Analysis of the Efficacy of Triamcinolone Acetonide Combined with Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Fundus Diseases

Objective:To analyze the effect of triamcinolone acetonide combined with ranibizumab in patients with fundus diseases.Methods:100 patients with fundus diseases admitted from January 2018 to January 2023 were selected.The patients were separated into two groups according to the random number table method,with 50 cases in the control group(treated with ranibizumab),and 50 cases in the observation group(treated with triamcinolone acetonide combined with ranibizumab).The clinical effects of both treatment regimens were compared.Results:The time taken for symptom disappearance of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group(P<0.05).The observation group had higher naked-eye visual acuity(4.18±0.89)compared to the control group.Besides,the observation group also had lower intraocular pressure(14.19±1.33 mmHg)and retinal thickness(283.14±3.29μm),with(P<0.05)compared to the control group.Moreover,the observation group had a lower adverse reaction rate and a higher quality of life(P<0.05).Conclusion:The application of triamcinolone acetonide combined with ranibizumab treatment can quickly relieve the clinical symptoms of patients with fundus disease,improve visual acuity,intraocular pressure,and retinal thickness,with low adverse reaction rate and better prognosis and quality of life.

Prognosis value of Chinese Ocular Fundus Diseases Society classification for proliferative diabetic retinopathy on postoperative visual acuity after pars plana vitrectomy in type 2 diabetes

AIM: To compare the postoperative visual acuity among eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy(PDR) of different stages after pars plana vitrectomy(PPV) in type 2 diabetic patients. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted for PDR eyes undergoing PPV in type 2 diabetic patients. All patients were divided into three groups based on Chinese Ocular Fundus Diseases Society(COFDS) classification for PDR: Group A(primary vitreous hemorrhage), Group B(primary fibrovascular proliferation) and Group C(primary vitreous hemorrhage and/or fibrovascular proliferative combined with retinal detachment). The postoperative visual acuity and the change between postoperative and preoperative visual acuity were compared among three groups. The associated risk factors for postoperative visual acuity were analyzed in the univariate and multiple linear aggression. RESULTS: In total, 195 eyes of 195 patients were collected in this study, including 71 eyes of 71 patients in Group A, 75 eyes of 75 patients in Group B and 49 eyes of 49 patients in Group C. The eyes in Group A got better postoperative best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA) compared to the eyes in Group B and C(0.48±0.48 vs 0.89±0.63, P<0.001;0.48±0.48 vs 1.04±0.67, P<0.001;respectively). The eyes in Group A got more improvement of BCVA compared to the eyes in Group B and C(1.07±0.70 vs 0.73±0.68, P=0.004;1.07±0.70 vs 0.77±0.78, P=0.024;respectively). In the multiple linear regression analysis, primary fibro-proliferative type(β=0.194, 95%CI=0.060-0.447, P=0.01), retinal detachment type(β=0.244, 95%CI=0.132-0.579, P=0.02), baseline log MAR BCVA(β=0.192, 95%CI=0.068-0.345, P=0.004), silicone oil tamponade(β=0.272, 95%CI=0.173-0.528, P<0.001) was positively correlated with postoperative log MAR BCVA. Eyes undergoing phacovitrectomy had better postoperative BCVA(β=-0.144, 95%CI=-0.389 to-0.027, P=0.025). CONCLUSION: PDR eyes of primary vitreous hemorrhage type usually have better visual acuity prognosis compared to primary fibrovascular proliferation type and retinal detachment type. COFDS classification for PDR may have a high prognostic value for postoperative visual outcome and surgical management indications.

Short-term fluctuation of intraocular pressure and influencing factors following intravitreal injection in patients with retinal vascular diseases

AIM:To investigate the patterns of short-term intraocular pressure(IOP)fluctuations and identify the contributing factors following intravitreal injection in patients with retinal vascular diseases.METHODS:Totally 81 patients were enrolled in this case control study.Eyes were categorized into 7 groups,including age-related macular degeneration(AMD),polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy(PCV),idiopathic choroidal neovascularization(CNV),proliferative diabetic retinopathy(PDR),diabetic macular edema(DME),macular edema secondary to branch(BVOME)and central(CVOME)retinal vein occlusion.IOP was measured in all patients using rebound tonometer at 7 preset time points perioperatively.Additionally,based on the administered medication,the eyes were classified into three treatment groups,including dexamethasone intravitreal implant(IVO),intravitreal conbercept(IVC),and intravitreal ranibizumab(IVR).To compare IOP values at various time points across groups,we employed one-way ANOVA,independent sample t-test or χ^(2) test and multivariate logistic regression analysis.RESULTS:Peak IOP values across all groups were observed at 40s,and 5min after intravitreal injection.Statistical differences in IOP were detected at the 5min among the 7 indication groups(F=2.50,P=0.029).When examing the impact of medications,the IVO group exhibited lower average IOP values at both 40s and 5min compared to the IVC and IVR groups(P<0.001;P=0.007).The IOP values at 40s and 5min were significantly higher in BVOME and CVOME group compared to non-retinal vein occlusionsecondary macular edema(RVOME)group(P<0.001).Multivariate logistic regression analysis further confirmed that IOP measurement at 40s was significantly higher in CVOME group than in non-RVOME group(OR=1.64,95%CI:1.09-2.47;P=0.018).CONCLUSION:Needle size plays a crucial role in the transient changes of IOP following intravitreal injection.Before administering intravitreal injection to patients with central retinal vein occlusion,it is essential to exclude any underlysing causes of increased IOP.