Objective： Combined overall survival （OS） analysis of Lux-Lung 3 and Lux-Lung 6 demonstrated that patients with epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） exon 19 deletions （Del19） would benefit from first-line se...Objective： Combined overall survival （OS） analysis of Lux-Lung 3 and Lux-Lung 6 demonstrated that patients with epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） exon 19 deletions （Del19） would benefit from first-line second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors （TKIs） afatinib but not for those with L858R. This study was to investigate the survival difference between first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy in patients with either Del19 or L858R, and to directly compare OS in these two mutation groups. Methods： Eligibles were all prospective and retrospective studies comparing EGFR-TKIs with conventional chemotherapy or receiving single agent EGFR-TKIs and demonstrating survival analysis based on mutation types. The primary outcome was OS measured as pooled hazard ratios （HRs）. All measures were pooled using random- effects models and 95% confidential interval （95% CI） was calculated. Results： A total of 14 studies incorporating 1,706 patients with either Del19 or L858R were included. Enrolling patients with Del19 or L858R in randomized controlled trials （RCTs）, first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs were associated with no OS benefit, compared with chemotherapy （pooled HR_TKI/Chemo for Del19： 0.82, 95% CI： 0.64- 1.06, P=0.14; pooled HR_TKI/Chemo for L858R： 1.15, 95% CI： 0.85-1.56, P=0.38）. Direct comparison of Del19 with L858R receiving with first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated no significant survival difference （pooled HR19/21： 0.88, 95% CI： 0.67-1.16, P=0.37）. Conclusions： Among patients with advanced non-small cell hmg cancer （NSCLC） harboring Del19 and L858R, first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated no survival benefit comparing with chemotherapy. Direct comparison between Del19 and L858R revealed no significant survival difference after first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs.展开更多
Background:Epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) mutations,including a known exon 19 deletion(19 del) and exon 21 L858 R point mutation(L858R mutation),are strong predictors of the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase in...Background:Epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) mutations,including a known exon 19 deletion(19 del) and exon 21 L858 R point mutation(L858R mutation),are strong predictors of the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor(EGFR-TKI) treatment in lung adenocarcinoma.However,whether patients carrying EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations exhibit different responsiveness to EGFR-TKls and what are the potential mechanism for this difference remain controversial.This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of EGFR-TKI treatment in patients with EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations and explore the genetic heterogeneity of tumors with the two mutation subtypes.Methods:Of 1127 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR 19 del or L858 R mutations,532 received EGFR-TKI treatment and were included in this study.EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations were detected by using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography(DHPLC).T790 M mutation,which is a common resistant mutation on exon 20 of EGFR,was detected by amplification refractory mutation system(ARMS).Next-generation sequencing(NGS) was used to explore the genetic heterogeneity of tumors with EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations.Results:Of the 532 patients,319(60.0%) had EGFR 19 del,and 213(40.0%) had L858 R mutations.The patients with EGFR 19 del presented a significantly higher overall response rate(ORR) for EGFR-TKI treatment(55.2%vs.43.7%,P = 0.017) and had a longer progression-free survival(PFS) after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment(14.4 vs.11.4 months,P = 0.034) compared with those with L858 R mutations.However,no statistically significant difference in overall survival(OS) was observed between the two groups of patients.T790 M mutation status was analyzed in 88 patients before EGFR-TKI treatment and 134 after EGFR-TKI treatment,and there was no significant difference in the co-existence of T790 M mutation with EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations before EGFR-TKI treatment(5.6%vs.8.8%,P = 0.554)or after treatment(24.4%vs.35.4%,P = 0.176).In addition,24 patients with EGFR 19 del and 19 with L858 R mutations were analyzed by NGS,and no significant difference in the presence of multiple somatic mutations was observed between the two genotypes.Conclusions:Patients with EGFR 19 del exhibit longer PFS and higher ORR compared with those with L858 R mutations.Whether the heterogeneity of tumors with EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations contribute to a therapeutic response difference needs further investigation.展开更多
目的比较一代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)联合化疗对两种表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)经典突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。方法选取2017年4月至2019年12月郑州大学第一附属医院肿瘤科收治的34例EGFR经典突变的晚期NSCLC患...目的比较一代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)联合化疗对两种表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)经典突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。方法选取2017年4月至2019年12月郑州大学第一附属医院肿瘤科收治的34例EGFR经典突变的晚期NSCLC患者。患者均接受一代EGFR-TKIs联合化疗治疗。按基因突变种类将患者分为两组,即EGFR基因19外显子缺失突变(19Del突变)为A组(18例),EGFR基因21外显子L858R点突变(21L858R突变)为B组(16例)。研究的主要终点为中位无进展生存时间(PFS)和1 a PFS率,次要终点为客观缓解率(ORR)。比较两组不良反应。结果治疗后,B组ORR[25.0%(4/16)]较A组[88.9%(16/18)]低(P<0.05)。B组1 a PFS率[25.0%(4/16)]与A组[44.4%(8/18)]比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组中位PFS短于A组(P<0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论接受一代EGFR-TKIs联合化疗治疗的EGFR基因19Del突变的NSCLC患者较EGFR基因21L858R突变患者的PFS更长。展开更多
文摘Objective： Combined overall survival （OS） analysis of Lux-Lung 3 and Lux-Lung 6 demonstrated that patients with epidermal growth factor receptor （EGFR） exon 19 deletions （Del19） would benefit from first-line second generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors （TKIs） afatinib but not for those with L858R. This study was to investigate the survival difference between first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs and chemotherapy in patients with either Del19 or L858R, and to directly compare OS in these two mutation groups. Methods： Eligibles were all prospective and retrospective studies comparing EGFR-TKIs with conventional chemotherapy or receiving single agent EGFR-TKIs and demonstrating survival analysis based on mutation types. The primary outcome was OS measured as pooled hazard ratios （HRs）. All measures were pooled using random- effects models and 95% confidential interval （95% CI） was calculated. Results： A total of 14 studies incorporating 1,706 patients with either Del19 or L858R were included. Enrolling patients with Del19 or L858R in randomized controlled trials （RCTs）, first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs were associated with no OS benefit, compared with chemotherapy （pooled HR_TKI/Chemo for Del19： 0.82, 95% CI： 0.64- 1.06, P=0.14; pooled HR_TKI/Chemo for L858R： 1.15, 95% CI： 0.85-1.56, P=0.38）. Direct comparison of Del19 with L858R receiving with first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated no significant survival difference （pooled HR19/21： 0.88, 95% CI： 0.67-1.16, P=0.37）. Conclusions： Among patients with advanced non-small cell hmg cancer （NSCLC） harboring Del19 and L858R, first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs demonstrated no survival benefit comparing with chemotherapy. Direct comparison between Del19 and L858R revealed no significant survival difference after first-line first generation EGFR-TKIs.
基金supported by grants from the National Natural Sciences Foundation Key Program(No.81330062)Education Ministry Innovative Research Team Program(No.IRT13003)+1 种基金Peking University-Tsinghua University Joint Center for Life Sciences Clinical Investigator,National High Technology Research and Development Program 863(No.SS2015AA020403)Beijing Technology Project(No.Z141100000214013)
文摘Background:Epidermal growth factor receptor(EGFR) mutations,including a known exon 19 deletion(19 del) and exon 21 L858 R point mutation(L858R mutation),are strong predictors of the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor(EGFR-TKI) treatment in lung adenocarcinoma.However,whether patients carrying EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations exhibit different responsiveness to EGFR-TKls and what are the potential mechanism for this difference remain controversial.This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of EGFR-TKI treatment in patients with EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations and explore the genetic heterogeneity of tumors with the two mutation subtypes.Methods:Of 1127 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma harboring EGFR 19 del or L858 R mutations,532 received EGFR-TKI treatment and were included in this study.EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations were detected by using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography(DHPLC).T790 M mutation,which is a common resistant mutation on exon 20 of EGFR,was detected by amplification refractory mutation system(ARMS).Next-generation sequencing(NGS) was used to explore the genetic heterogeneity of tumors with EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations.Results:Of the 532 patients,319(60.0%) had EGFR 19 del,and 213(40.0%) had L858 R mutations.The patients with EGFR 19 del presented a significantly higher overall response rate(ORR) for EGFR-TKI treatment(55.2%vs.43.7%,P = 0.017) and had a longer progression-free survival(PFS) after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment(14.4 vs.11.4 months,P = 0.034) compared with those with L858 R mutations.However,no statistically significant difference in overall survival(OS) was observed between the two groups of patients.T790 M mutation status was analyzed in 88 patients before EGFR-TKI treatment and 134 after EGFR-TKI treatment,and there was no significant difference in the co-existence of T790 M mutation with EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations before EGFR-TKI treatment(5.6%vs.8.8%,P = 0.554)or after treatment(24.4%vs.35.4%,P = 0.176).In addition,24 patients with EGFR 19 del and 19 with L858 R mutations were analyzed by NGS,and no significant difference in the presence of multiple somatic mutations was observed between the two genotypes.Conclusions:Patients with EGFR 19 del exhibit longer PFS and higher ORR compared with those with L858 R mutations.Whether the heterogeneity of tumors with EGFR 19 del and L858 R mutations contribute to a therapeutic response difference needs further investigation.
文摘目的比较一代表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(EGFR-TKIs)联合化疗对两种表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)经典突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效。方法选取2017年4月至2019年12月郑州大学第一附属医院肿瘤科收治的34例EGFR经典突变的晚期NSCLC患者。患者均接受一代EGFR-TKIs联合化疗治疗。按基因突变种类将患者分为两组,即EGFR基因19外显子缺失突变(19Del突变)为A组(18例),EGFR基因21外显子L858R点突变(21L858R突变)为B组(16例)。研究的主要终点为中位无进展生存时间(PFS)和1 a PFS率,次要终点为客观缓解率(ORR)。比较两组不良反应。结果治疗后,B组ORR[25.0%(4/16)]较A组[88.9%(16/18)]低(P<0.05)。B组1 a PFS率[25.0%(4/16)]与A组[44.4%(8/18)]比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组中位PFS短于A组(P<0.05)。两组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论接受一代EGFR-TKIs联合化疗治疗的EGFR基因19Del突变的NSCLC患者较EGFR基因21L858R突变患者的PFS更长。
