BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)-induced rheumatic immune-related adverse events(ir AEs)have been infrequently reported,and the treatment of severe or refractory arthritis as ir AEs has not been established...BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)-induced rheumatic immune-related adverse events(ir AEs)have been infrequently reported,and the treatment of severe or refractory arthritis as ir AEs has not been established yet.CASE SUMMARY The patient was a 67-year-old man with a history of well-controlled foot psoriasis who presented with polyarthralgia.He had received pembrolizumab for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma 2 mo previously.Physical examination revealed erythematous swelling in the distal interphalangeal joints,left shoulder,and both knees.He had plaque psoriasis with psoriatic nail dystrophy and dactylitis in the distal joints of the fingers and toes.Inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were elevated but rheumatoid factor and anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody were negative.The patient was diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis(PsA)and started on methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/day after pembrolizumab discontinuation.However,despite 1 wk of methylprednisolone treatment,PsA worsened;hence,leflunomide and methotrexate were started.After 4 wk of steroid treatment,PsA worsened and improved repeatedly with steroid tapering.Therefore,the therapy was intensified to include etanercept,a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor,which ultimately resulted in adequate PsA control.CONCLUSION This is the first report of ICI-induced PsA in a gastric cancer patient.Some rheumatic ir AEs with refractory severe arthritis may require disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and long-term management.展开更多
Significant cellular senescence has been observed in cartilage harvested from patients with osteoarthritis(OA).In this study,we aim to develop a senescence-relevant OA-like cartilage model for developing disease-modif...Significant cellular senescence has been observed in cartilage harvested from patients with osteoarthritis(OA).In this study,we aim to develop a senescence-relevant OA-like cartilage model for developing disease-modifying OA drugs(DMOADs).Spe-cifically,human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells(MSCs)were expanded in vitro up to passage 10(P10-MSCs).Following their senescent phenotype formation,P10-MSCs were subjected to pellet culture in chondrogenic medium.Results from qRT-PCR,histology,and immunostaining indicated that cartilage generated from P10-MSCs displayed both senescent and OA-like phenotypes without using other OA-inducing agents,when compared to that from normal passage 4(P4)-MSCs.Interestingly,the same gene expression differences observed between P4-MSCs and P10-MSC-derived cartilage tissues were also observed between the preserved and damaged OA cartilage regions taken from human samples,as demonstrated by RNA sequencing data and other analysis methods.Lastly,the utility of this senescence-initiated OA-like cartilage model in drug development was assessed by testing several potential DMOADs and senolytics.The results suggest that pre-existing cellular senescence can induce the generation of OA-like changes in cartilage.The P4-and P10-MSCs derived cartilage models also represent a novel platform for predicting the efficacy and toxicity of potential DMOADs on both preserved and damaged cartilage in humans.展开更多
A recent study published in World J Clin Cases addressed the optimal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs)for juvenile idiopathic arthritis(JIA).Herein,we outline the progress in drug therapy of JIA.NSAIDs hav...A recent study published in World J Clin Cases addressed the optimal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs)for juvenile idiopathic arthritis(JIA).Herein,we outline the progress in drug therapy of JIA.NSAIDs have traditionally been the primary treatment for all forms of JIA.NSAIDs are symptom-relief medications,and well tolerated by patients.Additionally,the availability of selective NSAIDs further lower the gastrointestinal adverse reactions compared with traditional NSAIDs.Glucocorticoid is another kind of symptom-relief medications with potent anti-inflammatory effect.However,the frequent adverse events limit the clinical use.Both NSAIDs and glucocorticoid fail to ease or pre-vent joint damage,and the breakthrough comes along with the disease-mo-difying antirheumatic drugs(DMARDs).DMARDs can prevent disease pro-gression and reduce joint destruction.Particularly,the emergence of biologic DMARDs(bDMARDs)has truly revolutionized the therapeutics of JIA,compared with conventional synthetic DMARDs.As a newly developed class of drugs,the places of most bDMARDs in the management of JIA remain to be well estab-lished.Nevertheless,the continuous evolution of bDMARDs raises hopes of improving long-term disease outcomes for JIA.展开更多
The systemic therapies available for the management of Psoriasis (PsO) patients who cannot be treated with more conservative options, such as topical agents and/or phototherapy, with the exception of acitretin, can wo...The systemic therapies available for the management of Psoriasis (PsO) patients who cannot be treated with more conservative options, such as topical agents and/or phototherapy, with the exception of acitretin, can worsen or reactivate a chronic infection. Therefore, before administering immunosuppressive therapies with either conventional disease-modifying drugs (cDMARDs) or biological ones (bDMARDs) it is mandatory to screen patients for some infections, including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). In particular, the patients eligible to receive an immunosuppressive drug must be screened for the following markers: antibody to hepatitis B core, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBsAg), HBsAg, and antibody to HCV (anti-HCV). In case HBV or HCV infection is diagnosed, a close collaboration with a consultant hepatologist is needed before and during an immunosuppressive therapy. Concerning therapy with immunosuppressive drugs in PsO patients with HBV or HCV infection, data exist mainly for cyclosporine a (CyA) or bDMARDs (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab). The natural history of HBV and HCV infection differs significantly as well as the effect of immunosuppression on the aforementioned infectious diseases. As a rule, in the case of active HBV infection, systemic immunosuppressive antipsoriatic therapies must be deferred until the infection is controlled with an adequate antiviral treatment. Inactive carriers need to receive antiviral prophylaxis 2-4 wk before starting immunosuppressive therapy, to be continued after 6-12 mo from its suspension. Due to the risk of HBV reactivation, these patients should be monitored monthly for the first 3 mo and then every 3 mo for HBV DNA load together with transaminases levels. Concerning the patients who are occult HBV carriers, the risk of HBV reactivation is very low. Therefore, these patients generally do not need antiviral prophylaxis and the sera HBsAg and transaminases dosing can be monitored every 3 mo. Concerning PsO patients with chronic HCV infection their management with immunosuppressive drugs is less problematic as compared to those infected by HBV. In fact, HCV reactivation is an extremely rare event after administration of drugs such as CyA or tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. As a rule, these patients can be monitored measuring HCV RNA load, and ALT, aspartate transaminase, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin and platelet every 3-6 mo. The present article provides an updated overview based on more recently reported data on monitoring and managing PsO patients who need systemic antipsoriatic treatment and have HBV or HCV infection as comorbidity.展开更多
AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness of the biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs(b DMARD) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis through a systematic review of observational studies.METHODS:The studies were...AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness of the biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs(b DMARD) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis through a systematic review of observational studies.METHODS:The studies were searched in the Pub Med,EMBASE,Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and LILACS databases(until August 2014),in the grey literature and conducted a manual search.The assessed criteria of effectiveness included the EULAR,the disease activity score(DAS),the Clinical Disease Activity Index,the Simplified Disease Activity Index,the American College of Rheumatology and the Health Assessment Questionnaire.The meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.2 software using a random effects model.A total of 35 studies were included in this review.RESULTS:The participants anti-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors(TNF) nave,who used adalimumab(P = 0.0002) and etanercept(P = 0.0006) exhibited greater good EULAR response compared to the participants who used infliximab.No difference was detected between adalimumab and etanercept(P = 0.05).The participants who used etanercept exhibited greater remission according to DAS28 compared to the participants who used infliximab(P = 0.01).No differences were detected between adalimumab and infliximab(P = 0.12) or etanercept(P = 0.79).Better results were obtained with b DMARD associated with methotrexate than with b DMARD alone.The good EULAR response and DAS 28 was better for combination with methotrexate than b DMARD monotherapy(P = 0.03 e P < 0.00001).In cases of therapeutic failure,the participants who used rituximab exhibited greater DAS28 reduction compared to those who used anti-TNF agents(P = 0.0002).The participants who used etanercept achieved greater good EULAR response compared to those who did not use that drug(P = 0.007).Studies that assessed reduction of the CDAI score indicated the superiority of abatacept over rituximab(12.4 vs +1.7) and anti-TNF agents(7.6 vs 8.3).The present systematic review with meta-analysis found that relative to anti-TNF treatmentnave patients,adalimumab and etanercept were more effective when combined with methotrexate than when used alone.Furthermore,in case of therapeutic failure with anti-TNF agents;rituximab and abatacept(non anti-TNF) and etanercept(as second anti-TNF) were more effective.However,more studies of effectiveness were found for the rituximab.CONCLUSION:The best treatment for treatment-nave patients is adalimumab or etanercept combined with methotrexate.For anti-TNF therapeutic failure,the best choice is rituximab,abatacept or etanercept.展开更多
Osteoarthritis(OA) is the most common type of arthritis found in the United States' population and is also the most common disease of joints in adults throughout the world with the knee being the most frequently a...Osteoarthritis(OA) is the most common type of arthritis found in the United States' population and is also the most common disease of joints in adults throughout the world with the knee being the most frequently affected of all joints. As the United States' population ages along with the increasing trends in obesity prevalence in other parts of the world, it is expected that the burden of OA on the population, healthcare system, and overall economy will continue to increase in the future without making major improvements in managing knee OA. Numerous therapies aim to reduce symptoms of knee OA and continued research has helped to further understand the complex pathophysiology of its disease mechanism attempting to uncover new potential targets for the treatment of OA. This review article seeks to evaluate the current practices for managing knee OA and discusses emerging therapies on the horizon. These practices include non-pharmacological treatments such as providing patient education and self-management strategies, advising weight loss, strengthening programs, and addressing biomechanical issues with bracing or foot orthoses. Oral analgesics and anti-inflammatories are pharmacologicals that are commonly used and the literature overall supports that some of these medications can be helpful for managing knee OA in the short-term but are less effective for long-term management. Additionally, more prolonged use significantly increases the risk of serious associated side effects that are not too uncommon. Diseasemodifying osteoarthritis drugs are being researched as a treatment modality to potentially halt or slow disease progression but data at this time is limited and continued studies are being conducted to further investigate their effectiveness. Intra-articular injectables are also implemented to manage knee OA ranging from corticosteroids to hyaluronans to more recently plateletrich plasma and even stem cells while several other injection therapies are presently being studied. The goal of developing new treatment strategies for knee OA is to prolong the need for total knee arthroplasty which should be utilized only if other strategies have failed. High tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are potential alternatives if only a single compartment is involved with more data supporting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as a good treatment option in this scenario. Arthroscopy has been commonly used for many years to treat knee OA to address degenerative articular cartilage and menisci, however, several high-quality studies have shown that it is not a very effective treatment for the majority of cases and should generally not be considered when managing knee OA. Improving the management of knee OA requires a multi-faceted treatment approach along with continuing to broaden our understanding of this complex disease so that therapeutic advancements can continue to be developed with the goal of preventing further disease progression and even potentially reversing the degenerative process.展开更多
A multidisciplinary approach is required to care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis(RA)in the perioperative period.In preparation for surgery,patients must have a cardiovascular risk assessment performed due to th...A multidisciplinary approach is required to care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis(RA)in the perioperative period.In preparation for surgery,patients must have a cardiovascular risk assessment performed due to the high risk of heart disease in patients with RA.Treatment of RA is with immunomodulatory medications,which present unique challenges for the perioperative period.Currently,there is no consensus on how to manage disease modifying antirheumatic drug(DMARD)therapy in the perioperative setting.Much of the data to guide therapy is based on retrospective cohort data.Choices regarding DMARDs require an individualized approach with collaboration between surgeons and rheumatologists.Consensus regarding biologic therapy is to hold the therapy in the perioperative period with the length of time dictated by the half-life of the medication.Special attention is required at the time of surgery for potential need for stress dose steroids.Further,there must be close communication with anesthesiologists in terms of airway management particularly in light of the risk for cervical spine disease.There are no consensus guidelines regarding the requirement for cervical spine radiographs prior to surgery.However,history and exam alone cannot be relied upon toidentify cervical spine disease.Patients with RA who undergo joint replacement arthroplasty are at higher risk for infection and dislocation compared to patients with osteoarthritis,necessitating particular vigilance in postoperative follow up.This review summarizes available evidence regarding perioperative management of patients with RA.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor(ICI)-induced rheumatic immune-related adverse events(ir AEs)have been infrequently reported,and the treatment of severe or refractory arthritis as ir AEs has not been established yet.CASE SUMMARY The patient was a 67-year-old man with a history of well-controlled foot psoriasis who presented with polyarthralgia.He had received pembrolizumab for metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma 2 mo previously.Physical examination revealed erythematous swelling in the distal interphalangeal joints,left shoulder,and both knees.He had plaque psoriasis with psoriatic nail dystrophy and dactylitis in the distal joints of the fingers and toes.Inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were elevated but rheumatoid factor and anticyclic citrullinated peptide antibody were negative.The patient was diagnosed with psoriatic arthritis(PsA)and started on methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg/day after pembrolizumab discontinuation.However,despite 1 wk of methylprednisolone treatment,PsA worsened;hence,leflunomide and methotrexate were started.After 4 wk of steroid treatment,PsA worsened and improved repeatedly with steroid tapering.Therefore,the therapy was intensified to include etanercept,a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor,which ultimately resulted in adequate PsA control.CONCLUSION This is the first report of ICI-induced PsA in a gastric cancer patient.Some rheumatic ir AEs with refractory severe arthritis may require disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and long-term management.
文摘Significant cellular senescence has been observed in cartilage harvested from patients with osteoarthritis(OA).In this study,we aim to develop a senescence-relevant OA-like cartilage model for developing disease-modifying OA drugs(DMOADs).Spe-cifically,human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells(MSCs)were expanded in vitro up to passage 10(P10-MSCs).Following their senescent phenotype formation,P10-MSCs were subjected to pellet culture in chondrogenic medium.Results from qRT-PCR,histology,and immunostaining indicated that cartilage generated from P10-MSCs displayed both senescent and OA-like phenotypes without using other OA-inducing agents,when compared to that from normal passage 4(P4)-MSCs.Interestingly,the same gene expression differences observed between P4-MSCs and P10-MSC-derived cartilage tissues were also observed between the preserved and damaged OA cartilage regions taken from human samples,as demonstrated by RNA sequencing data and other analysis methods.Lastly,the utility of this senescence-initiated OA-like cartilage model in drug development was assessed by testing several potential DMOADs and senolytics.The results suggest that pre-existing cellular senescence can induce the generation of OA-like changes in cartilage.The P4-and P10-MSCs derived cartilage models also represent a novel platform for predicting the efficacy and toxicity of potential DMOADs on both preserved and damaged cartilage in humans.
文摘A recent study published in World J Clin Cases addressed the optimal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs(NSAIDs)for juvenile idiopathic arthritis(JIA).Herein,we outline the progress in drug therapy of JIA.NSAIDs have traditionally been the primary treatment for all forms of JIA.NSAIDs are symptom-relief medications,and well tolerated by patients.Additionally,the availability of selective NSAIDs further lower the gastrointestinal adverse reactions compared with traditional NSAIDs.Glucocorticoid is another kind of symptom-relief medications with potent anti-inflammatory effect.However,the frequent adverse events limit the clinical use.Both NSAIDs and glucocorticoid fail to ease or pre-vent joint damage,and the breakthrough comes along with the disease-mo-difying antirheumatic drugs(DMARDs).DMARDs can prevent disease pro-gression and reduce joint destruction.Particularly,the emergence of biologic DMARDs(bDMARDs)has truly revolutionized the therapeutics of JIA,compared with conventional synthetic DMARDs.As a newly developed class of drugs,the places of most bDMARDs in the management of JIA remain to be well estab-lished.Nevertheless,the continuous evolution of bDMARDs raises hopes of improving long-term disease outcomes for JIA.
文摘The systemic therapies available for the management of Psoriasis (PsO) patients who cannot be treated with more conservative options, such as topical agents and/or phototherapy, with the exception of acitretin, can worsen or reactivate a chronic infection. Therefore, before administering immunosuppressive therapies with either conventional disease-modifying drugs (cDMARDs) or biological ones (bDMARDs) it is mandatory to screen patients for some infections, including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). In particular, the patients eligible to receive an immunosuppressive drug must be screened for the following markers: antibody to hepatitis B core, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBsAg), HBsAg, and antibody to HCV (anti-HCV). In case HBV or HCV infection is diagnosed, a close collaboration with a consultant hepatologist is needed before and during an immunosuppressive therapy. Concerning therapy with immunosuppressive drugs in PsO patients with HBV or HCV infection, data exist mainly for cyclosporine a (CyA) or bDMARDs (etanercept, adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab). The natural history of HBV and HCV infection differs significantly as well as the effect of immunosuppression on the aforementioned infectious diseases. As a rule, in the case of active HBV infection, systemic immunosuppressive antipsoriatic therapies must be deferred until the infection is controlled with an adequate antiviral treatment. Inactive carriers need to receive antiviral prophylaxis 2-4 wk before starting immunosuppressive therapy, to be continued after 6-12 mo from its suspension. Due to the risk of HBV reactivation, these patients should be monitored monthly for the first 3 mo and then every 3 mo for HBV DNA load together with transaminases levels. Concerning the patients who are occult HBV carriers, the risk of HBV reactivation is very low. Therefore, these patients generally do not need antiviral prophylaxis and the sera HBsAg and transaminases dosing can be monitored every 3 mo. Concerning PsO patients with chronic HCV infection their management with immunosuppressive drugs is less problematic as compared to those infected by HBV. In fact, HCV reactivation is an extremely rare event after administration of drugs such as CyA or tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. As a rule, these patients can be monitored measuring HCV RNA load, and ALT, aspartate transaminase, gamma-glutamyl-transferase, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin and platelet every 3-6 mo. The present article provides an updated overview based on more recently reported data on monitoring and managing PsO patients who need systemic antipsoriatic treatment and have HBV or HCV infection as comorbidity.
基金Supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico,Brazil
文摘AIM:To evaluate the effectiveness of the biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs(b DMARD) in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis through a systematic review of observational studies.METHODS:The studies were searched in the Pub Med,EMBASE,Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and LILACS databases(until August 2014),in the grey literature and conducted a manual search.The assessed criteria of effectiveness included the EULAR,the disease activity score(DAS),the Clinical Disease Activity Index,the Simplified Disease Activity Index,the American College of Rheumatology and the Health Assessment Questionnaire.The meta-analysis was performed with Review Manager 5.2 software using a random effects model.A total of 35 studies were included in this review.RESULTS:The participants anti-tumor necrosis factor inhibitors(TNF) nave,who used adalimumab(P = 0.0002) and etanercept(P = 0.0006) exhibited greater good EULAR response compared to the participants who used infliximab.No difference was detected between adalimumab and etanercept(P = 0.05).The participants who used etanercept exhibited greater remission according to DAS28 compared to the participants who used infliximab(P = 0.01).No differences were detected between adalimumab and infliximab(P = 0.12) or etanercept(P = 0.79).Better results were obtained with b DMARD associated with methotrexate than with b DMARD alone.The good EULAR response and DAS 28 was better for combination with methotrexate than b DMARD monotherapy(P = 0.03 e P < 0.00001).In cases of therapeutic failure,the participants who used rituximab exhibited greater DAS28 reduction compared to those who used anti-TNF agents(P = 0.0002).The participants who used etanercept achieved greater good EULAR response compared to those who did not use that drug(P = 0.007).Studies that assessed reduction of the CDAI score indicated the superiority of abatacept over rituximab(12.4 vs +1.7) and anti-TNF agents(7.6 vs 8.3).The present systematic review with meta-analysis found that relative to anti-TNF treatmentnave patients,adalimumab and etanercept were more effective when combined with methotrexate than when used alone.Furthermore,in case of therapeutic failure with anti-TNF agents;rituximab and abatacept(non anti-TNF) and etanercept(as second anti-TNF) were more effective.However,more studies of effectiveness were found for the rituximab.CONCLUSION:The best treatment for treatment-nave patients is adalimumab or etanercept combined with methotrexate.For anti-TNF therapeutic failure,the best choice is rituximab,abatacept or etanercept.
文摘Osteoarthritis(OA) is the most common type of arthritis found in the United States' population and is also the most common disease of joints in adults throughout the world with the knee being the most frequently affected of all joints. As the United States' population ages along with the increasing trends in obesity prevalence in other parts of the world, it is expected that the burden of OA on the population, healthcare system, and overall economy will continue to increase in the future without making major improvements in managing knee OA. Numerous therapies aim to reduce symptoms of knee OA and continued research has helped to further understand the complex pathophysiology of its disease mechanism attempting to uncover new potential targets for the treatment of OA. This review article seeks to evaluate the current practices for managing knee OA and discusses emerging therapies on the horizon. These practices include non-pharmacological treatments such as providing patient education and self-management strategies, advising weight loss, strengthening programs, and addressing biomechanical issues with bracing or foot orthoses. Oral analgesics and anti-inflammatories are pharmacologicals that are commonly used and the literature overall supports that some of these medications can be helpful for managing knee OA in the short-term but are less effective for long-term management. Additionally, more prolonged use significantly increases the risk of serious associated side effects that are not too uncommon. Diseasemodifying osteoarthritis drugs are being researched as a treatment modality to potentially halt or slow disease progression but data at this time is limited and continued studies are being conducted to further investigate their effectiveness. Intra-articular injectables are also implemented to manage knee OA ranging from corticosteroids to hyaluronans to more recently plateletrich plasma and even stem cells while several other injection therapies are presently being studied. The goal of developing new treatment strategies for knee OA is to prolong the need for total knee arthroplasty which should be utilized only if other strategies have failed. High tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty are potential alternatives if only a single compartment is involved with more data supporting unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as a good treatment option in this scenario. Arthroscopy has been commonly used for many years to treat knee OA to address degenerative articular cartilage and menisci, however, several high-quality studies have shown that it is not a very effective treatment for the majority of cases and should generally not be considered when managing knee OA. Improving the management of knee OA requires a multi-faceted treatment approach along with continuing to broaden our understanding of this complex disease so that therapeutic advancements can continue to be developed with the goal of preventing further disease progression and even potentially reversing the degenerative process.
文摘A multidisciplinary approach is required to care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis(RA)in the perioperative period.In preparation for surgery,patients must have a cardiovascular risk assessment performed due to the high risk of heart disease in patients with RA.Treatment of RA is with immunomodulatory medications,which present unique challenges for the perioperative period.Currently,there is no consensus on how to manage disease modifying antirheumatic drug(DMARD)therapy in the perioperative setting.Much of the data to guide therapy is based on retrospective cohort data.Choices regarding DMARDs require an individualized approach with collaboration between surgeons and rheumatologists.Consensus regarding biologic therapy is to hold the therapy in the perioperative period with the length of time dictated by the half-life of the medication.Special attention is required at the time of surgery for potential need for stress dose steroids.Further,there must be close communication with anesthesiologists in terms of airway management particularly in light of the risk for cervical spine disease.There are no consensus guidelines regarding the requirement for cervical spine radiographs prior to surgery.However,history and exam alone cannot be relied upon toidentify cervical spine disease.Patients with RA who undergo joint replacement arthroplasty are at higher risk for infection and dislocation compared to patients with osteoarthritis,necessitating particular vigilance in postoperative follow up.This review summarizes available evidence regarding perioperative management of patients with RA.
