Endoscopic intramural cystogastrostomy for treatment of peripancreatic fluid collection: A viewpoint from a surgeon

Percutaneous or endoscopic drainage is the initial choice for the treatment of peripancreatic fluid collection in symptomatic patients.Endoscopic transgastric fenestration(ETGF)was first reported for the management of pancreatic pseu-docysts of 20 patients in 2008.From a surgeon’s viewpoint,ETGF is a similar procedure to cystogastrostomy in that they both produce a wide outlet orifice for the drainage of fluid and necrotic debris.ETGF can be performed at least 4 wk after the initial onset of acute pancreatitis and it has a high priority over the surgical approach.However,the surgical approach usually has a better success rate because surgical cystogastrostomy has a wider outlet(>6 cm vs 2 cm)than ETGF.However,percutaneous or endoscopic drainage,ETGF,and surgical approach offer various treatment options for peripancreatic fluid collection patients based on their conditions.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fluid collection drainage: Where are we?

Pancreatic fluid collections(PFCs)result from injury to the pancreas from acute or chronic pancreatitis,surgery,or trauma.Management of these collections has evolved over the last 2 decades.The choice of interventions includes percu-taneous,endoscopic,minimally invasive surgery,or a combined approach.Endoscopic drainage is the drainage of PFCs by creating an artificial communication between the collection and gastrointestinal lumen that is maintained by placing a stent across the fistulous tract.In this editorial,we endeavored to update the current status of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of PFCs.

Association between acute peripancreatic fluid collections and early readmission in acute pancreatitis:A propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND Patients with acute pancreatitis(AP)frequently experience hospital readmissions,posing a significant burden to healthcare systems.Acute peripancreatic fluid collection(APFC)may negatively impact the clinical course of AP.It could worsen symptoms and potentially lead to additional complications.However,clinical evidence regarding the specific association between APFC and early readmission in AP remains scarce.Understanding the link between APFC and readmission may help improve clinical care for AP patients and reduce healthcare costs.AIM To evaluate the association between APFC and 30-day readmission in patients with AP.METHODS This retrospective cohort study is based on the Nationwide Readmission Database for 2016-2019.Patients with a primary diagnosis of AP were identified.Participants were categorized into those with and without APFC.A 1:1 propensity score matching for age,gender,and Elixhauser comorbidities was performed.The primary outcome was early readmission rates.Secondary outcomes included the incidence of inpatient complications and healthcare utilization.Unadjusted analyses used Mann-Whitney U andχ2 tests,while Cox regression models assessed 30-day readmission risks and reported them as adjusted hazard ratios(aHR).Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests verified readmission risks.RESULTS A total of 673059 patients with the principal diagnosis of AP were included.Of these,5.1%had APFC on initial admission.After propensity score matching,each cohort consisted of 33914 patients.Those with APFC showed a higher incidence of inpatient complications,including septic shock(3.1%vs 1.3%,P<0.001),portal venous thrombosis(4.4%vs 0.8%,P<0.001),and mechanical ventilation(1.8%vs 0.9%,P<0.001).The length of stay(LOS)was longer for APFC patients[4(3-7)vs 3(2-5)days,P<0.001],as were hospital charges($29451 vs$24418,P<0.001).For 30-day readmissions,APFC patients had a higher rate(15.7%vs 6.5%,P<0.001)and a longer median readmission LOS(4 vs 3 days,P<0.001).The APFC group also had higher readmission charges($28282 vs$22865,P<0.001).The presence of APFC increased the risk of readmission twofold(aHR 2.52,95%confidence interval:2.40-2.65,P<0.001).The independent risk factors for 30-day readmission included female gender,Elixhauser Comorbidity Index≥3,chronic pulmonary diseases,chronic renal disease,protein-calorie malnutrition,substance use disorder,depression,portal and splenic venous thrombosis,and certain endoscopic procedures.CONCLUSION Developing APFC during index hospitalization for AP is linked to higher readmission rates,more inpatient complications,longer LOS,and increased healthcare costs.Knowing predictors of readmission can help target high-risk patients,reducing healthcare burdens.

Endoscopic transgastric fenestration versus percutaneous drainage for management of(peri)pancreatic fluid collections adjacent to gastric wall(with video)

BACKGROUND Percutaneous drainage(PCD)and endoscopic approaches have largely replaced surgical drainage as the initial approach for(peri)pancreatic fluid collections(PFC)s,while complications associated with endoscopic stent implantation are common.AIM To introduce a novel endoscopic therapy named endoscopic transgastric fenestration(ETGF),which involves resection of tissue by endoscopic accessory between gastric and PFCs without stent implantation,and to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared with PCD for the management of PFCs adjacent to the gastric wall.METHODS Patients diagnosed with PFCs adjacent to the gastric wall and who subsequently received ETGF or PCD were restrospectively enrolled.Indications for intervention were consistent with related guidelines.We analyzed patients baseline characteristics,technical and clinical success rate,recurrence and reintervention rate,procedure-related complications and adverse events.RESULTS Seventy-two eligible patients were retrospectively identified(ETGF=34,PCD=38)from October 2017 to May 2021.Patients in the ETGF group had a significantly higher clinical success rate than those in the PCD group(97.1 vs 76.3%,P=0.01).There were no statistically significant differences regarding recurrence,reintervention and incidence of complication between the two groups.While long-term catheter drainage was very common in the PCD group.CONCLUSION Compared with PCD,ETGF has a higher clinical success rate in the management of PFCs adjacent to the gastric wall.ETGF is an alternative effective strategy for the treatment of PFCs adjacent to the gastric wall.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: The impact of evolving experience and new technologies in diagnosis and treatment over the last two decades

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage is the preferred approach for drainage of pan- creatic uid collections (PFCs) due to the better experience and signi cant progress using newer stents and access devices during last decade. This study aimed to evaluate the role of the evolving experience and possible in uence of new technological devices on the outcome of patients evaluated for PFCs and submitted to EUS-guided drainage during two different periods: the early period at the beginning of experience when a standardized technique was used and the late period when the increased experience of the operator, combined with different stents quality were introduced in the management of PFCs. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of a cohort of 91 consecutive patients, who underwent EUS-guided drainage of symptomatic PFCs from October 2001 to September 2017. Demographic, therapeutic results, complications, and outcomes were compared between early years’ group (2001 2008) and late years’ group (2009 2017). Results: Endoscopic treatment was successfully achieved in 55.6% (20/36) of patients in the early years’ group, and in 96.4% (53/55) in the late years’ group. Eighteen patients (12 in early years’ and 6 in the late year’s group) required additional open surgery. Procedural complications were observed in 5 patients, 4 in early years’ and 1 in late years’ group. Mortality was registered in two patients (2.2%), one for each group. Conclusions: During our long-term survey using EUS-guided endoscopic drainage of PFCs, signi cantly better outcomes in term of improved success rate and decrease complications rate were observed during the late period.

Lumen apposing metal stents for pancreatic fluid collections:Recognition and management of complications

For patients recovering from acute pancreatitis,the development of a pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) predicts a more complex course of recovery,and introduces difficult management decisions with regard to when,whether,and how the collection should be drained.Most PFCs resolve spontaneously and drainage is indicated only in pseudocysts and walled-off pancreatic necrosis when the collections are causing symptoms and/or local complications such as biliary obstruction.Historical approaches to PFC drainage have included surgical (open or laparoscopic cystgastrostomy or pancreatic debridement),and the placement of percutaneous drains.Endoscopic drainage techniques have emerged in the last several years as the preferred approach for most patients,when local expertise is available.Lumen-apposing metal stents(LAMS) have recently been developed as a tool to facilitate potentially safer and easier endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections,and less commonly,for other indications,such as gallbladder drainage.Physicians considering LAMS placement must be aware of the complications most commonly associated with LAMS including bleeding,migration,buried stent,stent occlusion,and perforation.Because of the patient complexity associated with severe pancreatitis,management of pancreatic fluid collections can be a complex and multidisciplinary endeavor.Successful and safe use of LAMS for patients with pancreatic fluid collections requires that the endoscopist have a full understanding of the potential complications of LAMS techniques,including how to recognize and manage expected complications.

Acute pancreatitis:A pictorial review of early pancreatic fluid collections

Acute pancreatitis is a common acute inflammatory disease involving the pancreas and peripancreatic tissues or remote organs.The revised Atlanta classification 2012 of acute pancreatitis divides patients into mild,moderately severe and severe groups.Major changes of the classification include acute fluid collection terminology.However,some inappropriate terms of the radiological diagnosis reports in the daily clinical work or available literature may still be found.The aim of this review article is:to present an image-rich overview of different morphologic characteristics of the early-stage(within 4 wk after symptom onset)local complications associated with acute pancreatitis by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging;to clarify confusing imaging concepts for pancreatic fluid collections and underline standardised reporting nomenclature;to assist communication among treating physicians;and to facilitate the implications for clinical management decision-making.

Subdural fluid collection rather than meningitis contributes to hydrocephalus after cervical laminoplasty:A case report

BACKGROUND Hydrocephalus following dural tear after spinal surgery is rare.Although a few cases of obstructive hydrocephalus caused by subdural fluid collection and communicating hydrocephalus associated with meningitis have been reported,the mechanism remains uncertain.Herein we describe a patient complicated with hydrocephalus after cervical laminoplasty in whom subdural fluid collection in the cervical spine and posterior cranial fossa rather than chronic meningitis was the main mechanism.CASE SUMMARY A 45-year-old man underwent cervical laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy at a local hospital.Ten days postoperatively,a high fever occurred and magnetic resonance imaging(MRI)showed cerebrospinal fluid(CSF)leakage.Pseudomeningocele liquid test showed high levels of protein and white blood cell(WBC)count with negative bacterial culture.The patient was treated with shortterm intravenous antibiotic and discharged with normal body temperature.The patient was uneventful during the first 8 mo follow-up although repeated MRI showed persistent pseudomeningocele.At the 9th mo postoperatively,the patient gradually presented with dizziness and headache accompanied by recurrent weakness of his left arm.Imaging examinations demonstrated hydrocephalus and a cystic lesion around the cervical spinal cord.CSF test from lumbar puncture indicated chronic meningitis.MRI on 1 d after pseudomeningocele drainage showed a significant decrease in the cystic volume,suggesting that the cystic lesion would be subdural fluid collection rather than adhesive arachnoiditis.After dural defect repair,the patient’s symptoms completely resolved and hydrocephalus gradually disappeared.CSF analysis at the 21-mo follow-up revealed significantly decreased protein level and WBC count.CONCLUSION Subdural fluid collection rather than meningitis contributes to the hydrocephalus formation after cervical laminoplasty.

Novel and supplementary management of pancreatic fluid collections:Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage

AIM To compare efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided and surgical drainage in pancreatic fluid collection management.METHODS Data were obtained retrospectively from January 2012 to December 2016.Patients with pancreatic fluid collection were performed EUS-guided or surgical procedure.Main outcome measures including clinical efficiency,complication,duration of procedures,hospital stay and cost were analyzed.RESULTS Thirty-six patients were enrolled into the study,including 14 in endoscopic group while 22 in the surgical group.Twelve (86%) patients were treated successfully by endoscopic approach while 21 (95%) patients benefited through surgical procedure.Endoscopic treatment had higher recurrence and complication rates than surgery,resulting in more re-interventions.Meanwhile,duration of procedure,hospital stay and cost were significantly lower in endoscopic group.CONCLUSION Both approaches were effective and safe.EUS-guided approach should be the first-line treatment in mild and simple cases,while surgical approach should be considered as priority in severe and complex cases.

Interventional radiology followed by endoscopic drainage for pancreatic fluid collections associated with high bleeding risk: Two case reports

BACKGROUND Endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided transluminal drainage is an advanced technique used to treat pancreatic fluid collections(PFCs). However, gastric varices and intervening vessels may be associated with a high risk of bleeding and are, therefore, listed as relative contraindications. Herein, we report two patients who underwent interventional embolization before EUS-guided drainage.CASE SUMMARY Two 32-year-old males developed symptomatic PFCs after acute pancreatitis and came to our hospital for further treatment. One patient suffered from intermittent abdominal pain and vomiting, and computed tomography(CT) imaging showed an encapsulated cyst 7.93 cm × 6.13 cm in size. The other patient complained of a mass inside the abdomen, which gradually became enlarged. Gastric varices around the ideal puncture site were detected by EUS when we evaluated the possibility of endoscopic drainage in both patients. Interventional embolization was recommended as the first procedure to decrease the risk of bleeding. After that, EUS-guided transluminal drainage was successfully conducted, without vascular rupture. No postoperative complications occurred during hospitalization, and no recurrence was detected at the last follow-up CT scan performed at 1 mo.CONCLUSION Interventional embolization is a safe, preoperative procedure that is performed before EUS-guided drainage in PFC patients with gastric varices or at high risk of bleeding.

Advancements in the endoscopic treatment of pancreatic fluid collections

Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic fluid collections(PFCs)with fewer complications and less trauma has gradually replaced surgery or percutaneous drainage to become the first-line treatment for PFCs.In recent years,the differential efficacy of various stent techniques to drain different types of PFCs has been controversial.This review summarizes the clinical applications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided stent placement for PFCs drainage.

Management of pancreatic fluid collections in patients with acute pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is associated with development of pancreatic fluid collections(PFCs).Acute PFCs that develop in interstitial edematous pancreatitis mostly resolve but some may persist and evolve into pseudocysts.Acute necrotic collections occurring in acute necrotizing pancreatitis generally persist and evolve into walled-off necrosis(WON)after 3 to 4 weeks.Most acute fluid collections do not require drainage unless they are large and cause compression of adjacent organs,contribute to increase in intraabdominal pressure or become infected.Acute infected collections can be managed with antibiotics and percutaneous drainage but may require necrosectomy either by minimally invasive surgical or endoscopic methods such as video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement and percutaneous endoscopic necrosectomy.Mature sterile collections,that is,pseudocyst and WON with a defined wall are best treated by internal transmural drainage which can be achieved either by per-oral endoscopic or surgical,preferably laparoscopic,method.Of late,infected PFCs are increasingly being treated with an endoscopic step-up approach that has been shown to be better than minimally invasive surgical step-up approach in terms of lesser complications.Use of lumen apposing metal stents during endoscopic drainage has emerged as an attractive option that facilitates necrosectomy in infected WON.

Contrast-enhanced guided endoscopic ultrasound procedures

Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound(CH-EUS)can overcome the limi-tations of endoscopic ultrasound-guided acquisition by identifying microvessels inside inhomogeneous tumours and improving the characterization of these tumours.Despite the initial enthusiasm that oriented needle sampling under CH-EUS guidance could provide better diagnostic yield in pancreatic solid lesions,further studies did not confirm the supplementary values in cases of tissue acquisition guided by CH-EUS.This review details the knowledge based on the available data on contrast-guided procedures.The indications for CH-EUS tissue acquisition include isoechoic EUS lesions with poor visible delineation where CH-EUS can differentiate the lesion vascularisation from the surrounding parenchyma and also the mural nodules within biliopancreatic cystic lesions,which occur in select cases.Additionally,the roles of CH-EUS-guided therapy in patients whose pancreatic fluid collections or bile ducts that have an echogenic content have indications for drainage,and patients who have nonvisualized vessels that need to be highlighted via Doppler EUS are presented.Another indication is represented if there is a need for an immediate assessment of the post-radiofrequency ablation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours,in which case CH-EUS can be used to reveal the incomplete tumour destruction.

Peripancreatic collections in acute pancreatitis: Correlation between computerized tomography and operative fi ndings

AIM: To evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) to characterize the nature of peripancreatic collections.METHODS: Twenty five patients with peripancreatic collections on CECT and who underwent operative intervention for severe acute pancreatitis were retrospectively studied. The collections were classified into (1) necrosis without frank pus; (2) necrosis with pus; and (3) fluid without necrosis. A blinded radiologist assessed the preoperative CTs of each patient for necrosis and peripancreatic fluid collections. Peripancreatic collections were described in terms of volume, location, number, heterogeneity, fluid attenuation, wall perceptibility, wall enhancement, presence of extraluminal gas, and vascular compromise.RESULTS: Fifty-four collections were identif ied at operation, of which 45 (83%) were identif ied on CECT. Of these, 25/26 (96%) had necrosis without pus, 16/19 (84%) had necrosis with pus, and 4/9 (44%) had fluid without necrosis. Among the study characteristics, fluid heterogeneity was seen in a greater proportion of collections in the group with necrosis and pus, compared to the other two groups (94% vs 48% and 25%, P = 0.002 and 0.003, respectively). Among the wall characteristics, irregularity was seen in a greater proportion of collections in the groups with necrosis with and without pus, when compared to the group with fluid without necrosis (88% and 71% vs 25%, P = 0.06 and P < 0.01, respectively). The combination of heterogeneity and presence of extraluminal gas had a specif icity and positive likelihood ratio of 92% and 5.9, respectively, in detecting pus. CONCLUSION: Most of the peripancreatic collections seen on CECT in patients with severe acute pancreatitis who require operative intervention contain necrotic tissue. CECT has a somewhat limited role in differentiating the different types of collections.

Lumen-apposing-metal stent misdeployment in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainages:A systematic review focusing on issues and rescue management

BACKGROUND The introduction of lumen-apposing metal stents(LAMS)for endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)-guided drainages has marked a turning point in the field of interventional ultrasound and it is gathering worldwide diffusion in different clinical settings.Nevertheless,the procedure may conceal unexpected pitfalls.LAMS misdeployment is the most frequent cause of technical failure and it can be considered a procedure-related adverse event when it hampers the conclusion of the planned procedure or results in significant clinical consequences.Stent misdeployment can be managed successfully by endoscopic rescue maneuvers to allow the completion of the procedure.To date,no standardized indication is available to guide an appropriate rescue strategy depending on the type of procedure or of misdeployment.AIM To evaluate the incidence of LAMS misdeployment during EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy(EUS-CDS),gallbladder drainage(EUS-GBD)and pancreatic fluid collections drainage(EUS-PFC)and to describe the endoscopic rescue strategies adopted under the circumstance.METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the literature on PubMed by searching for studies published up to October 2022.The search was carried out using the exploded medical subject heading terms“lumen apposing metal stent”,“LAMS”,“endoscopic ultrasound”and“choledochoduodenostomy”or“gallbladder”or“pancreatic fluid collections”.We included in the review on-label EUS-guided procedures namely EUS-CDS,EUS-GBD and EUS-PFC.Only those publications reporting EUS-guided LAMS positioning were considered.The studies reporting a technical success rate of 100%and other procedure-related adverse events were considered to calculate the overall rate of LAMS misdeployment,while studies not reporting the causes of technical failure were excluded.Case reports were considered only for the extraction of data regarding the issues of misdeployment and rescue techniques.The following data were collected from each study:Author,year of publication,study design,study population,clinical indication,technical success,reported number of misdeployment,stent type and size,flange misdeployed and type of rescue strategy.RESULTS The overall technical success rate of EUS-CDS,EUS-GBD and EUS-PFC was 93.7%,96.1%,and 98.1%respectively.Significant rates of LAMS misdeployment have been reported for EUS-CDS,EUS-GBD and EUS-PFC drainage,respectively 5.8%,3.4%,and 2.0%.Endoscopic rescue treatment was feasible in 86.8%,80%,and 96.8%of cases.Non endoscopic rescue strategies were required only in 10.3%,16%and 3.2%for EUS-CDS,EUS-GBD,and EUS-PFC.The endoscopic rescue techniques described were over-the-wire deployment of a new stent through the created fistula tract in 44.1%,8%and 64.5%and stent-in-stent in 23.5%,60%,and 12.9%,respectively for EUSCDS,EUS-GBD,and EUS-PFC.Further therapeutic option were endoscopic rendezvous in 11.8%of EUS-CDS and repeated procedure of EUS-guided drainage in 16.1%of EUS-PFC.CONCLUSION LAMS misdeployment is a relatively common adverse event in EUS-guided drainages.There is no consensus on the best rescue approach in these cases and the choice is often made by the endoscopist relying upon the clinical scenario,anatomical characteristics,and local expertise.In this review,we investigated the misdeployment of LAMS for each of the on-label indications focusing on the rescue therapies used,with the aim of providing useful data for endoscopists and to improve patient outcomes.

Therapeutic interventional endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatobiliary disorders:Does it really replace the surgical/percutaneous approach?

Pancreato-biliary disorders are still incredibly challenging in the field of gastroenterology,as they would sometimes require multi-approach interventional procedures.Recently,therapeutic interventional endoscopic ultrasound(EUS)has emerged as a potential alternative to surgical or percutaneous approaches.Unfortunately,considering the high cost of EUS,lack of facility and expertise,most gastroenterologists still often refer cases to undergo surgical interventions without contemplating the possibility of utilizing EUS first.EUS-guided biliary drainage has become one of the best choices for establishing access to biliary system,given the clear visualization of pancreas,gallbladder,and common bile duct.Although there are still only a few studies which directly compare EUSguided and surgical approaches for biliary drainage,current evidence demonstrated the superiority of EUS-guided approach in terms of adverse events and reintervention rates,with similarly high technical and clinical success rates compared to percutaneous and surgical approaches,especially in patients with history of failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography attempt.Comparable success rates with shorter length of hospital stay between endoscopic and surgical approaches have also been exhibited for pancreatic pseudocysts and walled-off necrosis.Recent findings about the progress of EUS approach in gastroenterostomy/jejunostomy also indicated a promising potential of EUS,as a less invasive approach,for managing gastric outlet obstruction.

Pancreatic pseudocyst:The past,the present,and the future

A pancreatic pseudocyst is defined as an encapsulated fluid collection with a welldefined inflammatory wall with minimal or no necrosis.The diagnosis cannot be made prior to 4 wk after the onset of pancreatitis.The clinical presentation is often nonspecific,with abdominal pain being the most common symptom.If a diagnosis is suspected,contrast-enhanced computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging are performed to confirm the diagnosis and assess the characteristics of the pseudocyst.Endoscopic ultrasound with cyst fluid analysis can be performed in cases of diagnostic uncertainty.Pseudocyst of the pancreas can lead to complications such as hemorrhage,infection,and rupture.The management of pancreatic pseudocysts depends on the presence of symptoms and the development of complications,such as biliary or gastric outlet obstruction.Management options include endoscopic or surgical drainage.The aim of this review was to summarize the current literature on pancreatic pseudocysts and discuss the evolution of the definitions,diagnosis,and management of this condition.

Investigation of the hydrodynamic behavior of diatom aggregates using particle image velocimetry

The hydrodynamic behavior of diatom aggregates has a significant influence on the interactions and flocculation kinetics of algae. However, characterization of the hydrodynamics of diatoms and diatom aggregates in water is rather difficult. In this laboratory study, an advanced visualization technique in particle image velocimetry （PIV） was employed to investigate the hydrodynamic properties of settling diatom aggregates. The experiments were conducted in a settling column filled with a suspension of fluorescent polymeric beads as seed tracers. A laser light sheet was generated by the PIV setup to illuminate a thin vertical planar region in the settling column, while the motions of particles were recorded by a high speed charge-coupled device （CCD） camera. This technique was able to capture the trajectories of the tracers when a diatom aggregate settled through the tracer suspension. The PIV results indicated directly the curvilinear feature of the streamlines around diatom aggregates. The rectilinear collision model largely overestimated the collision areas of the settling particles. Algae aggregates appeared to be highly porous and fractal, which allowed streamlines to penetrate into the aggregate interior. The diatom aggregates have a fluid collection efficiency of 10%-40%. The permeable feature of aggregates can significantly enhance the collisions and flocculation between the aggregates and other small particles including algal cells in water.

Advantages of using a prophylactic epidural closed drain and non-watertight dura suture in a craniotomy near the“parietal site”

Background:In neurosurgery,the necessity of having a drainage tube is controversial.Subgaleal fluid collection(SFC)often occurs,especially in a craniotomy near the“parietal site”.This study aimed to reassess the benefit of using a prophylactic epidural drainage(ED)and non-watertight dura suture in a craniotomy near the parietal site.Methods:A retrospective review was conducted on 63 consecutive patients who underwent a craniotomy near the parietal site.The patients were divided into two groups according to different period.The deal group received ED and a non-watertight dura suture(drain group,DG),the control group that did not(non-drain group,NDG).Complications and patient recovery were evaluated and analysed.Results:Three patients(11.5%,26)in DG and 20 patients(54.1%,37)in NDG presented with SFC(p<0.05).One patient(3.8%)in DG and three patients(8.1%)in NDG presented with subdural tensile hydrops(STH)(p>0.05).Six developed an infection in NDG(four intracranial infections,one abscess,one pulmonary infection),while none in DG(p>0.05)developed infection.Three(11.5%)cases in DG and one(2.7%)case in NDG had muscle strength that improved postoperatively(p>0.05).Fifteen(57.7%)in DG and 14(37.8%)in NDG had epileptic seizures less frequently postoperatively(p<0.05).The average temperature(37.4°C vs 37.6°C,p>0.05),the maximum temperature(37.9°C vs 38.1°C,p>0.05)on 3 PODs,the postoperative hospital stay day(7.5 days vs 8.0 days,p>0.05),and the postoperative medicine fee(¥29762.0 vs¥28321.0,p>0.05)were analysed.Conclusion:In patients who undergo a craniotomy near the parietal site,the prophylactic use of ED and a nonwatertight dura suture helps reduce SFC,infection,and control epilepsy.