Traumatic pancreatic ductal injury treated by endoscopic stenting in a 9-year-old boy:A case report

BACKGROUND Traumatic pancreatic injury is relatively rare in children,accounting for approximately 3%-12%of blunt abdominal trauma cases.Most traumatic pancreatic injuries in boys are related to bicycle handlebars.Traumatic pancreatic injuries often result in delayed presentation and treatment,leading to high morbidity and mortality.The management of children with traumatic main pancreatic duct injuries is still under debate.CASE SUMMARY We report the case of a 9-year-old boy who was presented at our institution with epigastric pain after being stuck with his bicycle handlebar at the upper abdomen and then treated with endoscopic stenting because of a pancreatic ductal injury.CONCLUSION We believe that endoscopic stenting of pancreatic ductal injuries may be a feasible technique in certain cases of children with traumatic pancreatic duct injuries to avoid unnecessary operations.

Endoscopic luminal stenting:Current applications and future perspectives

Endoscopic luminal stenting(ELS)represents a minimally invasive option for the management of malignant obstruction along the gastrointestinal tract.Previous studies have shown that ELS can provide rapid relief of symptoms related to esophageal,gastric,small intestinal,colorectal,biliary,and pancreatic neoplastic strictures without compromising cancer patients’overall safety.As a result,in both palliative and neoadjuvant settings,ELS has largely surpassed radiotherapy and surgery as a first-line treatment modality.Following the abovementioned success,the indications for ELS have gradually expanded.To date,ELS is widely used in clinical practice by well-trained endoscopists in managing a wide variety of diseases and complications,such as relieving non-neoplastic obstructions,sealing iatrogenic and non-iatrogenic perforations,closing fistulae and treating post-sphincterotomy bleeding.The abovementioned development would not have been achieved without corresponding advances and innovations in stent technology.However,the technological landscape changes rapidly,making clinicians’adaptation to new technologies a real challenge.In our mini-review article,by systematically reviewing the relevant literature,we discuss current developments in ELS with regard to stent design,accessories,techniques,and applications,expanding the research basis that was set by previous studies and highlighting areas that need to be further investigated.

Palliative Therapy for Gastric Outlet Obstruction Caused by Unresectable Gastric Cancer： A Meta-analysis Comparison of Gastrojejunostomy with Endoscopic Stenting

Background： Gastrojejunostomy （G J J） and endoscopic stenting （ES） are palliative treatments for gastric outlet obstruction （GO0） caused by gastric cancer. We compared the outcomes of GJJ with ES by performing a meta-analysis. Methods： Clinical trials that compared GJJ with ES for the treatment of GOO in gastric cancer were included in the meta-analysis. Procedure time, time to resumption of oral intake, duration of hospital stay, patency duration, and overall survival days were compared using weighted mean differences （WMDs）. Technical success, clinical success, procedure-related mortality, complications, the rate of re-obstruction, postoperative chemotherapy, and reintervention were compared using odds ratios （ORs）.Results： Nine studies were included in the analysis. Technical success and clinical success were not significantly different between the ES and GJJ groups. The ES group had a shorter procedure time （WMD = -80.89 min, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -93.99 to -67.78, P 〈 0.001）, faster resumption of oral intake （WMD = -3.45 days, 95% CI = -5.25 to -1.65, P 〈 0.001）, and shorter duration of hospital stay （WMD = -7.67 days, 95% CI = -11.02 to -4.33, P 〈 0.001）. The rate of minor complications was significantly higher in the GJJ group （OR = 0.13, 95% CI = 0.04-0.40, P 〈 0.001）. However, the rates of major complications （OR = 6.91, 95% CI = 3.90-12.25, P 〈 0.001）, re-obstruction （OR = 7.75, 95% CI = 4.06-14.78, P 〈 0.001）, and reintervention （OR = 6.27, 95% CI = 3.36-11.68, P 〈 0.001） were significantly lower in the GJJ group than that in the E S group. Moreover, GJJ was significantly associated with a longer patency duration （WMD = -167.16 days, 95% CI = -254.01 to -89.31, P 〈 0.001） and overall survival （WMD = -103.20 days, 95% CI = -161.49 to -44.91, P = 0.001）. Conclusions： Both GJJ and ES are effective procedures for the treatment of GOO caused by gastric cancer. ES is associated with better short-term outcomes. GJJ is preferable to ES in terms of its lower rate of stent-related complications, re-obstruction, and reintervention. GJJ should be considered a treatment option for patients with a long life expectancy and good performance status.

Stenting as a bridge to surgery in obstructing colon cancer:Longterm recurrence pattern and competing risk of mortality

BACKGROUND Stenting as a bridge to curative surgery(SBTS)for obstructing colon cancer(OCC)has been associated with possibly worse oncological outcomes.AIM To evaluate the recurrence patterns,survival outcomes,and colorectal cancer(CRC)-specific death in patients undergoing SBTS for OCC.METHODS Data from 62 patients undergoing SBTS at a single tertiary centre over ten years between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively examined.Primary outcomes were recurrence patterns,overall survival(OS),cancer-specific survival(CSS),and CRC-specific death.OS and CSS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curves.Competing risk analysis with cumulative incidence function(CIF)was used to estimate CRC-specific mortality with other cause-specific death as a competing event.Fine-Gray regressions were performed to determine prognostic factors of CRC-specific death.Univariate and multivariate subdistribution hazard ratios and their corresponding Wald test P values were calculated.RESULTS 28 patients(45.2%)developed metastases after a median period of 16 mo.Among the 18 patients with single-site metastases:Four had lung-only metastases(14.3%),four had liver-only metastases(14.3%),and 10 had peritoneum-only metastases(35.7%),while 10 patients had two or more sites of metastatic disease(35.7%).The peritoneum was the most prevalent(60.7%)site of metastatic involvement(17/28).The median follow-up duration was 46 mo.26(41.9%)of the 62 patients died,of which 16(61.5%)were CRC-specific deaths and 10(38.5%)were deaths owing to other causes. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS probabilities were 88%, 74%, and 59%;1-, 3-, and5-year CSS probabilities were 97%, 83%, and 67%. The highest CIF for CRC-specific death at 60 mowas liver-only recurrence (0.69). Liver-only recurrence, peritoneum-only recurrence, and two ormore recurrence sites were predictive of CRC-specific death.CONCLUSIONThe peritoneum was the most common metastatic site among patients undergoing SBTS. Liveronlyrecurrence, peritoneum-only recurrence, and two or more recurrence sites were predictors ofCRC-specific death.

Intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for traumatic pancreatic ductal injuries:Two case reports

BACKGROUND In order to successfully manage traumatic pancreatic duct(PD)leaks,early diagnosis and operative management is paramount in reducing morbidity and mortality.In the acute setting,endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)can be a useful,adjunctive modality during exploratory laparotomy.ERCP with sphincterotomy and stent placement improves preferential drainage in the setting of injury,allowing the pancreatic leak to properly heal.However,data in this acute setting is limited.CASE SUMMARY In this case series,a 27-year-old male and 16-year-old female presented with PD leaks secondary to a gunshot wound and blunt abdominal trauma,respectively.Both underwent intraoperative ERCP within an average of 5.9 h from time of presentation.A sphincterotomy and plastic pancreatic stent placement was performed with a 100%technical and clinical success.There were no associated immediate or long-term complications.Following discharge,both patients underwent repeat ERCP for stent removal with resolution of ductal injury.CONCLUSION These experiences further demonstrated that widespread adaption and optimal timing of ERCP may improve outcomes in trauma centers.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage-current status and future perspectives

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP)with stenting is the treatment modality of choice for patients with benign and malignant bile duct obstruction.ERCP could fail in cases of duodenal obstruction,duodenal diverticulum,ampullary neoplastic infiltration or surgically altered anatomy.In these cases percutaneous biliary drainage(PTBD)is traditionally used as a rescue procedure but is related to high morbidity and mortality and lower quality of life.Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage(EUS-BD)is a relatively new interventional procedure that arose due to the development of curvilinear echoendoscope and the various endoscopic devices.A large amount of data is already collected that proves its efficacy,safety and ability to replace PTBD in cases of ERCP failure.It is also possible that EUS-BD could be chosen as a first-line treatment option in some clinical scenarios in the near future.Several EUS-BD techniques are developed EUS-guided transmural stenting,antegrade stenting and rendezvous technique and can be personalized depending on the individual anatomy.EUS-BD is normally performed in the same session from the same endoscopist in case of ERCP failure.The lack of training,absence of enough dedicated devices and lack of standardization still makes EUS-BD a difficult and not very popular procedure,which is related to life-threatening adverse events.Developing training models,dedicated devices and guidelines hopefully will make EUS-BD easier,safer and well accepted in the future.This paper focuses on the technical aspects of the different EUS-BD procedures,available literature data,advantages,negative aspects and the future perspectives of these modalities.

Changing clinical profile,management strategies and outcome of patients with biliary tract injuries at atertiary care center in SriLanka

BACKGROUND: Biliary tract injuries are mostly iatrogenic Related data are limited in developing countries. There are lessons to be learned by revisiting the clinical profiles management issues and outcome of patients referred to a tertiary care center in Sri Lanka, compared with the previous data from the same center published in 2006. Such a review is particularly relevant at a time of changing global perceptions of iatrogenic biliary injuries. This study aimed to analyze and compare the changes in the injury pattern, management and outcome following biliary tract injury in a Sri Lankan study population treated at a tertiary care center. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was made of 67 patients treated between May 2002 and February 2011. The profiles of the last 38 patients treated from October 2006 to February 2011 were compared with those of the first 29 patients treated from May 2002 to September 2006. Definitive management options included endoscopic biliary stenting, reconstructive hepaticojejunostomy with creation of gastric access loops and biliary stricture dilation. Post-treatment jaundice cholangitis and abdominal pain needing intervention were considered as treatment failures. RESULTS: In the 67 patients, 55 were women and 12 men Their mean age was 40.6 (range 19-80) years. Five patients had traumatic injuries. Thirty-seven injuries (23 during the second study period) were due to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and 25 (10 during the second study period) to open cholecystectomy The identification rate of intra-operative injury was 19% in the laparoscopic group and 8% in the open group. Bismuth typeI, II, III and IV injuries were seen in 18, 18, 15 and 12 patients, respectively. Endoscopic stenting was the definitive treatment in 20 patients. In 35 patients who had hepaticojejunostomy, 33 underwent creation of the gastric access loop. Twenty- two reconstructions were performed during the second study period. A gastric access loop was used for endotherapy in three patients with anastomotic occlusion at the site of hepaticojejunostomy. The overall outcome was satisfactory in the majority of patients. There were four injury-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary tract injuries associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy have become the most frequent cause of biliary injury management at our center. Although endotherapy was useful in selected patients, in the majority, surgical reconstruction with hepaticojejunostomy was required as the definitive treatment. Creation of the gastric access loop was found to be a useful adjunct in the management of hepaticojejunostomy strictures.

Clinical management for malignant afferent loop obstruction

Afferent loop obstruction(ALO)is defined as duodenal or jejunal mechanical obstruction at the proximal anastomosis site of a gastrojejunostomy.With advances in chemotherapy,the incidence of malignant ALO is increasing.Malignant ALO can be complicated by ischemia,gangrenous bowel,pancreatitis,and ascending cholangitis.Moreover,the general condition of patients with recurrent cancer is often poor.Therefore,accurate and rapid diagnosis and minimally invasive treatments are required.However,no review articles on the diagnosis and treatment of malignant ALO have been published.Through literature searching,we reviewed related articles published between 1959 and 2020 in the PubMed database.Herein,we present recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of malignant ALO and describe future perspectives.Endoscopic transluminal self-expandable metal stent(SEMS)placement is considered the standard treatment for malignant ALO,as this procedure is well established and less invasive.However,with the development of interventional endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)in recent years,the usefulness of EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy has been reported.Moreover,through indirect comparison,this approach has been reported to be superior to transluminal SEMS placement.It is expected that a safer and less invasive treatment method will be established through the continued advancement and innovation of interventional endoscopy techniques.