Objective To compare survival outcomes between primary radical surgery and primary radiation in early cervical cancer.Methods Patient information was extracted from the Surveillance,Epidemiology,and Results database.P...Objective To compare survival outcomes between primary radical surgery and primary radiation in early cervical cancer.Methods Patient information was extracted from the Surveillance,Epidemiology,and Results database.Patients diagnosed with early cervical cancer of stage T1a,T1b,and T2a(American Joint Committee on Cancer,7th edition)from 1998 to 2015 were included in this study after propensity score matching.Overall survival(OS)was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results Among the 4964 patients included in the study,1080 patients were identified as having positive lymph nodes(N1),and 3884 patients were identified as having negative lymph nodes(N0).Patients with primary surgery had significantly longer 5-year OS than those with primary radiotherapy in both the N1 group(P<0.001)and N0 group(P<0.001).In the subgroup analysis,similar results were found in patients with positive lymph nodes of stage T1a(100.0%vs.61.1%),T1b(84.1%vs.64.3%),and T2a(74.4%vs.63.8%).In patients with T1b1 and T2a1,primary surgery resulted in longer OS than primary radiation,but not in patients with T1b2 and T2a2.In multivariate analysis,the primary treatment was identified as an independent prognostic factor in both N1 and N0 patients(HR_(N1)=2.522,95%CI=1.919–3.054,PN1<0.001;HR_(N0)=1.895,95%CI=1.689–2.126,PN0<0.001).Conclusion In early cervical cancer stage T1a,T1b1,and T2a1,primary surgery may result in longer OS than primary radiation for patients with and without lymph node metastasis.展开更多
Five-year survival rate for patients with all cancers combined, in China, is only 30.9%, which is much lower than those in developed countries. The three main reasons for the low cancer curative rates in China include...Five-year survival rate for patients with all cancers combined, in China, is only 30.9%, which is much lower than those in developed countries. The three main reasons for the low cancer curative rates in China include differences in the spectrum of cancer types, in early detection rates, and in the percentage of cancer patients receiving standardized treatment between China and developed countries.The most important mechanism for improving the curative rate is to improve early detection rates of major cancers in China using novel and affordable technologies that can be operated at home by the patients themselves.This attempt could be helpful in setting up a practical example for other developing countries with limited medical resources and a limited number of healthcare practitioners.展开更多
Objective： To study the influences of different time intervals between loop electrosurgical excision （LEEP） and abdominal hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy on postoperative complications. Methods： Sixty-eight p...Objective： To study the influences of different time intervals between loop electrosurgical excision （LEEP） and abdominal hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy on postoperative complications. Methods： Sixty-eight patients, who received subsequent abdominal hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy after LEEP due to C1N III and cervical cancer （IA1, IA2 and IB1）, were included in the present study. The hospital and clinic records of these patients were reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups according to the time intervals between LEEP and hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy： group l（within 48 h）, group 2 （between 48 h to 6 weeks）, and group 3（〉 6 weeks ）.Results： General characteristics of patients, including the mean age, delivery history, BMI, menopausal status, clinical stage and HPV infection, were comparable between patients of different groups. There were no significant differences in the mean transfusion amount, posthysterectomy hospital stay or operation time between different groups. The frequencies and spectrum of complications were not significantly affected by the time interval between LEEP and hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy. Conclusion： It is concluded that whenever the LEEP is done, the operation including hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy can be conducted at any time as it is necessary for the patients.展开更多
目的：探讨腹腔镜宫颈癌根治手术的可行性、安全性及优势。方法回顾性分析2005年1月～2010年3月广泛子宫切除＋盆腹腔淋巴结切除术治疗的早期宫颈癌（ⅠB～ⅡA期）患者资料，根据患者年龄、肿瘤分期、肿瘤组织学类型和淋巴结转移情况对...目的：探讨腹腔镜宫颈癌根治手术的可行性、安全性及优势。方法回顾性分析2005年1月～2010年3月广泛子宫切除＋盆腹腔淋巴结切除术治疗的早期宫颈癌（ⅠB～ⅡA期）患者资料，根据患者年龄、肿瘤分期、肿瘤组织学类型和淋巴结转移情况对接受腹腔镜和开腹手术的患者进行1∶1配对病例对照分析，2组各21例。比较2组手术指标、术后病理结果及随访结果。结果2组手术时间及并发症发生率差异无显著性，腹腔镜组术中出血少[（233．3±202．1） ml vs．（983.3±462．2）ml，t＝-6．814，P＝0．000]，术后排气早[（41．0±13．9）h vs．（55．4±15．0）h，t＝-3．219，P＝0．003]，但清扫盆腹腔淋巴结数量较少[（19．7±8．2）枚vs．（27．5±7．7）枚，t＝-3．170，P＝0．003]，术后留置尿管时间较长[（31．8±23．4） d vs．（14．5±4.7）d，t＝3．177，P＝0．005]。失访腹腔镜组13例，开腹组12例，其余17例中位随访时间53个月（53～107个月），肿瘤复发率差异无显著性[0（0／8） vs．11．1％（1／9），P＝1．000]。结论腹腔镜早期宫颈癌根治手术是安全可行的，在严格把握手术适应证的情况下，可替代开腹手术。腹腔镜手术还具有术中失血少、术后恢复快等优势。经过中期随访观察，效果满意。展开更多
目的:对比腹腔镜与开腹两种手术途径行根治性子宫切除术(RH)治疗早期宫颈癌的近期疗效差异。方法:计算机检索Pub Med、Cochrane图书馆,检索时限为1990年1月至2015年3月,纳入比较两种手术途径行RH治疗早期宫颈癌的前瞻性比较性研究,采用R...目的:对比腹腔镜与开腹两种手术途径行根治性子宫切除术(RH)治疗早期宫颈癌的近期疗效差异。方法:计算机检索Pub Med、Cochrane图书馆,检索时限为1990年1月至2015年3月,纳入比较两种手术途径行RH治疗早期宫颈癌的前瞻性比较性研究,采用Rev Man 5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入6篇前瞻性比较性研究,共计449例宫颈癌患者。Meta分析结果示:两种手术途径在术后复发率、手术出血量、手术时间、手术并发症、盆腔淋巴结切除数量、住院时间等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。纳入文献无明显异质性和发表偏倚。结论:与开腹途径相比,腹腔镜途径RH不增加术后复发和手术并发症风险。展开更多
基金This study was supported by a grant from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81602629).
文摘Objective To compare survival outcomes between primary radical surgery and primary radiation in early cervical cancer.Methods Patient information was extracted from the Surveillance,Epidemiology,and Results database.Patients diagnosed with early cervical cancer of stage T1a,T1b,and T2a(American Joint Committee on Cancer,7th edition)from 1998 to 2015 were included in this study after propensity score matching.Overall survival(OS)was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results Among the 4964 patients included in the study,1080 patients were identified as having positive lymph nodes(N1),and 3884 patients were identified as having negative lymph nodes(N0).Patients with primary surgery had significantly longer 5-year OS than those with primary radiotherapy in both the N1 group(P<0.001)and N0 group(P<0.001).In the subgroup analysis,similar results were found in patients with positive lymph nodes of stage T1a(100.0%vs.61.1%),T1b(84.1%vs.64.3%),and T2a(74.4%vs.63.8%).In patients with T1b1 and T2a1,primary surgery resulted in longer OS than primary radiation,but not in patients with T1b2 and T2a2.In multivariate analysis,the primary treatment was identified as an independent prognostic factor in both N1 and N0 patients(HR_(N1)=2.522,95%CI=1.919–3.054,PN1<0.001;HR_(N0)=1.895,95%CI=1.689–2.126,PN0<0.001).Conclusion In early cervical cancer stage T1a,T1b1,and T2a1,primary surgery may result in longer OS than primary radiation for patients with and without lymph node metastasis.
基金supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China(No.81472386,No.81672872)the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China(863 Program)(No.2012AA02A501)+1 种基金the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province,China(No.2014B020212017,No.20148050504004 and No.2015B050501005)the Provincial Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong,China(No.2016A030311011)
文摘Five-year survival rate for patients with all cancers combined, in China, is only 30.9%, which is much lower than those in developed countries. The three main reasons for the low cancer curative rates in China include differences in the spectrum of cancer types, in early detection rates, and in the percentage of cancer patients receiving standardized treatment between China and developed countries.The most important mechanism for improving the curative rate is to improve early detection rates of major cancers in China using novel and affordable technologies that can be operated at home by the patients themselves.This attempt could be helpful in setting up a practical example for other developing countries with limited medical resources and a limited number of healthcare practitioners.
文摘Objective： To study the influences of different time intervals between loop electrosurgical excision （LEEP） and abdominal hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy on postoperative complications. Methods： Sixty-eight patients, who received subsequent abdominal hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy after LEEP due to C1N III and cervical cancer （IA1, IA2 and IB1）, were included in the present study. The hospital and clinic records of these patients were reviewed. The patients were divided into three groups according to the time intervals between LEEP and hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy： group l（within 48 h）, group 2 （between 48 h to 6 weeks）, and group 3（〉 6 weeks ）.Results： General characteristics of patients, including the mean age, delivery history, BMI, menopausal status, clinical stage and HPV infection, were comparable between patients of different groups. There were no significant differences in the mean transfusion amount, posthysterectomy hospital stay or operation time between different groups. The frequencies and spectrum of complications were not significantly affected by the time interval between LEEP and hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy. Conclusion： It is concluded that whenever the LEEP is done, the operation including hysterectomy or radical hysterectomy can be conducted at any time as it is necessary for the patients.
文摘目的：探讨腹腔镜宫颈癌根治手术的可行性、安全性及优势。方法回顾性分析2005年1月～2010年3月广泛子宫切除＋盆腹腔淋巴结切除术治疗的早期宫颈癌（ⅠB～ⅡA期）患者资料，根据患者年龄、肿瘤分期、肿瘤组织学类型和淋巴结转移情况对接受腹腔镜和开腹手术的患者进行1∶1配对病例对照分析，2组各21例。比较2组手术指标、术后病理结果及随访结果。结果2组手术时间及并发症发生率差异无显著性，腹腔镜组术中出血少[（233．3±202．1） ml vs．（983.3±462．2）ml，t＝-6．814，P＝0．000]，术后排气早[（41．0±13．9）h vs．（55．4±15．0）h，t＝-3．219，P＝0．003]，但清扫盆腹腔淋巴结数量较少[（19．7±8．2）枚vs．（27．5±7．7）枚，t＝-3．170，P＝0．003]，术后留置尿管时间较长[（31．8±23．4） d vs．（14．5±4.7）d，t＝3．177，P＝0．005]。失访腹腔镜组13例，开腹组12例，其余17例中位随访时间53个月（53～107个月），肿瘤复发率差异无显著性[0（0／8） vs．11．1％（1／9），P＝1．000]。结论腹腔镜早期宫颈癌根治手术是安全可行的，在严格把握手术适应证的情况下，可替代开腹手术。腹腔镜手术还具有术中失血少、术后恢复快等优势。经过中期随访观察，效果满意。
文摘目的:对比腹腔镜与开腹两种手术途径行根治性子宫切除术(RH)治疗早期宫颈癌的近期疗效差异。方法:计算机检索Pub Med、Cochrane图书馆,检索时限为1990年1月至2015年3月,纳入比较两种手术途径行RH治疗早期宫颈癌的前瞻性比较性研究,采用Rev Man 5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入6篇前瞻性比较性研究,共计449例宫颈癌患者。Meta分析结果示:两种手术途径在术后复发率、手术出血量、手术时间、手术并发症、盆腔淋巴结切除数量、住院时间等方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。纳入文献无明显异质性和发表偏倚。结论:与开腹途径相比,腹腔镜途径RH不增加术后复发和手术并发症风险。
