AIM： To evaluate the patterns of use of clarithromycin for gastrointestinal disease treatment and promote its rational use.METHODS： Using a structured pro forma, we conducted a two-month survey of the electronic pre...AIM： To evaluate the patterns of use of clarithromycin for gastrointestinal disease treatment and promote its rational use.METHODS： Using a structured pro forma, we conducted a two-month survey of the electronic prescriptions containing immediate-release （IR） or sustained-release （SR） product of clarithromycin for outpatients with gastrointestinal diseases in a 2200-bed general hospital. Suitability of the prescription was audited retrospectively. RESULTS： One hundred and sixty-four prescriptions of SR product and 110 prescriptions of IR product were prescribed for gastrointestinal disease treatment. Among prescriptions for anti-Helicobacter pylori （H pylori） therapy, triple therapy take the dominant position （91.8%）, followed by quadruple therapy （4.3%） and dual therapy （3.9%）. Amoxicillin was the most frequently co-prescribed antibiotic.Furazolidone and levofloxacin are used more widely than metronidazole or tinidazole. Clarithromycin SR was administered at inappropriate time points in all prescriptions. Fifty percent of all prescriptions of clarithromycin SR, and 6.4% of prescriptions of clarithromycin IR, were prescribed at inappropriate dosing intervals. Surprisingly, disconcordance between diagnoses and indications was observed in all prescriptions of clarithromycin SR which has not been approved for treating Hpy/ori infection although off-label use for this purpose was reported in literature. On the contrary, only one prescription （0.9%） of clarithromycin IR was prescribed for unapproved indication （i.e. gastro-oesophageal reflux disease）. 1.4% of prescriptions for chronic gastritis or peptic ulcer treatment were irrational in that clarithromycin was not co-prescribed with gastric acid inhibitors. Clinical significant CYP3A based drug interactions with clarithromycin were identified. CONCLUSION： There is a great scope to improve the quality of clarithromycin prescribing in patients with gastrointestinal disease, especially with regard to administration schedule, concordance between indications and diagnoses and management of drug interactions.展开更多
基金Zhejiang Provincial Bureau of Education,No.20070227Zhejiang Medical Association,No.2007ZYC18Association of Zhejiang Hospital Administration,No.2007AZHA-KEB312
文摘AIM： To evaluate the patterns of use of clarithromycin for gastrointestinal disease treatment and promote its rational use.METHODS： Using a structured pro forma, we conducted a two-month survey of the electronic prescriptions containing immediate-release （IR） or sustained-release （SR） product of clarithromycin for outpatients with gastrointestinal diseases in a 2200-bed general hospital. Suitability of the prescription was audited retrospectively. RESULTS： One hundred and sixty-four prescriptions of SR product and 110 prescriptions of IR product were prescribed for gastrointestinal disease treatment. Among prescriptions for anti-Helicobacter pylori （H pylori） therapy, triple therapy take the dominant position （91.8%）, followed by quadruple therapy （4.3%） and dual therapy （3.9%）. Amoxicillin was the most frequently co-prescribed antibiotic.Furazolidone and levofloxacin are used more widely than metronidazole or tinidazole. Clarithromycin SR was administered at inappropriate time points in all prescriptions. Fifty percent of all prescriptions of clarithromycin SR, and 6.4% of prescriptions of clarithromycin IR, were prescribed at inappropriate dosing intervals. Surprisingly, disconcordance between diagnoses and indications was observed in all prescriptions of clarithromycin SR which has not been approved for treating Hpy/ori infection although off-label use for this purpose was reported in literature. On the contrary, only one prescription （0.9%） of clarithromycin IR was prescribed for unapproved indication （i.e. gastro-oesophageal reflux disease）. 1.4% of prescriptions for chronic gastritis or peptic ulcer treatment were irrational in that clarithromycin was not co-prescribed with gastric acid inhibitors. Clinical significant CYP3A based drug interactions with clarithromycin were identified. CONCLUSION： There is a great scope to improve the quality of clarithromycin prescribing in patients with gastrointestinal disease, especially with regard to administration schedule, concordance between indications and diagnoses and management of drug interactions.
