Role of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 in the bone development and skeletal diseases

Accumulating data suggest that FGFs/FGFR1 plays essential roles in the bone development and human skeletal diseases. Conditional inactivation of fgfrl caused different phenotypes displaying in different cells or specific organs and revealed some novel functions of FGFR1 in bone development. Fgfrl mutation mainly induced 2 types of human skeletal diseases, craniosynostosis syndrome and dysplasias. Similar mutation of fgfrl in mouse model just mimicked the phenotype that happened in human. These fa- cilitate the investigation on the underlying mechanism of the diseases. Here we mainly focused on the ad- vance of FGFR1 function in the bone development and its mutation caused skeletal diseases.

Are there fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 mutations in a Chinese Kallmann syndrome family?

The present study examined 58 members of a Kallmann syndrome family and investigated whether there are fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 （FGFR1） gene mutations in this family. Genomic DNA from the proband and family members was subjected to PCR to amplify 18 exons of FGFR1, and the amplified products were sequenced to identify potential mutations. MRI of the olfactory bulb region was performed on suspected subjects. The patient and his father were diagnosed with Kallmann syndrome. A polymorphic site was found at 39542, with the proband and his parents being heterozygous （guanine ＋ cytosine）. However, healthy controls and the other members of this family were homozygous for guanine at this position.

EXPRESSION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF BASIC FIBROBLAST GWOWTH FACTOR AND FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR-1 IN OVARIAN EPITHELIAL NEOPLASM

Objective To study the relevance of expression of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR 1) and carcinogenesis and progression of ovarian epithelial neoplasm. Methods Ten cases of normal ovarian tissues and 75 cases of ovarian epithelial neoplasm tissues were detected by immunohistochemical methods: S P for bFGF, FGFR 1,double immunohistochemistry Lab SA for Ki 67 antigen and bFGF. Results The expression level of bFGF, FGFR 1in ovarian epithelium and ovarian epithelial neoplasm showed a step wise increase in the following order:normal <benign <borderline <malignant; The expression level and intensity of bFGF and FGFR 1 were increased with the decrease of differentiation degree and increase of clinical stage in ovarian carcinoma; There was no statistical difference between the expression of bFGF, FGFR 1 in serous cystadenocarcinoma and that of mucinous cystadenocarcinoma; The expression of bFGF was correlated with that of FGFR 1 in neoplastic tissues; There were positive expression rates of bFGF and Ki 67 antigen in ovarian epithelial neoplasm. Conclusion As an important proliferative factor, bFGF plays an important role in carcinogenisis and progression of ovarian epithelial neoplasm.

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 1 Gene Amplification in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

Objective： To review the prevalence and prognostic significance of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 （FGFRI） amplification and to establish an association between FGFRI amplification and the clinical characteristics of nonsmall cell lung cancer （NSCLC）. Data Sources： We searched PubMed for English-language studies published between January 2010 and May 2016. Study Selection： We included all relevant articles, with no limitation of study design. Results： FGFRI amplification was reported in 8.7-20.0% of NSCLC cases and was significantly more frequent in squamous cell carcinomas （SCCs） （9.7-28.3%） than in adenocarcinomas （ADCs） （0-15.0%）. The rates of FGFRI amplification were as follows： males, 13.9-22.1%; females, 0-20.1%; Stage 1 NSCLC, 9.3-24.1%; Stage II NSCLC, 12.9-25.0%; Stage 111 NSCLC, 8.2-19.5%： Stage IV NSCLC, 0-12.5%; current smokers, 13.3-29.0%; former smokers, 2.5-23.0%; and nonsmokers, 0-22.2%. Overall survival was 43.9-70.8 months in patients with FGFRI amplification and 42.4-115.0 months in patients with no FGFRI amplification; disease-free survival was 22.5-58.5 months and 52.4-94.6 months, respectively. Conclusions： FGFR1 amplification is more frequent in SCCs than in ADCs. The association between FGFRI amplification and clinical characteristics （gender, smoking status, and disease stage） and the prognostic significance of FGFRI amplification in NSCLC remain controversial.

Comparison of FGFR1 expression on lens epithelial cells between adults and fetuses

AIM: To study the differences of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) gene on human lens epithelial cells (HLECs) of adults and fetuses. METHODS: Indirect in situ RT-PCR was adopted for detection of FGFR1 gene. The cDNA of the nnRNA in the paraffin sections of fetus and adult HLEC was synthesized by reverse transcription reaction. After PCR amplification, in situ hybridization test was performed with synthesized oligonucleotide probe and relative quantification was carried out using image analysis. RESULTS: HLECs of adults and fetuses expressed FGFR1 gene, the expression level was higher in fetuses than in adults. The difference between them had significance (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: FGFR1 Exist in HLEC and the expression is age-related, which could be one of causes of the high occurrence of post operational after-cataract in children.

Overexpression of the receptor tyrosine kinase EphA4 in human gastric cancers

AIM: To clarify the expression and role of Ephrin receptor A4 (EphA4) in gastric cancer in relation to clinicopathological characteristics and the expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) and ephrin ligands. METHODS: Eleven gastric carcinoma cell lines, 24 paired surgical fresh specimens of gastric adenocarcinoma and adjacent nontumor tissue, 74 conventional formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor specimens, and 55 specimens spotted on tissue microarray (TMA) were analyzed. Reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR), real-time RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and cell growth assays were performed. RESULTS: Overexpression of EphA4 mRNA expres-sion was observed in 8 (73%) of 11 gastric cancer cell lines and 10 (42%) of 24 gastric cancer tissues. Over-expression of EphA4, analyzed by immunohistochemistry, was observed in 62 (48%) of 129 gastric cancer tissues. EphA4 overexpression, at the protein level, was significantly associated with depth of invasion and recurrence. EphA4 overexpression was also correlated with FGFR1 overexpression. Patients with EphA4-positive cancer had significantly shorter overall survival periods than did those with EphA4-negative cancer (P = 0.0008). The mRNAs for ephrin ligands were coexpressed in various combinations in gastric cancer cell lines and cancer tissues. Downregulation of EphA4 expression by siRNA in EphA4-overexpressing gastric cancer cell lines resulted in a significant decrease in cell growth. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that overexpres-sion of EphA4 plays a role in gastric cancer.