BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths,and is classified according to its location in the proximal,middle,or distal stomach.Surgical resection is the primary approach for treating ...BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths,and is classified according to its location in the proximal,middle,or distal stomach.Surgical resection is the primary approach for treating gastric cancer.This prospective study aimed to determine the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.AIM To explore the efficacy of different staplers and digestive tract reconstruction(DTR)methods after radical gastrectomy and their influence on prognosis.METHODS Eighty-seven patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer at our institution between April 2017 and April 2020 were included in this study,with a follow-up period of 12-26 mo.The patients were assigned to four groups based on the stapler and DTR plan as follows:BillrothⅠ(B-I)reconstruction+linear stapler group(group A,22 cases),B-I reconstruction+circular stapler group(group B,22 cases),Billroth II(B-II)reconstruction+linear stapler group(group C,22 cases),and B-II reconstruction+circular stapler group(group D,21 cases).The pathological parameters,postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery,postoperative complications,and quality of life(QOL)were compared among the four groups.RESULTS No significant differences in the maximum diameter of the gastric tumors,total number of lymph nodes dissected,drainage tube removal time,QLQ(QOL questionnaire)-C30 and QLQ-STO22 scores at 1 year postoperatively,and incidence of complications were observed among the four groups(P>0.05).However,groups A and C(linear stapler)had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss and significantly shorter anastomosis time,operation time,first fluid diet intake time,first exhaust time,and length of postoperative hospital stay(P<0.05)than groups B and D(circular stapler).CONCLUSION Linear staplers offer several advantages for postoperative recovery.B-I and B-II reconstruction methods had similar effects on QOL.The optimal solution can be selected according to individual conditions and postoperative convenience.展开更多
目的观察外剥内扎术结合残余痔组织剥除、痔上黏膜套扎术(M-M procedure,excision of residual piles tissue and above mucosa ligation,MEAL)治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效。方法收集2019年1月至2020年1月于南京中医药大学第二附属医院肛...目的观察外剥内扎术结合残余痔组织剥除、痔上黏膜套扎术(M-M procedure,excision of residual piles tissue and above mucosa ligation,MEAL)治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效。方法收集2019年1月至2020年1月于南京中医药大学第二附属医院肛肠中心接受MEAL的54例环状混合痔病人作为实验组(MEAL组);以同期47例行单纯外剥内扎术(M-M组)和36例行选择性痔上黏膜切除术(TST组)的病人为对照组,分别比较各组病人的住院时间、创面愈合时间、皮赘残留、痔疮复发、肛门狭窄及肛门失禁情况。结果随访时间为(351.80±110.28)d,MEAL组的住院时间和对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);MEAL组的创面愈合时间(11.55±1.67)d短于M-M组(12.38±1.91)d及TST组(12.38±2.11)d,均差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);MEAL组的痔疮复发率1.85%(1/54)、皮赘残留发生率18.52%(10/54)均低于M-M组痔疮复发率14.89%(7/47)、皮赘残留发生率36.17%(17/47)及TST组痔疮复发率16.66%(6/36)、皮赘残留发生率41.67%(15/36),差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);全组均无肛门失禁及肛门狭窄病例。结论基于M-M的MEAL治疗环状混合痔具有减少创面、降低复发率等优点,在保护肛门的同时,明显减少了皮赘残留的发生。展开更多
BACKGROUND Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery(NOSES)has emerged as a promising alternative compared to conventional laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy(LATG)for treating gastric cancer(GC).However,evidenc...BACKGROUND Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery(NOSES)has emerged as a promising alternative compared to conventional laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy(LATG)for treating gastric cancer(GC).However,evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of NOSES for GC surgery is limited.This study aimed to compare the safety and feasibility,in addition to postoperative complications of NOSES and LATG.METHODS Dual circular staplers were used in Roux-en-Y digestive tract reconstruction for transvaginal specimen extraction LATG,and its outcomes were compared with LATG in a cohort of 51 GC patients with tumor size≤5 cm.The study was conducted from May 2018 to September 2020,and patients were categorized into the NOSES group(n=22)and LATG group(n=29).Perioperative parameters were compared and analyzed,including patient and tumor characteristics,postoperative outcomes,and anastomosis-related complications,postoperative hospital stay,the length of abdominal incision,difference in tumor type,postoperative complications,and postoperative survival.RESULTS Postoperative exhaust time,operation duration,mean postoperative hospital stay,length of abdominal incision,number of specific staplers used,and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire score were significant in both groups(P<0.01).In the NOSES group,the postoperative time to first flatus,mean postoperative hospital stay,and length of abdominal incision were significantly shorter than those in the LATG group.Patients in the NOSES group had faster postoperative recovery,and achieved abdominal minimally invasive incision that met aesthetic requirements.There were no significant differences in gender,age,tumor type,postoperative complications,and postoperative survival between the two groups.CONCLUSION The application of dual circular staplers in Roux-en-Y digestive tract reconstruction combined with NOSES gastrectomy is safe and convenient.This approach offers better short-term outcomes compared to LATG,while long-term survival rates are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic surgery.展开更多
目的:探讨无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪对腹部瘢痕的影响。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月—2022年9月于新余市妇幼保健院行剖宫产手术的120例患者的病历资料,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合的60例患者纳入A组,将接受无创皮肤吻合...目的:探讨无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪对腹部瘢痕的影响。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月—2022年9月于新余市妇幼保健院行剖宫产手术的120例患者的病历资料,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合的60例患者纳入A组,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合传统美容缝合的60例患者纳入B组,两组出院后均随访6个月。比较两组切口缝合时间、切口愈合时间及住院时间,术后24 h、72 h、7 d切口疼痛[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)],术后1个月切口愈合情况、切口并发症发生率,术后6个月切口瘢痕情况[温哥华瘢痕评定量表(VSS)]、缝合效果满意度。结果:两组切口缝合时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组切口愈合时间与住院时间均短于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后24 h、72 h VAS评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组术后7 d VAS评分低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1个月,A组伤口愈合等级优于B组,A组切口并发症总发生率低于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月,A组VSS评分低于B组,A组缝合效果满意度高于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪在剖宫产患者中应用价值高,能有效促进术后患者腹部切口愈合,减少术后疼痛,降低切口并发症发生及瘢痕增生风险,并获得更高的患者满意度。展开更多
Introduction: Systematic lymphadenectomy and ligation of the feeding artery is extremely important when performing radical resection in colorectal cancer. However, vascular surgery via laparoscopy requires advanced sk...Introduction: Systematic lymphadenectomy and ligation of the feeding artery is extremely important when performing radical resection in colorectal cancer. However, vascular surgery via laparoscopy requires advanced skills and techniques;thus, this procedure needs to be simplified while maintaining quality of the surgery to make it a preferred technique for the surgeons. Methods: There were 49 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy or anterior resection till T2 level for sigmoid colon cancer and recto-sigmoid colon cancer. We analyzed short-term and long-term outcomes between stapling ligation and clipping ligation techniques used in these surgeries. Results: The mean volume of blood loss in the stapling ligation group was 12.8 ± 12.3 ml, which was significantly lower than 41.9 ± 71.2 ml of mean volume of blood loss in the clipping ligation group. There was no significant difference in the mean duration of surgery, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes, morbidity, recurrence, and 5-year relapse free survival rates between the 2 groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a surgical technique using staplers for vascular treatment of tumor-feeding arteries as a new technical improvement in laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of early-stage colon cancer. We found that the described procedure was technically safe, simple, convenient, and oncologically valid.展开更多
文摘BACKGROUND Gastric cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths,and is classified according to its location in the proximal,middle,or distal stomach.Surgical resection is the primary approach for treating gastric cancer.This prospective study aimed to determine the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.AIM To explore the efficacy of different staplers and digestive tract reconstruction(DTR)methods after radical gastrectomy and their influence on prognosis.METHODS Eighty-seven patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer at our institution between April 2017 and April 2020 were included in this study,with a follow-up period of 12-26 mo.The patients were assigned to four groups based on the stapler and DTR plan as follows:BillrothⅠ(B-I)reconstruction+linear stapler group(group A,22 cases),B-I reconstruction+circular stapler group(group B,22 cases),Billroth II(B-II)reconstruction+linear stapler group(group C,22 cases),and B-II reconstruction+circular stapler group(group D,21 cases).The pathological parameters,postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery,postoperative complications,and quality of life(QOL)were compared among the four groups.RESULTS No significant differences in the maximum diameter of the gastric tumors,total number of lymph nodes dissected,drainage tube removal time,QLQ(QOL questionnaire)-C30 and QLQ-STO22 scores at 1 year postoperatively,and incidence of complications were observed among the four groups(P>0.05).However,groups A and C(linear stapler)had significantly lower intraoperative blood loss and significantly shorter anastomosis time,operation time,first fluid diet intake time,first exhaust time,and length of postoperative hospital stay(P<0.05)than groups B and D(circular stapler).CONCLUSION Linear staplers offer several advantages for postoperative recovery.B-I and B-II reconstruction methods had similar effects on QOL.The optimal solution can be selected according to individual conditions and postoperative convenience.
文摘目的观察外剥内扎术结合残余痔组织剥除、痔上黏膜套扎术(M-M procedure,excision of residual piles tissue and above mucosa ligation,MEAL)治疗环状混合痔的临床疗效。方法收集2019年1月至2020年1月于南京中医药大学第二附属医院肛肠中心接受MEAL的54例环状混合痔病人作为实验组(MEAL组);以同期47例行单纯外剥内扎术(M-M组)和36例行选择性痔上黏膜切除术(TST组)的病人为对照组,分别比较各组病人的住院时间、创面愈合时间、皮赘残留、痔疮复发、肛门狭窄及肛门失禁情况。结果随访时间为(351.80±110.28)d,MEAL组的住院时间和对照组比较,差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);MEAL组的创面愈合时间(11.55±1.67)d短于M-M组(12.38±1.91)d及TST组(12.38±2.11)d,均差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);MEAL组的痔疮复发率1.85%(1/54)、皮赘残留发生率18.52%(10/54)均低于M-M组痔疮复发率14.89%(7/47)、皮赘残留发生率36.17%(17/47)及TST组痔疮复发率16.66%(6/36)、皮赘残留发生率41.67%(15/36),差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);全组均无肛门失禁及肛门狭窄病例。结论基于M-M的MEAL治疗环状混合痔具有减少创面、降低复发率等优点,在保护肛门的同时,明显减少了皮赘残留的发生。
文摘BACKGROUND Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery(NOSES)has emerged as a promising alternative compared to conventional laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy(LATG)for treating gastric cancer(GC).However,evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of NOSES for GC surgery is limited.This study aimed to compare the safety and feasibility,in addition to postoperative complications of NOSES and LATG.METHODS Dual circular staplers were used in Roux-en-Y digestive tract reconstruction for transvaginal specimen extraction LATG,and its outcomes were compared with LATG in a cohort of 51 GC patients with tumor size≤5 cm.The study was conducted from May 2018 to September 2020,and patients were categorized into the NOSES group(n=22)and LATG group(n=29).Perioperative parameters were compared and analyzed,including patient and tumor characteristics,postoperative outcomes,and anastomosis-related complications,postoperative hospital stay,the length of abdominal incision,difference in tumor type,postoperative complications,and postoperative survival.RESULTS Postoperative exhaust time,operation duration,mean postoperative hospital stay,length of abdominal incision,number of specific staplers used,and Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire score were significant in both groups(P<0.01).In the NOSES group,the postoperative time to first flatus,mean postoperative hospital stay,and length of abdominal incision were significantly shorter than those in the LATG group.Patients in the NOSES group had faster postoperative recovery,and achieved abdominal minimally invasive incision that met aesthetic requirements.There were no significant differences in gender,age,tumor type,postoperative complications,and postoperative survival between the two groups.CONCLUSION The application of dual circular staplers in Roux-en-Y digestive tract reconstruction combined with NOSES gastrectomy is safe and convenient.This approach offers better short-term outcomes compared to LATG,while long-term survival rates are comparable to those of conventional laparoscopic surgery.
文摘目的:探讨无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪对腹部瘢痕的影响。方法:回顾性分析2021年1月—2022年9月于新余市妇幼保健院行剖宫产手术的120例患者的病历资料,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合的60例患者纳入A组,将接受无创皮肤吻合器联合传统美容缝合的60例患者纳入B组,两组出院后均随访6个月。比较两组切口缝合时间、切口愈合时间及住院时间,术后24 h、72 h、7 d切口疼痛[视觉模拟评分法(VAS)],术后1个月切口愈合情况、切口并发症发生率,术后6个月切口瘢痕情况[温哥华瘢痕评定量表(VSS)]、缝合效果满意度。结果:两组切口缝合时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组切口愈合时间与住院时间均短于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组术后24 h、72 h VAS评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),A组术后7 d VAS评分低于B组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后1个月,A组伤口愈合等级优于B组,A组切口并发症总发生率低于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后6个月,A组VSS评分低于B组,A组缝合效果满意度高于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:无创皮肤吻合器联合心形缝合皮下脂肪在剖宫产患者中应用价值高,能有效促进术后患者腹部切口愈合,减少术后疼痛,降低切口并发症发生及瘢痕增生风险,并获得更高的患者满意度。
文摘Introduction: Systematic lymphadenectomy and ligation of the feeding artery is extremely important when performing radical resection in colorectal cancer. However, vascular surgery via laparoscopy requires advanced skills and techniques;thus, this procedure needs to be simplified while maintaining quality of the surgery to make it a preferred technique for the surgeons. Methods: There were 49 patients who underwent laparoscopic sigmoidectomy or anterior resection till T2 level for sigmoid colon cancer and recto-sigmoid colon cancer. We analyzed short-term and long-term outcomes between stapling ligation and clipping ligation techniques used in these surgeries. Results: The mean volume of blood loss in the stapling ligation group was 12.8 ± 12.3 ml, which was significantly lower than 41.9 ± 71.2 ml of mean volume of blood loss in the clipping ligation group. There was no significant difference in the mean duration of surgery, the mean number of harvested lymph nodes, morbidity, recurrence, and 5-year relapse free survival rates between the 2 groups. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a surgical technique using staplers for vascular treatment of tumor-feeding arteries as a new technical improvement in laparoscopic colectomy for the treatment of early-stage colon cancer. We found that the described procedure was technically safe, simple, convenient, and oncologically valid.
