Laparoscopic right radical hemicolectomy: Central vascular ligation and complete mesocolon excision vs D3 lymphadenectomy - How I do it?

In colon cancer surgery,ensuring the complete removal of the primary tumor and draining lymph nodes is crucial.Lymphatic drainage in the colon follows the vascular supply,typically progressing from pericolic to paraaortic lymph nodes.While NCCN guidelines recommend the removal of 10-12 lymph nodes for ade-quate oncological resection,achieving complete oncological resection involves more than just meeting these numerical targets.Various techniques have been developed and studied over time to attain optimal oncological outcomes.A key technique central to this goal is identifying the ileocolic vessels at their origin from the superior mesenteric vessels.Complete excision of the visceral and parietal mesocolon ensures the intact removal of the specimen,while D3 lymphade-nectomy targets all draining regional lymph nodes.Although these principles emphasize different aspects,they ultimately converge to achieve the same goal of complete oncological resection.This article aims to simplify the surgical steps that align with the principle of central vascular ligation and mesocolon mobilization while ensuring adequate D3 dissection.

Single port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for ileocolic intussusception

A 36-year-old male was admitted with right lower abdominal pain and diarrhea for more than 3 mo. Colonoscopy and a barium enema study revealed a submucosal tumor over the cecum, but computed tomography showed an ileal lipoma. There was no definitive diagnosis preoperatively, but ileocolic intussusception was noted during surgery. Single port laparoscopic radical right hemicolectomy was performed because intra-operative reduction failed. The histological diagnosis of the resected tumor was lipoma. Single port laparoscopic surgery has recently been proven to be safe and feasible. There are advantages compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery, such as smaller incision wounds, fewer port site complications, and easier conversion. However, there are some drawbacks which need to be overcome, such as difficulties in triangulation and instrument clashing. If there are no contraindications to laparoscopy, single port laparoscopic surgery can be performed safely and should be considered for diagnosis and treatment of intussusception in adults. Here, we report the first case of ileocolic intussusception successfully treated by single port laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma

AIM: Laparoscopic surgery, especially laparoscopic rectal surgery, for colorectal cancer has been developed considerably. However, due to relatively complicated anatomy and high requirements for surgery techniques, laparoscopic right colectomy develops relatively slowly. This study was designed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) with open right hemicolectomy (ORH) in the treatment of colon carcinoma. METHODS: Between September 2000 and February 2003, 30 patients with colon cancer who underwent LRH were compared with 34 controls treated by ORH in the same period. All patients were evaluated with respect to surgery related complications, postoperative recovery, recurrence and metastasis rate, cost-effectiveness and survival. RESULTS: Among 30 LRH, 2 (6.7%) were converted to open procedure. No significant differences were observed in terms of mean operation time, blood loss, post-operative complications, and hospital cost between LRH and ORH groups. Mean time for bowel movement, hospital stay, and time to resum?early activity in the LRH group were significantly shorter than those in the ORH group (2.24±0.56 vs 3.25±1.29 d, 13.94?.5 vs 18.25±5.96 d, 3.94±1.64 vs 5.45±1.82 d respectively, P<0.05). As to the lymph node yield, the specimen length and total cost for operation and drugs, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Local recurrence rate and metachronous metastasis rate had no marked difference between the two groups. Cumulative survival probability at 40 mo in LRH group (76.50%) was not obviously different compared to the ORH group (74.04%). CONCLUSION: LRH in patients with colon cancer has statistically and clinically significant advantages over ORH. Thus, LRH can be regarded as a safe and effective procedure.

En bloc pancreaticoduodenectomy and right hemicolectomy for locally advanced right-sided colon cancer

AIM To assess the usefulness of en bloc right hemicolectomy with pancreaticoduodenectomy(RHCPD) for locally advanced right-sided colon cancer(LARCC).METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the database of Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, between January 2009 and December 2016. During this time, 299 patients underwent radical right hemicolectomy for right-sided colon cancer. Among them, 5 underwent RHCPD for LARCC with tumor infiltration to adjacent organs. Preoperative computed tomography(CT) was routinely performed to evaluate local tumor infiltration into adjacent organs. During the operation, we evaluated the resectability and the amount of infiltration into the adjacent organs without dissecting the adherent organs from the cancer. When we confirmed that radical resection was feasible and could lead to R0 resection, we performed RHCPD. The clinical data were carefully reviewed, and the demographic variables, intraoperative data, and postoperative parameters were recorded.RESULTS The median age of the 5 patients who underwent RHCPD for LARCC was 70 years. The tumors were located in the ascending colon(three patients) and transverse colon(two patients). Preoperative CT revealed infiltration of the tumor into the duodenum in all patients, the pancreas in four patients, the superior mesenteric vein(SMV) in two patients, and tumor thrombosis in the SMV in one patient. We performed RHCPD plus SMV resection in three patients. Major postoperative complications occurred in 3 patients(60%) as pancreatic fistula(grade B and grade C, according to International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula Definition) and delayed gastric empty. None of the patients died during their hospital stay. A histological examination confirmed malignant infiltration into the duodenum and/or pancreas in 4 patients(80%), and no patients showed any malignant infiltration into the SMV. Two patients were histologically confirmed to have tumor thrombosis in the SMV. All of the tumors had clear resection margins(R0). The median follow-up time was 77 mo. During this period, two patients with tumor thrombosis died from liver metastasis. The overall survival rates were 80% at 1 year and 60% at 5 years. All patients with node-negative status(n = 2) survived for more than seven years.CONCLUSION This study showed that the long-term survival is possible for patients with LARCC if RHCPD is performed successfully, particularly in those with node-negative status.

Laparoscopic vs open extended right hemicolectomy for colon cancer

AIM: to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic extended right hemicolectomy (LERH) for colon cancer. METHODS: Since its establishment in 2009, the Southern Chinese Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgical Study (SCLCSS) group has been dedicated to promoting patients' quality of life through minimally invasive surgery. The multicenter database was launched by combining existing datasets from members of the SCLCSS group. The study enrolled 220 consecutive patients who were recorded in the multicenter retrospective database and underwent either LERH (n = 119) or open extended right hemicolectomy (OERH) (n = 101) for colon cancer. Clinical characteristics, surgical outcomes, and oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in terms of age, gender, body mass index (BMI), history of previous abdominal surgery, tumor location, and tumor stage between the two groups. The blood loss was lower in the LERH group than in the OERH group [100 (100-200) mL vs 150 (100-200) mL, P < 0.0001]. The LERH group was associated with earlier first flatus (2.7 +/- 1.0 d vs 3.2 +/- 0.9 d, P < 0.0001) and resumption of liquid diet (3.6 +/- 1.0 d vs 4.2 +/- 1.0 d, P < 0.0001) compared to the OERH group. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LERH group (11.4 +/- 4.7 d vs 12.8 +/- 5.6 d, P = 0.009) than in the OERH group. The complication rate was 11.8% and 17.6% in the LERH and OERH groups, respectively (P = 0.215). Both 3-year overall survival [LERH (92.0%) vs OERH (84.4%), P = 0.209] and 3-year disease-free survival [LERH (84.6%) vs OERH (76.6%), P = 0.191] were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: LERH with D3 lymphadenectomy for colon cancer is a technically feasible and safe procedure, yielding comparable short-term oncologic outcomes to those of open surgery. (C) 2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

Clinical research of superior mesenteric vascular intrathecal approach in right hemicolectomy

Objective: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical value of superior mesenteric vascular intrathecal approach in right hemicolectomy. Methods: We retrospectively studied the clinical data of 132 patients who had right hemicolectomy from June 2007 to June 2010, including 68 cases with superior mesenteric vascular intrathecal approach to resect specimen, and compared the operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and the number of dissected lymph nodes with patients treated with conventional surgery. Results: Compared the vascular intrathecal approach with conventional approach, the operation time and blood loss were decreased significantly, the number of Dukes C No. 3 lymph node dissection was increased, while the incidence of postoperative complications and hospital stay were equivalent to traditional surgery group. Conclusion: The use of vascular intrathecal approach in right hemicolectomy can significantly shorten the operation time and reduce bleeding and improve surgical radical outcomes.

Pure transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery right hemicolectomy for colon cancer:A case report

BACKGROUND Pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES)for colorectal cancer is a complex procedure and rarely used in clinical practice because of the ethical concerns and technical challenges,including loss of triangulation,in-line orientation,and instrument collision.Transvaginal(v)NOTES,however,can overcome these technical challenges.We report a case of pure vNOTES right hemicolectomy for colon cancer,attached with surgical video.CASE SUMMARY A 65-year-old woman with a 2-year history of intermittent diarrhea was diagnosed with ascending colon adenocarcinoma by colonoscopy and biopsy.Pure vNOTES right hemicolectomy was performed with complete mesocolic excision by well-experienced surgeons.The operative time was 200 min and the estimated blood loss was 30 mL.No intraoperative or postoperative complications occurred within 30 d after the surgery.The visual analog scale pain score on postoperative day 1 was 1 and dropped to 0 on postoperative days 2 and 3.The patient was discharged at postoperative day 6.The pathologic specimen had sufficient clear resection margins and 14 negative harvested lymph nodes.CONCLUSION vNOTES right hemicolectomy,performed by well-experienced surgeons,overcomes the technical challenges of pure NOTES and may be feasible for colon cancer.

Does cranial-medial mixed dominant approach have a unique advantage for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision?

BACKGROUND Complete mesocolic excision(CME)with central vascular ligation(CVL)was proposed by Hohenberger in 2009.The CME principle has gradually become the technical standard for colon cancer surgery.How to achieve CME with CVL in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy(LRH)is controversial,and a unified standard approach is not yet available.In recent years,the authors’team has integrated the theory of membrane anatomy,tried to combine the cephalic approach with the classic medial approach(MA)for technical optimization,and proposed a cranialmedial mixed dominant approach(CMA).AIM To explore the feasibility of operational approaches for LRH with CME.METHODS In this retrospective cohort study,the clinical data of 57 patients with right-sided colon cancer(TNM stage I,II,or III)who underwent LRH with CME from January 2016 to June 2020 were collected and summarized.There were 31 patients in the traditional MA group and 26 in the CMA group.RESULTS There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups.The operation was shorter and the number of lymph nodes dissected was higher in the CMA group than in the MA group,but there was no significant difference in the number of positive lymph nodes,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative exhaust time,feeding time,postoperative hospital stay or postoperative complication incidence.CONCLUSION Our study shows that the CMA is a safe and feasible procedure for LRH with CME and has a unique advantage.

Open versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy in the elderly population

AIM:To compare short term outcomes of elective laparoscopic and open right hemicolectomy(RH) in an elderly population.METHODS:All patients over the age of 70 undergoing elective RH at Ninewells Hospital and Perth Royal Infirmary between January 2006 and May 2011 were included in our analysis.Operative details,hospital length of stay,morbidity and mortality was collected by way of proforma from a dedicated prospective database.An extracorporeal anastomosis was performed routinely in the laparoscopic group.The primary endpoints for analysis were morbidity and mortality.Our secondary endpoints were operative duration,length of hospital stay and discharge destination.RESULTS:Two hundred and six patients were included in our analysis.One hundred and twenty-five patients underwent an open resection and 81 patients had a laparoscopic resection.The mean operating time was significantly longer in the laparoscopic group(139 ± 36 min vs 197 ± 53 min,P = 0.001).The mean length of hospital stay was similar in both groups(11.2 ± 7.8 d vs 9.6 ± 10.7 d,P = 0.28).The incidence of postoperative morbidities was 27% in the open group and 38% in the laparoscopic group(P = 0.12).Overall inhospital mortality was 0.8% in open procedures vs 1% in laparoscopic.CONCLUSION:Laparoscopic RH was associated with a significantly longer operative time compared to open RH.In our study,laparoscopic RH was not associated with reduced post-operative morbidity or significantly shorter length of hospital stay.

Comparison Study between Extracorporeal and Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy

Background: Nowadays, laparoscopic colectomy is considered a safe and effective surgical technique regarding short- and long-term outcomes, as well as specific oncologic outcomes. The anastomosis can be created intra- or extracorporeally. The goal of our study was to evaluate and compare short term outcomes of extra- and intra-corporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemi colectomies. Aim of the Study: The goal of our study was to evaluate and compare short term outcomes of extra- and intra-corporeal anastomosis after laparoscopic right hemi colectomies. Methods: In the period from December 2014 to January 2019, all patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for cancer colon who presented to surgical oncology department—south Egypt cancer institute and general surgery department—Assiut University was analyzed. Data like age, sex, body mass index (BMI), operative technique, operative times, blood loss, intra- and post-operative complications, pathology and hospital stay were reported and analyzed. Results: Twenty three (69.7%) patients underwent extracorporeal anastomosis while intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in ten (30.3%) patients. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics and demographic data in both groups (P > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in operative (operative time, blood loss or length of hospital stay) and postoperative (ileus, anastomotic leak, wound infection, incisional hernia, readmission, reoperation or deaths) details in the 2 groups except in length of the incision which was significantly shorter in the IA group (5.500 ± 1.269) vs. (6.565 ± 1.308) for EA (P = 0.015). Conclusion: No significant difference in short term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted and total laparoscopic right colectomy. Intracorporeal anastomosis had shorter incision which may decrease wound-related complications.

Isoperistaltic vs antiperistaltic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy:A comprehensive review

To optimize the efficiency of ileocolic anastomosis following right hemicolectomy,several variations of the surgical technique have been tested.These include performing the anastomosis intra-or extracorporeally or performing a stapled or hand-sewn anastomosis.Among the least studied is the configuration of the two stumps(i.e.,isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic)in the case of a side-to-side anastomosis.The purpose of the present study is to compare the isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic side-to-side anastomotic configuration after right hemicolectomy by reviewing the relevant literature.High-quality literature is scarce,with only three studies directly comparing the two alternatives,and no study has revealed any significant differences in the incidence of anastomosis-related complications such as leakage,stenosis,or bleeding.However,there may be a trend towards an earlier recovery of intestinal function following antiperistaltic anastomosis.Finally,existing data do not identify a certain anastomotic configuration(i.e.,isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic)as superior over the other.Thus,the most appropriate approach is to master both anastomotic techniques and select between the two configurations based on each individual case scenario.

Causes of epigastric pain and vomiting after laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy-superior mesenteric artery syndrome

BACKGROUND Superior mesenteric artery syndrome(SMAS)is a rare condition causing functional obstruction of the third portion of the duodenum.Postoperative SMAS following laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy is even less prevalent and can often be unrecognized by radiologists and clinicians.AIM To analyze the clinical features,risk factors,and prevention of SMAS after laparoscopic-assisted radical right hemicolectomy.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 256 patients undergoing laparoscopicassisted radical right hemicolectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from January 2019 to May 2022.The occurrence of SMAS and its countermeasures were evaluated.Among the 256 patients,SMAS was confirmed in six patients(2.3%)by postoperative clinical presentation and imaging features.All six patients were examined by enhanced computed tomography(CT)before and after surgery.Patients who developed SMAS after surgery were used as the experimental group.A simple random sampling method was used to select 20 patients who underwent surgery at the same time but did not develop SMAS and received preoperative abdominal enhanced CT as the control group.The angle and distance between the superior mesenteric artery and abdominal aorta were measured before and after surgery in the experimental group and before surgery in the control group.The preoperative body mass index(BMI)of the experimental group and the control group was calculated.The type of lymphadenectomy and surgical approach in the experimental and control groups were recorded.The differences in angle and distance were compared preoperatively and postoperatively in the experimental group compared.The differences in angle,distance,BMI,type of lymphadenectomy and surgical approach between the experimental and control groups were compared,and the diagnostic efficacy of the significant parameters was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves.RESULTS In the experimental group,the aortomesenteric angle and distance after surgery were significantly decreased than those before surgery(P<0.05).The aortomesenteric angle,distance and BMI were significantly higher in the control group than in the experimental(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the type of lymphadenectomy and surgical approach between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION The small preoperative aortomesenteric angle and distance and low BMI may be important factors for the complication.Over-cleaning of lymph fatty tissues may also be associated with this complication.

Robotic vs laparoscopic right colectomy—the burden of age and comorbidity in perioperative outcomes: An observational study

BACKGROUND Several studies have shown the safety,feasibility and oncologic adequacy of robotic right hemicolectomy(RRH).Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy(LRH)is considered technically challenging.Robotic surgery has been introduced to overcome this technical limitation,but it is related to high costs.To maximize the benefits of such surgery,only selected patients are candidates for this technique.In addition,due to progressive aging of the population,an increasing number of minimally invasive procedures are performed on elderly patients with severe comorbidities,who are usually more prone to post-operative complications.AIM To investigate the outcomes of RRH vs LRH with regard to age and comorbidities.METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 123 minimally invasive procedures(68 LRHs vs 55 RRHs)for right colon cancer or endoscopically unresectable adenoma performed in our Center from January 2014 until September 2019.The surgical procedures were performed according to standardized techniques.The primary clinical outcome of the study was the length of hospital stay(LOS)measured in days.Secondary outcomes were time to first flatus(TFF)and time to first stool evacuation.The robotic technique was considered the exposure and the laparoscopic technique was considered the control.Routine demographic variables were obtained,including age at time of surgery and gender.Body mass index and American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status were registered.The age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index(ACCI)was calculated;the tumornode-metastasis system,intra-operative variables and post-operative complications were recorded.Post-operative follow-up was 180 d.RESULTS LOS,TFF,and time to first stool were significantly shorter in the robotic group:Median 6[interquartile range(IQR)5-8]vs 7(IQR 6-10.5)d,P=0.028;median 2(IQR 1-3)vs 3(IQR 2-4)d,P<0.001;median 4(IQR 3-5)vs 5(IQR 4-6.5)d,P=0.005,respectively.Following multivariable analysis,the robotic technique was confirmed to be predictive of significantly shorter hospitalization and faster restoration of bowel function;in addition the dichotomous variables of age over75 years and ACCI more than 7 were significant predictors of hospital stay.No outcomes were significantly associated with Clavien-Dindo grading.Sub-group analysis demonstrated that patients aged over 75 years had a longer LOS(median6-IQR 5-8-vs 7-IQR 6-12-d,P=0.013)and later TFF(median 2-IQR 1-3-vs 3-IQR 2-4-d,P=0.008),while patients with ACCI more than 7 were only associated with a prolonged hospital stay(median 7-IQR 5-8-vs 7-IQR 6-14.5-d,P=0.036).CONCLUSION RRH is related to shorter LOS when compared with the laparoscopic approach,but older age and several comorbidities tend to reduce its benefits.

腹腔镜右半结肠切除同期行肝方叶转移癌切除1例

目的分析腹腔镜下同期治疗结肠癌及其肝转移的过程,探讨腹腔镜同期手术在治疗结肠癌肝转移中的作用。方法回顾性分析2023年3月安徽医科大学第一附属医院1例结肠癌伴肝方叶转移患者的临床资料,同期行混合入路腹腔镜右半结肠切除、Glisson蒂横断法肝方叶转移癌切除。结果RO切除右半结肠及肝转移癌,术中出血量约50 mL,第4天拔引流管,无并发症,顺利出院。病理结果:结肠溃疡型低分化腺癌,肠周(12/21)个淋巴结有癌转移,低分化肝转移癌。结论腹腔镜同期行右半结肠切除和肝转移癌切除的治疗安全可行,采用新的手术路径和操作模式可保证手术安全,值得推广。

腹腔镜右半结肠切除术围手术期并发症影响因素分析及列线图风险模型的构建

目的分析腹腔镜右半结肠切除术围手术期并发症影响因素,并构建预测腹腔镜右半结肠切除术围手术期并发症的列线图模型。方法回顾性选取2019年10月至2023年6月首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院普通外科胃肠病房收治的行腹腔镜右半结肠切除术病人223例,根据病人围手术期是否有并发症的发生,将其分为并发症组(n=42)和非并发症组(n=181)。多因素logistic回归分析腹腔镜右半结肠切除术围手术期并发症发生的影响因素,采用R4.3.2软件构建围手术期并发症发生的预测模型,受试者操作特征曲线分析列线图的预测价值,Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检校准曲线评价列线图的拟合程度,决策曲线分析(DCA)评估预测模型的临床实用价值。结果223例行腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的病人中,围手术期内有42例发生并发症;多因素logistic回归分析结果发现,合并糖尿病、手术时间>3 h、肿瘤低分化、腹腔外吻合术和急性生理与慢性健康评分Ⅱ(APACHE-Ⅱ)≥14分是影响腹腔镜右半结肠切除术围手术期发生并发症的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。将危险因素进行可视化风险预测列线图构建,可计算出腹腔镜右半结肠切除术围手术期并发症发生的预测概率;绘制列线图预测模型的DCA曲线,当预测概率阈值为0~0.6之间时,表明腹腔镜右半结肠切除术围手术期并发症的列线图模型的净收益率较高;受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.941(95%CI:0.893~0.988),灵敏度为87.46%,特异度为81.48%,提示列线图预测模型具有较好的判别能力。Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度检验(χ^(2)=5.236,P=0.732),校准曲线的实际曲线位于理想曲线附近,提示的预测概率与实际概率具有较好的一致性。结论合并糖尿病、手术时间>3 h、肿瘤低分化、腹腔外吻合术和APACHE-Ⅱ≥14分是影响腹腔镜右半结肠切除术围手术期发生并发症的独立危险因素,基于上述构建的列线图预测模型,准确度和区分度较好,具有较好的临床实用性。

改良单孔加一孔腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的临床效果

目的探讨改良单孔加一孔腹腔镜(single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery,SILS+1)右半结肠癌根治术的安全性及有效性。方法采用回顾性病例对照研究。选取2019年1月到2024年6月我院收治的行SILS+1右半结肠癌根治术患者34例。其中对照组23例,行经典的SILS+1右半结肠癌根治术,切口采用3~4 cm绕脐切口+左中腹1.2 cm戳孔;研究组11例,行改良SILS+1右半结肠癌根治术,切口采用3~4 cm下腹部横切口+左中腹1.2 cm戳孔。比较两组的手术时间、出血量、淋巴结清除数量、术后首次肛门排气时间、术后1 d疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、术后住院时间等。结果两组出血量、淋巴结清除数量、术后首次肛门排气时间无明显差异(P>0.05);手术时间、术后1 d的VAS及术后住院时间有差异,研究组优于对照组(P<0.05)。结论改良单孔(下腹部横切口)加一孔(左中腹1.2 cm戳孔)腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治手术安全有效,且较绕脐切口手术时间及术后住院时间更短,术后疼痛更轻,手术切口更加美观和隐蔽,值得临床推广应用。

Risk factors for the prognosis of colon cancer

A study on clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in T4N0M0 colon cancer patients after R0 resection revealed that ileostomy,T stage,right hemicolectomy,irregular follow-up,and CA199 level were independent risk factors affecting overall survival.T4-stage cancer invades the entire thickness of the intestinal tract,increasing the difficulty of treatment and the risk of recurrence,and requires a combination of chemotherapy,immunotherapy,and targeted therapy to control the spread of cancer cells.The prognosis of right hemicolectomy is significantly worse than that of left hemicolectomy,and right hemicolectomy is an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis.Advanced age,histopathological type,and lymph node metastasis are also risk factors for colon cancer.

腹腔镜右半结肠切除术与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌的效果比较

目的比较腹腔镜右半结肠切除术与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌的临床效果。方法将80例右半结肠癌患者根据手术方式不同分为参照组(n=40,行开腹右半结肠切除术治疗)和研究组(n=40,行腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗)。比较两组的手术相关指标、T淋巴细胞亚群变化及预后情况。结果研究组手术时间长于参照组,术中出血量低于参照组,术后排气时间、肠鸣音恢复时间、术后进食时间及住院时间短于参照组(P<0.05)。研究组术后CD3^(+)、CD4^(+)、CD4^(+)/CD8^(+)水平高于参照组,CD8^(+)水平低于参照组(P<0.05)。术后随访6个月,研究组局部复发率及远处转移率低于参照组(P<0.05)。结论与开腹右半结肠切除术治疗相比,腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗右半结肠癌创伤较小,可促进患者术后尽快恢复,减轻对患者机体免疫功能的影响,降低局部复发率及转移率。

腹腔镜中间入路法右半结肠切除术解剖学观察

目的:探讨腹腔镜右半结肠切除术中线入路相关活体解剖学特点。方法:对2004年1月至2006年12月我科施行的21例腹腔镜中间入路右半结肠切除术手术录像进行观察分析。结果:利用中间入路,以肠系膜上静脉为解剖学标志,可成功进行系膜血管的解剖、淋巴结清扫,并进入正确的外科平面。结肠系膜和肾前筋膜之间存在融合筋膜间隙,其内侧、外侧、腹侧、背侧的边界分别是肠系膜上静脉、右结肠旁沟、结肠系膜、肾前筋膜。胃结肠韧带、肝结肠韧带和结肠外侧腹膜返折等外周固定装置是右半结肠切除术中必须离断的结构。结论:在腹腔镜中间入路右半结肠切除术中,肠系膜上静脉是关键解剖学标志和主线,融合筋膜间隙是正确的外科平面;一系列外周腹膜结构是重要固定装置。

完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的临床疗效对比

目的比较完全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助右半结肠根治术的治疗效果。方法回顾性分析我科2009年3月~2012年3月采用完全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术32例与同期30例腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌的临床资料,比较手术安全性及其疗效。结果 2组术后均无严重并发症及死亡。2组在手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结切除数量、标本长度、排气时间、住院时间等方面差异无显著性（P〉0.05）。2组中位生存期分别为55.0月及57.0月,差异无显著性（log-rankχ2=0.995,P=0.318）。结论完全腹腔镜和腹腔镜辅助右半结肠切除术治疗结肠癌可获得相同手术安全性及肿瘤学疗效。完全腹腔镜右半结肠切除术更加微创,但手术要求更高。