Relationship between serum adhesion molecules, trace elements and delayed union of tibial and fibula fractures

Objective:To investigate the relationship between serum adhesion molecules, trace elements and delayed union of tibial and fibula fractures.Methods:A total of 46 patients with delayed union of tibial and fibula fractures in our hospital from May 2014 to June 2016 were selected as the observation group, 46 patients with normal healing of tibial and fibula fractures were selected as the control group, then the serum adhesion molecules and trace elements levels of two groups at forth, eighth and sixteenth week after the surgery were compared.Results:The serum dhesion molecules levels of observation group at forth, eighth and sixteenth week after the surgery were all higher than those of control group, the serum trace elements levels were all lower than those of control group, and the serum adhesion molecules levels of two groups at eighth week after the surgery were all higher than those at other time, the trace elements levels were all lower than those at other time (allP<0.05).Conclusions:The serum adhesion molecules and trace elements of patients with delayed union of tibial and fibula fractures show obviously abnormal state, so those indexes of those patients should be paid to more monitoring and improvement.

Systematic review of dynamization vs exchange nailing for delayed/non-union femoral fractures

AIM To analyze the literature on efficacy of dynamamization vs exchange nailing in treatment of delayed and nonunion femur fractures.METHODS Ultimately, 31 peer-reviewed articles with 644 exchanged nailing patients and 131 dynamization patients were identified and analyzed. The following key words were inputted in different combinations in order to search the field of publications in its entirety: "nonunion", "delayed union", "ununited", "femur fracture", "femoral fracture", "exchange nailing", "dynaiz(s)ation", "secondary nailing", "dynamic", "static", and "nail revision". The initial search yielded over 150 results, and was refined based on the inclusion criteria: Only studies reporting on humans, non-unions and delayed unions, and the usage of exchange nailing and/or dynamization as a secondary treatment after failed IM nailing. The resulting 66 articles were obtained through online journal access. The results were filtered further based on the exclusion criteria: No articles that failed to report overall union rates, differentiate between success rates of their reported techniques, or articles that analyzed less than 5 patients. RESULTS Exchange nailing lead to fracture union in 84.785% of patients compared to the 66.412% of dynamization with statistically comparable durations until union(5.193 ± 2.310 mo and 4.769 ± 1.986 mo respectively). Dynamically locking exchange nails resulted in an average union time of 5.208 ± 2.475 mo compared to 5.149 ± 2.366 mo(P = 0.8682) in statically locked exchange nails. The overall union rate of the two procedures, statically and dynamically locked exchange nailing yielded union rates of 84.259% and 82.381% respectively. Therefore, there was no significant difference between the different locking methods of exchange nailing for union rate or time to union at a significance value of P < 0.05. The analysis showed exchange nailing to be the more successful choice in the treatment of femoral non-unions in respect to its higher success rate(491/567 EN, 24/57 dynam, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference between the success rates of the two procedures for delayed union fractures(25/27 EN, 45/55 dynam, P = 0.3299). Nevertheless, dynamization was more efficient in the treatment of delayed unions(at rates comparable to exchange nailing) than in the treatment of non-unions.CONCLUSION In conclusion, after examination of factors, dynamization is recommended treatment of delayed femur fractures, while exchange nailing is the treatment of choice for non-unions.

Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for midshaft clavicular delayed union: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND One of the most common complications following surgery for midshaft clavicle fracture is nonunion/delayed union.Extracorporeal shock wave therapy(ESWT)is an alternative to promote new bone formation without surgical complications.To date,no literature has reported low-intensity ESWT(LI-ESWT)in delayed union of midshaft clavicle fracture.CASE SUMMARY We reported a 66-year-old Chinese amateur cyclist with clavicle delayed union treated with 10 sessions of LI-ESWT(radial,0.057 mJ/mm^(2),3 Hz,3000 shocks).No anesthetics were applied,and no side effects occurred.At the 4 mo and 7 mo follow-ups,the patient achieved clinical and radiographical recovery,respectively.CONCLUSION In conclusion,our findings indicated that LI-ESWT could be a good option for treating midshaft clavicular delayed union.

Two-stage surgical treatment for septic non-union of the forearm

AIM To investigate the effectiveness of a two-stage surgical procedure for the treatment of septic forearm non-union.METHODS Septic non-unions are rare complications of forearm fractures. When they occur, they modify the relationship between forearm bones leading to a severe functional impairment. Treatment is challenging and surgery and antibiotic therapy are required to achieve infection resolution. It is even harder to obtain non-union healing with good functional results. The aim of this study is to present a two stages surgical treatment for septic forearm non-union with revision and temporary stabilization of the non-union until infection has cleared and subsequently perform a new synthesis with plate, opposite bone graft strut and intercalary graft. We retrospectively reviewed 18 patients with a mean age at the time of primary injury of 34.5 years(19-57 years) and a mean follow-up of 6 years(2-10 years). All patients presented an atrophic nonunion with a mean length of the bone defect of 1.8 cm(1.2-4 cm). Complications and clinical results after surgical treatment were recorded. RESULTS Mean time to resolution of the infectious process was 8.2 wk(range 4-20 wk) after the first surgery and specific antibiotic therapy. All the non-union healed with an average time of 5 mo(range 2-10 mo) after the second step surgery. Cultures on intraoperative samples werepositive in all cases. No major intraoperative complications occurred. Two patients developed minor complications and one needed a second surgical debridement for infection resolution. At the last follow-up functional results were excellent in 5(27.8%) patients, satisfactory in 10(55.5%) and unsatisfactory in 3(16.7%) patients. No activities of daily living(ADLs) limitations were reported by 12(66.6%) patients, slight by 3(16.6%) and severe limitation by 3(16.6%) patients. Mean visual analog scale at the last follow-up was 1(0-3).CONCLUSION The two-step technique has proven to be effective to achieve resolution of the infectious process and union with good functional results and low rate of complications.

Clinical Research on Zishengukang Pill(滋肾骨康丸)Used to Treat Delayed Union of Fracture

Objective:To observe the curative effect of Zishengukang Pill(滋肾骨康丸) on delayed union of fracture.Methods:Sixty-four patients with delayed union of fracture were randomly divided into a control group of 32 cases treated with Western medicine and a treatment group of 32 cases treated with Western medicine and Zishengukang Pill.After 3 courses of treatment with 30 days as a course,the curative effects in the two groups were evaluated and their clinical symptoms,union rate and union time of fracture were compared.Results:The treatment resulted in cure in 25 cases,improvement in 6 cases and ineffectiveness in 1 case with the effective rate at 96.8% in the treatment group,higher than 81.3% in the control group(P<0.05).The union rate of fracture in the treatment group was higher than that in the control group(34.3% vs.12.5%,P<0.05).The union time of fracture in the treatment group was shorter than that in the control group((4.0±1.7) months vs.(5.0±1.4) months,P<0.05).Conclusion:Zishengukang Pill with obvious curative effect in the treatment of delayed union of fracture is worth popularizing.

Research advances of nanomaterials for the acceleration of fracture healing

The bone fracture cases have been increasing yearly,accompanied by the increased number of patients experiencing non-union or delayed union after their bone fracture.Although clinical materials facilitate fracture healing(e.g.,metallic and composite materials),they cannot fulfill the requirements due to the slow degradation rate,limited osteogenic activity,inadequate osseointegration ability,and suboptimal mechanical properties.Since early 2000,nanomaterials successfully mimic the nanoscale features of bones and offer unique properties,receiving extensive attention.This paper reviews the achievements of nanomaterials in treating bone fracture(e.g.,the intrinsic properties of nanomaterials,nanomaterials for bone defect filling,and nanoscale drug delivery systems in treating fracture delayed union).Furthermore,we discuss the perspectives on the challenges and future directions of developing nanomaterials to accelerate fracture healing.

放散状与聚焦状冲击波治疗骨折延迟愈合或不愈合的疗效比较

目的比较放散状与聚焦状冲击波治疗骨折延迟愈合或不愈合的疗效。方法对2011年4月至8月收治的47例骨折延迟愈合或不愈合患者资料进行凹顾性分析，男38例，女9例；年龄21-56岁，平均35．0岁。所有患者均为肥大型稳定性骨折延迟愈合或不愈合。骨折延迟愈合或不愈合部位：股骨24例，肱骨6例，胫骨17例。初次内固定方法：钢板固定37例，外同定支架同定8例，带锁髓内钉内固定2例。23例患者接受放散状冲击波治疗（放散组），24例患者接受聚焦状冲击波治疗（聚焦组），根据不同骨折部位选择合适的冲击能量、频率和剂量进行治疗。患者每个月复金x线片，了解骨痂生长情况。比较两组患者的治愈率和有效率。结果所有患者术后均获9个月随访。放散组23例患者中，22例有较明显的骨痂生长，其中21例完全愈合，1例部分愈合，1例无效，治愈率为91．3％，有效率为95．7％。骨折愈合时间为8-24周，平均12周。聚焦组24例患者中，17例完全愈合，7例无效，治愈率和有效率均为70．8％。骨折愈合时间为8-40周，平均18周。两组患者治愈率比较差异无统计学意义（P=0．137），有效率比较差异有统计学意义（P=0．048）。两组分别有4、9例患者出现肢体血管损伤。结论体外冲击波是治疗骨折延迟愈合或不愈合较理想的方法；放散状冲击波治疗骨折延迟愈合或不愈合的有效率优于聚焦状冲击波。

Nonun ions of the humerus-Treatment concepts and results of the last five years

Puqjose: Fractures of the humerus account for 5%—8% of all fractures. Non union is Found with an incidence of up to 15%, depending on the location of the fracture. In case of a manifest nonunion the surgeon faces a challenging problem and has to conceive a therapy based on the underlying pathology. The aim of this study was to describe our treatment concepts for this entity and present our results of the last five years. Methods: Twenty-six patients were treated for nonunion of the humerus between January 2013 and December 2017. Their charts were reviewed retrospectively and demographic data, pathology, surgical treatment and outcome were assessed. Results: The most frequent location for a nonunion was the humeral shaft, with the most common trauma mechanism being multiple falls. Most often atrophic nonunion (n = 14), followed by hypertrophic and infection-caused nonunion (each n = 4), were found. Our treatment concept could be applied in 19 patients, of which in 90% of those who were available for follow-up consolidation could be achieved. Conclusion: Humeral non union is a heterogeneous entity that has to be analyzed precisely and be treated correspondingly. We therefore present a treatment concept based on the underlying pathology.