Objective To identify and determine the optimal method to screening for fetal Down's syndrome (DS). Methods Three large cohorts with 17 118, 39 903, 16 646 subjects were enrolled for the first trimester double mark...Objective To identify and determine the optimal method to screening for fetal Down's syndrome (DS). Methods Three large cohorts with 17 118, 39 903, 16 646 subjects were enrolled for the first trimester double marker (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free [B-human chorionic gonadotropin) screening (FTDMS), second trimester double marker (c{-fetoprotein and free B-human chorionic gonadotropin) screening (STDMS), and second trimester triple marker (a-fetoprotein, free 13-human chorionic gonadotropin and unconjugated estriol 3) screening (STTMS), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR) and the areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were estimated in order to determine the optimal screening method in women under or above 35 years old. Results For women under 35 years old, STTMS was the best method with a detection rate of 68.8% and FPR of 4.3% followed by the STDMS with a detection rate (sensitivity) of 66.7% and FPR of 4.9%. The FTDMS had a lower detection rate of 61.1% and FPR of 6.3%. For women above 35 years old, the detection rate of all the methods was similar, but STTMS method had a lowest FPR of 15.9%. For women under 35 years old AUCs were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.96) for FTDMS, STDMS, and STTMS methods, respectively; for those above 35 years old, AUCs were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.83), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82), 0.78 (95% Cl, 0.58 to 0.97) for FTDMS, STDMS and SITMS, respectively. Conclusion Findings from our study revealed that STDMS is optimal for the detection of fetal DS in pregnant women aged under 35. For individual women, if economic condition permits, STFMS is the best choice, while for women aged above 35, STTMS is the best choice in this regard.展开更多
Objective:To compare the efficiency and related financial parameters of the double- and triple-marker test for the second-trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. Methods:The serum samples were coll...Objective:To compare the efficiency and related financial parameters of the double- and triple-marker test for the second-trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. Methods:The serum samples were collected from the 2^(nd) trimester pregnant women in this hospital and were examined for three biomedical markers[alpha-fetoprotein(AFP),freeβ-human chorionic gonadotropin(freeβ-hCG) and unconjugated estriol(uE_3)]by TR-FIA.The pregnancy outcomes were followed up and screening efficiency calculated for double-marker(AFP+freeβ-hCG) and triple-marker(AFP+ freeβ-hCG+uE_3) test. Results:(1)A total of 4,707 serum samples of 2^(nd) trimester pregnancy were collected in this study,of which 4,245 pregnancy outcomes got followed up by May 30,2009,with 462 cases lost to follow-up.The follow-up rate was 90.2%.3 cases of Down's syndrome,4 cases of other chromosome abnormalities and 1 case of neural tube defect (NTD) were found.There was no medically induced miscarriage by invasive tests.(2) Detection rate and false positive rate of triple marker test for Down's syndrome screening were 66.7%and 5.26%,respectively,while those in double marker test were 33.3%and 4.01%,respectively.The detection rate of all chromosome abnormalities was 75%in triple marker test and 37.5%in double marker test.The detection rate of NTD was 100%either in double or triple marker test.(3) It costs 499,375 RMB to avoid one Down's syndrome birth by using triple marker test and 781,200 RMB by using double marker test. Conclusion:Triple-marker test is superior to double marker test in 2nd trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome,and costs less to avoid a Down's syndrome birth.展开更多
Objective: To study the value ofα-fetoprotein (α-FP),β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG), inhibin A, and uncojugated estriol (UE3) at the second trimester for early screening of preeclampsia. Methods: This coho...Objective: To study the value ofα-fetoprotein (α-FP),β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG), inhibin A, and uncojugated estriol (UE3) at the second trimester for early screening of preeclampsia. Methods: This cohort study was performed on 1713 consecutive pregnant women with gestational age from 15 to 18 weeks. We measured the serum levels ofα-FP, β-HCG, inhibin A, and UE3 and they were followed-up for 48 h after delivery. Results: A total of 1713 women were recruited and through the study 151 women (8.8%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia (n=123, 21.5% in the pregnant women with high risk, n=28, 2.5% in the pregnant women with low risk;P<0.0001). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated to be 2.39 MOM forα-FP, 2.84 MOM forβ-HCG, 1.92 MOM for inhibin A, and 0.77 MOM for UE3. The best cutoff value was specifically considered for each marker that was determined a positive predictive value ranged 19.60% forα-FP, 17.62% for β-HCG, 18.33% for inhibin A and 14.88% for UE3, a negative predictive value ranged 95.63% for α-FP, 93.89% for β-HCG, 94.28% for inhibin A and 93.57% for UE3, and an area under receiver operating characteristic curve ranged 0.70 forα-FP, 0.63 forβ-HCG, 0.65 for inhibin A and 0.61 for UE3. Conclusions: This study reveals that the new cutoff values are more valuable in screening preeclampsia. Although these markers have a low positive predictive value, they present a high negative predictive value. Also, the combination ofα-FP,β-HCG and inhibin A and the combination ofα-FP and inhibin A have the highest value in screening preeclampsia.展开更多
A retrospective descriptive study is conducted at the San Juan de Dios Hospital, San José, Costa Rica, during the period from February 2016 to March 2017, with a total of 37 patients from which a combined screeni...A retrospective descriptive study is conducted at the San Juan de Dios Hospital, San José, Costa Rica, during the period from February 2016 to March 2017, with a total of 37 patients from which a combined screening during the first trimester of pregnancy was conducted, evaluating maternal age, biochemical and sonographic methods that together can predict the risk of fetal chromosomal alterations during pregnancy. The purpose of using combined screening as a noninvasive method is to identify high risk gestations and to minimize the number of invasive procedures to detect the highest number of cases. Four patients with higher risk of aneuploidy during pregnancy were identified through this screening.展开更多
Preeclampsia(PE),a multisystem disorder in pregnancy,is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality that poses financial and physical burdens worldwide.Preterm PE with delivery at<37 weeks of ges...Preeclampsia(PE),a multisystem disorder in pregnancy,is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality that poses financial and physical burdens worldwide.Preterm PE with delivery at<37 weeks of gestation is associated with a higher risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes than term PE with delivery at≥37 weeks of gestation.A myriad of first trimester screening models have been developed to identifying women at risk of preterm PE.In fact,the Fetal Medicine Foundation(FMF)first trimester prediction model has undergone successful internal and external validation.The FMF triple test enables the estimation of patient-specific risks,using Bayes theorem to combine maternal characteristics and medical history together with measurements of mean arterial pressure,uterine artery pulsatility index,and serum placental growth factor.Establishing a quality control process for regular monitoring and to ensure data standardization,reliability,and accuracy is key to maintaining optimal screening performance.The rate of preterm PE can be reduced by 62%by using the FMF prediction model,followed by the administration of low-dose aspirin.Recent evidence has also demonstrated that metformin has the potential for preventing PE in patients at high-risk of the disorder.In this article,we will summarize the existing literature on the different screening methods,different components of risk assessment,therapeutic interventions,and clinical implementation of the first trimester screening and prevention program for PE with specific considerations for Chinese mainland.展开更多
Introduction: A novel three dimensional approach for aneuploidy screening in the first trimester of pregnancy was developed in which risk assessment derives directly from comparing the plotted data of nuchal transluce...Introduction: A novel three dimensional approach for aneuploidy screening in the first trimester of pregnancy was developed in which risk assessment derives directly from comparing the plotted data of nuchal translucency, pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (fβ-hCG) of an examined fetus with similar coordinates of fetuses with already known health status. Under this approach, it is possible to utilize either a ‘box’ or a ‘sphere’ model. In either case, optimal volume sizes and the benefits of adopting a ‘minimum number of required fetuses’ (MNR) have not yet been investigated;and for the box model, two modifications, called ‘empty box results positive’ (EB+) and ‘simulation’ (SIM), provide additional options. It was the aim of this study to analyze which of the two models and their variants provides the best test performance. Methods: The study cohort was divided into a reference collective (n = 10,954) and a test collective (n = 4239). The test collective was examined repeatedly, with another model and modification used on each occasion. Test performances were compared by the area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Results: The sphere model was inferior to the box model when optimal volumes were used with the latter and combined with the modifications EB+ and Sim. EB+ increased the number of assessable fetuses while Sim improved the test performance. MNR improved neither the box nor the sphere model. Conclusion: A new, optimized model in line with the obtained results should be developed and tested in further studies.展开更多
目的通过成本-效用分析,评价孕早期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查相比于孕中期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查的经济性,为临床路径优化提供循证依据。方法从全社会角度出发,构建决策树模型,模拟孕妇于孕早期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查(干预组)与于孕中...目的通过成本-效用分析,评价孕早期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查相比于孕中期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查的经济性,为临床路径优化提供循证依据。方法从全社会角度出发,构建决策树模型,模拟孕妇于孕早期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查(干预组)与于孕中期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查(对照组)2种不同产前筛查方案的临床选择及转归路径,评估2组不同路径下的成本-效用情况。模型模拟时长为18周,临床转移概率和成本参数来源于深圳市南山区妇幼保健院数据,效用数据来源于已公开发表的文献。结果指标包括成本、质量调整生命年(qualityadjusted life years,QALYs)和增量成本-效果比(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio,ICER)。通过敏感性分析评估模型结果的稳健性。结果相比对照组,干预组可减少不必要的妊娠发生,以更少的总成本投入获得更多的QALYs,ICER为−161732.68元/QALY,具有绝对成本效果优势。概率敏感性分析表明基础分析结果具有稳健性,干预组具有成本效果的概率为94.60%。结论在全社会角度下,于孕早期进行胎儿结构畸形筛查相比于孕中期具有绝对的经济学优势。展开更多
Background The incidence of autosomal trisomy in livebirths is strongly dependent on maternal age. Special consideration is given to the provision of prenatal screening and cytogenetic testing to women of advanced mat...Background The incidence of autosomal trisomy in livebirths is strongly dependent on maternal age. Special consideration is given to the provision of prenatal screening and cytogenetic testing to women of advanced maternal age (AMA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of second trimester prenatal screening and amniocentesis for Down syndrome (DS) and compare the trends of choice of screening and amniocentesis among AMA women. Methods A total of 5404 AMA patients with natural singleton pregnancy were recruited for this prospective study from January 2008 to December 2010. The gestational weeks were from 15 weeks to 20~6 weeks. The patients referred were grouped into a screening group (2107 cases) and an amniocentesis group (3297 cases) by their own decision. The prevalence of DS was compared between the two groups by chi-square test. Choice rates for each maternal age with trends were compared by regression analysis. Results There were 18 cases of fetal DS detected in the screening group with a prevalence of 8.54%o (18/2107). Twenty- five cases of fetal DS were diagnosed in the amniocentesis group with a prevalence of 7,58%0 (25/3297). No statistical difference was observed in the prevalence of DS between the screening and amniocentesis group (P=0.928). The invasive testing rate for DS in the amniocentesis group was 5.54 times higher than that of the screening group (1/131.88 vs. 1/23.78). With the increase of the maternal age, the choice of amniocentesis increased while the choice of the screening showed an opposite trend. The choice of the AMA women between the screening and amniocentesis was significantly age relevant (P=0.012). Conclusions The second trimester serum screening age alone to screen for DS. We suggest educating screening and amniocentesis options. in combination with maternal age was more effective than maternal the patients by recommending AMA women be informed of both展开更多
目的:建立南京地区孕早期产前筛查血清游离β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-human chorionic gonadotropin,β-HCG)、妊娠相关蛋白A(pregnancy-associated plasma protein A,PAPP-A)及胎儿颈项皮肤透明层厚度(nuchal translucency thickness,...目的:建立南京地区孕早期产前筛查血清游离β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-human chorionic gonadotropin,β-HCG)、妊娠相关蛋白A(pregnancy-associated plasma protein A,PAPP-A)及胎儿颈项皮肤透明层厚度(nuchal translucency thickness,NT)等指标的中位数值,探讨孕早期筛查切割值的制定和筛查指标的临床意义。方法:采用时间分辨免疫荧光(time-resolved fluoroim-munoassay,TRFIA)技术对1 684例妊娠8~13+6周孕妇血清游离β-HCG和PAPP-A浓度进行测定,并在其妊娠11~13+6周通过超声技术测定胎儿NT值,随访已分娩孕妇的妊娠结局。结果:①孕妇不同孕周血清游离β-HCG中位数平均水平比软件内嵌高32%,而PAPP-A除8周外均接近于软件内嵌,NT值则低于软件内嵌15%;②当筛查阳性率为5%时,21-三体高风险的切割值约为1∶550,共检出4例染色体异常;③不良妊娠结局者孕早期筛查单指标中血清PAPP-A中位数的倍数值(multiples of the medi-an,MOM值)显著低于正常结局者,NT值则显著高于正常结局者。结论:①不同地区血清和超声指标中位数的筛查切割值制定标准可能存在差异,有必要进一步深入探讨应用国外软件作内嵌参数的适用性;②孕早期产前筛查单指标MOM值对妊娠结局的判定有重要意义,并有助于检出其他染色体异常。展开更多
基金supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81101655)the grant from the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2011M501282)the grant from Hunan Provincial Science & Tecnology Departemnt(2009SK3048)
文摘Objective To identify and determine the optimal method to screening for fetal Down's syndrome (DS). Methods Three large cohorts with 17 118, 39 903, 16 646 subjects were enrolled for the first trimester double marker (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free [B-human chorionic gonadotropin) screening (FTDMS), second trimester double marker (c{-fetoprotein and free B-human chorionic gonadotropin) screening (STDMS), and second trimester triple marker (a-fetoprotein, free 13-human chorionic gonadotropin and unconjugated estriol 3) screening (STTMS), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR) and the areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were estimated in order to determine the optimal screening method in women under or above 35 years old. Results For women under 35 years old, STTMS was the best method with a detection rate of 68.8% and FPR of 4.3% followed by the STDMS with a detection rate (sensitivity) of 66.7% and FPR of 4.9%. The FTDMS had a lower detection rate of 61.1% and FPR of 6.3%. For women above 35 years old, the detection rate of all the methods was similar, but STTMS method had a lowest FPR of 15.9%. For women under 35 years old AUCs were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.96) for FTDMS, STDMS, and STTMS methods, respectively; for those above 35 years old, AUCs were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.83), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82), 0.78 (95% Cl, 0.58 to 0.97) for FTDMS, STDMS and SITMS, respectively. Conclusion Findings from our study revealed that STDMS is optimal for the detection of fetal DS in pregnant women aged under 35. For individual women, if economic condition permits, STFMS is the best choice, while for women aged above 35, STTMS is the best choice in this regard.
文摘Objective:To compare the efficiency and related financial parameters of the double- and triple-marker test for the second-trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome. Methods:The serum samples were collected from the 2^(nd) trimester pregnant women in this hospital and were examined for three biomedical markers[alpha-fetoprotein(AFP),freeβ-human chorionic gonadotropin(freeβ-hCG) and unconjugated estriol(uE_3)]by TR-FIA.The pregnancy outcomes were followed up and screening efficiency calculated for double-marker(AFP+freeβ-hCG) and triple-marker(AFP+ freeβ-hCG+uE_3) test. Results:(1)A total of 4,707 serum samples of 2^(nd) trimester pregnancy were collected in this study,of which 4,245 pregnancy outcomes got followed up by May 30,2009,with 462 cases lost to follow-up.The follow-up rate was 90.2%.3 cases of Down's syndrome,4 cases of other chromosome abnormalities and 1 case of neural tube defect (NTD) were found.There was no medically induced miscarriage by invasive tests.(2) Detection rate and false positive rate of triple marker test for Down's syndrome screening were 66.7%and 5.26%,respectively,while those in double marker test were 33.3%and 4.01%,respectively.The detection rate of all chromosome abnormalities was 75%in triple marker test and 37.5%in double marker test.The detection rate of NTD was 100%either in double or triple marker test.(3) It costs 499,375 RMB to avoid one Down's syndrome birth by using triple marker test and 781,200 RMB by using double marker test. Conclusion:Triple-marker test is superior to double marker test in 2nd trimester maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome,and costs less to avoid a Down's syndrome birth.
文摘Objective: To study the value ofα-fetoprotein (α-FP),β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG), inhibin A, and uncojugated estriol (UE3) at the second trimester for early screening of preeclampsia. Methods: This cohort study was performed on 1713 consecutive pregnant women with gestational age from 15 to 18 weeks. We measured the serum levels ofα-FP, β-HCG, inhibin A, and UE3 and they were followed-up for 48 h after delivery. Results: A total of 1713 women were recruited and through the study 151 women (8.8%) were diagnosed with preeclampsia (n=123, 21.5% in the pregnant women with high risk, n=28, 2.5% in the pregnant women with low risk;P<0.0001). The area under receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated to be 2.39 MOM forα-FP, 2.84 MOM forβ-HCG, 1.92 MOM for inhibin A, and 0.77 MOM for UE3. The best cutoff value was specifically considered for each marker that was determined a positive predictive value ranged 19.60% forα-FP, 17.62% for β-HCG, 18.33% for inhibin A and 14.88% for UE3, a negative predictive value ranged 95.63% for α-FP, 93.89% for β-HCG, 94.28% for inhibin A and 93.57% for UE3, and an area under receiver operating characteristic curve ranged 0.70 forα-FP, 0.63 forβ-HCG, 0.65 for inhibin A and 0.61 for UE3. Conclusions: This study reveals that the new cutoff values are more valuable in screening preeclampsia. Although these markers have a low positive predictive value, they present a high negative predictive value. Also, the combination ofα-FP,β-HCG and inhibin A and the combination ofα-FP and inhibin A have the highest value in screening preeclampsia.
文摘A retrospective descriptive study is conducted at the San Juan de Dios Hospital, San José, Costa Rica, during the period from February 2016 to March 2017, with a total of 37 patients from which a combined screening during the first trimester of pregnancy was conducted, evaluating maternal age, biochemical and sonographic methods that together can predict the risk of fetal chromosomal alterations during pregnancy. The purpose of using combined screening as a noninvasive method is to identify high risk gestations and to minimize the number of invasive procedures to detect the highest number of cases. Four patients with higher risk of aneuploidy during pregnancy were identified through this screening.
基金the National Key Research and Development Program of China(No.2021YFC2701600 and 2021YFC2701604).
文摘Preeclampsia(PE),a multisystem disorder in pregnancy,is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality that poses financial and physical burdens worldwide.Preterm PE with delivery at<37 weeks of gestation is associated with a higher risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes than term PE with delivery at≥37 weeks of gestation.A myriad of first trimester screening models have been developed to identifying women at risk of preterm PE.In fact,the Fetal Medicine Foundation(FMF)first trimester prediction model has undergone successful internal and external validation.The FMF triple test enables the estimation of patient-specific risks,using Bayes theorem to combine maternal characteristics and medical history together with measurements of mean arterial pressure,uterine artery pulsatility index,and serum placental growth factor.Establishing a quality control process for regular monitoring and to ensure data standardization,reliability,and accuracy is key to maintaining optimal screening performance.The rate of preterm PE can be reduced by 62%by using the FMF prediction model,followed by the administration of low-dose aspirin.Recent evidence has also demonstrated that metformin has the potential for preventing PE in patients at high-risk of the disorder.In this article,we will summarize the existing literature on the different screening methods,different components of risk assessment,therapeutic interventions,and clinical implementation of the first trimester screening and prevention program for PE with specific considerations for Chinese mainland.
文摘Introduction: A novel three dimensional approach for aneuploidy screening in the first trimester of pregnancy was developed in which risk assessment derives directly from comparing the plotted data of nuchal translucency, pregnancy associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin (fβ-hCG) of an examined fetus with similar coordinates of fetuses with already known health status. Under this approach, it is possible to utilize either a ‘box’ or a ‘sphere’ model. In either case, optimal volume sizes and the benefits of adopting a ‘minimum number of required fetuses’ (MNR) have not yet been investigated;and for the box model, two modifications, called ‘empty box results positive’ (EB+) and ‘simulation’ (SIM), provide additional options. It was the aim of this study to analyze which of the two models and their variants provides the best test performance. Methods: The study cohort was divided into a reference collective (n = 10,954) and a test collective (n = 4239). The test collective was examined repeatedly, with another model and modification used on each occasion. Test performances were compared by the area under curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Results: The sphere model was inferior to the box model when optimal volumes were used with the latter and combined with the modifications EB+ and Sim. EB+ increased the number of assessable fetuses while Sim improved the test performance. MNR improved neither the box nor the sphere model. Conclusion: A new, optimized model in line with the obtained results should be developed and tested in further studies.
文摘目的通过成本-效用分析,评价孕早期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查相比于孕中期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查的经济性,为临床路径优化提供循证依据。方法从全社会角度出发,构建决策树模型,模拟孕妇于孕早期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查(干预组)与于孕中期行胎儿结构畸形超声筛查(对照组)2种不同产前筛查方案的临床选择及转归路径,评估2组不同路径下的成本-效用情况。模型模拟时长为18周,临床转移概率和成本参数来源于深圳市南山区妇幼保健院数据,效用数据来源于已公开发表的文献。结果指标包括成本、质量调整生命年(qualityadjusted life years,QALYs)和增量成本-效果比(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio,ICER)。通过敏感性分析评估模型结果的稳健性。结果相比对照组,干预组可减少不必要的妊娠发生,以更少的总成本投入获得更多的QALYs,ICER为−161732.68元/QALY,具有绝对成本效果优势。概率敏感性分析表明基础分析结果具有稳健性,干预组具有成本效果的概率为94.60%。结论在全社会角度下,于孕早期进行胎儿结构畸形筛查相比于孕中期具有绝对的经济学优势。
文摘Background The incidence of autosomal trisomy in livebirths is strongly dependent on maternal age. Special consideration is given to the provision of prenatal screening and cytogenetic testing to women of advanced maternal age (AMA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of second trimester prenatal screening and amniocentesis for Down syndrome (DS) and compare the trends of choice of screening and amniocentesis among AMA women. Methods A total of 5404 AMA patients with natural singleton pregnancy were recruited for this prospective study from January 2008 to December 2010. The gestational weeks were from 15 weeks to 20~6 weeks. The patients referred were grouped into a screening group (2107 cases) and an amniocentesis group (3297 cases) by their own decision. The prevalence of DS was compared between the two groups by chi-square test. Choice rates for each maternal age with trends were compared by regression analysis. Results There were 18 cases of fetal DS detected in the screening group with a prevalence of 8.54%o (18/2107). Twenty- five cases of fetal DS were diagnosed in the amniocentesis group with a prevalence of 7,58%0 (25/3297). No statistical difference was observed in the prevalence of DS between the screening and amniocentesis group (P=0.928). The invasive testing rate for DS in the amniocentesis group was 5.54 times higher than that of the screening group (1/131.88 vs. 1/23.78). With the increase of the maternal age, the choice of amniocentesis increased while the choice of the screening showed an opposite trend. The choice of the AMA women between the screening and amniocentesis was significantly age relevant (P=0.012). Conclusions The second trimester serum screening age alone to screen for DS. We suggest educating screening and amniocentesis options. in combination with maternal age was more effective than maternal the patients by recommending AMA women be informed of both
文摘目的:建立南京地区孕早期产前筛查血清游离β-人绒毛膜促性腺激素(β-human chorionic gonadotropin,β-HCG)、妊娠相关蛋白A(pregnancy-associated plasma protein A,PAPP-A)及胎儿颈项皮肤透明层厚度(nuchal translucency thickness,NT)等指标的中位数值,探讨孕早期筛查切割值的制定和筛查指标的临床意义。方法:采用时间分辨免疫荧光(time-resolved fluoroim-munoassay,TRFIA)技术对1 684例妊娠8~13+6周孕妇血清游离β-HCG和PAPP-A浓度进行测定,并在其妊娠11~13+6周通过超声技术测定胎儿NT值,随访已分娩孕妇的妊娠结局。结果:①孕妇不同孕周血清游离β-HCG中位数平均水平比软件内嵌高32%,而PAPP-A除8周外均接近于软件内嵌,NT值则低于软件内嵌15%;②当筛查阳性率为5%时,21-三体高风险的切割值约为1∶550,共检出4例染色体异常;③不良妊娠结局者孕早期筛查单指标中血清PAPP-A中位数的倍数值(multiples of the medi-an,MOM值)显著低于正常结局者,NT值则显著高于正常结局者。结论:①不同地区血清和超声指标中位数的筛查切割值制定标准可能存在差异,有必要进一步深入探讨应用国外软件作内嵌参数的适用性;②孕早期产前筛查单指标MOM值对妊娠结局的判定有重要意义,并有助于检出其他染色体异常。