期刊文献+
共找到2篇文章
< 1 >
每页显示 20 50 100
Ecological impact of land reclamation on Jiangsu coast(China):A novel ecotope assessment for Tongzhou Bay 被引量:1
1
作者 Jos R.M.Muller Yong-ping Chen +6 位作者 Stefan G.J.Aarninkhof Ying-Chi Chan Theunis Piersma Dirk S.van Maren Jian-feng Tao Zheng Bing Wang Zheng Gong 《Water Science and Engineering》 EI CAS CSCD 2020年第1期57-64,共8页
China’s continuous and rapid economic growth has led to the reclamation of large sections of the intertidal mud coast in combination with port construction,such as that of the proposed Tongzhou Bay port on the Jiangs... China’s continuous and rapid economic growth has led to the reclamation of large sections of the intertidal mud coast in combination with port construction,such as that of the proposed Tongzhou Bay port on the Jiangsu coast.These reclamations threaten the local ecosystem services.An ecotope distribution map was created and a hydrodynamic numerical model of Tongzhou Bay was set up to quantify the impacts of reclamation on the ecosystem.Based on the field data and model results,several abiotic features were classified into 11 ecotopes and visualized in an ecotope map of the Tongzhou Bay ecosystem.Validation with spatial distributions of two threatened shorebird species(bar-tailed godwit and great knot) showed confirmation with the mid-range and low-range littoral zones(inundated from 40% to 100% of a tidal cycle),indicating the importance of the areas with these conditions to these populations.Overlaying the ecotope map with recent and proposed land reclamation schemes revealed a loss of ecotopes,composed of the high-range(42%),mid-range(48%),and low-range(38%) littoral habitats,corresponding to a 44%-45% loss of the most important ecotopes for bar-tailed godwit and great knot(mid-range and low-range littoral zones).These results confirm the applicability of the novel ecotope assessment approach in practice. 展开更多
关键词 Mapping ecotope ecotope map INTERTIDAL MUDFLATS Migratory SHOREBIRDS RECLAMATION Tongzhou BAY Jiangsu COAST
下载PDF
Biogenetic Linkage among Ecotopes within Matera-Sassi (Italy) Habitat
2
作者 Giovanni Figliuolo Mario Nuzzi 《Open Journal of Genetics》 2021年第4期63-76,共14页
In the management of UNESCO cultural sites of significant environmental importance, the erroneous assumption that the environment is independent of biological heritage often prevails. The mapping of phy</span>&l... In the management of UNESCO cultural sites of significant environmental importance, the erroneous assumption that the environment is independent of biological heritage often prevails. The mapping of phy</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">l</span><span style="font-family:""><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ogenetic resources in the ancient city Matera-Sassi (MS) and the multivariable analysis at the level of ecotope and habitat have made it possible to identify the consistency of the plant genetic heritage and the biogenetic associations between the different ecotopes through the species they host. The bioclimatic variables and geomorphology of MS define an ecological niche refuge for rare or absent species in the surrounding landscape (e.g., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Campanula</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>versicolor</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> L., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Centranthus</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>ruber</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> (L.) Dc., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Capparis</span></i> <i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">spinosa</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> L., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Cymbalaria</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>muralis</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> Hill, </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Crepis</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> spp., </span><i><span style="font-family:Verdana;">Lavathera</span></i><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> <i>arborea</i></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> L.) The total floristic capital in MS amounts to 190 species belonging to 59 different botanical families;80% are native species and only 4% are invasive. About half are Mediterranean with a moderate presence (17%) of cosmopolitan and sub-cosmopolitan;5% are endemic species. Autogenic ecotopes (Type I) represented by “Pleistocene limestone” and “House wall” contribute to the variation of total biodiversity through Endemic species mainly Chamephytes;anthropogenic ecotopes (Type III) such as “Garden” and “Town boundary” with Archaeophytes and exotic Neophytes mainly Phanerophytes;while “Humid margins” and mixed ecotope</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">s (Type II) are linked to feral species and mainly to hemi-cr</span></span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">y</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;">ptophytes and therophytes. Minimum spanning tree of the habitat features</span><span style="font-family:Verdana;"> traced by the floristic biological heritage is consistent with the pedogenetic relationships between primary mother rocks, their derived ecotopes and anthropogenic impacts. Ecotope ranking based on its biodiversity value indicates that appropriate simultaneous conservation of both genetic resources and human works is achievable. 展开更多
关键词 BIODIVERSITY ecotope HABITAT HERITAGE In Situ Conservation
下载PDF
上一页 1 下一页 到第
使用帮助 返回顶部