09±1.04)mmol/L、(6.65±0.76)%和(3.78±0.50),对照组分别为(6.50±0.75)mmol/L、(10.14±1.22)mmol/L、(7.80±0.81)%和(4.61±0.59),GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的上述血糖相关指标及HOMA-IR均较对照组显著下降,且GLP-1联合组显著低于DPP-4联合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GLP-1联合组治疗后的SOD和6-Keto-PGF1α分别为(95.09±9.97)U/mL、(76.19±6.80)ng/L,DPP-4联合组分别为(85.17±10.18)U/mL、(67.32±6.39)ng/L,对照组分别为(76.89±9.06)U/mL、(60.46±6.02)ng/L,GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的血清SOD、6-Keto-PGF1α均较对照组显著上升,且GLP-1联合组血清SOD、6-Keto-PGF1α均较DPP-4联合组显著上升,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GLP-1联合组TNF-α、IL-6和hs-CRP分别为(7.05±1.16)ng/L、(5.01±1.35)pg/mL、(4.04±0.51)mg/L,DPP-4联合组为(7.93±1.29)ng/L、(5.97±1.40)pg/mL、(4.99±0.59)mg/L,对照组为(10.34±1.58)ng/L、(7.58±1.49)pg/mL、(5.94±0.64)mg/L,GLP-1联合组与DPP-4联合组治疗后的上述血清炎症因子均较对照组显著下降,且GLP-1联合组显著低于DPP-4联合组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论GLP-1受体激动剂联合二甲双胍治疗T2DM的降糖效果优于DPP-4受体抑制剂联合二甲双胍,在改善胰岛素抵抗和氧化应激,降低炎症反应方面同样优于DPP-4受体抑制剂联合二甲双胍治疗。
文摘[目的]探讨二肽基肽酶4抑制剂(DPP-4i)对2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者血清肌酐(Cr)的影响。[方法]系统检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库,纳入DPP-4i治疗T2DM患者调节Cr的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用固定效应或随机效应模型进行数据拟合,采用I^(2)指数定量评价异质性,使用标准方法进行敏感性分析和发表偏倚检验。[结果]经系统检索数据库,纳入12项RCT,共计2276名受试者。由于潜在异质性的原因,故采用随机效应模型进行数据拟合,DPP-4i治疗可轻度提高T2DM患者的Cr水平(WMD:0.15 mg/L,95%CI:0.03~0.27,I^(2)=18%,P=0.02),结果具有统计学差异。根据敏感性测试,Meta分析其结果较为可靠。同时进行Begg’s与Egger’s检验,未见发表偏倚。[结论]T2DM患者应用DPP-4i进行降糖治疗,可能会出现血Cr水平轻度升高。未来还需开展更大样本量的多中心研究,以进一步探讨DPP-4i治疗引起Cr水平改变的临床意义。
