Whole Perfect Vectors and Fermat’s Last Theorem

A naïve discussion of Fermat’s last theorem conundrum is described. The present theorem’s proof is grounded on the well-known properties of sums of powers of the sine and cosine functions, the Minkowski norm definition, and some vector-specific structures.

Products of Odd Numbers or Prime Number Can Generate the Three Members’ Families of Fermat Last Theorem and the Theorem Is Valid for Summation of Squares of More Than Two Natural Numbers

Fermat’s last theorem, had the statement that there are no natural numbers A, B, and C such that An + Bn = Cn, in which n is a natural number greater than 2. We have shown that any product of two odd numbers can generate Fermat or Pythagoras triple (A, B, C) following n = 2 and also it is applicable A2 + B2 + C2 + D2 + so on =An2 where all are natural numbers.

On Fermat Last Theorem: The New Efficient Expression of a Hypothetical Solution as a Function of Its Fermat Divisors

Denote by a non-trivial primitive solution of Fermat’s equation (p prime).We introduce, for the first time, what we call Fermat principal divisors of the triple defined as follows. , and . We show that it is possible to express a,b and c as function of the Fermat principal divisors. Denote by the set of possible non-trivial solutions of the Diophantine equation . And, let (p prime). We prove that, in the first case of Fermat’s theorem, one has . In the second case of Fermat’s theorem, we show that , ,. Furthermore, we have implemented a python program to calculate the Fermat divisors of Pythagoreans triples. The results of this program, confirm the model used. We now have an effective tool to directly process Diophantine equations and that of Fermat. .

An Elementary Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem for Epsilons

The author presents a new approach which is used to solve an important Diophantine problem. An elementary argument is used to furnish another fully transparent proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. This was first stated by Pierre de Fermat in the seventeenth century. It is widely regarded that no elementary proof of this theorem exists. The author provides evidence to dispel this belief.

Fractional Noether theorem and fractional Lagrange equation of multi-scale mechano-electrophysiological coupling model of neuron membrane

Noether theorem is applied to a variable order fractional multiscale mechano-electrophysiological model of neuron membrane dynamics.The variable orders fractional Lagrange equation of a multiscale mechano-electrophysiological model of neuron membrane dynamics is given.The variable orders fractional Noether symmetry criterion and Noether conserved quantities are given.The forms of variable orders fractional Noether conserved quantities corresponding to Noether symmetry generators solutions of the model under different conditions are discussed in detail,and it is found that the expressions of variable orders fractional Noether conserved quantities are closely dependent on the external nonconservative forces and material parameters of the neuron.

Very Original Proofs of Two Famous Problems: “Are There Any Odd Perfect Numbers?” (Unsolved until to Date) and “Fermat’s Last Theorem: A New Proof of Theorem (Less than One and a Half Pages) and Its Generalization”

This article presents very original and relatively brief or very brief proofs about of two famous problems: 1) Are there any odd perfect numbers? and 2) “Fermat’s last theorem: A new proof of theorem and its generalization”. They are achieved with elementary mathematics. This is why these proofs can be easily understood by any mathematician or anyone who knows basic mathematics. Note that, in both problems, proof by contradiction was used as a method of proof. The first of the two problems to date has not been resolved. Its proof is completely original and was not based on the work of other researchers. On the contrary, it was based on a simple observation that all natural divisors of a positive integer appear in pairs. The aim of the first work is to solve one of the unsolved, for many years, problems of the mathematics which belong to the field of number theory. I believe that if the present proof is recognized by the mathematical community, it may signal a different way of solving unsolved problems. For the second problem, it is very important the fact that it is generalized to an arbitrarily large number of variables. This generalization is essentially a new theorem in the field of the number theory. To the classical problem, two solutions are given, which are presented in the chronological order in which they were achieved. Note that the second solution is very short and does not exceed one and a half pages. This leads me to believe that Fermat, as a great mathematician was not lying and that he had probably solved the problem, as he stated in his historic its letter, with a correspondingly brief solution. To win the bet on the question of whether Fermat was telling truth or lying, go immediately to the end of this article before the General Conclusions.

A Proof of Brouwer’s Fixed Point Theorem Using Sperner’s Lemma

This article offers a simple but rigorous proof of Brouwer’s fixed point theorem using Sperner’s Lemma.The general method I have used so far in the proof is mainly to convert the n-dimensional shapes to the corresponding case under the Sperner’s Labeling and apply the Sperner’s Lemma to solve the question.

A Brief New Proof to Fermat’s Last Theorem and Its Generalization

This article presents a brief and new solution to the problem known as the “Fermat’s Last Theorem”. It is achieved without the use of abstract algebra elements or elements from other fields of modern mathematics of the twentieth century. For this reason it can be easily understood by any mathematician or by anyone who knows basic mathematics. The important thing is that the above “theorem” is generalized. Thus, this generalization is essentially a new theorem in the field of number theory.

From Pythagoras Theorem to Fermat’s Last Theorem and the Relationship between the Equation of Degree <i>n</i>with One Unknown

The most interesting and famous problem that puzzled the mathematicians all around the world is much likely to be the Fermat’s Last Theorem. However, since the Theorem was proposed, people can’t find a way to solve the problem until Andrew Wiles proved the Fermat’s Last Theorem through a very difficult method called Modular elliptic curves in 1995. In this paper, I firstly constructed a geometric method to prove Fermat’s Last Theorem, and in this way we can easily get the conclusion below: If a and b are integer and?a = b, n ∈ Q and n > 1, the value of c satisfies the function an + bn = cn that can never be integer;if a, b and c are integer and a ≠ b, n is integer and n > 2, the function an + bn = cn cannot be established.

Diophantine Quotients and Remainders with Applications to Fermat and Pythagorean Equations

Diophantine equations have always fascinated mathematicians about existence, finitude, and the calculation of possible solutions. Among these equations, one of them will be the object of our research. This is the Pythagoras’- Fermat’s equation defined as follows. (1) when , it is well known that this equation has an infinity of solutions but has none (non-trivial) when . We also know that the last result, named Fermat-Wiles theorem (or FLT) was obtained at great expense and its understanding remains out of reach even for a good fringe of professional mathematicians. The aim of this research is to set up new simple but effective tools in the treatment of Diophantine equations and that of Pythagoras-Fermat. The tools put forward in this research are the properties of the quotients and the Diophantine remainders which we define as follows. Let a non-trivial triplet () solution of Equation (1) such that . and are called the Diophantine quotients and remainders of solution . We compute the remainder and the quotient of b and c by a using the division algorithm. Hence, we have: and et with . We prove the following important results. if and only if and if and only if . Also, we deduce that or for any hypothetical solution . We illustrate these results by effectively computing the Diophantine quotients and remainders in the case of Pythagorean triplets using a Python program. In the end, we apply the previous properties to directly prove a partial result of FLT. .

One More Assertion to Fermat’s Last Theorem

Around 1637, Fermat wrote his Last Theorem in the margin of his copy “It is impossible to separate a cube into two cubes, or a fourth power into two fourth powers, or in general, any power higher than the second, into two like powers”. With n, x, y, z ∈ N (meaning that n, x, y, z are all positive numbers) and n > 2, the equation xn + yn = zn has no solutions. In this paper, I try to prove Fermat’s statement by reverse order, which means no two cubes forms cube, no two fourth power forms a fourth power, or in general no two like powers forms a single like power greater than the two. I used roots, powers and radicals to assert Fermat’s last theorem. Also I tried to generalize Fermat’s conjecture for negative integers, with the help of radical equivalents of Pythagorean triplets and Euler’s disproven conjecture.

On a Simpler, Much More General and Truly Marvellous Proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem (I)

English mathematics Professor, Sir Andrew John Wiles of the University of Cambridge finally and conclusively proved in 1995 Fermat’s Last Theorem which had for 358 years notoriously resisted all gallant and spirited efforts to prove it even by three of the greatest mathematicians of all time—such as Euler, Laplace and Gauss. Sir Professor Andrew Wiles’s proof employed very advanced mathematical tools and methods that were not at all available in the known World during Fermat’s days. Given that Fermat claimed to have had the “truly marvellous” proof, this fact that the proof only came after 358 years of repeated failures by many notable mathematicians and that the proof came from mathematical tools and methods which are far ahead of Fermat’s time, has led many to doubt that Fermat actually did possess the “truly marvellous” proof which he claimed to have had. In this short reading, via elementary arithmetic methods, we demonstrate conclusively that Fermat’s Last Theorem actually yields to our efforts to prove it.

Solutions to Beal’s Conjecture, Fermat’s Last Theorem and Riemann Hypothesis

A Simple Mathematical Solutions to Beal’s Conjecture and Fermat’s Marginal Conjecture in his diary notes, Group Theoretical and Calculus Solutions to Fermat’s Last theorem & Integral Solution to Riemann Hypothesis are discussed.

A COMMENT ON THE PROOF OF FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM

In this paper, some conmments on the proof of Fermat’s last theorem are proposed.The main resuilt is thai the proof proposed by Wong Chiahe is only part of proof for fermat’s last theorem. That is to sqy ,the proof is not all-full proof to Fermat’s last theorem.

THE PROOF OF FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM

i) Instead of x￣n+ y￣n = z￣n ,we use as the general equation of Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT),where a and b are two arbitrary natural numbers .By means of binomial expansion ,(0.1) an be written as Because a￣r-(-b)￣r always contains a +b as its factor ,(0.2) can be written as where φ_r =[a￣r-(-b)￣r]/ (a+b ) are integers for r=1 . 2, 3. ...n (ii) Lets be a factor of a+b and let (a +b) = se. We can use x= sy to transform (0.3 ) to the following (0.4)(iii ) Dividing (0.4) by s￣2 we have On the left side of (0.5) there is a polynomial of y with integer coefficient and on the right side there is a constant cφ/s .If cφ/s is not an integer ,then we cannot find an integer y to satisfy (0.5), and then FLT is true for this case. If cφ_n/s is an integer ,we may change a and c such the cφ_n/s≠an integer .

Gravitation, Density Upper Limit and Quantization of Space

The singularity at distance r → 0 at the center of a spherically symmetric non-rotating, uncharged mass of radius R, is considered here. Under inverse square law force, the Schwarzschild metric, needs to be modified, to include Newton’s Shell Theorem (NST). By including NST for r, both Schwarzschild singularity at r = 2GM/c2 and at r → 0 singularities are removed from the metric. Near R → 0, the question of maximal density is considered based on Schwarzschild’s modified metric, and compared to the quantum limit of maximal mass density put by Planck’s quantum-based universal units. It is asserted, that General relativity, when combined with Planck’s universal units, inevitably leads to quantization of gravity.

A Geometric Proof of Fermat’s Little Theorem

We present an intuitively satisfying geometric proof of Fermat's result for positive integers that for prime moduli p, provided p does not divide a. This is known as Fermat’s Little Theorem. The proof is novel in using the idea of colorings applied to regular polygons to establish a number-theoretic result. A lemma traditionally, if ambiguously, attributed to Burnside provides a critical enumeration step.

具有饱和恢复率的SEIR时滞模型的行波解

研究一类具有饱和恢复率的SEIR时滞模型的行波解.首先,考虑一类二维系统初值问题的适定性;然后,通过构造一对有界的向量值上、下解得到一个闭凸集;最后,利用Schauder不动点定理证明:当基本再生数R^(0)>1,波速c>c^(*)时模型存在非平凡行波解.

On Fermat’s Last Theorem and Galaxies of Sequences of Positive Integers

We construct sequences of positive integers which are solutions of the equation x2+y2=z2. We introduce Mouanda’s choice functions which allow us to construct galaxies of sequences of positive integers. We give many examples of galaxies of numbers. We show that the equation x2n+y2n=z2n (n ≥2) has no integer solutions. We prove that the equation xn+yn=zn (n ≥3) has no solutions in N. We introduce the notion of the planetary representation of a galaxy of numbers which allow us to predict the structure, laws of the universe and life in every planet system of every galaxy of the universe. We show that every multiverse contains a finite number of universes.

层次化的K.Fan’s Theorem

在L-拓扑空间中,对任意LF集,我们利用层次化的K.Fan’s Theorem定义了一种层次连通并研究了其基本性质.